SirCmpwn

Untitled

Apr 26th, 2012
54
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.38 KB | None | 0 0
  1. <SirCmpwn> I am NOT happy
  2. <jdiez> I know.
  3. <jdiez> :/
  4. <SirCmpwn> hacque has made unorthodox, sweeping changes to the established archetecture without any discussion, and to boot he's trying to push a shitty assembler that doesn't support our needs
  5. <jdiez> I know
  6. <jdiez> but what can I say?
  7. <SirCmpwn> it's YOUR project
  8. <SirCmpwn> I'm tempted to fork it and work on it alone
  9. <jdiez> well
  10. <jdiez> I cannot do anything to stop you from doing that
  11. <SirCmpwn> I know
  12. <jdiez> but I would really not like that
  13. <jdiez> and you know it's not my fault
  14. <jdiez> I mean
  15. <SirCmpwn> I want to hear the justification for switching to that shitty half-assed assembler
  16. <jdiez> I like .orgASM much more than dcpu toolchain's
  17. <SirCmpwn> I don't mind not using .orgASM!
  18. <SirCmpwn> I DO mind using something worse
  19. <jdiez> I know
  20. <jdiez> Drew, we're in the same position
  21. <SirCmpwn> it is your project!
  22. <jdiez> sorry for using your name, but it emphasizes it
  23. <SirCmpwn> you have the last word on it
  24. <jdiez> you do know I did not change it, right?
  25. <SirCmpwn> so why are you pussyfooting aorund?
  26. <SirCmpwn> *
  27. <SirCmpwn> I do know you didn't change it
  28. <SirCmpwn> but you are tolerating the change
  29. <jdiez> okay
  30. <jdiez> here's what we'll do
  31. <jdiez> I'll talk to hachque, and tell him that we really need to use .orgASM since it cannot assemble with other assembler
  32. <jdiez> so he either accepts it
  33. <jdiez> or we move 0x42c-mt to another org
  34. <SirCmpwn> that is fine with me
  35. <jdiez> and if the dcpu toolchain assembler is up to speed, we'll move it back
  36. <jdiez> but fuck, the last thing I want to do is get you pissed
  37. <SirCmpwn> I even plan to make the custom tool support C development
  38. <SirCmpwn> and I plan to make .orgASM support building the compiler's output
  39. <SirCmpwn> but his assembler just doesn't cut it :/
  40. <jdiez> hey
  41. <jdiez> seriously, I know
  42. <SirCmpwn> sorry, half of this is venting frustration
  43. <jdiez> as soon as I finish what I'm doing right now I'll revert his changes to how it was before, and later I'll talk to him/shoot him a mail
  44. <SirCmpwn> okay
  45. <jdiez> and after that, I'll write some driver thingies I have in mind
  46. <SirCmpwn> sure
  47. <SirCmpwn> I'll pastebin some of my ideas for drivers
  48. <jdiez> okay
  49. <jdiez> but don't be angry
  50. <jdiez> internet hug?
  51. <SirCmpwn> *hug
  52. <jdiez> :D
  53. <SirCmpwn> I'm not angry at you
  54. <SirCmpwn> I'm very frustrated with hacque
  55. <SirCmpwn> just to be clear
  56. <jdiez> I know
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment