Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-30 1320 +Anthony B.

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-30 1320 +Anthony B.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nuYfLMnbbk&lc=z12odlghoputvvwpw04cffzoqzjaydny1u00k
https://pastebin.com/tJ3FieCk
__


+Anthony B. __ You have missed the point of this video. *You have made a claim about reality but you do not have sufficient proof.* We have communicated about this and you insist that you don't even need sufficient proof. That makes you reckless and thus dangerous. *You are dangerous because you have the potential to influence vulnerable minds who are trusting that you do have (or have seen) sufficient proof.* You are corrupting minds and that is why I am p!ssed at you.







It is one thing to make the claim but an entirely different thing to make a claim *but not make any effort to actually prove it.* It needs proving. It is not intuitive that they would be the same person - _rather_ - it is *counter intuitive.* Even though you were not mentioned in this video at all *YOU say that "Jeff C" is 100% "Stefan Molyneux"* - so how can it be that placing the voice of "Jeff C" over the top of "Stefan Molyneux" *is ridiculous, absurd and does not "fit" or makes sense?* _Shouldn't it just a little bit?_







According to you it's the SAME PERSON. We see "Stefan Molyneux" but we hear "Jeff C" but according to you it is a MATCH. So why does it not match at all? *Maybe it's because the character we see on screen is a MASTER voice actor?!* He would need to be! *But if he's THAT GOOD then how the f_kc are you able to see through it?* You must be *amazing!* But then again - you have gotten this very thing wrong once before.







You have made a claim *but you have not substantiated the claim.* YOU HAVE NOT. It does not matter that you SAY you have or that you THINK you have - you HAVE NOT. It does not matter that other people - a minority or a majority - agree with you. *Truth is not a democracy.* The only thing that necessarily proves your claim is to SEE "Jeff C" (or to see a "Stefan Molyneux" video where we actually hear "Jeff C" as though it were "Jeff C" speaking).







Without those things *YOU do not have a justified belief.* NO ONE who believes you can justify their belief. *YOU are being RECKLESS.* You are enacting your own "lie system" by INSISTING that they are the same person WITHOUT justifying your claim. You are being a "charming scumbag". Those who happen to find you charming are vulnerable to accepting falsehoods from you.







You haven't done due diligence. You have only TALKED. It's all AIR. *You ARE playing games which means you ARE wasting time.* Sure - you can do whatever the F_KC you want with your spare time - just so long as you don't go corrupting the minds of vulnerable people with it. *That's where I draw the line.* Had you kept this claim to yourself - not a problem. But the instant you involved "normal people" and the general public - you crossed a line.







*So why are you doing this?* Why are you bringing this up *now?* Since you won't EVER show us any ACTUAL proof other than _"Hey, trust me - I'm an audio engineer with 20 years experience!"_ you can at least explain *WHY NOW* and not last month or last year? *Why are you bringing this up now?*







By sticking to this course of action - despite what I have pointed out and cautioned you with - *you have ruined your reputation with me.* I cannot trust you any more because if you were to say to me: *"Hey Lesta, I know X because I have proof of X"* - I can't take your word for it. I can no longer believe it or take it on good faith. Your word no longer has value or currency. And all we have is our word. All because you REFUSE to show the "evidence" you say you have AND because you *insist* you don't even have to prove it.







It is not up to anyone else to prove you wrong though you could say in this video I have shown how absurd the claim is. You have made a claim - so there is no more reason to delay with the "hard proof" - right? *Where is your presentation of the ACTUAL evidence?*







And to repeat - you have missed the point of this video. The point of this video is to use this claim to outline the term "sufficient proof" - *that which necessarily proves an event or claim to be true and real.* You lack sufficient proof yet you carry on as though you have it. That is what makes you reckless and thus dangerous. You have forced me to react in this way - it doesn't matter who you are - anyone who does what you have done will get the same reaction.







*So why are you doing this? Why now?*



__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w