Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2016-09-01 2250 +marvin martin
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnYCT0uSPxY&lc=z13fit05dw3gdvnkv22bunxzwx24tzs2b
- https://pastebin.com/sq3nvvsF
- __
- +marvin martin __ Howdy. *I can instantly tell you're one of the slow ones*. The number plate was visible elsewhere - _shown all over the news_ - and this was all before that news article was published. With that in mind answer the following *or your inability to meaningfully respond shall be your confession of trolling*:
- In your opinion (since you're all about giving it) *why do you suppose the number plate was erased from the photo when in another photo from the very same article it was visible?* You say the answer is "easy to find" *but that "easy answer" only applies if it's consistently removed*. _The answer is only "easy" to you because you stopped thinking, dummy_.
- What point is erasing a number plate from one photo but not also the other? *Any "innocent" explanation you give for its removal must apply equally to the additional photo found above it* - _in the very same article_ - *or how are you not being an arbitrary and most retarded spastic*? Oh - so they used two photos from two different sources (even though both photos were clearly taken from the same camera) did they? *Got some proof for that claim*? _That brings me to the next point with regard to your obvious trolling_.
- You talk about "Lesta not doing research" - *you should not rush to blindly believe what deceitful characters like "Surfpurzel" would have to say about me*. I examined the "TransAsia" issue closer than most - _certainly closer than you_ - including the number plate issue. And so if a claim of "not doing research" is to be substantiated against me *then simply find one more photo from the event where the number plate had also been removed*.
- _You won't find one_. What I point out is the only instance of it. That's because unlike you I know what the f_kc I'm talking about.
- If you really did watch the video (twice? _oh, sure you did_ haha) and read the comments - _which all seems incredibly unlikely_ - *then do you accept the lines on the road were digitally altered?*
- Yes or no? It's a simple question and you'd know exactly what I'm talking about if you'd watched the video (twice).
- In your worthless "opinion" what is the "innocent" explanation for that? I can't wait to hear what "plausible explanation" your *dummy brain* invents.
- *With the altered lines on the road have I not found something and pointed it out that no one else has?* _Indeed I have_.
- And so with bated breath I await your response to see how you attempt to dance around these things - _if not outright avoid them_ - *since you are an incompetent little spastic who is trying to troll*.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment