7 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-18 1320 +Mitch Conner

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-18 1320 +Mitch Conner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6GtkM8m1wE&google_comment_id=z12dhr5o1y2xilbbb04cdz5wjknqu1iwjck
https://pastebin.com/sWfyfGaL
Orlando Shooting
__


+Mitch Conner __ If I tell you a lie that is rooted in what you accept is possible and you can also imagine to be true - how would you go about proving it was a lie?



So long as the lie told isn't "too outrageous" how can it be shown to be a lie?



To be proven a lie something "impossible" would need to be said or claimed. If everything said and claimed was "rooted in reality" - then I don't think it can be proven false (at least not from where we sit in the audience).



But put that aside.



We agree on the first point. So let's take a squiz at the second. The second point is this: *that the idea of "crisis actors" being used in "genuine shootings" is just a bit of nonsense told by people selling "event realism"*.



(E.g., people like "Jeff C" and pals.)



For example - if "Sandy Hook" were a genuine shooting then none of the people we saw were acting. They were all genuine people.



Would you accept that? Maybe you disagree?!



Would you say that "Sandy Hook" was a genuine shooting but so-called "crisis actors" were used? Or - in your view was everyone genuine? (I'm not going to ask you to "prove" anything - I just want to know your position.)



As for me - I suggest that inserting "actors" into a "genuine event" is simply not done - that it is impractical and if not outright impossible then it can only backfire.



I think +Terran Downvale agrees on that point and I think he can describe why this is the case better than I can.




For example - take this "Orlando Shooting". We're told 49 people were slaughtered plus about another 50. If we accept it as a genuine event then would it really be possible to insert "actors" to "dramatise" it or "control the narrative"?




Wouldn't something on such a massive scale be infeasible/impossible to then so quickly "insert" actors into the event?




Wouldn't it be the case that - especially at a nightclub where many of the people would know and recognise each other - the genuine victims would soon figure out that there are now "extra people" who weren't really there who are claiming they were [and claiming to be victims!] doing all the television interviews?




So - I am asking - what are your thoughts on "crisis actors" being inserted into *genuine* events? I don't buy into it.




Obviously - if an event is outright fabricated then everyone involved is a kind of "actor". But if an event is genuine - then it would be a mixture of "real people" and "actors".




So the second point is: either an event is genuine or it is not. If it is genuine then there are no "crisis actors" who get parachuted into the event.




Maybe you disagree!




So let's talk about that first - and if Terran wants to point anything out - please do so.




__

(If the above was a bit repetitive and confusing that's because I am again sleep deprived haha. If you need me to clarify something just ask.)


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w