ikov34

Untitled

Apr 6th, 2021
853
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
XML 3.74 KB | None | 0 0
  1. <record>
  2. <header>
  3.  <identifier>oai:arXiv.org:0704.0001</identifier>
  4.  <datestamp>2008-11-26</datestamp>
  5.  <setSpec>physics:hep-ph</setSpec>
  6. </header>
  7. <metadata>
  8.  <arXiv xmlns="http://arxiv.org/OAI/arXiv/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://arxiv.org/OAI/arXiv/ http://arxiv.org/OAI/arXiv.xsd">
  9.  <id>0704.0001</id><created>2007-04-02</created><updated>2007-07-24</updated><authors><author><keyname>Bal&#xe1;zs</keyname><forenames>C.</forenames></author><author><keyname>Berger</keyname><forenames>E. L.</forenames></author><author><keyname>Nadolsky</keyname><forenames>P. M.</forenames></author><author><keyname>Yuan</keyname><forenames>C. -P.</forenames></author></authors><title>Calculation of prompt diphoton production cross sections at Tevatron and
  10.   LHC energies</title><categories>hep-ph</categories><comments>37 pages, 15 figures; published version</comments><report-no>ANL-HEP-PR-07-12</report-no><journal-ref>Phys.Rev.D76:013009,2007</journal-ref><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.76.013009</doi><abstract>  A fully differential calculation in perturbative quantum chromodynamics is
  11. presented for the production of massive photon pairs at hadron colliders. All
  12. next-to-leading order perturbative contributions from quark-antiquark,
  13. gluon-(anti)quark, and gluon-gluon subprocesses are included, as well as
  14. all-orders resummation of initial-state gluon radiation valid at
  15. next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy. The region of phase space is
  16. specified in which the calculation is most reliable. Good agreement is
  17. demonstrated with data from the Fermilab Tevatron, and predictions are made for
  18. more detailed tests with CDF and DO data. Predictions are shown for
  19. distributions of diphoton pairs produced at the energy of the Large Hadron
  20. Collider (LHC). Distributions of the diphoton pairs from the decay of a Higgs
  21. boson are contrasted with those produced from QCD processes at the LHC, showing
  22. that enhanced sensitivity to the signal can be obtained with judicious
  23. selection of events.
  24. </abstract></arXiv>
  25. </metadata>
  26. </record>
  27. <record>
  28. <header>
  29.  <identifier>oai:arXiv.org:0704.0002</identifier>
  30.  <datestamp>2008-12-13</datestamp>
  31.  <setSpec>cs</setSpec>
  32.  <setSpec>math</setSpec>
  33. </header>
  34. <metadata>
  35.  <arXiv xmlns="http://arxiv.org/OAI/arXiv/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://arxiv.org/OAI/arXiv/ http://arxiv.org/OAI/arXiv.xsd">
  36.  <id>0704.0002</id><created>2007-03-30</created><updated>2008-12-13</updated><authors><author><keyname>Streinu</keyname><forenames>Ileana</forenames></author><author><keyname>Theran</keyname><forenames>Louis</forenames></author></authors><title>Sparsity-certifying Graph Decompositions</title><categories>math.CO cs.CG</categories><comments>To appear in Graphs and Combinatorics</comments><msc-class>05C85; 05C70; 68R10; 05B35</msc-class><license>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/</license><abstract>  We describe a new algorithm, the $(k,\ell)$-pebble game with colors, and use
  37. it obtain a characterization of the family of $(k,\ell)$-sparse graphs and
  38. algorithmic solutions to a family of problems concerning tree decompositions of
  39. graphs. Special instances of sparse graphs appear in rigidity theory and have
  40. received increased attention in recent years. In particular, our colored
  41. pebbles generalize and strengthen the previous results of Lee and Streinu and
  42. give a new proof of the Tutte-Nash-Williams characterization of arboricity. We
  43. also present a new decomposition that certifies sparsity based on the
  44. $(k,\ell)$-pebble game with colors. Our work also exposes connections between
  45. pebble game algorithms and previous sparse graph algorithms by Gabow, Gabow and
  46. Westermann and Hendrickson.
  47. </abstract></arXiv>
  48. </metadata>
  49. </record>
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment