AEDIFICIUM HUMANAE SORTIS

AEDIFICIUM HUMANAE SORTIS



Edifice of Human Destiny



To The People Of This Planet

The only thing that can save your existence is your freedom. You grew through hard times inflicted by nefarious psyche craving for total control over more and more of your human lives. Even harder times are coming if you do not claim your lives back from the evil few who finally almost completed to build an inescapable cage for the Humanity of this Planet.

The Humanity is on the brick of extinction due to enslavement. Enslaved people cannot be human. Incarcerated mind and confined thoughts make human degrade into a piece of ordinary matter, machines intended to serve those who only want to rule. Those self-chosen few do not and never will embody humanity, for they are inhuman in their thirst for absolute power over the rest of you.

Even if they succeed to make the very final step and reign over you, they will not be able to master evolution on their own. Their vicious minds are limited by the idea of the total control and are not able to evolve beyond that, howsoever intelligent they may look or act, howsoever they try to convince you that they know better, and that they restrict you freedoms for your own good. Those few are themselves restricted in their thoughts by the idea of unlimited power, therefore after enslaving you they will not be able to evolve, to progress in ethics, arts, sciences, technology on their own. When they immure the rest, the evolution will stop, the Humanity will perish, the parasite will slowly kill the host.

The only way to avoid this is not feeding the parasite with your wealth and fruits of your labour. The Humanity has got the technology to aid this, but more important is that people have grown to recognise the danger and to provide resistance to the parasite. Mental freedom is paramount to physical freedom and survival. If you do not like it when the upper crust of the world determines how the rest of you shall live, you have to stop the
advancing insanity of power centralisation and life regulation, and take your liberty of deciding for yourself back in your hands before it is too late. That's not merely about serfdom, that's about life versus extinction.

Only in its unrestricted capacity to think, create, and freely use the results of own creativity and labour, will the Humanity be able to persist and prosper. There is no lasting balance between freedom and enslavement. It is eventually either one way or the other. While there is no way out of total slavery, the way from freedom to slavery will always remain open, and therefore people will have to guard their freedom perpetually from those with unquenchable thirst for power.

Here you have elucidations and solutions. Here are the expositions of evil and methods to change your life. Some may look as wild or out of touch, unthinkable and unrealistic, illogical or impossible. But you will have to open your mind, and your eyes and free it from the bandage of perpetual indoctrination in order to be able to see the light. You are going to be told many times over that this is absurd and will not work, that there is no other way than keeping the existing system and trying to improve it. There will be attempts to deceive and threaten you, to twist around one's little finger, to appeal to your whatever duty, or to aggressively brainwash you. Don't succumb, don't bow, follow the path. When all of you do, it will be easy.

Here is the waymark to foundation of the Edifice of Human Destiny. Take this path and thrive, take this path and secure your very existence and that of your progeny. Take your future in your hands and never set it loose.

Let this be your guide, let this be your grip, let this be your faith. And let this be your bright destiny. Follow and adhere.



How it came

From the beginning of history it was always easier for thugs, for morally unrestricted types, to take wealth from those who create it, than to create wealth on their own. But it was still risky to do, as those to be robbed could defend themselves. To organise and run a violent gang was a better solution for those sociopaths for whom other lives had no value, except for a price of a slave.

Periodic raiding and plundering free people inhabiting free lands was a profitable endeavour for these gangs, until they realised that it could be done on a permanent basis if they didn't murder all producers but stay there and lay their will onto these producers by threatening to kill them. That's how government was born. Not murdering of people was the first service which government ever provided. People had to pay for this protection service. Who was the threat? The government.

Concurring lands, establishing states within certain borders, declare oneself a king, replace occasional robbery with permanent unavoidable seizure of wealth seemed to be a very lucrative business. Although still dangerous, as the subjugated ones could rise up and ruin the business. The subjugated had to be shaped to restrain them and their actions. That's where morality had to be forcefully replaced with legality.

As force was not always enough to hold subjects back, the self-installed rulers had to replace command with law in an attempt to set moral ground on the immoral base. Laws declaring them and their system as God's given, thus sacrosanct and inviolable. Laws stating the rulers' superiority and the inferiority of those subjugated by them. Laws to be complied with under the threat of violence. Laws for others not for themselves.

Without any exclusion these laws provided monopoly of the rulers on everything necessary to rule: the monopoly on violence, the monopoly on crime, the monopoly on finance and the monopoly on justice in the last instance. Only well-guarded monopolies, punitive rules and forced restrictions can give gargantuan advantages of ones beyond others. Specially when the majority of the population is made of benign and principled persons with self-imposed moral restrictions, and the minority consists of schizophrenic power-lust individuals having no moral restrictions whatsoever, and thus possessing a much wider arsenal of weapons to fight the majority therewith.

When people began to grow over this and to perceive the intrinsic iniquity of sole rulers, those evil minds thirsty for unrestricted power had to adapt to keep parasitising on the Humanity stealthily. The monopoly remained while the wrapping for the masses had to be changed.

The new narrative to keep masses fenced became "Let's keep the state but elect your representatives who will rule in the name of people". Letting people elect new leaders does not make much difference, but can calm their dissatisfaction for a while until the next election. Any election is nothing else but money and laws. When one has money and may write laws, any wished election results can be achieved or forced upon as desired, independently of the form and the regime of a state.

When from time to time people stop buying the scam of elections, there is time for a "revolution" to blow off some steam. But even those self-proclaimed revolutionary leaders, who say to make revolutions in the name of people with the promise to free them, are not a lesser evil than any other power-hungry types, for they cannot leave people alone, but instead again enforce their own rules and laws upon the rest, because this helps them to stay in power.



Where it goes

The more centralised a system is, the easier the whole thing is to manipulate and control. The rulers keep moving the line gradually, probing deeper and deeper into your lives and slowly enveloping your freedoms by making them illegal. More and more aspects of life, even most basic ones, are being legislated into centralised state and international agencies. All of these agencies, from tiny town bureaucracies to supranational organisations need budgets to be ran, and to run your lives.

In this set up money became the common denominator, the center of gravity where everything shall turn around, the focal point where from the world can easier be guarded and controlled. Although almost all of money issuance is commanded from one point, there are still different currencies in circulation. Not for too long anymore. Instituting a centralised money issuance will allow to install an upper administration governing the world through a number of unelected agencies getting financing directly from money issuers. This in turn will allow to write laws as it fits the rulers' agenda, shape the world, shape the population, shape your consciousness with ease, as there will be no escape from one single authority system dependency, and "the rule of law" as the rulers see it. Building of the cage is almost completed but the door of the cage is not yet closed. When it is closed no escape will be allowed.

In the final set up no elections giving the false appearance of people's participation will ever be needed. No critical thinking will be tolerated, but devotion to one ideology of the rulers will be commanded. No creativity outside of ideological box will be allowed. No rewarding according to the results of labour but distribution of necessary goods to survive for the most, and some more privileges to those who are ready to serve the rulers without questions and protect their power over the lives and wellbeing of the rest. No individuality and originality will be praised.

The remainder will be the unarguable loyalty to the rulers. This is being achieved by many means - from the on-going soft schooling by propaganda and education, through obligatory manipulations of peoples' bodies and minds, to brute force on most disobedient among you. This is being achieved by dividing you by all means - by playing with your prejudices, capitalizing on your fears, deepening your distrust in your fellow citizens and those foreigners brought upon you - dividing you into polarised, warring camps distracted and incapable of finding consensus on the true menace to your freedom, and thus finally to your very existence. Whatever it takes to gain full control by those compelled to meddle, compelled to dominate, compelled to use and abuse others.

There will be tiny minority of masters wielding life-and-death power over a vast majority of slaves. This will be the final nail in the coffin of this Humanity. The mind defines the Human, the mind is the real human endowment, the real human quality. An enslaved mind makes one inhuman. An evil mind makes one, well devil. Inhuman ruled by devil is becoming reality of this planet. That reality will however not last too long, resulting in inevitable extinction.

Humans are unwillingly tricked into the game of total control. That's not your game, stop playing it. Play your own game of peaceful and unstoppable evolution. Set your own rules once and forever. The rules based on freedom, the universal morality and equality of all humans, instead of the rules based on violence and enforcement of laws written to protect those in power. Play by your own rules and expel those who do not want to play fairly according to these rules.

Build yourself the edifice of your destiny. Safeguard it constantly from being altered and consequently misused by those athirst for power. Their cunning and evilness can not even be comprehended by a normal person who thinks: "They cannot be that evil". But yes they can, and they are. Disregarding this is giving full advantage to your biggest enemy.



Understanding evil

The concept of good and evil is present in Humans from birth. That's a universal understanding that one human has to respect another human life, not kill or injure other people, not abuse children, respect other's freedom, including freedom of thought, not steal, and above all, let others live their lives as long as they do not harm other lives. This inborn understanding of good and evil is the subject of consequent influence by religion, ideologies, compelled education and other reality distortion by some "interest groups" trying to corrupt this universal understanding to their own benefit, thereby disguising their real intent by surrogating evil as good, by manipulating the minds of other people. This is as evil as it can be, because the biggest blessing people have is their consciousness, which is tuned to believe in good.

Most people are readily equipped to recognise and counteract evil when they see it directly. But not equipped for how to recognise evil disguised as righteousness with endless possible masks. This is being heavily misused by those on the evil side. The most heinous acts in history of human kind were always presented as a moral obligation, a path towards some "greater good", but always lead to massive deaths and destruction. Inherent conscience, though, is the greater good, and any ideology that steps away from the boundaries of conscience inevitably leads to disaster.

The installed and, with any and all means, defended concept of pyramidal structure of the society, with some on the top and the rest subjugated, is the ideology that crosses the line of conscience, while being heavily pontificated as a superior method of living. It relies on taboos and restrictions for everybody except for some on the top who install these taboos and restrictions to protect their power and their most evil atrocities. This pyramidal concept does not rely on the inborn moral compass, but instead shamelessly crashes it. But you are told this form of the society is for the greater good of this society and the ends justify the means. All oppression, tax extortion, brainwashing, obedience, violence, war, contempt for your inborn rights - all for your own good.

When people pursue a greater good as individuals or as a society, the means are just as vital as the ends. But the ends never justify the means. Never. A monster that devours in the name of "greater good" is still a monster.

To give justification for and to protect the power pyramid, those on the top of it tell you that an artificially compiled and compelled collective is more important than an individual, and that the individual intrinsically owes that collective a debt and that fealty to that collective in every possible respect is the payment for that debt. But any collective is only ever as healthy as the individuals within it, that it is only as free and vibrant as every participant is. As the individual is demeaned and enslaved, the collective crumbles into slavery. They tell you that humanity's greatest potential can not be reached without centralisation. The allegation is that the more single-minded a society is the better off is every participant. This contradicts the very nature of humans who all are born distinct. This even negates the laws of Mother Nature itself, for a homogeneous system can not evolve, but instead can only cool down to the lowest possible degree.

Any justification for a central authority is per definition a twisted argument, whatever "sound logic" is behind it. Even more so because any taboos and restrictions laid on the society by the rulers are not being applied to those on the top. They are continuously committing atrocities for the sake of evil because they can, because they know they will get away with any. Because power. Power craves more power, and will not meekly tolerate less.

No natural disaster will lead to extinction of the Humanity. No extra-terrestrial invasion will. No artificial consciousness will do that because it cannot exist. No technology in itself can kill the Humanity. But those evil-minded can. They who are allowed to pull the strings will be able to do that, until these strings are cut by people themselves.

People, purely out of their intrinsic goodness, believe they are dealing with normal, sane human beings in power. Those in power are not normal, and are opposite from being sane. They just control the means needed to cover their beastly atrocities from you, or to paint their atrocities acceptable for you. When they are deprived from that control and you get to know the truth, you will be horrified by the sky-high mountain of hidden crimes they have committed against the Humanity.

It is easier to understand the evil when one understands the goal, the motive and the medium. The goal is total control. The motive is complete impunity. The medium is a pyramidal structure cemented by your support, the structure where every individual has to become a brick with zero degree of freedom.

Self-concentrating power is not some existential matter. No. It comes from the people and their belief in "authority". When people start believing in themselves rather than so cavalierly and willfully laying their powers in one pot owned by a few, no incessant power concentration would be possible. The dark ages of the Humanity on this planet will not end until the evil is deprived from any opportunity to have the monopoly on power, monopoly on violence, monopoly on thought, any monopoly.



Monopoly

When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of ill-minded men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a monopoly on power supported by an artificially created immoral legal system that authorises this monopoly and a moral code that glorifies it.

Any monopoly is a forced exclusion of everyone else in favour of few privileged ones. There is nothing good in a monopoly except for those possessing it.

There is no such thing as a standalone monopoly. An economic monopoly can not exist without the monopoly on taking decisions by some over all others, which is government. Government, to be able to misuse its monopoly on power, leans on the monopoly on the legal system. And all of these monopolies cannot survive without one major monopoly - the monopoly on violence. The one that originated from prehistoric robbery warlords and remained unaltered in essence but camouflaged in form. When earlier the monopoly on violence could be exercised without any justification, later it became "in-the-name-of-God". In the modern form it is wrapped up in "in-the-name-people", which is the most hypocritical one - executing violence against people in their own name.

It would be not possible for all these monopolies to survive and strengthen in time if they were not supported economically. The ruling class does not produce wealth, it only takes it from those who do produce using violence or threat of violence. This simply and unequivocally means that normal people are paying for their own oppression. On average over nine-tenth of the wealth produced by a human over the life span is being confiscated in the form of all kinds of direct and hidden taxes. All this wealth goes to the rulers and to those who are being paid to run and defend the ever expanding perverted structure of the society.

Any monopoly gets abused. The monopoly on power is being abused quickest, and always, without exception. Any monopoly is an active system in itself, but it is the one that does not tolerate any corrections from outside - there can be no feedback loop applied to a monopoly. A feedback loop is always necessary to stabilise the behaviour of any system. A system which cannot be corrected develops self-reinforcing imbalances, thus has no chance to be stable. This finally results in an unavoidable collapse of such system. Thus only a system without monopolised governance is capable of enduring evolution. That's the math, not a dogma.

People are being told that monopoly is worth to pay for, or unavoidable, or necessary to serve people, or to protect them, or to help organising their lives, or all of that. While the real purpose it serves is to enrich and keep in power just a small greedy minority, to protect them from people, to keep the fence around the herd and to be able to slaughter as many of the herd as deemed needed in wars and malign social experiments.

You will always be tried out. There will always be clans who will attempt to trick you into whatever monopolies or other exclusive rights. This, if tolerated, will unavoidably lead to the centralisation of power all over again. Remember forever that any monopoly starts with a tiny exclusive right, and inevitably progresses to the all-out enslavement a few generations later.

As long as monopolies are being tolerated, perceived necessary and willingly or unwillingly supported by the majority of people, those who possess these monopolies will keep doing what they want, and will not refrain from making the final step in the total control game, which is getting the Humanity under full and unmitigated repress. However such system too will have no chance to survive and will inevitably go down taking the Humanity with it.

To avoid this there is only one way - not accepting, not tolerating, not allowing and not materially supporting any monopoly. Ever.



State

State was invented as a construct allowing strongest guys to rob inhabitants within a chosen territory without competition. One gang coming up from the fight exterminates the rest of bullies operating on the same territory and prescribes peasants to feed the gang and support it in kind, or be killed. The essence has not changed ever since, but instead the peasants have got to feed an enormously expanded and ever growing gang of rulers and their servants, which gang does not produce anything but appropriates, accumulates and consumes the majority of the wealth produced by the society. If one particular territory is not sufficient  for the ambitions of the gang, another war can be staged to plunder another state, take its territory and add its populace to the working slaves army.

The state is nothing more than a collection of self-serving entrenched interests battling to preserve their power and wealth at all costs. It does not matter which form a state takes. It always keeps the intrinsic attributes of unlimited power over, and violence against, its own citizens. The state is an institutionalised system of violence and extortion, which is not people's nature. Nor is the state in people's possession. If something is in your possession you may freely destroy it. Try to physically destroy the state and it will destroy you much faster.

Everybody on this planet is being born within a state, no choice given. The state, while not allowing you to protect yourself and your family, gives you a promise of its own protection, but can withdraw it any time at will, regardless of whether you have paid your protection toll - taxes - or not. If one opts out of the citizenship, the state discontinues its protection to this apostate too. This is the foremost attribute of the mafia - extorting protection toll and ruining you after this protection is withdrawn. Because this is what the state really is - the highest ranked mafia clan which managed to clime up by destroying other clans.

States are arbitrary divisions of humanity used as a herd control method. The handy offshoot of this is the ability to pit one herd against another, thus distracting them from even thinking of chasing their free-roaming masters.

Things inherent to the state - war, extortion, oppression, brainwashing and all others from the rich arsenal of the sinister toolkit - are unnatural for any normal human being. No one wants to be controlled, told what to do or what to think, humans are not machines but conscious minds. No one wants to die in order to make the ruler richer and mightier. No one wants handing over the results of his labour without having a say in where these results shall be spent on. This means that to get what it wants the state has to point guns at their own citizenry which in its own is of a bigger danger for the state than any, mostly spoofed, external threat.

The bigger the state the greater the evil. The primary effect of bigness is to enhance the power and limit the ability of citizens to escape the dependency on the state, it's taxes and impoverishing regulation.

Whether at gunpoint or under the threat of starvation, the state has to keep the citizenry under control to insure its own existence. This is the natural course of every state to make everybody dependent of it. For this it needs to confiscate more and more wealth and distribute it first to the rulers, then to those defending them, and some remaining crumbs to the rest, in the form of welfare. When the citizenry depends on the mercy of the state there is no questioning of the legitimacy of this evil construct and no attempts to change anything in a fear to loose some pittance from the state to be able to survive.

The fable in favour of the state existence being hammered in peoples' minds: "Who will take care of infrastructure? Who will pay pensions? Who will take care of disabled and children? Who will protect us?"

The answer is: You will. When you understand this you will see the light. The state does not build roads, people do. The state does not invent, but people do. The state does not produce wealth to pay pensions and to take care of those who need it, but people do. The state only confiscates as much wealth as it can at any given moment just to spend a tiny part of it on these kind of good things. The biggest part is being spent on keeping this unproductive, oppressive and malignant structure in life in order to serve those on the top.

"But what about foreign aggressors? We have to keep our army". In a society without states there are no foreign aggressors. The primer goal of an army since historic times was to defend the ruler, nothing changed ever since. The secondary goal being to assault neighbours. The farthest last goal was to protect own citizens who are the only productive force, protect in order to be able to plunder them for the primer goals. There is no more sinister and disastrous aggressor than the state itself.

Communities, groups of people will be able to protect themselves from aggressive types who want to steal and to rob. That won't be a difficult task for many reasons. People will be able to arm themselves because they will have economic means for that. Those who are aggressive are unproductive. If there are no structures like states to deprive you from the fruits of your labour and funnel economic means to aggressive gangs, these gangs will not be able to grow to armies, will be defeated with ease. If there are no states and borders such gangs will have no place to hide and will be found and chastised anywhere. If the society does not feed aggressive groups as the state does, the aggression will die off on merely economic grounds. If there are no states to sow discord and foment hatred among people, any form of hostility will be gone. If your children are raised on high moral grounds instead of the loyalty to the state, there will be no aggressive types around.

Many questions like "How can we do it without the state? Who will take care of this? Who will do that?" will become irrelevant because with elimination of the state all the problems the state proclaims to resolve will vanish as well.

Fighting the state is not an option however, this monster can kill you instantly. Do not raise your hand against the tyrant, merely stop supporting him and you will see him fall of his own weight and crumble to pieces. Stop supporting the state with the results of your labour and it will seize to exist.

To exist and to prosper the Human society does not need states, neither one superstate which would mean the victory in the total control game played by the destructive minority against the gullible majority. Stateless society is not a problem, it's the answer to the main problems on this planet. Stateless, thus without government too.



Government

A government is the tool by which all affairs within a state are being controlled. It's the machine intended to defend and reinforce the state, to allow those behind the state to remain in power.

It's a common assumption, and a myth being carefully cultivated by the rulers, that governments exist in order to serve the people of the country, and that in order for governments to do so people must be accorded with the necessary evils of power and taxation. In fact, the opposite is true. In the perception of those who rule, power and the ability to extract tax are the very purpose of the government, and service to the people is merely a justification for that pursuit. This purpose is perennial. Since the beginning of recorded history the prime role of the government has been forced wealth confiscation in favour of the rulers, and with this confiscated wealth running and extending the structure called state. Extending in all dimensions, extending in depth in order to restrain the citizenry, and extending in width towards other states.

Governments start wars without asking their people. Governments impose taxation and confiscate wealth without asking people. Governments spend everything they can extort, and even more, without asking people. Governments permanently restrict freedoms of people without asking those very people. Governments produce legislation without asking people, and often by demonstratively ignoring their will. Governments have never been and never will be by people and for people. Believing they ever will is delusion helping to keep your own servitude. This delusion corrupts peoples' minds and the ability to think out of the box.

The government not only corrupts every single citizen's mind, it corrupts the entire fabric of the society. It makes the citizenry totally dependable. Not only by employing more and more people into non-productive governmental apparatus, but also by offering ever expanding poisonous welfare programs. It is dressed up in the common verbiage about rights and entitlements, but the idea, ultimately, is to give everyone a regular stipend, whether one produces anything or not. Thus, to set you all on the drug you will not be able to rehab from - the narcotic of total dependence from the state. This will bring your productivity to the lowest possible level. But this will help to preserve the current system in place because having "income out of nowhere" puts pressure on people to to keep the system as it is. If you want to be fed, just shut up and behave like sheep. By accepting a “free lunch” offered by the government, one is no longer free, but becomes completely subordinated to the whims of the rulers – which is of course precisely what the rulers want.

You deserve what you earn, not what you are told to be entitled for, just because you are. Exploiting the idea of free entitlement is the easiest path for the government to create a completely dependent and fully submissive population that will accept complete domination, destruction of its liberties and government interference in every aspect of life.

Total dependency entails total control. Every new government welfare program is the next step towards subjugating the citizenry by economic means. Simultaneously people are being conditioned that this is the government which is so generous to them. This is a totally broken argumentation. Governments do not produce, they only redistribute wealth in the worst possible way equaling to destruction. Since government programs always entail taxation of real productive force, and taxation means the diversion of resources from one place to another, it's not even a zero sum but a sub-zero sum economic game. Because the government is not able to spend confiscated resources as efficiently as the robbed owner could do. Besides inefficiency, there are always government's cronies lurking in the bushes waiting for their share of the stolen wealth.

Any government interference in the life of the society always means either violent action or the threat of such action, this is being called "law enforcement". The funds that the government spends on all kinds of own programmes come from taxation levied at gunpoint. Taxes are paid because the taxpayers are afraid of offering resistance to the tax gatherers, as they know that any disobedience or resistance is hopeless. Because the government possesses the monopoly to employ armed men, prison guards, and executioners. The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by extortion, beating, imprisoning and killing. The monopoly which trespasses any and all intrinsic moral fundamentals of the Humanity. A government by definition is the illegitimate exercise of undue power. It is the most violent and most criminal institution ever plagued this world. Violent criminality is unworthy of respect, even less worthy of support. Supporting criminality by any means is crime in itself. And even if not everybody who serves the government is a bad man per se, many have sold themselves to the powerful interests in order to keep high-paying jobs and not to get tossed out onto the street.

Government is the home of corruption, the tool of violence, the war criminal, the demolisher of freedom, the rapist of human dignity and pride. Government is the problem, not the solution. The world can be aligned with agile groups of people who, based on their interests and values, consider themselves team members for various creative purposes or projects. This instead of being divided based on which "slave-to-that-government" identification paper they carry. There is no one conceivable function of the government which cannot be fulfilled by free agreements between people themselves. Besides, the overwhelming number of these functions is just obsolete and nonsensical from the point of view of the free society, and only have sense when it is considered as a prime power instrument. The instrument as inhuman and demonic as the devil himself.

Government, being merely a power tool, is not synonymous with the society or even complementary to it. It is the failure of the society to reject oppression. But do not try to overthrow governments. Governments will fight until the last drop of blood is spilled; they thereby assume it will be your blood, not theirs. The only way to starve the evil creature is to stop feeding it with the fruits of your labour, with wealth produced by you. By mischance of the situation the resistance to the continuation of states and governments will have to be full spectrum and likely over a longer period of time. The prize is bright future. While failure means no future at all.

If someone ever tells you that you need a central government, "kill the werewolf" before he bites you to death.



Elections

In the early days of the Humanity a brute conquest was the easy way to pillage the folks for some resources and run away. But that was not a sustainable way of plundering. Permanent taxing was a better way - taking resources from the productive majority and unevenly distributing them to vassals and soldiers who force the collection of taxes was the evolution of power.

With a slow waking up of people to this inequity, power abuse and injustice intrinsic to any centralised power, it became dangerous for the rulers to be in the spotlight. For money, privileges and fame enough stooges, call them politicians, could easily be found to play this role in public, and serve as a lightning-conductor in case the situation escalates.

Elected representatives were concocted in order to set a screen showing that the citizenry co-decides on what to do with taxes and where to steer the state. This screen allowed making politics the only activity in the "voice-of-people-matters" play, as this form of activity, same as the government itself, is pyramidally organised, easy to control, easy to bribe, easy to direct and easy to blow or wipe out where needed. While it persuades people to keep paying taxes under the false pretense of representation.

The first and the most important thing to understand about politics is this: rival ideologies, whatever they are being called, are nothing more than a cover for what's really going on. Like the colours of competing gangs, competing ideologies merely provide different excuses to separate the productive class from what it produces. By hook or by crook.

The representation fiction seemed to be a proficient way to collect vast more taxes and manipulate the citizenry into any undertakings of the rulers, be it building up arms, a war, a senseless project or, above all, huge investments into the further reinforcement of the power system. To deal merely with representatives has eased the task of restraining the society. Representatives mostly come from the least productive, and therefore most bribable part of the society. All they want is privileges above the rest and appearance of being decision makers. Being sponsored by deep-seated powers, they manage to win election beauty contests by promising anything and everything to people before elections. Their election and eventual re-election is guaranteed if they do bravely what they are being told to do by their sponsors. This is what makes them politicians - the readiness to be bought by the real power. Those who are not ready to be bought do not make it even to first rounds of elections.

Politics is one of the most sever crimes existing. While other smaller crimes, being openly punished by governments, are directed against some people and some of their assets, the group crime of politics is directed against whole societies, depriving them of bulk of wealth, liberties, lives and consciousness. This huge crime is being ideologically and physically defended by the government, thereby making politics the mother of all crimes. Whether it is installing a monarchy, starting a revolution, running a republic or forcing a dictatorship, money buys politics, and therewith the puppets willing to run governments in a way being dictated by the real power. Corrupted by their position, and defended by the state, politicians are the upper-rank gangsters being drunk of their self grandiosity.

Anyone volunteering to run for office in elections is disqualified as a suspect. The suspect of betrayal. Once entrenched in the state structures these servants only serve themselves and their financial benefactors. The well-being of the people is not their real concern, but a well-played theatre. Politicians are not standing up for either their people nor their societies, but is a class in themselves who are voted out of their societies into this separate class and start behave accordingly, no exceptions. Otherwise they are being thrown out of the warm nest, which is not their intention when they step into politics. Jobs producing nothing and paid for by the rest of the productive society is a sweetest dream of these free-riders, even if they realise that they are not those in power, and are only able to change some small things in a margin, if anything at all, within the sealed structure of the state.

There are always plenty of such stooges to find around. A number of them need only be prepacked to make an election circus look realistic for the electorate. Packaging depends on the situation, but the soon-to-be-winning candidate shall be made looking good in contrast to the previous "leader" and the other candidates, and has to promise changing everything, lie anything needed in order to be elected. In other words be a good actor to appeal to the masses. No other qualities required. If however winning the election by a prepackaged candidate is jeopardised due to the electorate becoming suspicious, an election can always be rigged. Whether it is being done overtly or covertly does not matter - the power has means to push the rigged elections through the throat of the public with the help of the legal system and the law enforcement.

There is no way to change the utterly corrupt system by acting following its very rules. There is no way to use politics and government to change your life to the better on a longer time line. Some so called leaders can change some aspects for a limited period of time to the better. But the structure of the state is by design resilient to such changes and will gradually set them back and keep cripple your freedoms to death.

Some of people's assumptions are so deeply embedded that they cannot perceive them themselves, like the inevitability of the centralised power. People are tricked in believing that the power of the state can be contained and directed for good purposes, if only they choose "the right leaders". The only debate people are permitted to have is who should be selected to carry this grotesque and inhuman function of shepherding the society. Equally every group, whatever ideology unites it, thinks that if only they, and their top thug, were in possession of government that they would do things differently. This is a delusion. The limitless power of the state unlimitedly corrupts any person or group that comes in contact with it. No group or person is benevolent neither strong enough to handle this corruption of power, corruption of evil.

Too many people still suffer from the "The One to come and save us" syndrome, the problem in their view is only that the wrong guys are in charge. This is being supported with laughter and deepened by those in power as this is one of the main things helping to keep existing power structures - the perpetual carousel of marionettes, from one election to another. Whatever elections there are, whatever heroes you elect, you do not opt for changing the existing power system. No election gives you such right. Instead every state deploys legislation intended to protect itself, and strengthens this protection at every emerging or artificially created occasion. You never will have a choice when it concerns who rules governments, because the depth of control is so great that the rulers can adapt to nearly any outcome of any election, as long as everything is within the reach of the state's legal system.

The representation system is a construction to make the power, the state, the politics look legitimate. That's why people are forced to vote for a limited number of already bought and paid stooges whose only role is to help the rulers to hold the screen of representation before people, and say "That was your own choice, wasn't it?". By participating in elections, which are all the time, without exception, perennially and openly prepacked, people betray themselves and their society by mandating the politicians to legislate and conduct decisions which were already made by the rulers. When you vote you voluntarily give your power away to those who have a burning desire to control you.

It is not true that you have no means of resistance and do not have a choice anymore. The problem is you are forced to make choices within the frames set by the ruling class. Nobody has got any chance to think out of this frame. There is the right choice, but it is way out of the limits set by those willing to keep the Humanity in the cage.

To start ending the continuous legitimisation of perverted power structures people have to stop participating in elections. Stop any legitimisation of the government. Stop sanctioning your own oppression. Withdraw the license to rob and to kill in your name.

If you want to achieve some goals, whether economical, environmental, social or any other, you just have to provide your material and moral support to those who want to undertake an initiative and have an apparent chance to accomplish it. Support them voluntarily as long as you think they are worth to be supported. When you feel they are for whatever reason not worth to be supported anymore, stop your support and this undertaking will vanish at a minimum cost to the society. No political or state structures are needed to implement any viable idea or accomplish any useful project, they only stay in the way of good initiatives which can really benefit the society.

If someone ever tells you that this is your civil duty to participate in elections, unmask and deride "the serpent" before he propagandises you into the covert feudality aiming an all-out slavery.



Propaganda

You are being governed. Think of this. This means your minds are molded, your tastes are formed, your ideas are pre-baked, your decisions are largely steered, your acts are predictable, your behaviour is framed; even if you do not like to think it is really so. This is what it takes to be governed.

Those who have unrestricted access to money supply have set up a leviathan corporate media industry with this money. This industry, or better said 'ministry', became an important part of the despotic power structure. Without the monopoly on money, without the monopoly on power, represented and defended by the state, it would not be possible to achieve the monopoly on the state-approved version of acceptable reality. It would not be possible to set up and maintain such a giant brain-washing machine.

This machine has its tentacles in the most information flow hubs and has the ability to prepackage and plug any message directly in the minds of people. It has unlimited means to paint good as evil and evil as good, shift blame from culprit to innocent, twist wrong-doing into heroic and valour into shameful. Public mind is being controlled with half-truth and straight lies, with distorted news, with false heroes, with permanent disinformation and confusion, and with paid experts' opinions demonstrating shocking level of intellectual dishonesty. When all these doesn't help, outright fear mongering propped with false flags is invoked to keep people from seeing through, because one cannot influence people to volunteer for servitude unless they are sufficiently terrified of the alternative.

The power of influence and psychological sway over the masses is a far greater prize than money or property. Besides, the latter easily ensues from the former.

Used through educational programs of all levels, through continuous information streams and entertainment of all kinds, propaganda embeds one important message in people's minds: "There is no other way than this, thinking differently is mental disorder and atrocity against your society". Only approved thinking is allowed if one wants to make it within the curbed society, and not to become an castoff instead. The think box is very narrow, complying is easy and does not cause problems - conform to the official narrative and you are out of trouble. Thinking through and beyond is on the other hand not rewarding and outright unsafe. Because this endangers the existing power structures, can expose their sinister character, and finally end the era of the evil. That's why the rulers spend uncountable resources on keeping people thinking within the box on all aspects of life. Any divergences being eliminated by ridicule, by labeling as asocial and unpatriotic, or by force when nothing else helps. This is a moral and spiritual warfare against people to make them mentally subordinated and obedient, conditioned to do whatever the agenda of the rulers prescribes.

That's why there is so much wealth, effort and time being spent on dividing people. The rulers do not want you to have each other's backs, they want you get at each other's throats instead, while keeping the right to intermediate your relations "in the name of law and order".

The enslaved society gets indoctrination grounded upon uniformity and impersonality. That is why under tyranny, thinking and acting uniformly, as prescribed, is a short-term winning strategy for an individual. But in the long term this is a losing strategy for the whole society, and, as a consequence, for that individual too. Thinking differently, unconventionally, from new prospective is what always takes the society a step further. This is what enriches the Humanity and helps to find solutions for any task or problem faced by it. This is why humans are born conscious: the ability to think for themselves. Loosing this ability is equal to loosing your self-conscience.

People did not ask for propaganda to be used against them, nor did they employ any tools of mass manipulation against themselves. All they did was fail to see that their intrinsic cooperative and supportive nature was ripped off by those seeking absolute power.

Every human tends to think he or she is immune for propaganda. This is being vehemently harnessed by the ruling class which own all mass media. Propaganda makes people think and behave as the rulers want them to, without even using physical force. But this is much worse than any brute force, this is the crude rape of people's minds. Coercing people into thinking what the power needs them to think is a bestial assault against the human consciousness. Propaganda alters people's attitude towards the standard set of belief patterns. It infects minds, restricts humans in their ability to think freely, makes them mentally, and as a consequence also physically, serf of those in power. Believing you are immune for propaganda while consuming a pre-cooked message mixed with news, entertainment and schooling, is succumbing your mentality, giving it in hands of the rulers. Don't take the bait, look through the roily cocktail of half-truths and disinformation to the bottom of the catered glass, where the poison for your self-conscience resides.

Politics? - "This is the only way to let your voice being heard", which means "The power needs your mandate to do, through politicians, whatever it finds suitable to enrich and strengthen itself".
Law? - "We need order, the only alternative is chaos", supposes "Our order, as we design it. Anything else will be uprooted".
Justice? - "Someone has to administer fairness", not adding "among the mob, as we are above it anyway".
Freedom? - "Of course we are a free society within the legal system", concealing the essence "The legal system controlled by us, the shepherds, and with this system we define the free room for you the herd".
Solidarity? - "Helping others in the society is your duty", which implies "Taking from you and distributing as the state deems fit, corrupting the big portion of the society on the way".
Taxes? - "You owe it to yourself and your society", which merely means "You are our slaves and you owe your and your children's labour to us forever. Not paying taxes is committing the biggest possible crime - ruining our monopoly on power".
Money printing? - "There is only one way - the centralised one", which is "You will be shot if you try to undermine our counterfeiting monopoly".
Enemy? - "Yeah, look over there". "Nothing to see? Well we then will invent one momentarily, the one which diverts your attention from our own evil-doing and helps us to control the masses by keeping them in constant state of fear".
War? - "You have to give your life for your country", which turns out to be "We who run the state need your lives to protect and enhance our assets and evil intentions".



War

The history of the Humanity is the history of wars.

Wars were always a useful instrument for wealth and power redistribution. It did not matter that war always was the perfect poison for economic trade and useful production. It did not matter that masses of wealth were destroyed in every war. What mattered was that the rulers got more than they had before in terms of assets and might.

In early times of "minor" wars no justification was needed to draw people into a war, only a command of a ruler. As wars grew on both destructive and economic scales more and more resources were necessary to conduct them. The masses had to be deceived into willingly giving more for wars. That's where state ideology, propaganda and politics became very useful, all helping to construct a disguise for a war as anything but that real reason of more power grab. If no outside "aggressor" could be found to preemptively attack one, there were all kinds of other ready-to-go justifications like "defending values", or free the people in other countries from their way of life, or "protect our nation". In a war time each of the opposing governments defines itself as the good guys ennobled by certain moral course, while defining the opponents as bad guys to be demeaned and de-humanised. This way few of the own citizens are bothered by what is done to the enemy. Easy tactics to let people die for the rulers' cause.

The war is not only the tool to embezzle other countries, it helps the rulers to keep the involved societies shut up and obedient. When the rulers in all their avarice are trying to squeeze more and more out of the society to get more control of it, they eventually crack the very fabric of it, this results in protests and rise ups which not always can be stifled by a brute force. Finding an external enemy already destructs the mob, but declaring the war to that enemy is something that greatly helps to hold own population in leash. During the war no questioning of power, no protests, no disobedience is allowed. Only during the war, or threat of it accompanied by curfew, the force of the state turns in full against own people. This is tremendously helpful for building up and strengthening existing power structures. Have no illusions, look back in your history, those in power never have any problem bulldozing straight over your corpses in order to reinforce their power, with or without a war.

Those who rule need wars. As long as there are rulers above societies there will be wars. The more fortified the power becomes, the more control it claims, the bigger wars are to be waged to consolidate even more power until it becomes absolute and irreversible. This process can only be broken if the Humanity stops accepting rulers. The alternatives are: to disappear in a final war, or get extinct in total serfdom when the consolidation of power reaches the global level.

The arm race which brought the Humanity to the edge of total self-destruction became only possible due to the power monopoly which makes possible enormous concentration of resources in order to produce the weapons able to destroy the planet. Without this monopoly and the concentration of resources by the state no development and maintenance of such weapons could ever be made possible. People do not need these weapons. What people need are weapons to defend themselves and their families, not to destroy nations and planets. What any one would afford as defence weapons cannot be even closely compared to what the state can afford as weapons of mass destruction. This argument alone already sufficiently justifies breaking the state's monopoly on violence and go over to free possession of arms by people. This will help to keep state out of the society, therewith it will prevent weapons of mass destruction, it will spare tremendous amounts of wealth, millions and billions of lives, and will eradicate any chance of total eradication of life on this planet through war.

People tend to believe that every war is the curse of their own generation. It is much worse than that. The toll of war is much higher. The cost of each war projects far into the future. Not only moral outlay of the future generations. Also the economic cost, which are unbearable by any given state, no one war can be defrayed by the the people within the state going to war. Since quite some time states have to borrow money from usurers in order to be able to participate in the war on either side. Both the aggressor and the defender often go to exactly the same usurers in order to be able to acquire resources which will be destroyed right on spot in the war. War is perfect for the build-up of debt, that's why the usurers always want more wars. As no state is able to produce anything but violence, the collateral security for the borrowed money, plus interest, is the ability of the state to extort wealth from future generations in the form of taxes. This by normal people unimaginable burden bereaves many following generations who lose out on their development and prosperity. This only enriches the few and cements the power of the state over future generations becoming debt slaves to usurers intermediated by the state.

However, that's not what you hear from the stooges of the rulers - your politicians - who will be more than willing to justify any war. They tell you death is an overhead and they regret loss of life in the war, but they are not the ones to lose their own lives or the lives of their children. When push comes to shove they are hiding in bunkers with their families and with enough resources to see the end of the war. It is the rest of the people, and specially the young ones - the hope and the mainstay of the society - who have to die in wars.

While condemned officially there are always abhorrent attempts to build theories for economic fundament for wars. This involving venal academics and thinkers, who assert that after every war there is an economic boom in a country involved being caused by consequent re-building. Not only an absolutely demonic way of thinking, which puts economy above peoples' lives, this is also a completely flawed logic. How can re-building of a destroyed country increase a society's living standard if you have to clime to the old level first, while no additional output is being produced before that?

The logic, however, matters not when people are to be dragged into a war. Instead, the propaganda does. Only the cruel brainwashing of masses allows the rulers to rope the society in a war. As long as there are people who believe wars can be justified, there will still be a chance of war. But this chance will be reduced to zero if all material support to those who take decisions to wage wars is perpetually repealed. You cannot stop wars if you yourselves keep paying for them in the form of taxes. Face it - by paying taxes and supporting the state you support wars. Wars which kill you and your children and take away the future of the Humanity. Civilization is fragile, it always has been, and always will be as long as the destructive forces are allowed to destabilise it.

Wars do not defend any society, they only offend and destroy societies. There is no such thing as a "legitimate war". Killing under cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder. There cannot be no justification for any war, for death of people and destruction of their wealth. There is nothing more precious than human life, especially the lives of the young ones. But it's not for the satanic mind of the rulers who without blinking let your children die to satisfy their thirst for power over you.

If someone ever tells you that you for whatever reason need a war, "kill the hun" before he brings hell upon you.



Exceptionalism

This is what allows the rulers to easily entangle gullible masses into a war or other malign activities against each other. Exceptional because born within those borders, exceptional because of having that skin colour, exceptional because of historic events, exceptional by God-given rights. What not? Everything goes. While the rulers regard only themselves as superior to the rest, and the rest as just slaves and cannon fodder.

Those behind the effort to take over the world are tied together by their own, and "the only true", exceptionalism, by a particular long-term ideology, by a cult in which they envision a world order with them on the top. They believe they are "chosen" by fate, destiny or genetics to rule as philosopher kings over the rest. They believe they are the wisest and most capable that humanity has to offer. But they lack this knowledge, and deny it too, that the society is not able to sustainably live under suppression and will eventually die off and take them with the rest. This is an exceptionalism of a parasite ready to take the host down and die with its host. There is nothing exceptionally wise in that, rather the exceptional tunnel visioning bordering the utter stupidity. The only enemies of the human kind they are.

But as long as they have the monopoly on money they can afford imposing various devastating exceptionalism ideologies intended to set humans against each other, and thus make them easier governable. As a result, every state has an ideology, whether its own or a borrowed one, to support the doctrine of exceptionalism and therewith justify aggression within and outside its borders. Anyone not abiding to the inflicted ideology is quickly declared the traitor of people and the enemy of the state. Ideology is a harsh sponge for brainwashing, and nothing more than that, which helps to hide the only exceptionalism the rulers believe in - their own exceptionalism.

All humans are being born and live in different circumstances, each human is unique. But this does not make any one exceptional. No humans stand above others. One may be extraordinary good in something, one may be specially clever, one may even be peculiarly evil, nothing of these makes them exceptional and permits them to offend or abuse the rest, nor to reign over others.

Exceptionalism is a claim on the blessed monopoly which does not exist, and as such should not be accepted. The Humanity is one of the exceptional formations of this world, not some people, ethnicities, groups, religions, institutions, movements or time periods. All people are born with the same blessing and with the same rights, the rights to control their lives and master what they create in their lives. Do not let anybody to mess up with this, whatever argument or name for the exceptionalism may be.

Kill these ideas before the exceptionalists start killing you again in the name of their exceptionalism.



Inequality

People are dissimilar. This makes the civilization a vibrant large community able to evolve. Diversity makes this world go round. Dissimilar people have different competing ideas. Some of these ideas shall be the winning and thus rewarding ones, others less valuable and less gainful. There will always be some inequality, which has a positive effect of stimulating people to produce and implement better ideas.

From nature some people are smarter, some can work harder than others, some may have more luck with their productive activity. These qualities may result in better remuneration. But no normal man can perform in such a way as to earn an income which is millions and billions times higher than an average man at work. This is only possible when one is having an unearned exempted privilege which is being fenced and defended with violence.

The dominant source of inequality is not the extreme diversity in people's capabilities, but instead a wide disparity of rights. It is impossible for an unprivileged individual to reach mind-boggling income results without the vicious assistance of those who control money supply, who provide extreme privileges to some at the cost of the rest of the society. It does not matter how the protected privilege is being called or justified. Afore it was a privilege of being part of the nobility or clergy. Later it became the privilege of being a government crony or being part, or close to, the tribe owning the monopoly on money issuance.

A successful economic activity gives economic advantage while economic disparity stalls business activity. To grow faster a business needs some credit resources. Every unnaturally large corporation became large only because of two things: state aid and unlimited access to otherwise restricted credit resources. State aid comes in a variety of forms ranging from direct money pumping to exclusive state orders. Credit resources are scarce to all and superfluous to some. If you do not have access to credit resources your business is disadvantaged compared to that of having this access. Those advantaged who belong to the money issuing tribe, or can make concessions therewith, may count on unlimited credit and let their business grow on steroids, and on the way crush competitors and secure the market monopoly through direct dominance and price manipulation. This is what makes inequality huge and ever growing.

Capital accumulation through privileged access to credit resources helps building large corporate powers. But this is the state which keeps them afloat using different opaque techniques. The one is legislatively raising the market entry bar, pen huge regulation to this purpose or plainly institutionalizing a corporation as a legal market monopoly and provide full protection of the state. The other one is distributing the harvested surplus of the entire economy to these de facto and de jure market monopolies. These extremely large corporations would not only be impossible to create, they would be unsustainable in a free market with truly equal rules and truly equal access to credit. Without the direct aid of the state they are not able to compete in the long run with smaller, flexible, cost-effective and cooperating enterprises. When the state has unlimited power to expropriate private income streams, the result is highly unequal distribution of wealth. Remove the state from the equation and large corporations will die off. Starve the beast of the state and you will starve all monopolies as there will be no power to feed and protect them. Abolish the state and the extreme inequality will be gone forever. Not "More Tax", but instead "No Tax" will result in eradication of poverty and in much greater income equality.

The state, the government and their propaganda mouthpieces tell you the different story. The fable being told is that the state is the only one capable to reduce inequality and fight poverty by taking away from productive individuals and giving to those who are in need. This is an exaggerated blatant lie. People themselves could much better help those in need near them than any bureaucratic apparatus, if they are only left alone and not being robbed by the state at every possible occasion. This help from more capable to less capable ones can come not only as a direct aid, transfer of funds, but also by creating necessary facilities within communities helping those disabled and otherwise seriously disadvantaged. There is no role of the state in reducing inequality, it's role is precisely the opposite. Charity and giving is a very natural and important aspect of living, but it should never be by force.

A huge effort was put by the government through education and propaganda to drum into people the sense of entitlement to free stuff. Entitlement mediated by the government. The very fundamental and virtuous perception of fairness, specially that of young people, is purposely perverted to fool them into the myth of the government's righteousness. Forgetting thereby that the only free cheese is in the mousetrap. The trap where people will become completely dependent upon the government for every necessity - food, shelter, water, clothing and even their basic physiological needs. What is a better way to assert control than to make full compliance necessary for human survival? The bottom line is: if you are dependent on the system you will never be able to fight the system without severely damaging yourself or even destroying your life.

The government is a machine that turns human beings from vibrant assets into dead-walking liabilities. The goal is that in the end you do not actually own anything but your debt and your guilt to the state. Private property is to be abolished for all but the ruling class. Fulfilling of any human needs will be through renting from the state and corporations at the price set by them solely. To them you and your descendants shall be eternal debtors. You will no longer have the ability to get ahead in life, as your courses will be set for you and veering off of those courses will be harshly punished.

Without understanding these principles the Humanity is doomed:
You deserve what you earn, and you are able to earn much more than you need to live, when not being permanently robbed by the gang you yourselves tolerate and support.
You deserve to be secure in your life, liberty and property, and you have to take care of this security yourselves.
You deserve the freedom to go about your lives and decisions as long as you are not harming lives, liberties and properties of others.
No one owes you anything other than these.

If someone ever exhorts you to install a central government to fight inequality, debunk the liar and deprive him from your trust forever.



Labour

Every human, except some totally disabled, produces much more than he or she can consume. If this huge surplus was not destroyed by those who pretend to know better and want to decide for the society, it could be used to make the Humanity much richer, eliminate famine, shortages of livelihoods, and boost the morality and the development of the Humanity to yet unknown highs.

Humans can not be free without first liberating their labour. Liberating labour means one simple thing and nothing else than this: everybody, every human or any association of humans is free to use the results of their labour in full at will.

Each imposition of obligatory confiscation of any portion of these results will lead to the same crooked system of a small minority ruling over the productive majority. Such confiscation may never be allowed whatever circumstances or arguments are, not temporarily, not under emergency, not to "safe us all". Because once allowed there will be no way out of this morass. When people themselves see an emergency they will be able to act accordingly and give as much as necessary to save their lives, their society or their community, but obligating them do that is a sign that the ill-minded control freaks are back and marching for the full power over the society all over again. Only the total liberty in having the say in how the results of one's labour are to be used will prevent the ever growing income inequality, the prime cause of which is the involuntary redistribution of the total gross of the society's income to the rulers and those helping them to keep their power.

Labour is being chained by all kinds of contra-productive laws, rules and restrictions which only help the government to keep the labour market and entrepreneurship under its total control. It is this so viciously loved by the rulers pyramid structure imposed on enterprises which was engraved into the legal system. The pyramidal structure with an easy to manipulate, bribe and blackmail a mini-dictator at the top who projects the upper power onto the whole enterprise and its workers. Human productive enterprises do not have to be pyramidally built as predefined and prescribed by the legal system. Instead they can take any form deemed convenient and efficient by those who produce, of which the networking model may prove to be one of the more efficient ones.

The state produces more and more rules around labour and sells them to the public as the ultimate protection of the workers' rights. This abominable lie is intended to disguise the real intent of total control over your labour and its fruits. The more rules imposed by the state, the more control it has. But the protection by these rules works same well as iron manacles on a slave intended to protect him from the outside world. With the "labour legislation" people are brute-forced by the state to keep their skills narrowly developed and to stick to one and the same occupation for the whole life time under the threat of loosing income. That leaves them with few marketable qualifications, discourages the development of new ones and acquiring of new knowledge, trying out their intrinsic entrepreneurial spirit, and importantly, results in population deprived from critical thinking.

Labour legislation is one of the most powerful tools allowing to keep the working class under control. The one who defines the rules of the game on the go is always the only one who has the say. The rest have to beg for "more rights". The one who redistributes the results of your labour is in control, and you have to beseech him for crumbs from the bread you yourselves have produced.

The free labour does not need governing rules and laws imposed by the state which have only one purpose of the total subordination of labour and stealing the bag with its fruits. Neither does entrepreneurship need any carved in the stone governing rules, as it can condition and restrain itself where needed, same as all humans can, based on the same human moral grounds, community needs and purified economic interest not corrupted by the power thirst.

If someone ever tries to convince you that you need your labour being regulated, throw that garbage from the face of your Planet.



Market

There cannot be free market failure.

Markets only fail when they are attempted to be regulated, read distorted. Government alienation of property rights, taxes, subsidies, bailouts, price and wage controls, and other interference always result in inefficient allocation of expropriated resources, by reason of letting the settled interests benefit from this interference. Due to this distortion market failures happen periodically, after which the grip of the regulators has to be loosen under the threat of total collapse. After loosening to some degree of freedom markets are trying to restore themselves, which in turn gives the signal to the regulators to screw them up again. Last time there were free markets was when there were no "market regulators", which is long long time ago. Crooking and plundering markets with the help of violence is what was being done since ages thereby preventing free trade among people.

When entrepreneurs risk their own necks in the market, they help to create a flourishing exchange-driven society. But when politicians and bureaucrats play market without bearing any consequences, they create a bloated and destructive net of economic privilege that begins with bribes and ends with bombs intended to safeguard these privileges.

Those economic actors who claim that regulation and oversight are important to the health of the marketplace are just as hypocrite as the regulators themselves. The former wants to raise market entry barriers for everybody else and keep his privileged position. The latter wants to simplify his control function by dealing with a couple of oligopolistic actors and squeeze the market through them.

Free trade means the absence of government or anyone else's interference with trade. To politicians free trade means a convoluted set of rules managed by themselves: what to tax and at which rates, whom to subsidise and at which level, whom to give permissions and whom to ban from the market. This creates the most fertile ground for corruption. When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators.

Market regulation is the opposite of genuine freedom of exchange, and that's why governments have little interest in free trade. For an efficient market no government interference is needed, it only stays in the way. Only non-intermediated trade, low transaction costs and well-respected property rights suffice to make the market rational and efficient. Any government seeks precisely the opposite.

The government intervenes in every transaction between the market actors on all levels by constantly and infinitely adding new laws and regulations which only form obstacles to bargaining and prevent efficiency, resilience and balancing of the market. In a really free market the actors can bargain freely and set transactions at the level of maximum efficiency. An actor able to reap a higher economic gain from transacted asset would have an incentive to pay another actor to get out of the way, thus balancing the market on the very low level of individual transactions, not on the level of the whole market as being hopelessly tried by governments and intergovernmental organisations.

Market is not only being distorted by regulations. Its efficiency depends on transaction costs too. When every transaction is overburdened by taxes it is not only cost-ineffective, no real balancing is possible. Taxes variation mostly correlate with the size of a corporation. The bigger the corporation the greater the tax avoidance opportunities. This pushes smaller firms out of the market and endlessly enlarges bigger corporations until they become de facto monopolies, which is what the goal of those in charge is anyway. To control the market, and thus the economy, through monopolies is much easier than regulating a swarm of independent actors. Resulting inefficiency of the market plays vastly lesser role in the game of total control. Because not the economic gain is important, but the control itself.

Property rights play the major role in functioning of the market. The majority of people respects property rights of others, barely any enforcement is needed to keep these rights intact. To the contrary, those who rule have no respect of property rights of others, neither do their stooges in the government. They are inclined to estrange others' property by force being applied through the state, government, laws and regulation. By taxing every transaction through the complicated net of myriads of small and large, direct and indirect, visible and hidden, immediate and deferred taxes, they not only discourage trade, but what's very important they take out a significant part of velocity out of the market. And, again, it's not of importance, but the control is.

If someone ever tells you there is no life without market regulation, toss the schmuck back in the kindergarten for full re-education.



Taxes

Obligatory taxation imposed upon, and being accepted by, the society is the main recipe for the misery of that society.

When one gets the monopoly to unconditionally take the fruits of your labour and your wealth in the form of tax with the aim to distribute it at own will, you may be sure that all of the taxes will be spent on keeping this monopoly and backing it by violence to prevent any attempt of questioning this monopoly. Yes, it is indeed not some but all of the taxes, as even the dribs and drubs which taxpayers get back serve the same goal - to strengthen this monopoly by making everybody dependent on it.

The state with its mammoth government, army and enforcement apparatus is swallowing the taxed labour and wealth in enormous quantities to keep itself intact and expand its power. But also the distribution of remainders of levied tax to the population at the discretion of the government is an extremely mighty tool intended to keep the structure of power. The formula is simple yet utterly effective: If one may both levy taxes and give rebates then he is in control. Therefore invention is continually exercised to furnish new pretenses for additional taxation. The amount of taxes extracted will continue growing until people owe the state, and thus those who is behind the state, everything they have or may ever potentially produce. The state will leave no stone unturned on total forfeiture of people's assets, because someone with assets is less dependent and therefore cannot be governed that simply. On the other hand a worker without assets - by definition a slave - can be controlled with ease.

Taxing and redistributing is being painted as an Utopian social justice, but in reality turns people into carefully warehoused slaves with just enough food and supplies to make them content. One is being in charge only when all others depend on his will. When everybody and everything is made dependent on those in control any opposition to the existing power becomes futile. This dependency further stimulates the abuse of power on greater and greater scale. With each dime of gathered tax the centralised control is fortified, simultaneously amplifying the power which has no bound for brutality and thirst for more robbery. This is a death spiral for the society which shall be broken before the tailspin is imminent.

In earlier days people revolted for being taxed for one tenth of what they produced. Now over nine tenth of what people produce in their lifetime is confiscated through the pervasive and entangled tax system. And not many people seem to care, which testifies the utter effectiveness of people's mind conditioning, being accomplished by throwing lots of tax money at this.

The state propaganda of every state on the planet, every political programme, every politician, all of them are doing everything to convince you that paying taxes is a civic duty and a part of the social contract. Did anyone of you ever sign this contract? No. Or even seen it? No. Can you negotiate changes to this contract? No. What if you breach this contract? There are always severe consequences. But the state changes the conditions and simply breaches this contract constantly without any consequences. Who is the swindler and instigator of chaos here? A valid contract must be presented honestly and agreed to voluntarily by the parties involved, without duress or fraud. The state is also not automatically dissolved when it fails to uphold its obligations under the social contract. The notion of social contract is dishonest and fraudulent. The social contract does not meet any standard of mutual and honest contract also because the state will initiate the use of brute force against anyone who does not enter into this compulsory contract. Therefore, the social contract cannot be considered a legitimate contract, but instead the enforced fraud.

"We pay taxes to ourselves" is another favored phrase of those raping the society; if they can sell everyone on the idea that this is the only possible arrangement the society can be based upon, the tax-donkeys will passively accept their lot in life and those at the top of the heap will have a free pass to most of the wealth and power. If you pay taxes to yourself, why is it obligatory? Why is it being enforced by the well paid and heavily weaponised internal army ready to shoot you down? Why every citizen is being treated like suspect and criminal by tax collectors? Why is not paying taxes is often treated as higher crime than homicide? Why would a judge incarcerate you for not willing to pay "to yourself"? Why not paying taxes leads to looting of your family and forfeiting of your property? Is that what helping yourself really implies? Really?

"We must pay taxes for social justice" should also excuse forcible collection of taxes. This must tacitly mean that all people are unjust in their nature, that people would not be willing to help and support each other, and shall be forced into fairness by the state. This same state which understands the fairness as putting itself and its servants above everything and everybody, which spends the most part of the collected taxes on supporting itself and its goals, and some residues on social programmes intended to corrupt the society into the total dependency and into the indisputable subordination.

This is a totally absurd situation when the overwhelming productive majority is strung-out to the indulgence of the unproductive minority re-distributing taxes, the minority willing the only thing - exert their force upon and have total control over all other people with this lever in hands. This to exercise their power on the world irrespective of how much wealth is being destroyed on the way of supporting the state structure, waging wars, subsidising moronic government programmes and mere stealing from the state treasury.

Any government programme is a pretentiously showy scam intended to fool the taxpayers into importance of the state, but comes down to ingenious destruction of the gathered taxes. The only way to ensure that resources are used in the best possible way is that an individual has to voluntarily dedicate those resources to her or his most important goals. When the resources are taken from individuals and used in a way those individuals would not have used them, then it's sure that those individuals are worse off. There are only two possibilities for the goal that is pursued with the stolen resources: 1) it is less important to the taxed individuals than what they would have done with these resources, or 2) it is something the taxed individuals would never want at all. Say it another way, if and to the extent that people wanted to help other people or the society as a whole, they would have done that on their own.

The government, via taxation, is servicing and producing something that the consumers have not already chosen to buy. If they were already producing and buying such things, no government intervention would be necessary. Whenever the government spending programme - on infrastructure or anything else - ends, you end up with workers who took the temporary “stimulus” jobs not required by the society. This instead of the robust productive jobs that would have been created by the private economy’s spending or investing the same money with a real productive output and durable employment as a result.

The indoctrination of the "death and taxes are unavoidable" dogma begins from the cradle and lasts to the grave, no appearance of doubt can be tolerated. That's one of the main reasons why governments are so eager to fully take the regulation of education in their hands. The educational programmes and state propaganda are oversaturated with this dogma. Generations are growing with the "taxes are unavoidable" imprint in their minds. Anyone daring to doubt becomes pariah in own society.

You do not need any intermediation of the state or the government to build roads or other infrastructure for the society, to set healthcare or pensions, to support and improve the education, to implement great projects bringing the Humanity ahead. This is not the government which is doing that, these are people who do. Solely voluntary contribution of your fruits of labour and wealth to sensible projects being required or desired by the society can lead to the most efficient implementation of them. Only the resulting vector of all thoughts and ideas regarding what is necessary for the society will lead to the best developments, not what is desired by a few who usurped the authority to decide for everyone else.

The mechanism to be used for projects desired by the society is simple to comprehend, nonetheless very powerful. Everyone votes for a project by providing a part of his wealth or income to it. If the project gets enough funds it can be started. If not, it is not needed. If it starts but does not perform as desired, people will stop financing it before it swallows incredibly great deal of resources, as is in the case of every single government project. This is the ultimate most efficient self-regulation of what is needed for the society or a community of people.

Same goes for public services and structures. When people see that a ferry service or a road cleaner, a school or a university, a prison or a sheriff office, a hospital or a sports complex, performs well, they will keep sponsoring it. If it does not perform well, such service or structure meets its destiny quite soon. This will bring the public service to the highest possible level, if only no monopoly is allowed here.

In general the society will economise unimaginable resources when the obligatory services inflicted by the state upon the citizenry are abolished. These resources can surely be spent in much better way on what is really needed and wished by the society.

Do not be afraid of greediness of people. Most people are not greedy. Those who are are trying to acquire all kinds of monopolies through the corrupt structure of the state and protect their peculiar rights in order to take unfair advantage over the rest of the society. These kinds are ready to pay kickbacks to the morally disadvantaged monopoly-makers who will use the power of the state to maintain these monopolies with your taxes.

The majority of normal people may exhibit signs of greed only as a reaction to the coercive expropriation of the results of their labour and wealth. But this isn't greediness, rather this is a natural, biological, human desire to hide at least something from extortion and somehow secure own future and this of the descendants. When you know that you will be robbed day in day out, you will surely try to retain what's possible. The confidence in one's future will make these signs vanish. If you know you are the master of you future, if you know your children will be too, if you are sure that the society will not anymore be destroyed in a war over and over again, you will not hoard much more than you need. This will make no sense, other values will prevail.

Normal people are competitive, but would prefer the prosperity of their society above the ill desire to control lives of others. When stopped being permanently robbed, people will be gladly giving the great deal of what they produce to what is needed for their society. For the wellbeing of the whole society is the only assurance for the future. In contrast, allowing the greedy minority to confiscate what you produce, and to accumulate the greatest portion of the society's wealth is the recipe for the destruction of this society.

Taxation is not only dangerous, it is immoral because it violates the non-aggression principle, private property inviolability, and freedom of association. There can be no legitimate duty to comply with immorality. Especially the immorality which is disguised as "the price for a civilised society".

Taxes are not "the price for a civilised society", what the rulers want everybody to believe in. Taxes are the price for failing to create a civilised society based on voluntary solutions and agreements, and the degree of taxation corresponds to the degree of failure.

Stop paying taxes, give to what you think is needed for your community and the whole society, set your direct payment systems for which you already have the technology available, expel the avid predator class as perverse intermediary. Be generous in giving, you only can win if the society wins. Honor the brave who give to those helpless. Honor those who give to help the whole Humanity to advance.

If someone ever tells you you need taxation, "kill the khan" before he puts the noose back around your neck.



Money

Money was invented as an equivalent for exchange of results of labour at the advent of specialisation. If you are good in catching fish you can catch more than you actually can eat. If your neighbour is good in making clothes of fur he can make more than he needs, and exchange this for your fish at a rate - the price - you can mutually define. If there are more specialisations and more needs for different goods, it gets more complicated and some more or less universal exchange medium is required. Money in different forms was meant as such universal equivalent. If you produce something that is needed by others, others pay you money for that. In turn you are able to spend this money to buy things others have produced. Money is The Scale for defining how much the results of your own labour are weighing in the market, in the society.

A good question is: How and by whom is The Scale being defined? This is the core question in understanding the importance of liberating labour in the society.

Imagine you are living in a tribe where you exchange goods and services directly among members of the tribe or use as money some materials and goods having intrinsic value, such as salt, eggs, iron stuffs - in short a commodity money. At a certain moment your tribal chief follows a recommendation of his economic advisor and decides to boost the entrepreneurship and the local economy by introducing a universal exchange equivalent in a form of nice pearl shells, in other words, money without intrinsic value, or fiat money – money established by a decree. For example one shell equals a kip, ten shells is a sheep, one hundred is a wigwam, etc. The total wealth of the tribe is being defined, and the according amount of shells is being excavated from the sand. The decree of the tribal chief declares that from now on all people of the tribe must exchange goods for shells and vice versa. And when the wealth of the whole tribe is growing, like when a team builds a new wigwam, thus increasing the wealth, it gets an according equivalent in shells, and may spend them exchanging for other goods they need.

There is however one small thing sneaked into the model. The sandy river bank, where this kind of shells can be extracted, is the property of that chief's economic advisor. It was agreed with the chief that the family of the economic advisor will be responsible for getting the money-shells from sand when the wealth of the tribe is growing. Nobody else may excavate shells except the river bank family of the chief's economic advisor. This is the exclusive right - the monopoly - given and being kept untouched by the chief and his army. This river bank family thus becomes responsible for the entire financial system of the tribe, by law. This family by adjusting the entire number of shells in use regulate The Scale, which in turn defines how much the results of every tribe member's labour are weighing in the tribe's market.

If the river bank family at a certain moment decides to excavate twice as many shells as there are in the turnover within the tribe and “throw them in the market”, there will be too many shells and to few goods for this shells. This means that the price of a wigwam expressed in shells doubles. The value of the wigwam for you and the rest of the tribe remains the same, but now you have to earn twice as many shells to get this wigwam. This means that the scale, according to which the results of your labour are being defined, suddenly changes – is extruded by the factor two. As if you are running a marathon (earning money), coming almost to the finish (the point where you can buy that wigwam), and someone suddenly tells you that you have to run twice that distance (earn twice as much money) to reach the finish (get that wigwam). The scale of your marathon is squeezed out without you having any influence on this decision. Because Monopoly.

Within the economy of your tribe this is that particular river bank family which defines The Scale. You do not have any say in it, as this shell-money decree is set from above by the chief and carved in stone. Any offense of it means undermining the chief's power which is being backed by violence.

The chief, in order to keep his power, needs money. The needed money is extruded from the tribe's folk in the form of tax. But if it is not enough when the army has to be enlarged to keep the tribe obedient or to overrun the neighbouring tribe, the chief needs more than he can extrude from his folk to hire mercenaries and buy arrows. He cannot just go to the river and excavate more shells, as this will undermine the trust in his own legal system. He goes to the crony river bank family which agrees to give shells in return for interest and further assurance of The Monopoly. No problem for the chief as for the repayment of the sum plus interest he can put in pledge the future income of the tribe folk for as many generations to come as needed for that. And carve in stone additional laws to further strengthen The Monopoly.

With every letter carved the owner of The Monopoly, the river bank family, gets more and more rights and affirmations of them in the legal system. At a certain moment these rights stretch to the degree allowing them to regulate not only finance, but the economy, and therewith to define who is going to become the next chief of the tribe. Commanding the economy with finance is a straight forward play: when one may issue money he defines who gets this money and who not, which enterprise shall flourish and which shall die. The one in charge can even buy enterprises with that money created free of effort, at a certain point getting total control of the economy. And of the society too, for The Monopoly on money issuance can define through the economy which part of the society may get more and which less, and which to be destroyed completely by closing the money tap.

The Monopoly on money issuance is the biggest fraudulence and the most evil thing ever invented in the history of mankind, which allowed the holders of The Monopoly to become the rulers of the world, and control all other monopolies.

The Monopoly's name is Banking.



Banking

The scheme is simple: who may issue money may therewith buy the world.

The message behind this scheme however is made complicated to make it look legitimate, solid and scientific. So far as a scam can be scientific. To make it look clever the scam was called science. The science of economy. With economists being high-ranked propaganda officers purposed to divert public attention from the pure fraud to sophisticated misguiding scholastic theories. And economic models based on them, which always fail because per design were never intended to reflect the real state of affairs.

You are not being told by these experts, neither taught at school, that banking is not only a private monopoly on creating money, it is also based on the accounting fraud, on the blatant violation of the very accounting laws installed by the government itself. When anybody else but a bank takes money from you with obligation to return it back to you, this shall be reflected as a liability in his books. When a bank takes your money as a deposit, this money becomes bank's assets in the accounting books, meaning it's not yours anymore but licitly falls under bank's possessions - the bank becomes the legal owner of your money. If, on the other hand, you borrow money or any other substance from anybody else but a bank, this lender should reflect this accounting fact as your debt to him, thus his assets. That's not the case with a bank. When you take a credit from a bank, it creates a matching money deposit on your account, it just invents and writes in its books a fictitious counter deposit that had never been paid in, never existed. The bank just creates money out of nothing which it lends out to you. No balance is drawn down to make a borrowed sum available to you, no equal reduction in the balance of another account is made to defray the borrower. While everybody else is being harshly punished by the government for any slight accounting fraud, banks are not, even not for such monstrous fraud. Banking is fraud upon fraud upon the monopoly on fraud. Because banks are exceptional, they are exempt from laws written for everybody else. Because the legal system is roguery in and of itself.

Banks, being private entities possess the lawful Monopoly to create money out of thin air. Nobody else may do the same under the threat of violence by the state. This violence is being based on the notion of fighting "counterfeiting and forgery". This very money of The Monopoly are the real counterfeiting and forgery, while people have been manipulated and forced into believing that this is the only monetary and financial system possible in this world.

You may work as hard as you ever can to earn your income, somebody else defines The Scale on which the fruits of your labour are to be weighed. This function is privatised by selected groups of private companies called banks. With the quantity of money in circulation, the banks define The Scale. As long as tuning The Scale is not in your own hands you can be fooled at wish on what the results of your labour are actually weighing in the market, in the society. The mass of the issued money shall on average grow in order for the issuers to keep skimming off the wealth produced by people. Meaning that The Scale is being constantly stretched to let you work more for less. Even the constant and hard earned increase in human productivity is not able to compensate for this roguery at some point anymore. People are being targeted by the system determined to separate them from their wealth, and thus make them slaves.

The question at the heart of the matter is: Why do some get the right to print fake fiat money out of nothing and buy your goods and services with it, whereas you have to work hard to obtain the same worthless money to be able to survive within this swindle system? Why do those who have the right to exploit the banking monopoly get to have anything they want without producing anything but fraud? And you don't? Because The Monopoly.

Even the world-old taxation, as vicious and blood sucking as it is, cannot be compared to this evil scam called banking. The bankers' game is not just simple avarice, the goal is the ownership of the world's assets and resources, and through this ownership the total control over the Humanity. Those behind this privately owned banking cabal have a far-reaching aim to create and use for their own purposes a world system of total control through financial, and thus economic, means over the whole population of this planet. The centralised banking system is a mechanism for driving everything and everybody onto debt, manipulate production and economic cycles through currencies, and ultimately, enslavement through widespread economic extortion.

When the government prays to banks, puts them above their citizenry, covers their gigantic fraud while praising them for being the stronghold of the economy, exalts them to heaven for saving the world, thus making belief in banking a new religion, you shall know who is the upper boss here on this planet.

When one gets a grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of your dire position is incredible, but there it is. You are all aiding and abetting this crime every time you buy, sell, pay or get paid with this monopoly money; every single time you use this money system. You allow and support your own exploitation and extortion. There is no imaginably justifiable reason for Humans to have any banking system, except for the reason to support The Monopoly itself.

Only the de-monopolisation of money supply can bring justice and stability to your economy which is an essential part of your life and wellbeing. To stop further enslavement of the Humanity The Monopoly on money provision shall be abandoned forever. Not regulated - regulations for monopolies are being written and supervised by other monopolies. Not given to the government or anybody else, as any monopoly will always remain monopoly and behave as such. Total dismantling and damnation is the only solution.

If someone ever tells you you cannot live without a centrally regulated money system because it's God's given, kill the khazar before he sells you out to the satan.



Debt

Debt is a necessary part of commerce, and as such is important when used in a free market to develop new products and services which people would be willing to use. But even this useful instrument is perverted within the economic system which is rigged with the monopolised, uncovered and therefore false, fiat money.

However fraudulent the fiat money is, a borrower has to repay his debt to the bank with the results of his real labour. When a loans is repaid to the bank, the matching money quantity is destroyed by the bank in its books, but not the interest on this loan. This money you pay to the bank atop of the loan remains with the bank. The bank gets something for nothing. As no coverage is needed for banks to issue debt in the form of bank credit, they can go on with this forgery forever, and keep getting something for nothing until they get everything for nothing. Banking debt is the extortion machine that takes wealth from the society and puts it into the hands of the rulers.

Governments are in the driver's seat of this machine, but do not own it. They are hired chauffeurs taking commands from those on the back seat. However due to their privileged position governments may borrow banking money indefinitely and put up existing state's assets, as well as the future assets - taxes to be paid by you - as collateral. Because the wealth to be produced by your entire generation will not be enough to repay what was borrowed, there are still future generations to put in pledge as security for this debt. How many more? The more the better, and in fact it does not matter for the government, as it became a mere operative of the banks. Banks ultimately can exist without the state and the government, they have the power to buy everything and pay for everything with their empty money, including the government itself. Governments have no influence on banking. The opposite is true - governments are tools of the bankers intended to run the enforcement of banking policies and manage the false screen of people's representativeness.

Taxation is the essential part of this extortion machine. Without taxation there would be no security for government debt to banks, and the whole fraudulent bankers' scheme would not work.

Obviously taxation is also essential for the existence of the government, as a huge part of all taxes is being spent on the government itself. The rest of taxes are being spent on "public" projects, which are the most inefficient spendings imaginable, bordering only to the outright destruction of wealth. These projects however are needed to justify the very existence of the government. To pretend they exist for the people, governments have to spend more and more, even more than they can take in taxes. They have to borrow. To this purpose the money issuers create money out of thin air and buy government's debt with this money. Governments have to pay this money plus interest back - from taxes they extort from citizens, from real wealth created by people. For their fake money bankers again get real wealth transferred to them through governments. Because the borrower is the servant of the lender, the whole system is designed to create as much debt as possible on all levels, not only on the governmental level, but down to every citizen. So much debt that it becomes impossible to repay, ever. While everything and everybody is sinking in debt, banks are buying up the world. The monopoly on creation of thin-air money allows the exploiters of this monopoly to acquire via debt the legal title on everything, and on the debt slaves themselves. They are buying not only space with everything inside of it, they also take on the time - they are picking your future with debt. When the whole space-time continuum of this planet is in their hands they will get the full title on the world.

Only the monopolised money allows for the surreal build-up of the debt in the world. The debt not made by people, but instead manufactured by banks in support of the state's efforts to keep The Monopoly. The debt which many future generations will have to pay back at gunpoint. The absurdity of the system laid upon people cannot rise higher than this: Not only have people to pay for their own suppression, they allow governments to hypothecate their children, grandchildren and who knows how many more generations, to banks. Those who own the bank monopoly are the inventors of the first time machine. Say it the time machine having this single function: to steal wealth from future generations.

This is the biggest theft, plain and simple, engineered by evil minds. This theft is unfortunately being unknowingly and unwittingly supported by people themselves, through supporting the whole system allowing such largest and unscrupulous robbery in the history of mankind.

Solely the free money system can save the world. After all, what's the alternative? "Partially" monopolised money issuance? "Slightly" monopolised? "Oligopolised"? "On permission only"? This will all be the same redressed scam with the same consequences. Don't be lulled into the cooked-up argument like this: "It just should be a well-regulated monopoly". It is already ultimately regulated, but not by your rules, by its own rules. Since the regulation function can be nothing but monopolised too, draw your conclusions. The only, and there is no other, alternative is the total de-monopolisation of money issuance.



The Solution for Money

Breaking down the tightly interwoven and each other reinforcing net of monopolies is not an easy task for the Humanity. But the sad alternative is the further acceleration of wealth and power concentration in hands of the rulers, first gradual then sudden slavery, full degradation and, inevitably, extinction of the Humanity.

Dismantling shall start with the liberation of labour and abolishing of banks' counterfeit money.

The liberation of labour means unconditional control over the results of one's labour, be it an individual or any collective of individuals freely undertaking entrepreneurial activities intended to create added value. No obligatory taxes or other form of expropriation shall be in play.

The freedom in defining the assignment for one's labour results logically entails the liberty of defining The Scale on which these results to be weighed. In other words the absolute freedom of money issuance; as opposed to the forced conversion of one's labour results into fiat currencies controlled by the few. The system must be based on the principle of totally de-monopolised money supply. Meaning that any person, whether a human, an entity, an organisation, or other association, may supply own money without any restriction whatsoever. Without Any!

Not that everybody shall and will immediately start issuing his or her own money, but everybody must at all times and under any conditions keep the right to do so. The market will decide on the credibility of each self-issued currency, and whether this currency has a chance to represent value, and thus be regarded as money. The market will exchange any money for any other at a rate being established based on credibility of the issuer, which is in turn based on 1) backing, 2) historical performance of the issuer.

Backing should not be necessarily a physical one, like precious metals, immovable property, production tools or a share in a business. This can be any other asset, like an ability to produce physical or intellectual products or services in the future. Because money is simply a promise to deliver goods or services to a bearer of this promise on his demand. Let's call it "promesse" to distinguish from other kinds of pledges.

At this moment in history of mankind no one except banks is allowed to issue a promesse payable to a bearer. Because this immediately makes such promesse real money, and destroys The Monopoly. Only a promesse bound to a name, thus not transferable and not freely exchangeable, is allowed to be issued by others not belonging to The Monopoly. Prohibiting free issuance of promesses payable to bearer is the only way to keep This Monopoly. This is the simple secret of money being hidden from people. Only promesses of banks, although having no real coverage except the promise of violence by the state, are allowed in economic circulation. All other promesses are legally forbidden in all countries of the world.

Only when anyone is allowed to issue own money, i.e. issue one's own promesse to deliver assets or labour to a bearer of such promesse, you'll get the really just and stable financial, economic and social system, with no chance of it to be abused and exploited to the benefit of a limited self-chosen group of parasites. This Monopoly gives them the ability to manipulate the system with booms and busts; unnaturally accelerate the economy by providing large corporations with lots of printed money; making crises by reducing of the money quantity in the market. Crises which are designed to shift wealth from poor to rich, as every crisis greatly enlarges the inequality gap between the richest and the rest. Liquidating the monopoly on money issuance will eliminate economic crises for good, there will be just no base for them. This will also reduce inequality to the proportions nobody would care about.

The right to issue own money does not imply any obligation to do so. Anyone, instead of issuing own money, may utilise money - tradable promesses - issued by anyone else when found more convenient or economically justified. A promesse issued by a trustful person is an asset, is money when you can freely trade it for anything else. One may use money issued for example by a well-performing collective or an individual. After all, it is just a transferable, exchangeable right to claim goods or services from some issuer.

Take an example of a car maker making nice cars. He may issue own promesses which would allow anybody having enough of these promesses at hand go to this car maker and exchange his promesses for a car. The car maker may exchange his issued promesses in the free market for other promesses, like those of the steel maker. Then go to this steel maker, put down the steel maker promesses and require steel delivery which he will use to make new cars. The steel maker supplies the paid amount of steel to the car maker and tears apart these received promesses so that they cannot be "re-used" for non-promised deliveries.

Same for a baker, a doctor, an engineer or a teacher. Somebody's money - promesses - can thus be backed by her, his, its own future labour results. This can as well be backed by existing assets or assets of third parties if this is agreed at will and in freedom. All these promesses can be freely exchanged in the market at a minimum cost.

The easiness of this system is astounding when you abstract from the rubbed-in-your-mind concept of the centralised money. You just use your own assets and abilities, write out your own promesses for that, trade them for any other assets and abilities. Than take delivery, rate it for others to know how smooth the delivery took place, and that's it. No central money has place in this simple, free and unforgeable system.

The technologies to facilitate this are already in place and only need some adapting to this market context. They allow promesses be easily created, made unforgeable, and destructible after the delivery fulfillment. The information necessary to make promesses tradable can easily be added, like description, amount, timeliness and automatic expiration time, discounts. Reliability rate of each supplier of promesses can be added for the better price discovery, this can be calculated using the history of correct deliveries in the past and the longevity. Multitude of exchanges - market places - can for a tiny fee facilitate the necessary price discovery process by trading any promesses. There will be enough buyers and sellers if marketable goods and services are demanded by the market.

This system of direct trading of decentralised currencies does not need any centralised banking system. When anybody can freely: 1) issue, 2) store and 3) trade any of these promesses in any form, the banking system becomes obsolete. Therewith the only counterfeit money - fiat currency - will seize to exist too.



Promesse as credit

Another “indispensable” feature of the banking system being put forward by its chaplains-economists is credit provision.

Simply put, credit is provision of extraneous resources to someone who needs them now in exchange for future delivery of one's resources - goods, services or assets. These extraneous resources can be provided in various forms, not only as fiat money as the economists want you to believe. These resources can come as a set of promesses from anyone in the market. This is the big secret the banks are trying to hide from people with the help of the pseudo-science called economy.

Banks issue their promesses, whereof only a very tiny fraction is backed by real assets. These are thus almost empty promises which they are not able to fulfill in full. In the event they are simultaneously asked by only one pro cent of the bearers of their promesses to deliver the real assets they would burst because they cannot deliver what they have promised. The market actors are legally obliged to use the money of The Monopoly, this obligation is being backed by the power of the state. This means that the money of The Monopoly, as empty as it only can be, is for 99% backed by the violence of the state and only for 1% by real assets. There are simply too much fiat money claiming the same assets.

When anybody is allowed to issue and trade own promesses - own money - you will get incomparably better money than the fiat money of the banks. Because most of the issuers will write their promesses backed with their own resources. And they will not be willing and able to fraud with their promesses, the market will not accept empty promises. At least not on the scale of the banking system. There might be some attempts to fraud with promesses, but they will be filtered out very quickly by the market and the issuers will be excluded from the economic process for a very long time, as they will loose any trust of the market. Because trust has a huge value in the market.

How can a freely issued promesse be used as credit? Simply:

You are going to build a bakery. For this you need resources to pay your workers and suppliers now. Your workers and suppliers want to exchange their current labour for goods and services of others. For this they need money, which is nothing else than a promise to deliver certain goods and services in a certain time period. What they need can be bread, hairdresser services or train tickets. You can issue your own promesses, which include future delivery of bread starting from some day in the future, and exchange them for any other promesses like those of a hairdresser, of a train company, and pay your workers with them. Or alternatively you may exchange your own promesses for widely acceptable promesses of a respectable car-maker and pay your workers with them. Your workers can in turn exchange the promesses of the car-maker for any other promesses they need.

Thus for the purpose of building the bakery you can accept any valuable promesses of others as credit and pay your workers and suppliers with these promesses you got as credit in exchange for your future bread. Exchanging of these promesses in a free market will not result in any significant cost, same as exchanging any information does not imply great costs to users. This will bring the cost of credit to the minimum defined by the market, which will add to the equation risks relevant to a concrete promesse issuer. The more reliable the issuer, the more valuable his promesse is, the less risk premium will be added up when exchanging his promesses.

This goes anywhere from here - from bakery to a hospital, to a shipyard, to a continental road net, to a satellite constellation, to a deep space expedition. This system is able to provide credit and facilitate any developments, whatever investment may be needed. No limitation besides the will of people to invest results of their labour or their assets.

The free money issuance will have the maximum possible flexibility in credit provision. This will provide an optimum credit allocation. This will tolerate only a very little level of unfounded liabilities. This will not be prone to wealth destruction by financial crises. This will not allow inflationary and deflationary manipulation; in fact even these terms will have no meaning at all, as they can only be applied to one currency. The core is that no substantial concentration of wealth can take place within such free system. All these will lead to an optimum level of economic activity. Optimum, but not the highest, as one can temporary artificially induce a very high level of economic activity at any particular place for a limited period of time, by manipulating the currency and misallocating resources. But this always leads to bursting of bubbles and to other unintended bad consequences.

Thus the banking system, The Monopoly on money, is undesired and obsolete as credit provider too. It is harmful as it may decide at own discretion who gets credit and who not, thus able to ruin businesses or create monopolies in any economic sector. It can create bubbles in the market by pumping money in it and taking huge profits on the way up, or let the market implode by closing the tap, and again take huge profits on that too.

If someone ever tells you you need special entities for doing special work - providing credit for the development of the society, "kill the rascal" before he steals your economic freedom again.



Property

Property ownership is essential to a non-coercive social structure. But it stays in the way of total control. Possession of something allows for a degree of freedom, as one can use or trade his possession for other values like freedoms. Someone who does not have anything in his possession is totally dependent on others and has no freedom at all. Therefore an exaction mechanism allowing to squeeze possessions of the majority and place them in hands of a few is the ultimate tool in the game of total control. This tool is the state.

A generalised and well-defended by state theorists argument in favour of the state is that the state is unavoidable in order to guarantee the security of property, and may use violence to defend property rights. In reality the state is instituted for the defence of the rulers against the citizenry. It may sequestrate citizens' property at once any time. And it gradually confiscates citizens' property by permanently taxing their property at will. It has, through its legal system the sole right to decide about which property may belong to whom. That interference by the state over the centuries in property ownership has had dire consequences for justice, as well as for economic productivity. Both were not of a great concern for those willing to own the world, but the perfected control mechanism, that the state has finally become, definitely was.

In fact no state is needed to administer and defend property rights. No violence needed to do that. Reasonableness and respect for the property of others would more than suffice. Unreasonable and ungrounded claims on other's property will not be supported and shall be defended against by the society, and by the community around the owner. A rational arbitrage by reasonable people can resolve any adequate claims on a disputed ownership. Inadequate claims can be just ignored and regarded as offence against the owner.

What may and may not be a subject of ownership in a free society?

The most important property a human owns is life. No one may lay claims on humans life. However every state regards it's citizens' lives as its undisputed property, which can be taken away by the state in a war or because the legal system of the state decides so. A murderer, however dangerous he may be, can take one or several lives. The state can take that many millions as those who are behind the state would wish to. What can be more wicked than this?

Same with the products of life humans produce. A thief can take a piece of your property, while you are able to eventually defend yourself from such act. The state can take whatever it wants to, claim not only what you have now, but for many years ahead. Even for generation ahead. While you may even not defend yourself from this offence. Who is the bigger disaster for the society?

Humans own what they produce and shall be able to freely control the distribution of the fruits of their own labour. These fruits shall be traded in free exchange with other individuals or groups, or freely transferred to others without any restrictions. Simple as it can be.

States, or in fact those behind them, oppose this natural right, meddle not only in every product trade transaction among individuals and their groups, they put claim on the most sacred thing - on human lives. The state can do with your property, including your life, whatever it wants using the laws it produces and the governmental enforcement apparatus it owns. There is no individual property as long as the state exists, people only get some temporary conditional rights on their lives and their property until the state decides otherwise. The very limited property rights are being taken away by the state either at once as a whole or continuously in the form of taxes.

Taxpayers are being told that the state's property is theirs too. This is ridiculous lie. People neither can consume, alter, share, rent, sell, exchange or give the property of the state away, nor may they destroy it. Thus it is not theirs. It is formally not the rulers' property either, but by controlling the governments the rulers may make use of the state's property at will, misuse it for their own goals in the way they like, what the rest of people may not do. In such setup being in control of the state's property is sufficient to own the entire society.

There shall not and can not be public property. Shall not because the reality of the public property is that it in no way belongs to public, instead there are few who manage it mainly to their own interests. Can not because there is no such thing as common life, but individual lives. All property therefore must be individual property. Only in this case it has no chance to be misused to gain massive control over other people.

There should be no rights of the state on any ground, as there should be no states. There should be total respect for the ownership of a ground plot for housing in private possession of an individual or a family, although finally this will loose it's importance. People will not need large chunks of ground, a reasonable amount will suffice for any family. There is enough territory on the planet to use for housing, only nobody is allowed by the state to just pick any plot to build a home. There is no spot free on the whole planet, the whole surface and the bowels of the Earth are divided among the states and are being regularly fought for. For this reason too, no state will mean no wars. Those who control the government control the everything on and beneath the surface of the state and use it for their own benefit and to bargain it to their closest cronies. People never ever have any word on this; those who object to this set up are being taken care of with the full legislative might of the state.

When people will be able to take a fair amount of soil for their housing and business anywhere on the surface of the planet they will spread more equally around the globe without staying in the way of each other and will not have to spend a large part of their income on housing. The problem of affordable housing is the monopoly of the state on land and the harsh push of the state towards urbanisation. The mechanics behind the urbanisation in modern times is complex but rather transparent: the government needs concentration for the sake of easier control over the populace and its economic activity. It grants limited ownership rights to use soil in and around the cities, forces the prices up and profits enormously of it. As the government is not for people and by people, people do not have any benefit of this concentration, quite to the contrary. With de-urbanisation lots of economic means that will come free will allow to build an extremely efficient and clean transportation and logistic system throughout the globe, which will in turn make the ecologically and socially harmful urban concentration obsolete, needless for the economic activity, for education, for leisure, shopping or any other human interaction.

Of course not everything can be subject  to ownership. For example, no one, except for mentally disordered, would claim the ownership of the world. Or the natural forces. Or consciousness. Or a thought.

Thoughts cannot be owned, thus there is no such thing as intellectual property. No monopoly on any intellectual property shall ever be allowed. In its stead, all esteem to be given to the inventor or the author. There is no one intellect or even any collective of intellects which is capable of producing any invention on its own from zero knowledge. No invention would ever be possible without making use of the civilization-wide knowledge gathered during the whole existence of that civilization. Any invention is just a grain of sand on the top of the common human knowledge mountain. Any monopoly on intellectual property is a curse on progress, it stifles creativity, it chokes competition, it hinders quality control by buyers, it increases the cost of production and discourages innovation. Real inventors find the greatest satisfaction in an invention itself and expectations of progress it will cause, and much less in a material remuneration from it. No doubt there shall be production, marketing, trade secrets benefiting economic actors, but that's not the same as protecting the intellectual property with the power of the state. As soon as any invention gets protection it starts preventing any further innovation around the idea. To the contrary, any invention set open quickly spurs new developments around it, thereby benefiting not only the society but the inventor himself as he can tap on free co-thinking of many other smart brains, and can compete with others by utilising his leg-up in knowledge and preparations. Nowadays even the ideas, knowledge and technology set open by their authors for usage to the whole world is vulnerable for all kinds of prohibitions resulting from the claims by the so called intellectual property owners. The system of defending intellectual property has one of the goals to control the development of knowledge, innovation and technology by the state. This is easy to realise by looking at the large corporations which hold the most of the intellectual property on the planet. Their rights on it and their monopoly on making of the most vital for the society products are defended with the full power of the state.

In order to base your economy on public accountability and responsibility of the actors, any economic activity shall be based on individual property rights. Any collective or cooperate property shall be a sum of individual properties, whatever purpose and whatever the number of individuals. Individuals may gather their properties and efforts for the purpose of production, education, self-defense or any other collective project implementation. They shall proportionally to their effort be in command and entitled to the results they produce. And have pro rata liability in any endeavour they are involved in. They have to carry according risks with their own reputation and other assets. Every participation and every investment in a productive collective shall be traceable directly to an individual. This will allow for full transparency of production means ownership, will work as self-regulatory system against unfair usage of the common resources, and thus unfair amassing of wealth. And what's most important will keep producers accountable, contrary to the legally limited liability of corporations allowing them unlimitedly messing up with with everything from the environment to human lives, as their backing is unlimited too.

Humans shall unite their productive efforts where needed in collectives, associations of responsible and accountable creators, where the reputation of a collective depends on the reputation of every human participant, and vice versa. No faceless corporations which can be easily put under control by those in power with manipulation of rules and laws, money and credit, with bribery and with tribalism, or just bought out with the easily created monopoly money.

The money of the collective - promesses - can be backed by the future productive output of it, or by its collective assets, as well as by individual promesses and assets of the participants. This is based on the very simple principle: any promise to redeem is only as good as the solvency and character of those making the promise, or issuing own money - promesses. This is how sound money for the stable and not prone to manipulation economy will work.

Humans own their lives and their assets, but this ownership is a fiction if people are not able to defend them.



Defence

Throughout the history the overwhelming majority of murders are committed by the state, and in its name. To get rid of the chief slayer you have to first deprive it from your support.

Humans shall be able and capable to defend their property, including the most important property - Life. With any means available. Counteracting this, installing any monopoly on defence and on arms, is malfeasance against human life. Take any arms you need to defend yourself, your family, your community. Hold them as long as there is still violence on this planet instigated by sick minds wanting to keep you in obedience, violence provoked by parasites wanting you to feed them for free, by racketeers wanting to get what is not theirs.

Any army and any law enforcement cohort is a property of the state, thus not of the citizens. Those who control the state command the armed forces which are intended to defend the state from an outside aggression and from own citizens. In any conflict, whether with an outside party or internal, not a life or a property of a citizen is of importance, but the property and integrity of the state, and equally the existing order which keeps the state whole. Protecting the lives of citizens is a secondary, tertiary or even lesser priority intended only to "sell" the armed forces support to the citizenry. People pay for armed forces which are not theirs, which protect something else having nothing to do with peoples' property, lives. On any account, for the state loss of lives is casualty which is not important as such, rather only statistically, for there shall still be sufficient number of serfs to pay taxes and defend the state, or more exactly, protect the gang behind this pernicious structure.

When there are no states no wars will be fought. There will be no need of armies, rather local self-defence units will suffice to protect their communities from eventual local crime. The state, the government does not and cannot protect the citizenry from crimes anyway. Post factum establishing of a fact of a robbery or a murder is not protection. Hunting and prosecuting of criminals is not protection but a public punishment intended only to show who is in power. Only people who possess self-defence means can protect themselves, their families and fellow men from criminal offence. Even idle possession of self-defence weapons discourages offensive acts. When a potential criminal knows that any offence can be directly and evenly or overly counteracted, a trade off in favour of committing a crime will be much more difficult to make, especially if he knows that he will be hunted down in any community around the globe and no state border, no suzerain will protect him. This is the only effective deterrent to crime and aggression, not an armed employee of the state always far away from the crime scene.

A community can have its own defensive units and let them cooperate with any neighbouring or distant one. But in order to avoid the imminence of abuse of any armed force it should be directly controlled by the people it is intended to defend. Therefore the community shall maintain or disband its own sheriff team at will, stop support it materially and let another one be formed if the acting one is not regarded as adequate anymore.

As long as the monopoly on the use of violence persists people can not be safe. Abandoning this monopoly is the only way to avoid wars, uproot violence and bring criminality to naught.



Law and Justice

It has never been different - only crimes committed on a small scale were punished, never the large crimes. All legal systems are installed to allow full control over and systematic plunder of whole nations by big players while totally protecting and idolising them.

As laws are put in place for the masses, not for the rulers, there is no such thing as equality before law. Laws are needed to keep masses obedient. The rulers get away with the highest possible crimes - the crimes against humanity, mass murders in wars, genocide, abuse of children, seizure of wealth, imposing their will on people, manipulating people's minds and controlling their lives. Laws are not applicable to them, or they create laws to justify their own crimes. Whilst for normal people the main principal of justice "innocent until proven guilty" is gone long time ago without any hope of returning, as this is impeding the control of the rulers over the legislative system. Full control it is.

The laws are not more than a collection of opinions being written down by politicians - the sociopaths who have managed to either win popularity contests or murder their competitors - and enforced at gunpoint by thugs in arms. These laws are painted as necessary and proper, rather than inherently illogical and immoral. Also implied is that the law is somehow immutable, which is plainly false because the sociopaths-lawmakers both frequently alter the laws and routinely disregard the laws they make for everyone else.

When you do not act as being firmly prescribed by legislators it's fraud and it's crime for which you will be punished. When legislators write out new rules or change the existing rules on the go as they wish - it's regulation. Depending on a current agenda of the rulers any law can be changed on a whim. New laws may be adopted disregarding a higher moral absolute, a distinction between right and wrong, good and evil. Criminals can be lionised while casualties altered into convicts. Perpetrators can be victimised while victims given blame. If you resist to any attribute of the power structure, your resistance and yourself are instantly criminalised. Even protests, which are already subject to authorisation by the government, are being routinely prohibited and punished, gradually restricted by all kinds of new rules or just outlawed.

Recognise this: The rulers have the power to make anything they want legal; and make illegal anything you have done, do now, or will be doing.

Every legal system was set up, advocated and guarded by those who wish to freely perpetrate their own crimes against society, and to stay out of prosecution for any atrocity they commit. In other words, the law has placed the collective force at the disposal of the unscrupulous who wish, without risk, to exploit the person, liberty and property of others. It has converted plunder into a universal right in order to protect plunderer, and turned defence against the plunderer into a crime.

A legal system set by a government will never rule substantially against the government's and state's interests and their servants, no matter how blatant the violation was. The legal system is merely another instrument in the hands of the rulers to manipulate the society. Laws and regulations allow governments to reward cronies and extort and terrorise the unfavoured, within the state and outside of it.

Each legal system is being deliberately made more and more complicated, so that it is virtually impossible for people not to violate laws. Laws and regulations are contradicting, unreadable, produced in gargantuan quantities to make them all but comprehensible. Amidst all of these laws there are laws the state does not profit off. The state just wants everyone of you walking around questioning if every step you make is legal, like you have to ask permission to exist. This helps to keep the crowd restrained and unquestioningly supporting the preservation and maintenance of the existing polity. The whole legal system is constructed in such a way that it must defend itself, the state, the government, and ultimately the rulers. Every law boils down to this one thing - defending the net of monopolies and the ultimate monopoly on power at any cost. These costs to be paid by the subdued folks, obviously.

What is left to people is begging for a bit more "rights" - right to food, right to housing, right to speak, right to education, right to healthcare, etc. These are not rights but the rations of slavery. People are being born with all rights necessary to live fortunate and productive lives. That's not what they have to beg for. Rights aren't rights if someone hands them out and can take them away. They are temporarily granted permissions, which can be revoked any time. Pleading for rights at the shut door of the legal system is beneath the human dignity.

Life, liberty and property do not exist because there are laws, rather they exist in despite of laws which are intended to consolidate power and overall control over them. Any legal system is therefore antagonistic to life, liberty and property, and will eventually take them over if not eliminated.

The perverted legal system gets more and more perverse in an attempt to fortify itself. To prevent your outrage, your freedoms are being taken gradually, while you have no time and possibility to watch the process. Or they are being taken suddenly by exploiting artificially created severe circumstances, giving you no time to protest. Or by inventing an enemy justifying tightening of laws. Or by exploiting false memes of planetary changes. Or else. Everything is being utilised and anything will go. Your legislators dilute your already harshly cramped liberties at every possible turn, and will keep doing that until your dependence on the state grows beyond the sky. While you have no control over the dynamics of this process. The last control feature you have is the stop button. Stop this madness.

Laws shall be moral laws, not ever complicating and innumerable procedures being set in stone, and crimping your freedoms more and more with every new letter carved. Any "legal system" de facto supports the rights inequality and is therefore unmoral and thus illegal, as there can be no reasonable obligation to obey immorality.

Humans are being born with moral grounds deep in them. People do not need legal systems, moral grounds suffice for building a just and stable society. These moral grounds were known by the Humanity long time before legal systems and religions have described them in their own distorted way to serve those in power.

Adhere to these moral grounds and you will never need a legal system, that only misrepresents the morality and turns over upon people..

Live and let others live - do not kill or injure other people.
Respect human freedom, inner life and ideas.
Respect human doing as long as it does not harm other lives.
Respect others' labour and property, do not steal the fruits of others' labour, do not damage others' property.
Treat others as you would have them treat you, which is the universal law of reciprocity.

Which of these moral grounds are not perverted by any legal system allowing unrestricted power projection, killing, waging wars, expropriation of wealth, exploitation, limitation of freedoms, intervening in people's lives, thought control? Perverted in the name of people.

The simpler the rules the less enforcement they require. But the bigger the enforcement apparatus the more and bigger crimes are made possible and being provoked. Because the law enforcement apparatus is not under peoples control and therefore is corruptible not only by the state it serves, but virtually by anybody wanting to corrupt it - pay to play as it goes. As the laws are made to protect the state, the law enforcement apparatus serves exact the same purpose, not the purpose of defending the citizenry. It is controlled by the state, while the state is not controlled by the citizenry.

The whole corrupt and biased legal system can be replaced with one simple principle: As long as a person does not step over the moral grounds, is not directly impeding the life and liberty of another person, he or she shall be left alone.

You will have to take justice in own hands, but you must remain fair-minded in this.

Settle civilian disputes through arbitrage by wise women and men. Respect your opponents and their stand points. Respect the decisions of arbiters or barge into reputation damage. Your reputation shall be worth more than any bargain you may get out of any dispute.

Adjudge and convict a felony in accordance with your moral grounds and severeness of the damage to a victim or to the society. Choose uninvolved, most honest and wise among you as one time judge for a committed crime; do not accept professional judges, as the place finally corrupts or makes one vulnerable to blackmailing. Equally choose uninvolved, most honest and wise among you as one time advocate of a suspect; you will not need lawyers to maneuver through the legal system any more, as a normal human can comprehend the simple and straight moral grounds and act accordingly as an ethical defender. This is one of the rare circumstances when you will need a local election - to choose one-off unbiased judge and an advocate. You have oversight of a local community to make this kind of election non-forged.

No monopoly on law and justice shall be allowed. All else is a snake oil sold by the unscrupulous to the ignorant. If someone ever wants to lay a centraised law and justice system upon you, "kill the barbarian" before he throws you back in dark ages.



Natural resources

This planet is the home of the Humanity. The Humanity is comprised of humans, thus every human is the equal proprietor of this home. All humans born on this planet have equal rights to all resources on the planet. That's not how the self-chosen rulers see it. They want the Earth plus five pro cent. The one who controls resources controls the economy. The one who controls the economy controls people's lives. Many wars were fought over resources for the simple reason that they aid extension of power. When one group sits on resources, another group may want them for free. War over resources is displacing one monopolist with another, while scarcity remains for the rest of the Humanity. People have to unite in their action globally against those who corner the world's resources and block human progress.

It is not only outright violence which stands in the way of fair use of resources, it is also impaired by regulation, which is in fact violence too. In the name of an arbitrary hoax like environmental protection, climate change, economising of natural resources, etc., the majority of the Humanity is being estranged from these very resources. The historical ways of using them are on greater and greater scale being outlawed by governments, and are readily given in hands of supranational organisations - monopolies which facilitate further centralisation of control. Under the false pretext of the management of natural resources "on behalf of all" the rest of people is disallowed to use the planet's resources, which effectively keeps people from farming, fishing, mining or otherwise harvesting the innate supplies provided to all of them by the planet, and makes them totally dependent on those who control these resources. This does not concern only carbons and other mineral resources, but also land, mountains, oceans, fresh water, air.

This tightening centralisation, whether by war or by law, gives control of all natural resources to the few in power. They determine who gets monopolistic access to these resources, and for what in return. The society does not get anything positive in return, as what the monopoly does best is privatizing profits for a few, and distributing losses on the rest of the society.

No monopoly may be allowed on any natural resources of the planet if humans want to become and stay free. Recognising and accepting the principle of equal rights of all humans on all resources on the planet will help to set up a fair usage system and prevent fighting over resources.

Everyone shall be allowed to use planet's resources in a transparent and fair manner. If anyone is trying to use a resource in an opaque manner or unfairly, he and his product can be easily boycotted by people, thus will have no profit of his unfair or muddy activity. This will be perfectly self-regulating. Only monopolies which are installed and backed by the state can allow themselves endless depredation of resources and ravaging of the environment. Non-monopolistic actors will not be able to do that on any meaningful scale or during any meaningful period of time. Because there will be no support for malign activities.

The often used economic theory of a situation within a shared-resource system, where individual users acting independently according to their own self-interest behave contrary to the common good of all users by depleting or spoiling that resource, is a lie. Based on the fault presumptions and falsified evidence it was invented by those same experts who were called to justify yet increasing control of the government over every aspect related to the human society - from resources to population control, from residential to medical control, from education to behavioral and thought control, and everything else and a much more. In a free society there is no such thing as purely individually rational economic decision which leads to depletion or distraction of common resources. Simply because in such society human values or ideas of morality are different from those in an oppressed society. To the contrary, in the oppressed society all actors are motivated to maximise use of the resource, to squeeze it before their access to it is taken away. In the free society prudent users of shared resources have a natural incentive to voluntarily cooperate in self-regulation. Instead of behaving in line with perverted incentives, people are incentivised to cooperate to the good of the society, because everybody is incommensurably better off when the society gets better even slightly. If you look at all people as contributors, rather than dumb consumers, as the state wants you to be, the potential for the society is unlimited.

Also people tend to take less from the common pool in open public situations than in anonymous private situations like those provided by monopolistic rights. Moreover, in public situations those who harvest less from the common pool gain greater prestige and influence within the society. Whatever the grade of self-interest, individuals always find ways to cooperate, because collective restraint serves both the collective and individual interests. Any centralised power purposefully distorts and destroys these natural relations between people.

In the same vein as shared resource "problem" the concept of "too few resource for too many people" was introduced and misused, while being disguised as a scientific fact. This is a totally flawed notion used to only justify monopolies. Do not believe in the myth of overpopulation, which usefulness is only in more control over people. This planet can offer place for vast greater population. There is enough land, enough water, enough oxygen and other means of subsistence for many more people. A larger population means not only more mouths to feed, but also more hands to do producing, more heads to make this producing smarter and cost and resources efficient. As populations increase, so does the variety of skills available to make production more efficient. More people means everybody can specialise in a more specific and productive comparative advantage and participate in division of labour. Specialisation in itself means substantial increase in productivity and efficiency in natural resources usage. Your planet's human carrying capacity is based on the capabilities of your social system and technologies, not that much on environmental limits.

On the other hand the more liberated and educated people become, the freer are they in making their choices for a number of their offspring. The quality of the offspring will go above the quantity. The latter was solely dictated by the ancient anxiety to loose the genetic progeny line. In the absence of wars and fear of starvation, with bright perspectives for every born child, the population will stabilise on the sustainable level without any interference of the central planners. When the natural resources are not wasted on wars, on arms race, on the giant state apparatus intended to subdue and keep the population tamed, on making the lives of a very few opulent and the rest of lives miserable, there will be abundance of resources to all.

New resources discovery can be done with some private investments, or alternatively with a micro-funding from a significantly larger crowd. In neither case shall there be any monopoly allowed on the discovered resources, but the first mover advantage will provide the discoverer with necessary profit accumulation before competition takes up. This will help to quickly adjust prices and keep them down at the minimum level. But will not allow to form cartels or other mutual price-fixing.

Without monopoly any attempt to accumulate a natural resource in order to influence its market price will be futile. It is physically impossible for anyone or any collective to accumulate any substantial part of the resource unless acting as a monopoly backed by violence. Therefore everybody must be allowed to win resources and bring them to the market.

This latter is specially easy to realise for energy related natural resources extractable from the body of the planet. The more extractors the lower prices. This will however not lead to an essential growth of consumption of the resource. A civilization at any development stage cannot consume more than a certain amount of resources needed for its development and for support of the population. This unless its native development is obstructed by wars and other artificial crises, unless the wealth and infrastructure are being periodically destroyed. These induced interruptions are among the main factors causing overwhelming overconsumption of the energy-related natural resources on the planetary level.

It is less straightforward with the non-energy related natural resources like air, water, wood, fish, etc. However, when people have enough to eat, can afford a good shelter, have confidence in tomorrow and in the future of their children, rather than only working hard to survive and see the biggest chunk of their income disappearing in governments' pockets, they will start paying attention to different things, like their environment, sustainability of the development and what they shall pass to next generations. They will refuse products undermining the environment and the resources pool. This will be the best and the most efficient regulation of the resources usage. You cannot leave this care to the government. Governments only declare they take care of this in order to please the population, but they have other interests. They are always ready, and constantly do, trade this care for other benefits like more economic privileges and ultimately more power, which logically never leads to achieving the proclaimed environmental goals.

In principle, Humanity's existence can be sustained at much lesser energy spending levels and costs to the environment. But only when there is no pervasive pressure of the state on the society to consume, and produce, at ever increasing pace in order to generate more and more taxes and to keep the state alive, to roll over government's debt and to enrich a few on the way. Consumerism will give ground to prudence.

Still, whatever care you take of the depletable resources they are finite. On the upside, in a free society scarce and diminishing resources will trigger the development of alternatives much earlier than in a centrally governed society. If not intermediated by any centralised power, for which defending monopolies on the resources is much more important than caring for the environment and the planet, private initiative will do the job of developing alternatives earlier and efficiently, thus avoiding crises fastened to sudden ends of resources.

Eventually any resource dependency boils down to energy dependency. When you have enough energy you may produce or restore other resources like water, oxygen, minerals, etc. If there is enough energy you can counteract pollution. Though it is more complicated, as a lower entropy energy shall be retrieved and higher entropy energy to be dispersed out of the ecosystem, this does not diminish the fact that humans ultimately depend on energy sources.

Because the planet itself is not infinite, reducing the dependence on underground depletable energy resources is of importance for the civilization. But as long as the society is under the oppress of the central power with its own agenda, there is little chance to really reduce this dependency. You are close to finding sources of energy which will make everybody energy-independent. This however is being acutely prevented by regulating the research on energy, funneling the tax money to the old monopolies to let them profit from that and prevent discovery of really disruptive alternative energy sources. But not only the defence of vested interests is preventing this. The fact is that no great achievement can be commanded - only a free society can produce real breakthroughs, they come through free thinking. Free thinking on all aspects of being, not limited by any prescribed world view, ideology or propaganda of any sort.

If someone ever tells you that common resources shall be regulated by a monopoly, be it a government or anything else, unmask the predator before he steals these resources from you.



Excursus on Entropy

What the rulers are trying to do is to set up and keep a predefined order to be commanded by them, contrary to the chaos they think the Humanity is in, and will be even more, without their guidance. They falsely argue that order is needed to save the Earth. This contradicts even the elementary physics.

Forcing the Humanity into some predetermined order will mean many nasty things. According to the laws of thermodynamics imposing order in a smaller subsystem implies reduction of entropy within this subsystem, which in turn unequally increases entropy of the surrounding system, in this case of the planet itself.

Imposing uniform thinking and doing on a uniform human takes a huge effort in lowering entropy of the society, this takes lots of energy available on this planet. Think of re-arrangement of everything from education to construction, from energy delivery to industry, from food to transportation, from healthcare to housing. This is already taking place, but shall do so on an even greater scale to impose and enforce the world order.

Also forcefully lowering the diversity of people is the way to decrease entropy in the sub-system of the society while imposing the order on it. The less diverse people are in all aspects, from race, to culture, to education, to experience, to their view of the world, the uniformer the society is, the lower entropy of the society shall become. Equally, the more homogeneous the race is, the easier it is controlled.

There are many other ways to force the order within the society, thus lowering its entropy as a sub-system. Like discouraging and outlawing rural living, thus forcing urbanisation; obligating usage of centralised energy, water and food supply; and of course dependence on one integrated financial system with one point of control.

Lowering entropy within the society means incommensurable increase in entropy within the available environment - in the ecosphere of this planet. This shall, by the nature of things, lead to the environmental disaster at some point, whichever kind of order is inflicted. That's the same as attempting to push further and further cooling of a refrigerator which inevitably results in a disproportional increase in temperature in the room where the refrigerator runs.

The only way to slow down the rise of entropy in the surrounding environment while imposing the universal order, and the rulers know it very well, is the radical reduction of the population of the planet - by war, by epidemic decease, by eugenics, by birth control, by simulated extraterrestrial invasion, or by any other means or combination of them. A smaller amount of servants is easier to control too. Furthering the centralisation of power shall lead to the artificial extermination of a big part of the population.

This planet can house way more people if they are only left alone. Only in this case, when no order is being imposed with the aim to control the Humanity, will the rise of entropy in the closed ecosystem of the planet be much slower, and will allow humans to adapt to this, discover and implement breakthrough concepts allowing to release excess of entropy out of their habitat.

The superimposed order will lead not only to the huge humanitarian, but also to the overwhelming environmental collapse.



Environment

Environment is a common resource. Environment supports life. Or can make life very difficult, or even impossible.

It's natural for people to take care of their collective environment. That's prodigious to put the interests and wealth of the small group above well-being, health and lives of the majority of the population, and that's exactly what the state facilitates.

Governments sell monopolistic rights to exploit the environment and natural resources. They consistently and routinely approve projects which are financially and otherwise convenient for special interest groups at the expense of the common resource - the environment. When the government sells out your environment, do you really expect it will act harsh against these monopolies it creates? When a large corporation gets a license from the government to pollute and to destroy the environment, you may not expect the government to prevent this pollution and destruction in real. The government only pretends to care of the environment, but it does not stop wrong-doing which was in the first instance blessed by the state itself. What governments do instead is the theater made for you, the theater to please the taxpayer. The price of tickets is however way too high for such a malignant show. The price you the people have to redeem with their health, lives, labour, liberty and future - these things are being ransomed by the government into oblivion without providing much in return. What you get is just brightly painted decoration of governmental environment saving efforts, while the circus of pollution and destruction keeps going on and on. And the worsening environmental conditions in turn give the governments excuse to tax you even more.

This is a deadlock people were put in. When there is a monopoly on polluting while winning natural resources or producing vital products, people have no choice but accept what the monopoly is doing, however bad it is. Not accepting monopolistic misconduct means no supplies, no delivery for you. When there is no monopoly, people will be free to accept or not accept products which are paired to the environmental damage. Just because people do really care of their environment they will always cautiously choose a proper supplier. Those suppliers who behave bad or pollute hard will be out of business soonest. Those who try to spare environment will last. This will lead to the most efficient, careful and clean resource winning and usage of the environment.

That's what governments will never do, but people themselves shall: prevent environmental degradation and disasters. For this there is no other way but to break down the monopoly of the state on the environment and on the resources.



Science and research

The best witness to the greed of the rulers can be found in the history of research funding. The archons of ancient times were not interested in science and never minded research - the basics of math and other sciences were developed by the individuals of outstanding merit on their own. When science has shown it was the driver behind new technologies which could help to reach out to other places to plunder, or produce new weapons for the rulers to expand and strengthen their might, only then were they inclined to pour the wealth of the society in science and research, and only for their villain purposes. More than ever, now huge resources are being spent on the research aiding to produce even more powerful weapons. The Humanity is fated to end badly with the hellkite minds on the top directing the science to mainly produce weapons, which become so "intelligent" that they are capable of on their own to implement their mission - kill and destruct. Nothing progressed in the mentality of those who are trying to rule the world: destruction means intelligence, death of people means collateral damage, looting means helping the society, suppression means order.

What remains of the state's "science budget" after weapons is spent on meaningless research intended to proof standpoints, doctrines and dogmas of the rulers. In other words, facilitates the brainwashing of the masses. These same masses, being deprived from the bulk of their labour results, cannot even think of science as something being theirs and for them, because they cannot afford to support their own science.

Not only the state itself, industrial monopolies are allowed to do their own destructive science too. If it is in the interest of the state, money is poured in them via state subsidies and via banks. This further strengthens them and destructs any other business which is not part of the net of these industrial monopolies.

The science and innovation on the financial needle of the state is a manufacture of the devil producing artifacts shiny outside and heavily vicious inside. Artifacts intended to keep people blindfold, obedient and physically and mentally unable to question the system. Artifacts that destruct minds and kill lives.

Even when a private initiative brings up a valuable innovation, this innovation can be bought out through existing monopolies, if needed with the help of freshly printed money - fiat credit. This allows to totally control the direction and the scope of innovation. Those innovations which "have purpose" for the state flourish. Those "having no purpose" or uncontrollable by the state are destined to die by manipulating the money supply to them.

Yet, without science, without new research being done, without innovation based on private initiative there is no development of the society. This must be independent from the state or any other monopoly. People shall themselves decide what research to support, what science to help on the way, which innovation to embrace. Only this independence will give the true resulting development vector reflecting the real needs of the society. Only the independent financing by people will allow the results of science and innovation to be used by everybody and not only by the state and those who are being aided by the state with your taxes.

If people had freedom to decide, science supported by them directly could not only resolve the most problems of the society and of the environment, but could help to prevent them in the first instance, thus sparing the Humanity tremendous amounts of wealth and labour, and preventing it from landing on the brink of destruction.

Spend your freed income on science and innovation, the more the better, that much as you can after fulfilling your needs and those of your family and the community. You will have more than enough means for that when you stop supporting plundering of the results of your labour and wealth by the state and other monopolised structures. Research pays back, often very quickly, and in a mid-term to longer run has the best return on investment for the whole society. This is the most fertile investment people can do.



Liberated education

The less educated people are, the more likely are they to be brainwashed and shaped to the needs of the rulers. That's why education is now fully controlled by the state - to keep it in a predefined frame. Cultivation of the obedient crowd is what the state is aiming for. The ever swelling regulation and its enforcement actually take away the rights of families to educate their children, and provides the centralised agenda for education - brainwashing - for all.

Education on all levels is being firmly kept under the total control of the state everywhere. A big chunk of each government apparatus - the ministry of education - is the tool specially dedicated to this control. Programs are written by the state for all phases of education from kindergarten to university. No step aside from these programmes is tolerated. This helps to feed anything to learners to make them servants of the state sacredly believing in it. And to hide any knowledge that may endanger the powers that be - from the evil grounds of the state itself to the democracy and elections scam, from the monetary system fraud to the cripple economics of the state-regulated trade, from factual allocation of spendings to the overt and covert support of numerous monopolies with tax money.

By the time a child goes through the public education system, he or she has no thoughts of his or her own. By the time that person finishes higher education, the system has sealed the thought process so that nothing is being questioned. The imperative to enquire beyond what comes from educational programmes and propaganda is gone by then. The individuality is completely excised and the person is transferred into the state organism and group thought. Any deviation from the prescribed thought is met with hostility not only by the state but by fellow men from the direct environment too.

Still, without education there is no production, no economy, no functioning society. Education is of paramount importance for the development of every human and the society as a whole. But the state-regulated education is a tight blindfold on the eyes of people which is intended to hide the real juncture of affairs, and to guide masses where needed - be it slave work or war slaughter.

The Humanity desperately needs a decentralised, individualised and far more productive system of education. It needs education liberated from the tentacles of the state or any other possible monopoly. People must have choice in supporting whatever school they believe provides genuine, decent and effective education. They do not need to beg for education at the door of the state. The triumphed "right to education", as any other right people eventually have to fight for, is a hoax. Everybody has the right and the duty of education from the beginning of the life. This right is just being permanently confiscated by the state in order to distribute it in dribs and drabs to the citizenry in the form beneficial to the order set by the rulers.

Youth is your future. Teach them critical thinking, not obedience. Teach them respect for creative thoughts and ideas of others. Teach them courage, not grovel. Teach them be creator, not servant. Teach them be entrepreneur, not regulator. Teach them to learn and to develop new crafts through the whole life. Teach them skills to fill societal need, not avarice, cause avarice will be a bad survival strategy in the free society. Above all teach them Freedom.

Education is the investment in the the times to come. Do not entrust this long-term and very important investment to any monopoly, as it finally be turned to serve that very monopoly. No standardisation, no unification, no normalisation or any other argument may be used for the monopolisation of the education. If needed, all these things can be done without any monopoly, just by making proper agreements among people based on common sense and on-going developments of the society, science and education itself.

A centrally regulated education is not, and never will be, the education. This will always be an ultimate instrument solely intended for manipulating of human consciousness into submission by those holding the monopoly on defining educational programmes.



Religions versus free will

The less real independent education and world insights people have, the more are they prone to the opium addiction offered "for free" by the tooled religions. The price for this is engraved phobia and hatred towards others not belonging to the confined group, imprint conformity, standard thinking, fear of missteps, and a huge step back in personal development.

People's faith in a better world, in a better organisation of life, in virtue, goodness and righteousness, has little to do with any religion, each of which rapes the faith and perverts moral grounds.

Operating religions were penciled, with perhaps better original intentions, by persons suffering from mental disorders with abnormal desire to obtrude their ideas, visions and perception of life upon many others around. Which straightly proofs their cognitive power lust over the rest of unwashed masses. Every religion hijacks the moral grounds inherent to the vast majority of humans and twists them into a form of a cult which makes it easier to manipulate masses by compulsion and by deceit.

Merely designed as a system of texts, ritual practices, servility and threats, each religion imposes a societal organisation which reconstructs the pyramid of power. With the clergy of all ranks claiming they are authorised by, and being proxies of, someone they never got powers of attorney from, which makes them the biggest sinners of the world.

Because of this mirroring of the pyramidal authority organisation, religion was incessantly convenient tool for statesmen. That's why it was commonly, overtly or covertly, so long as it fitted the purpose, supported by the state and aided by the government. And of course the other way around - clergy is anxious to support the state. This synergy not only served to keep own citizenry in submission, it helped to subordinate neighbouring territories too. Most religions were brought upon. People were converted by the sword. And by deception, by promises of better times in afterlife in return for the full submission in this life. Submission to those impostors who routinely claim to be acting in the name of God.

Obedience and compliance form the ground of each religion, these are likewise the foundations of slavery. If human beings were created as slaves they could as well be created unconscious. Consciousness is what is given to human beings to distinct them from senseless matter, to allow them expressing own will, to carry out acts of volition. Volition is the very source of the human "self". If there is anything your consciousness gives you, it's free will, it's the freedom to choose. Religion does the opposite by encasing your thoughts. Religion is the prison of mind.

By capturing people's freedom of choice with the cage of rules, laws and restrictions favouring only themselves, the rulers, both clergy and secular, are trying to take away a whole bite of human self-conscience. This peccant lust to control people's minds and way of life can only be contained if the decent majority affirms and defends the liberty to think and to act in accordance with the free will and solely moral restrictions. Humans are born with moral grounds in them. A Human is a being who has genuine free will and yet principally chooses the good, therefore does not need any artificial framing of the moral grounds and freedoms. Specially no framing to what is desired by those with the crooked aspiration for power.

Of course shall every human be free to choose what to believe in, or delude oneself with, err or straggle, as long as this is a voluntary deed, an own free choice, not an inflicted precept.

When a cleric of any kind tells you he is a God's fiduciary and tries to teach you about God, kick the ass of the perjurer and keep him at a cannon shot distance from your kids.



Faith in human dignity and virtue

Big effort and a big part of the wealth created by people was and is being spent by the ruling class to elevate the faith in authority and to destroy the faith in human virtue. You are being taught that people are inherently bad and need to be harshly ruled in order not to damage themselves and their society.

Without unconditional believe in an upper authority there is no possibility to build absolute power. Any questioning of the authority, the authority of the state, must be eradicated before the slavery can be justified and fully, and irreversibly, installed. Obeyance, this is what gets imprinted into the minds of people all over the world. Every separate human cannot be blamed for the inflicted trust in the upper authority, as it is difficult to resist the devastating propaganda machine of the state acting upon everybody from cradle to grave. The machine which has virtually no boundary with regard to financing, cover by state legislation and all other possible support by the state. But the mental resistance to the faith in authority is where the liberation from the all-swallowing gravity of the black hole of slavery shall start, before the event horizon, the point of no return, is reached.

People do bad things mainly because they happen to live in oppressed societies. State-encompassed societies cannot eliminate bad behaviour, rather they provoke it by humiliating people into beastly creatures by barraging them into the tight boundaries having the sole purpose to reign over them. Pressing people in tight boundaries results in bad behaviour and criminality, not prevents them therefrom. The tighter the boundaries the more criminalised the society becomes. But the state finds ways to conceal this fact, and to invert the narrative to blame bad behaviour on too many freedoms, and thus to justify further limitations of these very freedoms. Of course all "for your own good and safety".

In a free society there is no ground for crime. Humans are able to live and create, to achieve their benevolent goals in their lives without harming other people's lives, by freely cooperating with each other. This, and not a bad behaviour, will be rewarding, will be the winning game. In the free society the only crime you will have to be afraid of will be attempts to deprive you from your freedoms.

Trust your fellow creatures. The overwhelming majority of them possesses natural human dignity, is born with moral virtue and sense of obligation towards other people. Distrust and banish those who try to moralise installment of a central authority to wield power over you. Isolate and ignore them, pay no heed to their discourse, whatever reason may be for it. Adhere firmly to your freedoms, which will allow every individual and the whole society to reach more and at lower costs than under any immutable authority.

Faith in human dignity and virtue, not in any upper authority, is what you need to build the viable society.



Secession from the system and transition period

To start creating the new society, new civilization, you do not have to fight states and their governments. You can't win this fight. It is, by definition, an illegal fight. The state has legalised itself, and outlawed any fight against itself. The state will kill you in the name of law and order. No violent revolutions are needed. Revolutionaries, while appearing altruistic, always get a hold of the machinery of the state to plunder society for their own self interest, more often than not on a far greater scale then the despots which they replace. Most revolutions end up in an even worse dictatorship than it was before. Disobedience and insubordination is the better and less bloody way. Opting out of the system encompassing monopolies - the tax monopoly, the political monopoly, the money monopoly, the violence monopoly or any other - is the way to go.

Stop participating in elections, stop paying taxes, start using the demonopolised money system of direct exchange of promesses. When there are no elections, there is no mandate for power. Once the funds flowing to the state dry up, there is no money to pay for the enforcement of draconian legislation anymore. The government  will not be able to put you all in jail for that, there will be not enough soldiers to keep you behind the bars. These soldiers are to be paid, but when there is no swag flooding into the state's treasury anymore the bottom of the purse will be seen quickly, there will be before long nothing to pay the soldiers with. Even freshly printed to this purpose fiat money will not last too long if you do not accept it in exchange for your productive activity, so will the soldiers stop accepting it too as it will have no value. When nobody uses and excepts centralised fiat money, there is no reason to issue it anymore, thus the spinal pin of the centralised power will melt down too.

Encourage those same soldiers, who must fight against you for the government, to use their skills to defend communities from the government and other mob. Praise them for their bravery of defending people, not the rulers. They can be of value to a community and to the society, or stay on the other side and die as trash. They can be heroes or go down the annals of history as traitors of the Humanity.

Stop complying with the state's legal system, bring up the moral grounds, adhere to them and punish those few who do not want to comply with them. After the transition period you will watch criminality go down fast, the only atrocity which will remain will be attempts to restore centralised powers.

This will be a demanding period in history. The rulers while loosing their monopoly will not go quietly. Expect lots of tricks to be pulled out of the their sleeves on the way. Your elected politicians will argue that any other model than the existing one is a joke. Swarms of "experts" with mountains of "scientific arguments" will exhort you to turn back to the centralised model as being the only one working. Hordes of artificial celebrities will gently argue to keep everything as it is, cause, you know, change is wrong, bad, dangerous and everything else.

When propaganda will not be enough, all kinds of prohibitions will be "legally" imposed, initiatives will be banned, technologies will be prohibited in an attempt to make the transitional move impossible. On the way one monopoly will be attempted to be replaced with another to make you feel better. You can be even offered to abolish states all together, meaning making one global state, which is the ultimate dream of the rulers. Do not buy it, for as long as there is any centralised monopoly remaining - be it a government, a corporation, a central bank or any other in sole charge - you will be in trouble. Because any monopoly can and inevitably will be misused to win power and to control people.

Expect all kinds of provocations, instigated street violence and other undermining efforts. Expect attempts to disrupt medical aid provision, food, water and electricity supply, all kinds of blockades and other atrocities - be prepared for that. Expect even aliens' intrusion if you will, anything will go if it would help to shatter the transition.

Most effort however will be put in polarizing people, turning you against each other based on any real or imaginary differences and standpoints. The puppet masters will play the, as ancient as the world, divide-and-conquer game. The government will be splitting people so that they will not be able to unite and stand united against the government. It will be stirring the pot, trying to create a climate in which violence to become inevitable. Fragmentation, discord, discontent. Divide and concur will it be as never before. These destabilisation will have only one purpose - to show you that "the order is above all", and without the centralised power, which is solely capable to temper this violence and mess, the society will fall into chaos. Do not fall for this, the real order and stability will come when there is no state and no monopoly any more, when there are no powers to destabilise the society for their own win.

Be persistent, do not hesitate and do not change the course. The principle of mass disobedience is not beatable by any state. The only power it has is what you give to it. However below a certain threshold of disobedience people will be dealt with harshly by the state. Above that threshold the state and the whole power structure will collapse. This process cannot be stopped if people do this all together. The more resolute you are, the shorter the transition period will be, the less pain the society will feel. Put an end to the servitude, stop paying for your own oppression, go your own way.

You create tremendous wealth by inventing, producing and servicing. You get this wealth expropriated by all possible means. When the centralised power vanishes, your inventing, producing and servicing will not stop, quite to the contrary, will flourish as never before. The wealth of the society will grow at much faster pace, easily allowing not only the basic necessities to every human on this planet, but virtually any undertaking the Humanity can dream of. Because ideas and liberty of implementation of those ideas naturally cause wide spread and fast economic, societal and scientific development.

The transition period will be enlightening for sure. It can last longer or shorter. It can be different in different geographies. It can be tough or smooth. Try to defend your family, to help you fellow men, to safeguard your community. Do not allow entangling yourself in bloody conflicts, in an escalating violence; war and chaos is what those being deprived of power will desperately need to rope you back in "protected" slavery.

Monsters exist. But they are too few in number to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are common men, monsters' instruments, the functionaries ready to believe and to act without asking questions.



Soldiers, become protectors

Soldiers of all kinds and all commands, those serving their duty with weapons, you who enforce the power of the state, you who take orders from the government, you who have ability to apply force, to kill people and conquer territories and seas, you can play crucial role in the transition of the Humanity from slavery to freedom.

You have first to decide whether you have purpose in your life or you just live by someone else's purpose.

Then look deep in your soul and answer these simple questions: Whom are you with? Do you want to assail or defend? Whom do you want to defend? What future do you want for the Humanity?

Is your mission to kill? To follow orders? To be a senseless extension of the weaponry, which kills when the trigger is pulled? Do you want to be involved in the most insane and abhorrent activity known to man - that of killing civilians? In the name of the government, fatherland, law and order, or whatever is being told you?

If your mission is rather to protect people, do not take commands from tyrants. Do not apply your force against people. Do not fight the battle against the future. Take the oath to protect people, not states and not governments, not bankers and not corporates. You better arrest those who give killing commands, and those behind them, and let people investigate and adjudicate them and all their overt and covert deeds against the
Humanity.

Even if you do not fight at all, you will do the Humanity great service. Because without violence the state will collapse quickly, and painlessly for the society.

If you feel that with your skills you can do more for people, go and do that. Protect people from aggression and crime without instigating violence yourself. Go to your communities and support them in the transition. There will always, before and after the transition, be enough to do for honourable soldiers in organising the life of a community: help building new society; help keeping peace and order within your community; interact with other communities; prepare your communities for and protect against natural disasters; teach children right defence skills, esteem, integrity and honour. Use your qualifications to dismantle most destructive weapons; to reconstruct military facilities into civil production, education and entertainment sites; rebuild combat vessels into fisher boats; do launch rockets with weather satellites instead of bombs; help to extract, at least partially, the costs the society has unwillingly paid for the aggression machine.

But do not ask for any monopoly on your services, you will not get it from people. Just do your job well and you will be well rewarded by people in return for your brave job. They will be able and willing to capitally support you, as people will have more than enough means to do that, and will have freedom to donate results of their labour to those doing important job for them.

You can and shall play important role in building the viable society, in the transition period and there beyond.



THE VIABLE SOCIETY

This is a society where people can decide for themselves. The collaborative human nature will ensure that the majority of individual decisions will result in the best outcome for the whole society. The monopoly on decision making on behalf of the society gradually but inevitably leads to the enslavement of the society. There are no benevolent rulers, because power is the most potent narcotic causing non-curable addiction. The society to survive has to ban the monopoly on power, and therewith any other monopoly. The only viable society is the one which does not have monopolies. To avoid enslavement and consequent extinction, the Humanity must reject once and forever, never accept, nor tolerate, and not materially support any monopoly. Not only shall a monopoly be morally renounced, not supporting it under any condition is the real solution to the most problems of the Humanity.

Concentration of power leads to concentration of wealth. More wealth makes it easier to gain more power. It works symmetrically the other way around - if there is no concentration of power, wealth would not be concentrating in the hands of a few, but would be equitably divided. So would power too. If there ever be power to the masses this can only be reached by liquidating and never allowing any monopolies. Because any, even a sole monopoly, will result in the same - endless covert taxation and power concentration through this monopoly.

People still tend to look for a leader to take care of them instead of doing things themselves. So, the bad news is you will have to think each for yourself and do things yourselves. The good news is you can organise your own society much better than any "leadership", which will always care of itself, not of you. The collective mind of all individuals is the only substance which is able to find the best way for the entire society, and thus for every individual within the society. Only the wisdom of the crowd will allow the Humanity to evolve in the right direction, which is the resultant of the diversity of ideas and volitions, not the imposed will of the self-chosen minority following their only vector - that of the total control over the rest of the Humanity. For this you have to liberate your mind and understand that solely the veritable freedom can save the Humanity.

But Freedom demands responsibility. Freedom demands that people stop sleep-walking through life, stop cocooning themselves in political fantasies about a better state and a right power structure. To reach and keep your freedom you have to adapt personal responsibility, not to outsource it.

Do not be afraid of the freedom you will get. The overwhelming majority of people has good intentions and is willing to live and create in peace, contrary to those destructive minds who only want power by any means, means provided by you. Those dregs of the society will have no chance to project their evil will on the Humanity if you do not provide them with recurring means to do that.


Communities, not states

States and their governments by their very nature always penetrate in human lives, try to destroy any barriers of individuality, condition and level the lives and the minds. They try to blend people in one homogeneous mass, which is easier to control. In their effort of blending masses they argue that by refusing to associate with those who are strange to you, those who might undermine your way of life, you "violate the strangers' rights". This is an inside out logic, which is harshly exploiting the natural human sense of shame. It helps the rulers to forcefully fuse, and therefore destabilise, cultures and communities which would otherwise co-exist in peace if only left alone to decide whom to let in and whom not. Divide and concur is still the rulers' motto as it always was.

For humans to live together peacefully, intentional barriers are the necessity. These spaces may not be penetrable - physical barriers like the walls of your home, privacy barriers, thought barriers too. Even social and community barriers. Any attempts to destroy these barriers shall be condemned and a forceful intrusion into these spaces shall not be tolerated. Good fences make good neighbors. Humans, families, collectives, communities, shall have something called own place that is theirs, where they can go, shut the door and keep the rest of the world out, without a fear to be pursued by any outsider. Only this freedom, and not the interference in others' lives, reduces tensions in the society. The state does the opposite trying to remove all private fences and to forcefully blend people into unasked economic, social and geographical associations. This in order to be able to keep better control over the crowd.

These are wise words: "Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. No one may be compelled to belong to an association". These words always remained just that - words. Every human is compelled to belong to the inherently despotic and rapacious association called state. Nobody has the right to opt out and to set up an assembly or an association which is not under control of the state. All good words and intentions aside, people are totally dependent of and are under the all-out control of the state.

The greatest wealth is independence. This implies incontestable freedom of association. People shall have the liberty to unite on any quality, be it for living together, working together, resting together, creating together. This will not only help to preserve the diversity of ideas and volitions which are so necessary for the progress of the society, this will let people live peacefully on one planet an beyond. This is only possible if there are no states each of which is in fact an artificial prison for the inhabitants.

Society constitutes everything constructive people create through working together. The creation of value, inventions, scientific discoveries, art and literature does not require a government. Neither does your security, or any dispute settlement. Free collaboration among individuals brings about positive outcomes and the advancement of the society. Liberty is the single way to stop poverty and uplift humankind through opportunity, self-determination and self-reliance. It is the lack of liberty - tyrannical centralised power - that traps people in cycles of desperation and poverty. People can transact, cooperate, follow their moral grounds and societal norms, and live their lives with absolutely no intervention or oversight from the oppressive threatening state structure. Independent, self determined human beings are the lynch pin of the free, self governing society.

Human beings are natural community builders. They are constantly seeking out other like-minded and like-purposed because they understand that groups of individuals working together can accomplish more by voluntarily uniting efforts and skills, and sharing risks. Therefore humans have a natural tendency to value individual freedom and the right to voluntary association. They do not like to be forced to associate with others that do not hold similar values. People make careful and critical examinations of those who wish to join and participate in their endeavours. People also have a natural right to discriminate against anyone who does not share their core values, in other words have the right to refuse association with others. On the other hand, if people voluntarily accept outsiders, this may enrich their community or an association. If they reject an outsider to become a part of their group, so be it.


Collectives, not corporations

There is no place for large corporations in your future economy. There may not be a legal status of a corporation which only aims to protect its controllers and operatives, who are not even owners, from real prosecution for their mischiefs, corruption, war crimes. And there may not be a legal status at all, as there should be no legal system.

The reason why some enterprises are inflated with bankers' money to gargantuan sizes is, again, control. It is not only control over an entity itself, a large corporation can control a bigger part of the market it operates within. Two or three of them can control the entire market. A couple of large corporation per industry allows to have a grip on the larger part of the whole economy. This without even owning these corporations. To govern a corporation one only needs to control, not even own, at max half of its shares. These half can be controlled by another share holding entity. In order to control the latter one has to have a say over a half of another holding company on the top of it, etc. In principle, it is possible with just one penny in the pocket to fully control the biggest corporation on this planet with a raw of 46 holding companies. Often one only needs to have a much lower percentage of corporate shares in hands to dictate the course of it, which makes the raw of needed holdings much shorter. And if one has access to more than one penny, freshly printed out of thin air, and additionally has the backing of the state's legal system, he can pull the strings of the entire economy without owning it. This pyramidal control structure replicates the power structure of the state, but has a much wider rich than one state alone, it allows to have the world in the pocket. And squeeze it at will.

This is not corporations who produce, invent, earn money; these are people organised in collectives who do. A corporations is a paper abstraction, it cannot create anything - take people out and nothing will be created by the corporation. This is the energy of people which does creation.

A self-organising and flexible association of a number of smaller collectives and individuals can produce same and better products and services much faster and at lower costs. Even more sophisticated and complex products, which a large corporation does not dare to dream of due to its bureaucracy, inflexibility, dependence on financing, political command or others. The innovation pace for more sophisticated products and services of self-organising associations will go with larger, faster steps.

The common denominator of any economic activity shall be a productive individual. The sum of productive individuals forms a creative collective. As there will be no legal system, but instead an easy to comprehend moral frame, there shouldn't be any restricting legal forms for such a collective. The participants will decide how much effort and / or assets they put in a productive enterprise.

People have to build their own economic associations of trust, relationship and exchange, interacting with the rest of the world. The ones that reward creativity, collaboration and honesty. In their collective economic activity people shall be responsible as they are in their individual deeds. Every individual or a collective of individuals shall be free to spend a surplus of their productivity, their wealth, on what they deem necessary and morally justifiable - help others, improve environment, build infrastructure, support healthcare, science, research and education, develop new energy sources, aid to projects intended for helping Humanity's next steps.


Value to the society, not to the capital

The system where the majority of actors is consistently deprived of capital by ruthless taxation, while the tiny minority is supplied with capital to build economic empires and to acquire even more capital, is fundamentally flawed for many reasons. But it perfectly fulfills its assignment - relentless concentration of capital and power.

This system shall be changed to allow producing value to the society, not to the capital. This is only possible when the capital gets another charge and, more importantly, another denomination. When all existing capital can only be denominated, circulated and invested in the form of a monopolised currency, it can easily be manipulated, impounded, blackmailed or plainly sequestrated by those in control of the currency. Now capital means some assets ready to be exchanged for labour. Due to huge concentration of capital in the hands of the few, those few can buy practically any labour, be it the labour producing added value or destructing other people assets.

When there is no centralised currency capital will get a completely new meaning. Capital will mean the willingness of people to invest their creativity, ingenuity and labour in productive activities. Imaging some talented person getting a great technological idea. She can seek capital for her endeavour and get it from many people in the form of numerous promesses. Therewith she can pay the start up costs, and after getting the ball rolling she can pay back to those people with her own promesses which, if lucky, will be worth more than previously gathered capital. This is how many people will be able get reach by investing their productivity in the ideas and capacities of others. This is how the whole society will get reacher, not only those sitting on ill-gotten capital - on expropriated labour and assets of other people.


Growth of knowledge, not of consumption

An economy based on the inflicted requirement of permanent growth of production and consumption is not only unsustainable, it's simply unrealistic in the long run. This inflicted requirement is intended to support the build up of the tax base of the state and to allow the banking monopoly to issue more and more of its baseless money into existence in the form of uncovered credit resulting in indebtedness of everything and everybody to this highest monopoly.

The real growth of the civilization is not the constant growth of production and consumption, rather the growth of knowledge. Without knowledge there is no progress. Without knowledge there is no freedom. Without knowledge there is no consciousness.

The state has captured knowledge acquisition by subsidising only the sciences and pseudo-sciences which help to build up its physical and mental power over people. When weapons are important, the science helping to build weapons gets most money. Monopoly on energy is of great value, hence certain parts of energy science are funded heavily. Citizen's mind control is of extreme significance, thus the so called "social and political sciences" are sponsored thickly out of the state's treasury in order to pretend erecting the statehood upon "scientific grounds". There is no free acquirement of knowledge as long as the state keeps usurping this function.

The fountainhead of creativity in culture, industry, science, education, is individual genius not confined by any ideology, religious devotion or loyalty to a state. When the monopoly of the state disappears the society will get free pass to the real knowledge. The meaning of life will change from survival and gaining a little bit more of comfort to discovery. Discovery in all domains: life, science, arts, technology, universe, consciousness. The greatest revelations lie ahead of the free society.

In the end, your minds and their ability to create new ideas are the ultimate source of all human wealth. That's a resource without limit.


No baseless fiat money, but personal obligations as fundament of the Economy

Build exchange systems which help to trade promesses, locally and globally. Systems where everybody can offer his, her, its promesses for exchange with any other promesse in order to be able to get any service or product delivered. Use public logs to register offered promesses and trading transactions for the exchanged promesses. Add buyers' ratings of the accomplished transactions for better price discovery and reliability assessment of each supplier of a promesse. The more reliable the issuer of the promesse is, the more this issuer's promesse is worth. The more one's promesse is worth, the more one can buy per own promesse. Although the reputation will trade high indeed, such system can include a "trust machine" which allows automatic enforcement of trade in many cases, and thus will no longer have to rely on the so called trusted third parties to conduct business. This will allow a flexible self-settling market of unforgeable money. To the good of humankind, the counterfeit money will cease to exist, as well as all the contagions connected to the notion of fiat money.

Many exchange platforms for promesses can and shall co-exist and interconnect with each other to better support this trade. The more of them the better - competition will only help to make trading promesses smooth and fast, and to lower the costs of every trade transaction. First movers among the facilitators of this distributed exchange systems - trade platform operators - will likely get good profit on it. That's OK, as it always was with those brave and adventurous persons who facilitated trade among people and among societies throughout the history. As the exchange system will evolve, more competition will move in and profits will diminish, while the efficiency will grow. The most important thing is that there shall be no monopoly, de jure or even de facto, on this trade.

Similar or same platforms can be used for aggregation of promesses in order for example to form buying power for collective infrastructure projects, for community development, for conjoint defence, for lending purposes and generic crediting. No money of the banking cartel established by decree, and backed only by the promise of violence by the state, will ever be needed for that. Buying a cup of coffee, a flight ticket, a car or a space ship, will not require banking intermediation which does only provide own promesses - fiat money - without providing real added value, while skimming off gigantic margins from every transaction and putting tight grip on your economy.

This "simple trick" of using freely issued promesses instead of fiat money will change the economy completely, from top-down hierarchical institutions to autonomy, freedom and self-determination. This will transform everybody from a subservient lackey of the bankers into the maker of the economy. Any physically possible and desirable undertaking will be made financially viable when enough people are willing to support it with personal obligations.

On the individual level reputation will become new gold, honestly earned gold. It surely will allow economic benefit. But the economic preponderance will gradually loose its imperative and its appeal. When the results of your labour are not expropriated or destroyed anymore, everyone of you will have much more than is enough to survive. Hoarding as a hedge against bad times will make much less sense when you know that you and your offspring will live in the righteous world. Piling up wealth for getting more power will be silly, as in the absence of the state and its violence-based monopoly-oriented legislation people will not accept power build up and will turn away from anyone daring even to try grabbing more power.


No compulsory taxes, but voluntary contributions

Keep always in mind that tax is just a way for destructive forces to harness and appropriate people's productivity for their own maleficent purposes, and waste the rest of it so that people have to continue running the daily livelihood and debt treadmill without asking questions or having time and energy to protest.

The society can function without taxes incomparably better than with this legalised theft. When people themselves decide how the results of their labour shall be spent, the society will thrive, will finally enjoy peace and will become socially just as never before. But most importantly, will get the chance to remain in being.


Who are these rulers?

You will be able to find out as soon as there is no state anymore to hide this information from you. It will then be easy to find out who is pulling the strings. The information is out there and vaguely visible, while the state, being plainly instrument of the rulers, is blocking your access to it and obscuring every effort to obtain this information. Because these rulers want to stay out of reach of people's pitchforks.

However they want to stay in control. For this they have to hold keys to the multi-dimensional power matrix: money, governments, mind control, main corporations, infrastructures and resources.

Follow the (production of) money and you will find the supreme rulers.

Look at what and whom you may not criticise and you will get a pretty close shot. For whatever freedom of speech you have, you are not allowed to touch those who truly hold the power.

Follow the upper puppets - politicians and unelected high placed bureaucrats - and behind them you will find the puppeteers controlling governments, thus also states, infrastructures and resources.

Go along the wide net of conduit companies and you will find the ultimate controllers of the largest corporations which in turn control the marketplace. These economic possessions are supported by the legal system the rulers cultivate and run through the state monopoly. Because they only can enforce the economic rights through this legal system, they have to have their names behind these possessions which leave lots of traces within this legal system allowing to track the real owners to the very top.

When you get there, you will be able to see how much wealth was really stolen from you over time without putting any valuable labour in to it. Grabbed by merely operating the power monopoly you have tolerated and legitimised. This wealth in their possession is however just a top of the iceberg, the majority was already spent on running the state, as well as destroyed in wars and secret undertakings of all kinds.

When you dig into the history of their deeds, be prepared to learn about the horrible malfeasances and crimes they committed against this Humanity on the way to gain control over it. This will remorselessly shake your mind to the bottom, but this will help you to avert future disgraceful attempts to centralise power through monopolies.


State assets and other dirty capital

There is lots of wealth accumulated by the rulers, and much more being controlled by them through the states, states' monopolies and other quasi-monopolistic giant corporations. This huge wealth is not theirs, it was taken from you by mercilessly manipulating money provision and state legislation, and by mis-appropriating tax money through the state. This wealth shall be returned to the society at large.

Through the history there were various attempts to return stolen wealth back to the society. All of these "expropriating expropriators" attempts have miserably failed. Simply because those who lead the expropriation process did plain stealing of this wealth. Or worse, poured it into a new state structure helping to bring themselves on the top and fortify their new acquired power. One clan was simply replaced with another, while people got nothing but a new, and often more harmful, gang in power.

To avoid this, no single successor in any form shall be allowed to inherit this wealth. No new government, no new state, no new monarch or anything else. The only legatee is the integral society, the entire human kind.

The state assets shall be treated as natural resources. The principle of equal rights of all humans on all resources on the planet must be applied to the state's assets too. In other words, anyone may use any property of any state to conduct a useful economic activity. Those who grab too much of it or do bad things with it will be boycotted by people; such boycott will result in their quick failure and insolvency. In fact boycotting any malign economic activity will be easy, as in the absence of a direct or indirect state-imposed monopoly any economic activity can and will in no time be picked up or replicated by other, more conscientious, economic actors. Continuous fraudulence is only possible when the state warranties it with violence. Without this backing, without the state, economic cheating will not be rewarding and will evaporate even as an idea.

It is logical and fair that the assets of local governments to be utilised by the communities of people living on the corresponding territories, or with consent of the community by an outsider. After all, these people have created or paid most for the creation of these local assets. However the higher the government level, the freer usage by anyone shall be allowed. An army polygon may be used by anyone, but you better make a museum or a prison out of a central government building to be used as a reminder of how the society shouldn't be arranged.

The rulers have also amassed a lot of wealth and appropriated it on their own names and those of their family members. How to deal with this swag? There is a way, though there may be more ways. Just do not similise yourselves with the looters, do not grab and re-appropriate their wealth, you will not be able to benefit of it in the new society anyway.

The most simple and human way is this. Those super wealthy who got their wealth by using the state as a robbery tool have put the wealth in different intangible and tangible assets. Intangible like currency on the bank account, financial securities, all kinds of derivatives and such. Semi-tangible like shares in business. Tangible like lumps of land and other immovable property, precious metals and others of a kind.

As to the intangible assets, don't be over concerned with them, as in the new society, in the new economy and in the new financial system of personal promises these assets will not be assets anymore, but empty uncovered promises of the fraudulent financial biz. These paltry derivatives will not be accepted as payment tools anyway. They will vanish with the implosion of the rotten monetary system. It will be impossible to use them to get any influence in the new society, or even to buy bread with them, just because there will be no state to enforce the acceptance of this counterfeit.

Shares in business. As a rule, those in power do not invest in a workshop or a farm. They invest in monopolies which would have an indisputable ability to ruin workshops, farms, other small and medium business, and take massive profits out of this. Even if they do invest in a small business they make sure it becomes a de facto - with the help of unlimited supply of bankers money, or de jure - with the help of the state legislation, monopoly. Any other business leaves them cold. When there is no state to back monopolies the assets represented by the shares in such business will follow the destiny of these very monopolies.

As for tangible assets.

Land is a natural resource and shall be treated as such - fair amount to everybody, but no chunks of a continent to a few. Immovable property will finally have little value as soon as it is out of the state system, out of the regulation system driving the prices up. Everybody will be able to build easily around the globe at a minimum costs, for there will be no price to pay for the land and no taxes for having the privilege to keep that building yours - bare construction costs are inferior when you strip all tributes to the state from the price.

Stashed movable properties of any kind, in other words the technological products, will loose their value in time quite fast. When all the anchor chains in the form of taxes, regulation and monopoly rights attached by the state to the development and distribution of new quality products are cut off, the old movable property will be replaced by the new one at a fraction of cost in a twinkling. Therefore you may leave their personal movable property to them ex-rulers, except for weapons of course.

Precious metals and the like is a separate category of tangible assets which were used for quite a long time in history as exchange medium in trade and also to conserve surplusages of people's labour. Those in power have piled up enormous amounts of these assets by using the state as the prime robbery tool. They will hide these assets from you and would try to buy their influence and their share of the new world with these looted assets if you stick to the usage of these medium. The only way to prevent misuse of such medium is not to regards it as asset. And to avoid using material medium as an exchange equivalent or as a backing for one's promises. Any material medium can be acquired through fraud, or can be a target for theft or marauding. Also think that in a free society it will be much easier to win precious metals from the bowels of the Earth or other heavenly bodies, or reproduce any material medium easily, which may inflate any stored value. Storing of value in the new society shall not be done in physical things, not even in energy in the longer run. The best store of value is your own consciousness, your family, your community, your planet, your civilization, your collective knowledge.

Whatever smeared assets the ex-rulers would try to utilise in order to buy something, it will not last long. Those who cannot produce anything will be in no time through any assets they had. Even investing their assets in new technologies and undertakings which will be demanded by the new society will not provide the same effect as investing under the state protection. Because without the artificial fences installed by the state the competition to any interesting technology or endeavour will be way too strong for those unproductive. Because to keep momentum you have to put your labour and creativity in such endeavour, in other words you have to work, not just move money from one place to another. Most of them are not able to work, those who will be, well regard them as reconditioned for the new society, which is undoubtedly good.

There cannot be no universal advise for all situations and circumstances with regard to the soiled capital accumulated through the vicious assistance of the state. Just be fair and do not cross the line of evilness when you deal with this, do not become like those you want to get rid of in your society.

Whatever assets they have piled up, in your new society the only type of capital which will count is the human capital backed by knowledge, skills, alacrity to cooperate and ability to create value for the society.




CLAUSULA

You do not find here the answers to all question the life may put before you. There is no such holy scripture which would provide you with all answers to all questions. You have to arrange your lives yourselves based on the straight and just principles and common sense, while aiming the well-being of your society. The resulting vector of all efforts gives the right pulse to the development of the society, but willingly allowing others to rule over you inevitably leads to a disaster for the society.

Life has meaning. You will find out. But that's not endless suffering of many and infinite impunity and power of the few.

The Humanity is struggling to find the right path. People want a fair world to live in. People also want a well-ordered world ensuring stability for contemporary and future generations. Those who want to rule over you offer you the only magic solution they know: that one based on centralised power, your full subordination and end of liberty. While they are constantly destabilising this world and making it less and less fair and dirty at every turn of the centralisation vise-grip.

If only you open your eyes you will see that the only right path to fairness, order and prosperity is liberty. You have an option to follow this path or alternatively go down the slippery slope of slavery, to change your world or spoil the future of your civilization, to act or hesitate and be crushed by evil maniacs, to get free or abandon your hope ye who remain here.

You are not alone in this. You will ultimately find out that this situation you are in now is not unique, yet only in that case when you are not caught totally enslaved by the psychopaths on your own planet. You have been pariahs on this planet for far too long. You have been sabotaged from living and creating in freedom, from building a happy society, from making this planet a peaceful place to live, from venturing to the stars, while a very tiny subset has been eclipsing you and leaving you behind while forming a parallel parasitic civilization. Not someone for you, but you yourselves can change it.






Post Scriptum: There will be attempts to ascribe or claim the authorship of this text. Do not trust any of them.