16 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-11 1430 +123456789123456789 12345

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-11 1430 +123456789123456789 123456789
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nObGH71j3z4&lc=z13awlwourzxwfbsn23jcpny4kepdpbum
https://pastebin.com/s2VXfaVX
__


+123456789123456789 123456789 __ *Tell me - is there any "proof" that you would actually accept?* I doubt there is anything. The only thing that necessarily proves (i.e., "sufficient proof") that there is a real and manned "ISS" is to see *sustained duration genuine micro/zero-gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.* After more than 15+ years we have a reasonable expectation of seeing such footage but it remains absent.







If there is no permanent zero gravity environment then the illusion of it must be artificially created by cleverly stitching together many briefer segments of genuine zero gravity. Any noticeable joins would need to be disguised by way of "glitches" that are made to appear as common "signal/broadcasting glitches". That way they go unnoticed and their importance overlooked when pointed out. Of course - it does not mean that every "masking glitch" represents a clever join - _only that some of them necessarily would._







And that is what we see. Through the use of cleverly stitching together briefer segments of genuine zero gravity we can be shown hour-long "ISS tours" (that are filled with cuts and/or misdirecting pans) and we can be shown thirty minute "ISS interviews" (which are packed with "masking glitches") *but we never get to see a simple three minute "fun video" of an astronaut clowning around doing somersaults or spinning on the spot or anything that would necessarily prove there exists a permanent zero-gravity environment.* All we get are excuses for why this footage doesn't exist. No doubt you will invent some "plausible explanations" of your own (perhaps you think they might kick over mission critical equipment?). Such "plausible explanations" are limited only by your natural intelligence and imagination. They allow you to stop thinking about the problem - _for example_ - if your worry is about the "astronaut" knocking over mission critical equipment then why aren't you also worried about them getting water all over it?







Let us suppose that at least one "astronaut" purportedly aboard the "ISS" has at least "1 free hour per day" to film the required footage (such qualifying footage could constitute *"sufficient proof"* - that which necessarily proves an event or claim to be real/true). That means that with just one person having just one free hour per day there have been some *5,475 potential hours* to have filmed a 3 minute video constituting "sufficient proof" over the past 15 years. *With three astronauts that figure grows to some 16,425 hours.*







For three "astronauts" - *out of nearly a million spare minutes over 15 years* - there has not been a single 3 minute clip of sufficient proof filmed. To film a 3 minute "spinning on the spot" video (*or anything of that nature*) would require only 0.0003% of the total *free time* aboard the "ISS" for three people. *At some point we are all entitled to ask and wonder why we have never seen such footage and why it does not appear to even exist.*







Of course - _for the sake of accuracy_ - the fact such footage has not apparently been filmed (or been made available to the public) does not strictly mean it cannot be produced (if the "ISS" is real and manned). What it *does* mean is that we are all being *intentionally denied* what it is we need to see *in order to justify a belief in a real and manned "ISS".* _That is what this is all about._







The absence of sufficient proof means that anyone - _such as yourself_ - who professes a belief in a real and manned "ISS" *has founded and formed that belief on trust and accepting (or mistaking) proof's appearances for proof.* What I am pointing out is simple stuff. Nothing could be simpler. However - it does require *an IQ of at least average* to grasp it and - _perhaps more importantly_ - for someone to be honest enough to accept what it means.







Right now if you believe there is a real and manned "ISS" it is *NOT* because you have seen *sufficient proof* but because you want to believe you live in a world which has one rather than a world that more simply lies about having one. At least know that you have put all of your trust into the same groups of people who have you believe they dropped atomic bombs on Japanese children just a few decades ago. All of that was done for the "greater good" - _right?_ And so if killing large numbers of children for the "greater good" is an option on the table (that is used) then why do you think lying to large numbers of children *also* for the "greater good" would be any more taboo? Why would that be an option that is *never* used?!







*Not everyone has it in them to let go of falsehoods that serve to make them feel good and have "hope for humanity".* After all - when you turn on the nightly news it is mostly bad. The "ISS" gives you a sense of pride but make no mistake: *it is a propaganda platform to impress beliefs upon children and to excite imaginations.* With your comments (here and elsewhere) you are effectively seeking to "shoot the messenger". I.e., me. For that: *shame on you.*






__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w