Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jul 27th, 2017
86
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 1.51 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 172
  2. TXPS28 KNES 202155
  3.  
  4.  
  5. A. 17P (ATU)
  6.  
  7. B. 20/2032Z
  8.  
  9. C. 17.7S
  10.  
  11. D. 169.7E
  12.  
  13. E. THREE/MTSAT
  14.  
  15. F. T5.0/6.0/W1.0/24HRS
  16.  
  17. G. IR/EIR/VIS/SSMI
  18.  
  19. H. REMARKS...MICROWAVE SUITE FROM AMSRE THROUGH MOST RECENT SSMI PASS
  20. SHOWED EYEWALL REPLACEMENT CYCLE. TWO BROKEN EYEWALL FEATURES WITH THE
  21. INNER CORE FEATURE LIMITED TO ONE SMALL CONVECTIVE TOWER ON THE NE SIDE AT
  22. 1716Z...VISIBLE LOOP SINCE THEN APPEARS TO INDICATE THAT THE INNER CORE
  23. CONVECTIVE ELEMENT HAS NOT DISSIPATED AND IN FACT HAS AN OVERSHOOTING
  24. TOP APPEARANCE...AND IS ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE CENTER AT 2032Z WHILE
  25. THE OUTER/NEW EYEWALL RING HAS REMAINED NEARLY CONSISTENT IN INTENSITY
  26. AND LOCATION WITH A WEAKNESS ON THE SW TO WESTERN SIDE. AS SUCH THE
  27. COMBINATION OF THESE 2 EYEWALLS HAS LEAD TO A DIFFICULT PATTERN TO ASSESS
  28. IN DVORAK AT 2032Z. POSSIBLY THE BEST METHOD IS USING A BANDING EYE TYPE
  29. FEATURE IN VIS WHERE 1.6 TO 1.7 DEGREES CAN BE MEASURED ON LOG 10 FOR
  30. DT OF 4.5. EMBEDDED CENTER WOULD BE IN MG GIVEN MOAT REGION ON EASTERN
  31. SIDE OF INNER CIRCULATION FOR DT OF 4.0 AS WELL. LASTLY...AN EYE PATTERN
  32. IS NOT REALISTIC AS WELL GIVEN THE SHAPE AND SIZE OF THE 'EYE'...SO
  33. AS SUCH DT IS 4.5 BUT WILL BE DIREGARDED GIVEN THE SITUATION. MET IS
  34. 4.5 BASED ON DEVOLOPING TREND FROM 24HRS AGO...THOUGH NOT RAPID TREND.
  35. PT IS 5.0 AS A GENEROUS 4.5 PLUS .5 ADDED FOR WHITE OR COLDER. GIVEN
  36. WEAKENING RULES/CONSTRAINTS...FT BASED ON PT/WEAKENING CONSTRAINTS.
  37.  
  38. I. ADDL POSITIONS
  39.  
  40. 20/1716Z 17.7S 169.5E SSMI
  41.  
  42.  
  43. ...GALLINA
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement