Revision:

I tried to write a post about the methodology, principles... provable, physical, evidenced situation, to be as applicable as possible (but focused due to circumstantial context) concerning covid, viruses, vaccines, germ theory, pasteur/rockefeller establishment, etc...)

Best I can do at the moment. It applies somewhat generally to other issues too.

In the PRS cycle, the "solution" is the goal. The product to sell, the "final solution", engineered, then with synthesized and engineered supposed problems and reactions to match that.

Comments in this article January last year, for an overview of how the PRS cycle "works". https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-01-global-coronavirus.html

I'll start with the vaccines, since that is the only real pathogen, the goal and commercial product of the PRS (problem, reaction, solution...) cycle and what they're trying to get people to "buy", so this post is kinda working from projected present, to the underlying processes.

The ONLY specifications in covid vaccine trials were reduction of mild symptoms, such as lessening cough (easily conflated, by placebos such as meningitis vaccines, aluminum injections, as well as suppressant medications which they used in the trials, which only involved healthy people).

In the mean time, the damage and results have been clear. Many people have died at nursing homes (with no hospitalizations, and then they try suggest vaccines have reduced hospitalizations by some percentage...), many "covid" outbreaks, directly after vaccinations. VAERS inundated, and only a tiny fraction of reports get through, or adverse reactions reported.

Women who have had the mRNA vaccines have shown symptomatic inflammations markers comparable to breast cancers and tumours, because the vaccines are weapons against you...which I'll get to.

Also consider that in the trials (with ONLY healthy people, and biased, false placebos, medications), 25-50% adverse reactions in the moderna/pfizer trials, with 15% of those serious.
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/race-for-a-vaccine/side-effects-of-covid-19-vaccine-trail-participant-speaks-out/2417356/

In animal trials with similar prototype vaccines from Novavax (2015) and Moderna (2017), there were absolutely horrible results. And when I say similar, I mean 50% and 75% identical.

The supposed covid spike protein includes homology with Nagalase (which was only present in the MMR vaccine, and is rather toxic and linked to many problems, particularly autism, with the MMR vaccine having been banned in Japan due to results and toxicity), as well as numerous other protein related function in your body. Also meaning it is purely synthetic, other than super toxic and VERY similar to your body's material, meaning, it targets your body and it's unnecessary.

The problem with the referenced homology is that it gives rise to a number of problems, autoimmune problems, prions from misfolded proteins, etc. Essentially, cellular cannibalism due to self-similarity. Mad Cow Disease, for instance, is a result from feeding cattle other cattle brains, and similar things happen with other cannibalism. Vaccines with homology have similar results.

That, btw, for a non-existent, fundamentally misattributed "problem", which was engineered and synthesized to demonize your body, including entirely synthetic toxins as part of the supposed virus and related to the "cure or solution" and uses a FALSE "testing" protocol with a tool unfit for diagnostics, but suitable for extrapolation.

The only problem with "covid" is policy, medications and vaccinations. Masks are degenerate, distancing is degenerate, medications are toxic, treatment protocol such as with ventilators having terrible results, etc. Then there are the psychological, financial problems too, which cause additional physical problems.

Also, there cannot be singular treatment protocols for supposed problems which are actually
conflated symptomatic results.

There are huge differences between health status. Address that. You can't have "fixed" treatment protocols. You can't say zinc, HCQ and ivermectin is necessarily going to help you. Physics doesn't care about that. Neither HCQ or ivermectin is essential, necessary. Both add toxicity. You can't fix a personal vitamin D or melatonin/serotonin or selenium and vitamin E issue with that, and those statuses are unique, despite general problems (such as vitamin D and iodine deficiency, potassium, magnesium vs chlorine and sodium excess, or fluorine excess, perhaps a lack of antioxidation or chelation factors).

A young man on a motorcycle was stabbed, but had previously been "tested" to be covid positive in the past two months...thus, that's classified as a covid death, though he had no obvious health problems, good lung function, clever guy. Should we have given him very toxic azithromycin and HCQ (HCQ for instance, worsening an already very common and bad potassium and sodium imbalance problem, among other negative effects), or ivermectin (all of which are unnecessary and toxic)? In the mean time, an old man sitting in nursing home was never outside and had severe vitamin D deficiency. Let's give him antibiotics, a vaccine and a ventilator.

While say, facebook deleted/censored the NVIC, which had basic stats from the CDC, the actual vaccine manufacturers, etc.

Vitamin D, being a regulator of your genetic material, rather essential. While vaccines only add toxicity.

Just a slight elaboration of the Vitamin D (more importantly sunlight, as Vitamin D is only one component of the benefits) related function. People cannot have immunity to Vitamin D deficiency, implicitly there cannot be herd immunity.

People even keep getting the same supposed "cold/flu viral" infections repeatedly, with huge amounts of supposed exposure, like clockwork in winter or low light conditions, and the symptomatic results from vitamin D deficiency is consistent regardless of the supposed implicated "cold/flu virus" (more generally RTIs).
https://pastebin.com/hM7h6D0G

In fact, with the flu vaccine, the toxicity from that vaccine causes systemic damage that RESULTS IN what manifests as something like "covid". Because all it does is break genetic material. And every single one of the viruses peddled, are results of toxicity and deficiency, with absolutely NO contagion for any of them. A flu vaccine for instance unnecessary, illicits an enormous chemokine
and cytokine response and inflammation, cellular damage...only adding damage through that toxicity, without taking away toxicity or addressing essential deficiency.

Absolutely no virus ever isolated properly or shown to be causative, pathogenic.
Absolutely no virus ever having the functionality that could allow for reproduction, motile function or any inherent energy mechanism (meaning it is dead and really can't do sh*t, as it is effectively detritus being ejected by the body). MISATTRIBUTED, MISIDENTIFIED,
CONFLATED RESULT, NOT CAUSE.

Another example related to the mythical virus problem is measles, from 1900-1962, per the CDC, supposed measles mortality was reduced by 98%, before vaccines. The amount of side effects and physical damage from say, the MMR vaccine being quite significant though.
https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/measles/dis/
https://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Measles/measles-vaccine-injury-death.aspx

Along with that, there is a huge implication of vitamin A deficiency with measles. So much so, that even the WHO acknowledges it, and it evidenced elsewhere too. Such as in the treatment of already severe cases of supposed measles, with merely 2 doses of vitamin A...reducing measles mortality by 80%+. In this study for instance (though notice they are loathe to admit vitamin A being the significant factor)...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11869601/

Another way to provably show the "origin of viruses" (such as with the flu vaccine actually breaking your genetic material which RESULTS in what is then classified as adenovirus, coronavirus, rhinovirus, influenza, etc) due to toxicity...

Organophosphates are a simple way to show the "origin of viruses". The main hypotheses for the "origin of viruses", btw, being REGRESSION AND ESCAPISM. Regression such as which can happen with vitamin D deficiency, or toxicity, breakage. DNA to RNA breaks, truncations, transcription errors, misfolded proteins, broken/mutated and EJECTED proteins.

Notice how that very elegantly exactly matches those two main viral origin hypotheses. And, any supposed mutations (which is importantly, the third viral origin hypothesis) being a result from varying toxicity or deficiency, or combined damage profiles.

That is, the Escapism and Regression hypotheses are the combined causation processes, and the supposed Evolution hypothesis is the variability of those.

Like when you break a cell in a certain way (say, with organophosphates), but then, you also add vitamin D deficiency, now that damage, is different ("mutated"), and you get a different supposed, "evolved", "viral" result.