cc: smooth
bcc: a couple of others

I hope you realize that most people would not lose the time to reply to something like this at all, and certainly not with the following detail. Yet I asked you to open a dialogue thus I should follow through because you have decided to communicate your thoughts, which is a positive outcome which I should reward. Being reasonable and helpful is something I strive to do.

Nevertheless, I can not justify putting in the effort just to write this response for you. So excuse me that I must violate your privacy and share this with some others. But hopefully you sort of understand that already would be the case, because everyone should know that nothing we write in PMs is really private and mods can access them. And you should know already I am very overloaded already with tasks. Thus I can not be a personal tool for any one person.

[quote=anonymous]
[quote=Hyperme.sh]
[quote=anonymous]
PS I suggest drop any bible references/zionist conspiracies from your writings, regardless of whether or not they are accurate they make you look like a nutcase to most people.
[/quote]

Why should I pander to sheep?

And no I am not accusing you of being a shill. I wrote “if that is the case” when I pondered why in the hell you had decided to go ballastic against me. And I still do not understand why.

But I think now I am getting the idea that you are writing me off because if I expend “all my time” doing anything other than what you perceive would be the most efficient/wise use of my time.

I am interested in understanding the Zionists as it pertains to what type of monetary systems and regulations we are headed into, so that the altcoin project has taken this into account as much as possible.
[/quote]

I can guarantee you large numbers of intelligent developers are not going to take you seriously based on your conspiracy beliefs, do you honestly think only weak minded sheep scoff at that stuff?
[/quote]

How did you fabricate a false dichotomy between intelligent developers and sheep. If they’re too dumb to understand logic, then they’re not intelligent enough to work with me. Not only did I write to you that my world view is uncertain because I do not have all the hard proof I need to make unequivocal conclusions, I also wrote comments on the following blog which require considerable depth of analysis in order to understand my thinking:

https://steemit.com/freedom/@anonymint/marissa-mayer-is-the-poster-child-for-bitches-in-tech

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@anonymint/re-anonymint-foolish-pride-of-useful-idiot-socialist-progressive-ideologues-20170814t233455886z

Anyone who expects a genius to have such simplistic thought processes that they can just dismiss them as a bible loving, conspiracy believing nutcase, has apparently not much real world experiences with geniuses.

I wonder what (the Christian, 180+ IQ) Freeman Dyson would say about my body of work if he had the time to dig into all of it. Did you see when he refuted Richard Dawkins in such a way that clearly demonstrated that the former’s IQ is out in the stratosphere. Yet I bet your friend w(h)or(e)ships Dawkins:

https://www.edge.org/discourse/dawkins_dyson.html

Freeman also pointed out that the alienation cuts both ways:

http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2007/09/30/freeman-dyson-dawkins-is-doing/

[quote=anonymous]
Get real.  In addition you are making predictions and tying in Bible passages as evidence (btc private keys are the mark of the devil? I would hope you were joking), usually when people do that they are religious zealots predicting the end times, you think smart people won't be turned off by that?  They will, Eric Raymond clearly thinks you are mentally ill, is he just another sheep?
[/quote]

There you go again putting words in my mouth that I never wrote. I never wrote that private keys are the mark of the beast. Once again you choose to interpret my writing with your own aliasing error.

Eric Raymond had to STFU because he realized he was being subjective where he lacked data to back up his politically motivated ideological stance:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1082909.msg22683719#msg22683719

And if you read my debate interwoven there with @CoinCube about religion, you will clearly see I’m against religion and my perspective on Biblical truth is highly skeptical and also scientific.

You and others who sample my thought process at below the Nyquist limit only end up with aliasing error instead of an accurate understanding of my thought process. Lookup the Shannon-Nyquist Sampling Theorem at Wikipedia (which I contributed to several years ago)

Any one who understands statistics understands that there can be 1000s of engineers who are appalled by their aliasing error, but it does not mean _ALL_ engineers are as myopic as they are. The smartest ones will appreciate intellect and technological innovation above political correctness. And those are the ones I want to work with, not some idiots who are going to make numerous mistakes because they under-sample reality when doing analysis.

My method serves as a very good filter of who is worth to work with and who is not. Because the Mythical Man Month insures that I can not work closely with dozens of devs. I only need one, two, or maybe three, and then they each can work with one, two, or maybe three more and within 2 degrees-of-separation or so, we’re already working with a huge team. This is Linus Torvalds’ point and he certainly pisses a lot of people off and explains that it is preferable than sacrificing his honesty. And even ESR admits that if he is not regularly pissing people off then he is doing something wrong:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ017D_JOPY <--- Watch this!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
(some where in the above video he explains that Git enables him to directly interact with a small core of people yet fan out to 1000s by degrees-of-separation)

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=1404

Besides WTF does political correctness have to do with getting technological work done! Even ESR has written numerous blogs urging people to stop judging coders by their politics and philosophical viewpoints and instead focus on their code and technological work.

[quote=anonymous]
I am friends with several talented software developers, one of whom currently at Google and has a passing interest in crypto.
[/quote]

If they are coming from Google that is already a significant warning sign that they probably are not that good. Anyone who is still working at Google is more or less clueless.

The smartest ones long since left that clusterfuck already. Srsly.

[quote=anonymous]
I showed him your steemit post on segwit and he was actually rather intrigued, but upon seeing you reference the bible in some of your predictions, wrote you off immediately as insane (and frankly almost any non-religious person, who btw make up a disproportionate number of high IQ people, would do the same); after this exchange I'm not convinced he is wrong.
[/quote]

The 150+ IQ Eric Raymond wrote that Freeman Dyson made him feel like the dumb kid at a breakfast roundtable. Yet Freeman is a Christian.

Your friend is apparently another idiot in a long line of idiots who lack depth and breadth of understanding. Why should I care?

[quote=anonymous]
You should understand that if you avoided posting on non-technical subjects, you would have an easier time finding developers to help you build your platform.
[/quote]

I doubt that correlation exists the way you might posit it does. For one reason being that I do not want to work with most developers. They will fuck up more things than they will fix.

The developers who are worth working with will not give a fuck about my personality and will focus on the technological goal and accomplishments.

Why would I want to work with fickle, thin skinned, judgemental, irrational, single-track minded idiots who misjudge my personality due to aliasing error?

[quote=anonymous]
[sub]
Also, your non-technical writings are not nearly as thorough as the technical ones, not in content, and certainly not in citations.  Your 9/11 post is all youtube videos!  You give nothing else to back up the veracity of any these claims OR the backgrounds of the people making them, people will not research to confirm these claims on their own, not for such a controversial subject. The Social Courtesies post is one of the most cringe things I have ever read, all you accomplished with that is showing that you have thin skin
[/sub]
[/quote]

The evidence and arguments is in the videos. If you think I have time to go become a published expert on 9/11, you must think I never intend to launch an altcoin.

I did not even want to watch that shit, as I had stopped looking at that 9/11 shit several years ago. But I recently decided I needed to make a decision as to whether the Zionists are really a threat to the USA or not. So I decided to take a look at a theory that was not as well developed when I had looked at it briefly several years ago. When I took the time to view the several hours of videos, I became more convinced that the evidence and arguments are overwhelming.

Until I see a better counter-argument, I stating that I can not refute those videos. Partly because I do not have time to do so. Partly because they appear to be quite compelling.

[quote=anonymous]
As for the passage in question, I don't know why it is so hard for you to see/admit your mistake.  The overall sentence implies that the blockchain itself was down, a hyperlink to a page on steemit's live status does not change that.
[/quote]

I have explained this numerous times and that you still do not understand seems to indicate something about your subjective desire to see it one way of your preference.

I do not see how explaining again after I have already explained 3X in exhaustive detail will help you to see my side of what transpired. You are determined to see it only one way.

And I emphatically disagree with you. Emphatically! You are incorrect!

I did admit the mistake of not explaining myself well enough from the very start and I did not admit that @smooth was correct to clarify the issue. And I am correct to have further corrected @smooth in further clarifying the issue(e.g. on the point that blockchain was effectively down even though the block producing nodes were still apparently functioning). So far it seems @smooth is not as dumb as you are on this issue. Sorry to be frank, but srsly.

How much time should I expend on dumber people?

[quote=anonymous]
When you were accused of making that point, all you had to do was say something along the lines of, "apologies, I meant to just reference the sites connection to the blockchain, not the blockchain itself, regardless it doesn't diminish my criticisms."
[/quote]

Sorry but that would have been dishonest. The blockchain was also effectively down for the most part.

And you’re attacking me about personality not about factuality. If you do not like my personality as it comes across in a forum setting, that is your prerogative. There is nothing I can or should say.

[quote=anonymous]
That would've been easy, and it would have looked fine.
[/quote]

Again I am not pandering to sheep. I hope I have made that point clear.

[quote=anonymous]
Instead you chose to claim you never made that point in the first place (you did, even if you did so unintentionally),
[/quote]

Disagree. You and some others who want to attack me, decided to interpret my statement a particular way. I have explained my statement did not make any claim about block producing nodes and I have offered more than one evidence to show why it did not (my link to the steemit being down, the mention of as observed from busy.org, the fact that I as a programmer would mention block producing nodes if I had checked them). None of your thought process makes any objective sense. Sorry.

Sheep decide to read what they want to read, even when the person did not unequivocally state what they sheep want to think was written (they tend to hallucinate like this because they’re non-objectively driven).

Yet people will believe what ever they want to believe. This is what causes rule (actually chaos) of the mob. Because objectivity is a very difficult thing for people to accomplish. And nature really wants it to be that way any way, else past and future light cones of relativity would collapse as I explained here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2268216.msg23409109#msg23409109

[quote=anonymous]
and accuse multiple people of lying, when all you had to do was clarify your intended point.
[/quote]

They are lying. They made a quote of me which is not what I ever wrote. Then they try to lie and claim I intended some meaning which I never intended.

And their motive is abundantly obvious that they’re trying to dig up some dirt on the person who is revealing their FOMO lies. So please stop pretending they were not disingenuous.

I will not acquiese to lies and dishonesty. You interpret that as ego. Pffff! What ever. Enjoy the aliasing error. Reap what you sow.

[quote=anonymous]
(including @smooth, who you apparently respect)
[/quote]

I respect @smooth because he is technologically and logically very astute and because he attempts to be more factual than partisan. Nevertheless there have been some times where @smooth does what you want me to do, which is pander to the crowd. That is one reason why @smooth has a 72 reputation and I have a 0 reputation.

@smooth thinks the way you do. Go to my first Steemit link above and I explain how I perceive the differences between us.

Btw, I can’t work with @smooth as a co-dev because I can’t even call him on the phone. He has decided to remain anonymous and I must respect his decision.

Someone like @smooth might be the perfect person to partner with in the sense that he could provide that connection with the BCT crowd that you are seeking.

But any way, the success or failure of my effort is not going to be dependent on how I related to the BCT crowd. It will be related to the actual development production. Which is why taking the time to write these sort of messages is very costly to me at this time.

Also when I am in a mode of talking my own project in my own community, that is the time where you will see me shine in a way that the community is in love. I have done that many times in the past (was for example doing all the Customer Support and liason to such departments in my career). You have not seen that yet, because that has not happened yet (and there are many who doubt it will ever happen).

We should also note that the nature of BCT is one of FOMO lies, which is thus presents my personality as acerbic because I step on a lot of FOMO lies.

In a community driven by actual adoption, I believe we will see my career skills shine.

[quote=anonymous]
and you ignore all of us; if that is not an ego defense I do not know what is.  I went "ballistic" against you, because I don't enjoy watching someone incorrectly accuse others of lying, which you did twice.
[/quote]

I was correct. They were lying bastards, trying to defend their FOMO lies by lying about what I had written.

You’re an enabler of their corruption.

I am the only person on the entire forum who had the balls and put in the effort to present counter-balancing material facts about EOS in their main thread. I know in my heart that I am the one who is doing honest work. Anyone who tries to claim I am a liar is a fucking idiot.

[quote=anonymous]
I worry you are just surrounding yourself with sycophants that just tell you what you want to hear, clearly you have no one in your life willing to call you out on your bullshit, and the mental gymnastics you are pulling on yourself is honestly frightening.
[/quote]

Oh here we go again. Did I ask you to be my psychiatrist? Please worry about yourself instead.

I encourage anyone to disagree with me and present cogent arguments when doing so.

Afaics, you have not done so.

[quote=anonymous]
IF I am wrong about you and you are in fact going to succeed in your project, I'll give you and your group a trading tip, buy Pascal Coin (good trading analysis here https://www.tradingview.com/chart/PASCBTC/8YjstAGE-PASC-the-hidden-gem/)
[/quote]

I had looked at that briefly but I can not remember what my conclusions were. Must not have been positive as I ignored it hence. Out of all the altcoins that have launched in 2016 and 2017, only Byteball and Steem really go my attention. Byteball for the consensus algorithm and Steem for the onboarding.

[quote=anonymous]
If you can not find some truth in anything I have written, then do me the kindness of not responding further, and we can each write the other off as a fools; otherwise all we will achieve is pissing each other off more than we already have.  Seriously I'd rather not continue if this will just stay negative.
[/quote]

Well geez I got to the bottom and then I read you do not want me to reply.

I can find some truth. You are writing your perspective and your perspective shared is the way for me to explain my perspective. Sharing perspectives is a form of truth. The universe can not be a total ordering.

Peace.