Advertisement
Nuppiz

F1RWRS 2016 rules discussion, Session 2

Apr 29th, 2013
361
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 61.64 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 20:47:06: <Nuppiz> ah, the evil overlord is here
  2. 20:47:18: <Aerond> :p
  3. 20:48:28: <Nuppiz> are you absolutely sure that you want to give andrew the responsibility of controlling one of the tyre suppliers? :P
  4. 20:49:34: <RealRacingRoots> We question his compotence
  5. 20:49:44: <Salamander> i question his ability to read
  6. 20:49:45: <Nuppiz> because based on quite a few posts his rule reading skills are below par, to put it nicely
  7. 20:50:43: <Aerond> :p
  8. 20:50:57: <Aerond> Well, I'm aware of this
  9. 20:51:55: <Aerond> But I can't discriminate anyone because of that
  10. 20:52:08: <Aerond> I'm not sending PM's as reminders
  11. 20:52:25: <Aerond> So if he doesn't show up I'll pass the slot to next on list
  12. 20:52:51: <Aerond> Not showing up also means being withdrawn from waiting list
  13. 20:52:59: <Aerond> as it shows a lack of interest in the series
  14. 20:53:15: <Nuppiz> good to hear
  15. 20:54:21: <Aerond> Spending 5 minutes every few days to check for updates in the thread is not too much to ask
  16. 20:54:27: <Nuppiz> even though it's not my turn yet (as we're waiting for andrew's reply), I'd like to express interest in becoming the next Paul Hembery
  17. 20:54:55: <Salamander> so you want to screw over alitalia, then? :p
  18. 20:55:00: <Aerond> :p
  19. 20:55:04: <RealRacingRoots> who wouldn't want that chance
  20. 20:55:14: <Salamander> pasta
  21. 20:55:16: <Salamander> evidently
  22. 20:55:16: <Nuppiz> ooh, so much power :P
  23. 20:55:40: <Nuppiz> well Pasta is really powerful with the Michelin supply under his control
  24. 20:55:41: <RealRacingRoots> I think Pasta was thinking andrew would take pirelli
  25. 20:56:42: <Salamander> maybe
  26. 20:56:52: <klon> Everyone wants him to take Pirelli
  27. 20:57:32: <Nuppiz> yeah, if that happens there's going to be a major shitstorm
  28. 20:57:52: <Pi3141> if what happens?
  29. 20:57:59: <Salamander> andrew takes on pirelli
  30. 20:58:09: <Salamander> and does an utter hashjob of it
  31. 20:58:15: <Salamander> ruining alitalia
  32. 20:58:33: <Nuppiz> combine Stramala's temper and andrew's apparent lack of reading skills
  33. 20:58:41: <Salamander> yeah
  34. 20:58:49: <RealRacingRoots> world war 3 would be on our hands
  35. 20:59:48: <Salamander> if i ever run a series, id be seriously tempted to bar him and roblomas52 from entering it
  36. 21:00:09: <Salamander> because i do not want to deal with their crap
  37. 21:00:40: <Nuppiz> Pirelli and Goodyear are likely the least influential tyre manufacturers in F1RWRS 2016, looking at last year's supplys and with Jones looking to ditch Goodyear
  38. 21:00:40: <RealRacingRoots> A reminder Aerond, I do require the ratings for your Puyo Puyo GT-R drivers
  39. 21:00:51: <Aerond> yeah i know
  40. 21:00:56: <Aerond> I haven't decided yet
  41. 21:00:57: <Aerond> :p
  42. 21:01:00: <RealRacingRoots> xD
  43. 21:01:23: <Salamander> if andrew picks goodyear nobodys ever going to use goodyears again
  44. 21:01:35: <Pi3141> with pasta getting an F1RWRS team for 2017, andrew is then first on the waiting list
  45. 21:01:48: <Salamander> yeah.... :S
  46. 21:01:50: <Salamander> :s
  47. 21:02:13: <RealRacingRoots> 7 teams, about 10 cars do not have driver ratings yet for GT-R
  48. 21:02:16: <Aerond> if Andrew doesn't show up he will loose his place on the waiting list
  49. 21:02:38: <Aerond> It could also happen that Pasta gets the place for 2016 if eurobrun leaves
  50. 21:02:44: <klon> and people say F1R is a place without all that bitchin' that happens everywhere else
  51. 21:02:46: <klon> lol
  52. 21:02:47: <klon> :P
  53. 21:03:06: <Nuppiz> Andrew has shown up, in the RTCC thread...
  54. 21:03:39: <Nuppiz> but I wouldn't be surprised if he had forgotten that he's on the F1RWRS list at all :P
  55. 21:03:46: <Aerond> :p
  56. 21:03:49: <Aerond> me neither
  57. 21:06:30: <Nuppiz> Salamander well, roblomas52 is in LGPS and he's been tolerable
  58. 21:06:42: <Nuppiz> apart from a few OOC things...
  59. 21:07:00: <Salamander> thats because he hasnt had to read anything beyond the signup sheet
  60. 21:07:01: <Salamander> yet
  61. 21:07:06: <dark77> he's been pretty bad in warped
  62. 21:07:33: <Salamander> i dont think hes even aware of the upgrade system
  63. 21:07:39: <Nuppiz> he is
  64. 21:07:54: <Nuppiz> he's done quite a few upgrades actually
  65. 21:07:58: <dark77> named one of his drivers Wankucini and wrote this... http://www.f1rejects.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=5549&p=234832#p233418
  66. 21:08:21: <Salamander> yeah
  67. 21:08:31: <Nuppiz> http://www.reactionface.info/sites/default/files/imagecache/Node_Page/images/1314029819767.png
  68. 21:08:34: <Salamander> then there was naming his driver after a takeout menu
  69. 21:08:42: <Salamander> id rather err on the side of caution
  70. 21:08:43: <Salamander> :D
  71. 21:09:36: <Nuppiz> oh and Aerond is the first on the IFRC waiting list
  72. 21:09:54: <Nuppiz> you might actually get in if I don't see some activity from certain people soon :P
  73. 21:10:13: <Salamander> and im last
  74. 21:10:16: <Salamander> on that list
  75. 21:11:10: <Nuppiz> at least all applications are from 2013
  76. 21:11:27: <Salamander> i kind of regret not signing up at the start of 2015 now
  77. 21:12:23: <dark77> wonder how long until i get an f2 tema
  78. 21:12:24: <dark77> *tema
  79. 21:12:26: <dark77> *TEAM
  80. 21:13:30: <RealRacingRoots> go home dark, you're drunk
  81. 21:13:55: <Salamander> :D
  82. 21:13:58: <Aerond> :p
  83. 21:14:46: <Nuppiz> updated F1RWRS waiting list: http://f1alternate.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Talk:Formula_1_Rejects_World_Race_Series
  84. 21:15:59: <Aerond> Nuppiz, any extra questions about tyres after reading the chatlog?
  85. 21:16:30: <Nuppiz> ehh, I haven't read it yet :P
  86. 21:16:34: <Aerond> :p
  87. 21:16:41: <Aerond> read it before making any
  88. 21:16:51: <Aerond> Pasta asked lots of things
  89. 21:16:51: <Nuppiz> sure
  90. 21:17:31: <Aerond> It pisses me off a bit eurobrun is bitching about 2016 rules when he hasn't asked any questions about how it works
  91. 21:17:32: <Aerond> :p
  92. 21:17:46: <Salamander> yeah
  93. 21:18:06: <Salamander> hes making a big deal about the new driver rules
  94. 21:18:23: <Aerond> lol, this is going to be in the chatlog he's probably going to read
  95. 21:18:24: <Aerond> haha
  96. 21:18:45: <Salamander> hello eurobrun
  97. 21:18:53: <Salamander> :p
  98. 21:18:59: <RealRacingRoots> you may be asking a couple of questions right now
  99. 21:19:06: <RealRacingRoots> like: why am I here
  100. 21:20:31: <klon> because you want to get away from your duties
  101. 21:20:33: <klon> and just be lazy
  102. 21:20:41: <klon> ya lazy basterd :P
  103. 21:20:46: <RealRacingRoots> dammit klon
  104. 21:20:54: <RealRacingRoots> I'm not talking to you. :(
  105. 21:21:37: <klon> ha, that's what you think
  106. 21:25:51: <Nuppiz> hmm, I think I got the main points on working as a tyre supplier
  107. 21:26:32: <Nuppiz> so in a multi-year deal I'll only get half the cash that I would get in a single-year one?
  108. 21:26:47: <Nuppiz> from customers, I mean
  109. 21:26:49: <Aerond> yup
  110. 21:27:13: <RealRacingRoots> but if you get 2 multi year deals you qould get the equivlanet of a 1, single year contract with of cash
  111. 21:27:36: <Nuppiz> and be assured to have an even cash flow
  112. 21:27:45: <Aerond> Signing multi year deals although cheaper may be a risk to the team owner
  113. 21:28:09: <Aerond> as the team owner don't know how much those tyres will cost in the future, and their characteristics in following years
  114. 21:28:18: <Nuppiz> well, if I control Pirelli Stramala will probably sign whatever deal I give to him :P
  115. 21:28:24: <Aerond> :p
  116. 21:29:04: <Nuppiz> 100 bucks for, uhh
  117. 21:29:26: <Nuppiz> excellent rain tyres that are among the worst in dry weather :P
  118. 21:29:33: <Aerond> :p
  119. 21:30:49: <RealRacingRoots> Best Qualifying Drys, and that's about it
  120. 21:31:22: <Nuppiz> yeah, if we want late 80s/early 90s Pirellis
  121. 21:31:32: <RealRacingRoots> which we be funny
  122. 21:31:42: <RealRacingRoots> after qualifying stramala sees he's got a 1-2
  123. 21:31:50: <RealRacingRoots> he finishes outside the points in the race
  124. 21:33:12: <klon> Tyres that would guarantee a win in the race but are impossible to qualify on
  125. 21:33:24: <RealRacingRoots> that's michelin
  126. 21:33:31: <Aerond> :p
  127. 21:33:49: <Aerond> it's going to be fun
  128. 21:33:55: <Nuppiz> Bridgestones could be dull all around
  129. 21:34:08: <Nuppiz> or maybe have them have excellent wets
  130. 21:34:10: <RealRacingRoots> Dunlop could be the wet weapon of choice
  131. 21:35:49: <Pi3141> How many tyre suppliers will there be in 2016?
  132. 21:36:04: <Nuppiz> six
  133. 21:36:08: <RealRacingRoots> 6 to be controlled by users
  134. 21:36:22: <RealRacingRoots> then a free, one if users fail to choose
  135. 21:36:35: <Aerond> 6; 5 controlled by users and 1 by comission
  136. 21:36:40: <Aerond> The 1 by comission will be free
  137. 21:37:03: <Aerond> But a team won't be able to use the free tyre for two seasons in a row
  138. 21:37:05: <klon> ... Yazd Tires?
  139. 21:37:12: <Nuppiz> Dunlop, Michelin, Goodyear, Bridgestone, Pirelli
  140. 21:37:17: <RealRacingRoots> i kinda want the free one to be a obscure brand, like DMACK in the WRC
  141. 21:37:37: <klon> RealRacingRoots - let's pick a Yazd Tires brand
  142. 21:37:47: <Nuppiz> Belshina :P
  143. 21:37:55: <RealRacingRoots> Kumho
  144. 21:38:04: <klon> Kumho is not obscure
  145. 21:38:08: <Salamander> to be accurate with real life, bridgestones should be able to go many times the race distance without even coming close to a puncture, but be slow and boring as hell :D
  146. 21:38:09: <RealRacingRoots> obscure in racing
  147. 21:38:50: <Aerond> I have Ovation tyres in my RL Peugeot
  148. 21:38:51: <Aerond> :p
  149. 21:39:05: <RealRacingRoots> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Tire_manufacturers
  150. 21:39:30: <klon> or let's take Goldstone
  151. 21:39:35: <klon> it's like Bridgestone
  152. 21:39:38: <klon> only Iranian
  153. 21:39:57: <Salamander> hoosiers! :D
  154. 21:40:02: <RealRacingRoots> Murica!
  155. 21:40:20: <Salamander> exactly
  156. 21:40:39: <RealRacingRoots> Nokian tires?
  157. 21:40:44: <RealRacingRoots> Are they related to Noika?
  158. 21:40:48: <RealRacingRoots> Nokia
  159. 21:40:51: <Nuppiz> no, Goodride
  160. 21:40:59: <Nuppiz> I mean, look at the logo: http://www.vannetukku.fi/images/goodrideLOGO_NETTIKOKO.jpg
  161. 21:41:09: <Nuppiz> so much ripoff
  162. 21:41:10: <RealRacingRoots> lool
  163. 21:41:31: <Salamander> yes :D
  164. 21:42:04: <RealRacingRoots> we need to make the 5 look as appealing as possible
  165. 21:42:15: <RealRacingRoots> and then, there's that OTHER tire make in F1R
  166. 21:42:32: <Aerond> Can somebody copypaste latest comments?
  167. 21:42:38: <Aerond> Since my ovation tyres one?
  168. 21:42:47: <Nuppiz> but to answer your question: no, Nokian Renkaat and Nokia are no longer related
  169. 21:43:03: <Nuppiz> 00:39 RealRacingRoots http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Tire_manufacturers 00:39 Klon or let's take Goldstone 00:39 Klon it's like Bridgestone 00:39 Klon only Iranian 00:39 Salamander hoosiers! 00:40 RealRacingRoots Murica! 00:40 *** Aerond quit (Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client) 00:40 Salamander exactly 00:40 RealRacingRoots Nokian tires? 00:
  170. 21:43:15: <Nuppiz> 00:40 RealRacingRoots Are they related to Noika? 00:40 RealRacingRoots Nokia 00:40 Nuppiz no, Goodride 00:40 Nuppiz I mean, look at the logo: 00:41 Nuppiz so much ripoff 00:41 RealRacingRoots lool 00:41 Salamander yes
  171. 21:43:41: <Nuppiz> and the Goodride logo is this: http://www.vannetukku.fi/images/goodrideLOGO_NETTIKOKO.jpg
  172. 21:44:10: <klon> ... well, we have our 6th manufacturer
  173. 21:44:14: <klon> :D
  174. 21:44:39: <Nuppiz> that's like Goodyear and Bridgestone combined
  175. 21:44:59: <Nuppiz> actually, not Bridgestone
  176. 21:45:12: <Nuppiz> the font looks very similar to Dunlop
  177. 21:45:21: <Aerond> Found this in the list: Cheng Shin Rubber
  178. 21:45:22: <Aerond> :p
  179. 21:47:33: <RealRacingRoots> What about Vittoria, a bike tire make trying to hack it in F1R
  180. 21:47:40: <RealRacingRoots> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vittoria_S.p.A.
  181. 21:48:20: <Salamander> they should supply scuderia vittore :D
  182. 21:48:23: <Aerond> :p
  183. 21:48:49: <dark77> they should supply this team too http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scuderia_Vittoria
  184. 21:48:52: <Salamander> so i see this is a very productive chat :p
  185. 21:49:10: <Salamander> ah yes
  186. 21:49:13: <Salamander> of course
  187. 21:49:23: <klon> Salamander, technically it is supposed to begin in 10 mins
  188. 21:49:24: <klon> :D
  189. 21:49:38: <Salamander> :D
  190. 21:49:58: <klon> but we ARE in agreement that the 6th manufacturer must be rejectful at any cost
  191. 21:50:01: <klon> ?
  192. 21:50:03: <RealRacingRoots> yup
  193. 21:50:06: <Salamander> yeah
  194. 21:50:13: <Salamander> i cast my vote for goodride
  195. 21:50:15: <RealRacingRoots> we have to make the user controlled 5 look as appealing as possible
  196. 21:50:34: <Salamander> yeah the free tyre should just be in case of emergency
  197. 21:50:50: <RealRacingRoots> Like if Dofiasco needs a change
  198. 21:51:01: <Nuppiz> IIRC Goodride was the worst tyre in the annual tyre tests carried out by Tekniikan Maailma
  199. 21:51:29: <Nuppiz> comments were along the lines "get yourself a life insurance if you use these"
  200. 21:51:39: <Aerond> lol
  201. 21:51:56: <Salamander> well then
  202. 21:52:04: <RealRacingRoots> i think that means he agrees with us
  203. 21:52:05: <klon> >ShutUpAndTakeMyCredits.jpg
  204. 21:52:06: <Salamander> thats a ringing endorsement if ever ive heard one :D
  205. 21:52:22: <Salamander> >ShutUpAndTakeMyLackOfCredits.jpg
  206. 21:52:34: <Salamander> thats what you meant, right klon? :p
  207. 21:52:36: <RealRacingRoots> uh oh, the other mad man is here
  208. 21:52:41: <Salamander> oh god
  209. 21:52:44: <Nuppiz> Mad Men
  210. 21:52:49: <RealRacingRoots> i like that tv show
  211. 21:52:49: <klon> actually, Salamander, Tropico has quite a lot of dosh
  212. 21:52:51: <Salamander> we'll never get anything done now :D
  213. 21:52:56: <wizzie> :D
  214. 21:52:57: <Nuppiz> Mad Men everywhere
  215. 21:53:06: <Salamander> klon yeah but this is the free tyre we're talking about
  216. 21:53:10: <klon> He's a mad man, such a mad man
  217. 21:53:16: <klon> he's a real, a real mad man
  218. 21:53:37: <RealRacingRoots> klon changed william regal's theme on us
  219. 21:53:44: <klon> indeed I did
  220. 21:54:32: <Nuppiz> Wizzie, do you agree that this is the perfect brand for the free-of-charge F1RWRS tyres: http://www.vannetukku.fi/images/goodrideLOGO_NETTIKOKO.jpg
  221. 21:54:39: <Aerond> Wizzie is still having his cornflakes
  222. 21:54:48: <Aerond> :p
  223. 21:54:48: <Aerond> don't disturb him with rubber discussion
  224. 21:55:05: <klon> Well, it would fit
  225. 21:55:10: <klon> if the bread is rather old
  226. 21:55:19: <klon> if he happens to have bread with his cornflakes
  227. 21:55:23: <Nuppiz> #LongerLastingRubber
  228. 21:55:30: <Aerond> typical Australian that would be
  229. 21:55:31: <Aerond> lol
  230. 21:58:30: <Nuppiz> meanwhile, I'll go and fetch some late night snack
  231. 21:58:58: <klon> I wish I had money for snacks
  232. 21:59:09: <wizzie> So I'm guessing I haven't actually missed anything then, correct?
  233. 21:59:14: <Salamander> i'll go and try and improve my RoGT time
  234. 21:59:24: <Aerond> Nothing worthy regarding team owners
  235. 21:59:24: <RealRacingRoots> I need to do that too Salamander
  236. 21:59:32: <klon> €3.30 to pay all my food from tomorrow til Thursday lol :D
  237. 21:59:37: <klon> that's what I got
  238. 21:59:40: <dark77> i need to make an RRC logo, any ideas what i should put on it
  239. 21:59:51: <RealRacingRoots> Comic Sans
  240. 22:00:11: <Aerond> loooool
  241. 22:00:25: <Aerond> Klon, just buy a pair of kilos of rice
  242. 22:00:49: <Aerond> :p
  243. 22:00:49: <Aerond> And a bit of curry to stuff it up
  244. 22:01:03: <RealRacingRoots> rice or ramen noodles
  245. 22:01:11: <Aerond> Rice is cheaper
  246. 22:01:12: <Aerond> :p
  247. 22:01:38: <klon> I was thinking on taking 49 cent spaghetti with the mayonese I have at hand :D
  248. 22:02:09: <Aerond> Spaghetti with mayo??
  249. 22:02:13: <Aerond> That's terrible
  250. 22:02:34: <klon> well, that's student life I guess
  251. 22:03:02: <Aerond> When I was in London I survived on 5 pounds worth of food a week
  252. 22:03:11: <Aerond> And I have to say I managed pretty well
  253. 22:03:22: <Aerond> With some cooking skills
  254. 22:04:21: <Nuppiz> macaroni is one of the cheapest foods here, especially on special offer
  255. 22:05:05: <Nuppiz> five 400g bags for 1€
  256. 22:06:18: <Aerond> Do that, buy 1/2 a kg of tomatoes and a couple of onions
  257. 22:06:26: <Aerond> Stir fry the tomatoes and onions
  258. 22:06:28: <Salamander> alright i think thats about as good is it'll get for me
  259. 22:06:38: <Aerond> And you have a decent sauce for your pasta instead of mayo
  260. 22:07:07: <Salamander> time to send that email
  261. 22:07:20: <Nuppiz> yeah, don't need to worry about those yet
  262. 22:07:22: <klon> tomatos are out of season and therefore expensive
  263. 22:07:24: <RealRacingRoots> what game are you doing RoGT with?
  264. 22:07:27: <Aerond> lol
  265. 22:07:30: <Aerond> Not in Spain
  266. 22:07:31: <Aerond> :p
  267. 22:07:36: <Nuppiz> GT4
  268. 22:07:39: <RealRacingRoots> Spain does not equal germany
  269. 22:07:42: <klon> Yeah, well, you wanna send me some?
  270. 22:07:42: <klon> lol
  271. 22:07:43: <klon> :D
  272. 22:07:46: <Aerond> lol
  273. 22:08:19: <Aerond> Wizzie, basically, if you want to clear up anything about the rules feel free to ask
  274. 22:08:38: <Nuppiz> but I do know how to make a decent Bolognese sauce
  275. 22:08:50: <klon> I should look at cabbage if I want cheap veggies
  276. 22:09:02: <Nuppiz> which can be then used as a pizza topping if needed
  277. 22:09:04: <Aerond> potatoes are always an option
  278. 22:09:21: <Aerond> You can do well with potatoes, a bit of oil, onions and an oven
  279. 22:09:25: <wizzie> Can I have a detailed explanation of the new driver system?
  280. 22:09:35: <wizzie> It makes like no sense to me :/
  281. 22:09:40: <Aerond> Well, it's more or less explained in the thread
  282. 22:09:51: <Aerond> So I'd need to know where you got lost
  283. 22:10:12: <wizzie> Wait, it's in the thread? Haven't looked there yet
  284. 22:10:25: <Aerond> The 2016 rules discussion thread
  285. 22:10:39: <Aerond> But I'm sure you already read that in the past
  286. 22:10:43: <Aerond> That's why I ask
  287. 22:11:38: <Aerond> With 3,30 you should be able to buy plenty of pasta, potatoes and onions to at least have a bit of variety
  288. 22:11:55: <klon> Well, I guess so
  289. 22:12:43: <Aerond> Don't you have absolutely nothing apart from mayo??
  290. 22:13:21: <Aerond> Roasted potatoes should marry the mayo pretty good as well if you want to make use of it
  291. 22:13:56: <Nuppiz> €3.30 for three days, that'd be an extreme challenge on Finland's price levels
  292. 22:14:17: <klon> I also have squash at hand
  293. 22:14:18: <klon> :D
  294. 22:14:27: <Aerond> In Finland I would buy plenty of Salmiakki
  295. 22:14:33: <Aerond> :p
  296. 22:14:33: <Aerond> if it¡s spelt like that
  297. 22:14:43: <Nuppiz> yes it is :P
  298. 22:15:22: <Nuppiz> it's one of the Finnish delicacies I'm less fond of
  299. 22:15:38: <Aerond> In Spain it's certainly pretty easy to live on 3,30 for three days
  300. 22:16:13: <klon> Well, it's not impossible by no means in Germany either...
  301. 22:16:22: <Nuppiz> I could probably get a meager dinner for three days with that
  302. 22:16:28: <Aerond> Hi TMLW
  303. 22:16:29: <Aerond> :)
  304. 22:16:38: <TMLW> Hey there
  305. 22:16:44: <Nuppiz> breakfast, lunch, others would be much harder
  306. 22:16:46: <TMLW> What have I missed this time?
  307. 22:17:01: <Aerond> Nothing serious concerning team owners
  308. 22:17:02: <klon> Tyres and food discussion
  309. 22:17:05: <Nuppiz> we're discussing how to eat cheaply
  310. 22:17:19: <Nuppiz> and Goodride tires: http://www.vannetukku.fi/images/goodrideLOGO_NETTIKOKO.jpg
  311. 22:18:37: <klon> ah, things were easier when I had money and had to spend less of it because I only ate one meal a day anyway :D
  312. 22:20:19: <Aerond> TMLW, basically, if you have any questions other than bitching once again against the engines just ask
  313. 22:20:20: <Aerond> :p
  314. 22:21:12: <TMLW> Well, since you didn't answer it yesterday, where are the TBA races likely to be?
  315. 22:21:24: <Aerond> I don't have a clear idea
  316. 22:21:28: <Aerond> Have yet to try tracks
  317. 22:21:38: <Salamander> the tba north america race should clearly be montreal
  318. 22:21:38: <Salamander> clearly
  319. 22:21:42: <Aerond> But we'll probably have Buenos Aires and Mexico
  320. 22:21:48: <klon> and I say Vancouver
  321. 22:21:52: <Salamander> clearly montreal
  322. 22:21:54: <Salamander> clearly
  323. 22:21:56: <klon> nope
  324. 22:22:01: <Nuppiz> Mexico?
  325. 22:22:01: <Salamander> yup
  326. 22:22:06: <klon> it's Vancouver or nothing
  327. 22:22:09: <Nuppiz> on Hermanos Rodriguez?
  328. 22:22:14: <Salamander> montreal or bust
  329. 22:22:32: <klon> Vancouver or war
  330. 22:22:36: <Aerond> Hermanos Rodriguez, which is on Mexico DF which is the track that has been used for the last few seasons
  331. 22:22:49: <Aerond> The continuity of that race was pendant on Plaza getting a seat
  332. 22:22:50: <Salamander> montreal or mad
  333. 22:22:59: <Nuppiz> hmm
  334. 22:22:59: <klon> location of Kay Lon's first (and only) F1RWRS win
  335. 22:23:02: <Salamander> oh
  336. 22:23:04: <Salamander> well
  337. 22:23:07: <Nuppiz> IFRC is going there on April 16-17
  338. 22:23:19: <Salamander> i kinda shot myself in the foot there didnt i? :D
  339. 22:23:31: <TMLW> I'm happy with Mexico City.
  340. 22:23:34: <wizzie> Aerond, I can still keep my chassis for this year, right?
  341. 22:23:46: <Aerond> Yes, for as long as you want
  342. 22:23:52: <Aerond> Just have in mind it'll age
  343. 22:24:00: <Nuppiz> maybe we could share travel costs? :P
  344. 22:24:04: <Aerond> And when you change you'll be forced to build one
  345. 22:24:15: <wizzie> Yeah. I figured I can get away with keeping it for this year and then building a new one for 2017
  346. 22:24:35: <wizzie> That way I can just blow all my credits on a new engine for this year, rather than have to do both :D
  347. 22:25:09: <TMLW> Which means more MRTWINSLOL for at least two years while the rest of us have no money.
  348. 22:25:27: <klon> ... Buenos Aires is lame though - it's just a shame I was not able to test this Chilean circuit I talked about earlier :D
  349. 22:25:36: <Aerond> Not bad on Gp2
  350. 22:25:44: <Aerond> Had some nice stuff on Chris Dagnall career
  351. 22:25:50: <wizzie> Wait, what happened to the Tropican race we were going to have for this year?
  352. 22:25:52: <dark77> there http://www.shoutwiki.com/w/images/f1alternate/3/39/RRC_Logo.png
  353. 22:26:03: <Aerond> Like top drivers spinning out several times during a race and first corner shunts
  354. 22:26:03: <klon> Well, yeah, the racing might be good but that is none of my concern
  355. 22:26:07: <klon> :D
  356. 22:26:09: <Salamander> also buenos aires was the site of james davies' lone f1rgp2c win to date :D
  357. 22:26:23: <klon> My top priorty is obscurity before anything else :P
  358. 22:26:34: <Aerond> yeah we all know
  359. 22:26:38: <Aerond> lady
  360. 22:26:40: <wizzie> Vancouver's not THAT obscure :P
  361. 22:26:46: <klon> obscure enough
  362. 22:27:07: <TMLW> In my personal opinion, we should drop Monaco for Vancouver.
  363. 22:27:13: <Aerond> Nooooooooo
  364. 22:27:14: <Aerond> NEVER
  365. 22:27:15: <Salamander> yes
  366. 22:27:17: <Salamander> yes
  367. 22:27:34: <klon> We should drop Monaco for Paris
  368. 22:27:41: <wizzie> Lappy, you of all people should know Vancouver for GP4 is probably one of only two tracks that are even more boring than Monaco :L
  369. 22:27:50: <TMLW> We have Macau, which I reckon is a better track anyway.
  370. 22:27:59: <Aerond> I'll be happy with Monaco as long as it provides a race as good as the 2014 one once every 10 seasons
  371. 22:28:22: <TMLW> And since the reason for it being so late is to not clash with F1, clearly we're not very welcome there.
  372. 22:28:32: <Nuppiz> Pau+fragile IFRC cars
  373. 22:28:42: <Nuppiz> inb4 humongous repair bills
  374. 22:28:43: <wizzie> But that's because F1 hates us, and we hate F1
  375. 22:28:52: <Salamander> yeah
  376. 22:29:06: <Salamander> we shouldnt be going to the most iconic f1 venue of all
  377. 22:29:11: <wizzie> The Monacan Prince just doesn't want his huge investment with Bernie to not go to waste, even though the F1RWRS is clearly the better series :P
  378. 22:29:33: <wizzie> Monegasque even
  379. 22:29:56: <Salamander> it just doesnt sit right with me, the f1rwrs going to monaco
  380. 22:30:20: <dark77> yeah it makes no sense
  381. 22:30:39: <Nuppiz> http://www.ustream.tv/channel/nuppiz
  382. 22:30:39: <Salamander> it should be replaced with montreal
  383. 22:30:45: <Salamander> a far superior track in every regard
  384. 22:30:46: <TMLW> The F1RWRS did fine before 2013 without Monaco, we can do just as as well now :D
  385. 22:30:53: <Salamander> yep
  386. 22:30:58: <RealRacingRoots> the only other race going on that weekend is the indy 500
  387. 22:31:05: <klon> muahahahahaha - my "this or that is too F1-ish" comments spread like a virus
  388. 22:31:12: <Aerond> :p
  389. 22:31:19: <Salamander> oh nooooooooo :o
  390. 22:31:21: <wizzie> Nah, we just all dislike Monaco Klon :P
  391. 22:31:26: <wizzie> No virus to speak of here :P
  392. 22:31:44: <Salamander> like i said montreal is a far superior track
  393. 22:31:48: <Salamander> we should go there instead
  394. 22:31:53: <TMLW> And to be fair, I already wanted to get away from F1. Years ago :P
  395. 22:31:58: <RealRacingRoots> you could go to laguna seca with gtr and ifrc
  396. 22:32:07: <Salamander> nooooo
  397. 22:32:11: <Aerond> No good Laguna in Gp2
  398. 22:32:13: <RealRacingRoots> no?
  399. 22:32:14: <wizzie> Yeah, but nobody cares what Frank Zimmer thinks anymore Lappy :P
  400. 22:32:17: <RealRacingRoots> okay
  401. 22:32:34: <Aerond> Long Beach is fine
  402. 22:32:43: <Salamander> yeah it is
  403. 22:32:48: <RealRacingRoots> both my cars stalled?
  404. 22:32:51: <RealRacingRoots> Piss!
  405. 22:32:52: <TMLW> Wait, didn't you hold a test at Laguna Seca a while ago?
  406. 22:32:59: <Aerond> Yeah
  407. 22:33:01: <Aerond> and it was crap
  408. 22:33:02: <Aerond> :p
  409. 22:34:20: <TMLW> Another advantage to no Monaco: We can actually make a decent calendar
  410. 22:34:26: <wizzie> Holy shit, I thought I'd never see the day where we'd see a Shell DJR Falcon on the track again
  411. 22:35:23: <TMLW> There's about 6 weeks between F3 events at the time.
  412. 22:35:41: <Aerond> Hi Eurobrun
  413. 22:35:47: <Eurobrun> Hello
  414. 22:35:59: <TMLW> Everything at the back end of the calendar can move forward two weeks, suddenly it seems sensible.
  415. 22:36:06: <Aerond> Well, I'd mark this as a revised calendar
  416. 22:36:21: <Aerond> 1. 20th March -- Adelaide
  417. 22:36:30: <wizzie> Aerond, if you have time, could you do the new stats for one driver right now, just to demonstrate how the new driver system works?
  418. 22:36:41: <Aerond> 2. 27th March -- Bathurst
  419. 22:36:42: <Salamander> do james davies
  420. 22:36:55: <Aerond> 3. 17th April -- Brands Hatch
  421. 22:36:59: <klon> or Kay Lon so Wizzie can know just in how deep of shit he is
  422. 22:37:07: <wizzie> Nah, I was thinking of someone bog standard and that nobody cares about... like Jari Kekkonen :P
  423. 22:37:12: <Aerond> 4. 1st May -- Monza
  424. 22:37:26: <Salamander> wizzie james davies fits that description perfectly
  425. 22:37:33: <Aerond> 5. 15th May -- RB Ring
  426. 22:37:46: <Eurobrun> The people want Andrea Battani
  427. 22:37:47: <Aerond> 6. 29th May -- Montreal
  428. 22:37:58: <TMLW> Douglas Mann!
  429. 22:38:13: <wizzie> Ahh, Andrea Battani. He of the Friday morning valium addiction :P
  430. 22:38:22: <Aerond> 7. 5 June -- Road America
  431. 22:38:36: <klon> Wizzie, that ain't Fredo Mestolio
  432. 22:38:38: <Aerond> 8. 19th June -- Long Beach
  433. 22:38:44: <wizzie> Montreal? I'm very okay with that :D
  434. 22:38:48: <Salamander> as am i :D
  435. 22:38:50: <klon> I ain't
  436. 22:38:51: <Aerond> 9. 10th July -- Norisring
  437. 22:39:04: <Aerond> 10. 24th July -- Zandvoort
  438. 22:39:25: <Aerond> 11. 4th September -- Spa
  439. 22:39:34: <Aerond> 12. 18th September -- Monaco
  440. 22:39:45: <Aerond> 13. 2nd October -- Mexico
  441. 22:39:47: <TMLW> Also, to distance from F1, abandon the summer break!
  442. 22:40:03: <Aerond> 14. 9th October -- Buenos Aires
  443. 22:40:13: <Aerond> 15. 30th October -- Macau
  444. 22:40:23: <Aerond> 16. 6th November -- Fuji
  445. 22:40:33: <Salamander> 1 week from mexico to argentina?
  446. 22:40:45: <Salamander> thats a bit taxing, isnt it?
  447. 22:40:46: <Aerond> It could be moved back one week
  448. 22:41:08: <wizzie> Or we could just move both Monaco and Mexico one week forward
  449. 22:41:08: <Aerond> to 16th October
  450. 22:41:17: <wizzie> That way Belgium and Monaco will be the back-to-back event
  451. 22:41:19: <Eurobrun> Seems good. Just really hope that Adelaide isn't called the Tasman GP (ugh)
  452. 22:41:24: <klon> Well, Salamander, those lazy twats could so something for their money
  453. 22:41:27: <klon> Eurobrun it sure is
  454. 22:41:35: <Eurobrun> FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
  455. 22:41:44: <Salamander> ...
  456. 22:41:50: <Aerond> For 2016 the race at Adelaide will be the Australian GP
  457. 22:42:00: <Aerond> And Bathurst will be NSW Grand Prix
  458. 22:42:04: <RealRacingRoots> a double electronics failure on the start nuppiz, really?
  459. 22:42:06: <TMLW> Why? What has Bathurst done to deserve demotion?
  460. 22:42:07: <Eurobrun> Wow that is good
  461. 22:42:13: <Nuppiz> yes
  462. 22:42:20: <RealRacingRoots> :/
  463. 22:42:20: <TMLW> Preserve the history of the series.
  464. 22:42:21: <Salamander> bathurst should be the australian gp
  465. 22:42:21: <Eurobrun> Good troll Klon :P
  466. 22:42:29: <Aerond> A lack of a good apropiate name for Adelaide
  467. 22:42:36: <Aerond> That was the reason of the change
  468. 22:42:37: <Aerond> :p
  469. 22:42:40: <wizzie> Pacific Grand Prix? :P
  470. 22:42:44: <Salamander> yeah
  471. 22:42:46: <TMLW> It should be the Tasman GP, virtually every team owner would agree, apart from Eurobrun.
  472. 22:42:47: <klon> Wizzie
  473. 22:42:47: <Salamander> pacific works
  474. 22:42:49: <klon> awnah
  475. 22:42:55: <dark77> call one of them the Australisian Grand Prix
  476. 22:42:59: <klon> We have enough GP designations
  477. 22:43:10: <klon> we don't need to pull new ones out of our arse erry year
  478. 22:43:19: <Salamander> yes we do :p
  479. 22:43:23: <Aerond> lol
  480. 22:43:41: <Aerond> Well, if I do a driver stats sim, it should be one which won't compete next year
  481. 22:43:48: <Eurobrun> TMLW, you are talking a load of crap. Adelaide is nowhere near either Tasmania of the Tasman sea
  482. 22:43:51: <dark77> or the Oceanian GP
  483. 22:43:54: <klon> Aerond, then let's help ourselves to some Daniel Melrose
  484. 22:43:56: <wizzie> Mad Uncle Melrose! :P
  485. 22:43:57: <Salamander> then do future world champion jordan davies :D
  486. 22:44:05: <RealRacingRoots> Melrose pl0x
  487. 22:44:05: <Salamander> or the mad uncle
  488. 22:44:08: <Salamander> either works
  489. 22:44:08: <Aerond> Ok, Melrose is cool
  490. 22:44:19: <klon> Eurobrun, but the name has tradition and a marquee value
  491. 22:44:20: <Aerond> It'll take me a while
  492. 22:44:26: <klon> even though it is stupid, it is mone
  493. 22:44:27: <klon> *money
  494. 22:44:32: <Aerond> I'm on the laptop and have to revise the calculation method
  495. 22:44:35: <Nuppiz> do we really need two Australian GPs?
  496. 22:44:41: <klon> Nuppiz, yes
  497. 22:44:42: <Aerond> Nuppiz YES
  498. 22:44:43: <wizzie> Yes. Yes we do Nuppiz
  499. 22:44:47: <RealRacingRoots> lol
  500. 22:44:47: <Salamander> do we?
  501. 22:44:50: <klon> we also need two grands prix in Germany
  502. 22:44:55: <klon> but we
  503. 22:44:55: <TMLW> Tasman has the history, and it's a good bit of rejectfulness, which is what this series is supposed to be about!
  504. 22:44:56: <Aerond> Klon, no way
  505. 22:44:56: <Eurobrun> Fuck tradition. The name was inaccurate
  506. 22:44:56: <Aerond> :p
  507. 22:45:02: <dark77> we need a GP in the vatican
  508. 22:45:07: <Salamander> we need one in france before any of that
  509. 22:45:13: <wizzie> Australians are the second biggest group in the RWRS paddock after the Brits :P
  510. 22:45:15: <RealRacingRoots> I don't think the GT rome tracks exist in GP2 Dark
  511. 22:45:29: <klon> Aerond, if we have two in Australia we have to have two in Germany since Germany and Australia always had the most races
  512. 22:45:30: <klon> :P
  513. 22:45:37: <Nuppiz> Wizzie, by that logic the Brits should get a second GP as well :P
  514. 22:45:43: <wizzie> And Australia was the original home of the F1RWRS as well
  515. 22:45:49: <Salamander> by any logic france should have a race!
  516. 22:45:56: <wizzie> Which is the deal breaker for the Brits Nuppiz :P
  517. 22:46:05: <klon> Salamander, France has one in 2016
  518. 22:46:14: <Salamander> yeah but its nc :(
  519. 22:46:27: <TMLW> We could drop Monaco and race at Pau again :P
  520. 22:46:32: <Salamander> YES
  521. 22:46:32: <klon> Well, we could move Monaco to Paris, then we'll have a French Grand Prix
  522. 22:46:33: <Salamander> PAU
  523. 22:46:38: <Salamander> I SECOND THIS
  524. 22:46:44: <klon> Pau was schmau in 2013
  525. 22:46:45: <wizzie> Or Paul Ricard :P
  526. 22:46:45: <Aerond> No, Pau was terrible
  527. 22:47:00: <Salamander> paul ricard maybe?
  528. 22:47:04: <Aerond> Paul Ricard wasn't very fun either except for Watkinson's shunt
  529. 22:47:11: <Salamander> dammy
  530. 22:47:11: <klon> Paul Ricard has banned F1RWRS events after the golf cart escapades
  531. 22:47:13: <Salamander> dammit
  532. 22:47:34: <wizzie> But Watkinson's shunt was one of the defining moments of the F1RWRS. It even made the front cover of the video game :P
  533. 22:47:40: <Salamander> ... magny cours? is that any good in gp2?
  534. 22:47:54: <Aerond> Not really, but first lap red flag assured
  535. 22:47:55: <Aerond> :p
  536. 22:47:59: <dark77> just race on a good track that already exists and pretend it's a new track constructed in france
  537. 22:48:01: <klon> Well, I once had Life GP (the legit one) score a point there in a manager game
  538. 22:48:06: <wizzie> And it's not that much better in GP4 either
  539. 22:48:13: <Salamander> yeah
  540. 22:48:20: <Salamander> what dark said
  541. 22:48:23: <klon> As I say, we should take the Paris street track that is on grandprix2.de and have the French GP there
  542. 22:48:24: <klon> :D
  543. 22:48:32: <Aerond> oh Shut up
  544. 22:48:36: <klon> never!
  545. 22:48:53: <Nuppiz> Nogaro? :P
  546. 22:48:56: <klon> You may take my life but you will never take my whinging :D
  547. 22:49:12: <Nuppiz> Mas du Clos?
  548. 22:49:23: <klon> Mas du wut?
  549. 22:49:28: <klon> Mas du bate?
  550. 22:49:28: <Nuppiz> Linas-Monthléry?
  551. 22:49:36: <Salamander> rouen?
  552. 22:49:48: <klon> Le Mans Bugatti?
  553. 22:49:49: <klon> :P
  554. 22:49:49: <TMLW> Le Mans Bugatti :P
  555. 22:49:54: <TMLW> DAMMIT!
  556. 22:49:55: <RealRacingRoots> we are really scraping the bottom of the barell now
  557. 22:50:06: <Nuppiz> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circuit_du_Mas_du_Clos
  558. 22:50:09: <klon> two idiots, one thought TMLW
  559. 22:50:09: <klon> :D
  560. 22:50:23: <Salamander> just pick another track thats actually good and lets pretend its in france
  561. 22:50:30: <Eurobrun> Rouen lol How much death do you want
  562. 22:50:33: <Salamander> or we could rebadge the monaco gp as the french gp :D
  563. 22:50:35: <TMLW> If great minds think alike, surely poor minds do the same :D
  564. 22:50:57: <klon> Well, technically Monaco becomes part of France if nobody is able to inherent the throne
  565. 22:51:03: <dark77> Charade
  566. 22:51:06: <klon> We could pretend that has happened lol
  567. 22:51:09: <Aerond> Let's calculate Melrose
  568. 22:51:11: <Salamander> @D
  569. 22:51:12: <Salamander> :D
  570. 22:51:24: <Aerond> Although it'll take me a while take his Qualifying history
  571. 22:51:26: <klon> *inherit
  572. 22:52:00: <klon> knowing my luck he turns out super awesome and Wizzie kicks Lon out
  573. 22:52:01: <klon> :D
  574. 22:52:07: <Aerond> I'll calculate first his race points as the qualifying points are very clearly explained and don't need much of a thought if it's ok with you
  575. 22:52:19: <wizzie> Took the words right out of my mouth Klon :P
  576. 22:52:28: <Nuppiz> Klon, in which case Albert had died because of, uh, sex overdose?
  577. 22:52:48: <Eurobrun> I really want to see what Dagnall can do in a shithouse car
  578. 22:53:02: <klon> His head exploded when AS Monaco was defeated 0-9 against the San Marinese champions in the Europa League :D
  579. 22:53:12: <wizzie> So do the rest of us Eurobrun. Which is why we need to have a Grand Reversal NC race at some point this year :D
  580. 22:53:25: <Salamander> i second this
  581. 22:54:10: <Aerond> So Melrose starts with 14000, his first year only scored points; so it's +/-100 in the RNG
  582. 22:54:31: <Aerond> The RNG throwed +73
  583. 22:54:50: <Aerond> 2nd year he got race wins
  584. 22:54:57: <wizzie> Good to see the system recognised he was more focused on another F1 title that year :P
  585. 22:55:04: <Aerond> So it's 0/+300
  586. 22:55:07: <klon> excuses
  587. 22:55:26: <Aerond> The RNG said +18
  588. 22:55:35: <Salamander> ohhh dear :D
  589. 22:55:35: <wizzie> +18? For fuck's sake :(
  590. 22:55:40: <Aerond> So it'd be 14091 by now
  591. 22:55:46: <Eurobrun> your so fucked
  592. 22:55:55: <RealRacingRoots> loool
  593. 22:55:55: <Salamander> its only melrose
  594. 22:56:12: <Aerond> In 2012 he got podiums, so it's -50/+200
  595. 22:56:29: <TMLW> Wins races, gets less experience than scoring points. Does that seem stupid to anyone else?
  596. 22:56:32: <Aerond> The RNG said -31
  597. 22:56:45: <Nuppiz> lol
  598. 22:56:45: <Salamander> tmlw yeah
  599. 22:56:52: <Eurobrun> lolololololololololololololololol
  600. 22:56:53: <klon> so 14060
  601. 22:56:55: <Aerond> So it's 14060 by the end of 2012
  602. 22:56:56: <Salamander> tbh it does seem a bit off to me
  603. 22:57:08: <wizzie> -31? Excuse me while the Mad Uncle drowns himself in more Tropican Spiced Rum
  604. 22:57:18: <Aerond> In 2013 got podiums again
  605. 22:57:28: <Aerond> It said +48
  606. 22:57:29: <klon> Unless aerond changed the system the Random Grip Range is still charged up the arse
  607. 22:57:46: <klon> so all that hype about experienced driver was asinine nonsense lol
  608. 22:57:55: <Aerond> 2014 podiums again
  609. 22:58:02: <wizzie> Not necessarily Klon :L
  610. 22:58:07: <Aerond> +124
  611. 22:58:34: <wizzie> As I explained before, random grip range can do some weird things at time. I mean, Kazama had the highest race random grip of all yet she was remarkably consistent for 90% of the year
  612. 22:58:49: <Aerond> By the end of 2014 it would be 14232
  613. 22:59:07: <Nuppiz> err, wat
  614. 22:59:11: <Salamander> aerond, so what kind of range would james davies be looking at for 2013/2014?
  615. 22:59:27: <Aerond> in 2015 he got absolutely nothing, so it's +50/-200
  616. 22:59:32: <Aerond> The RNG said -36
  617. 22:59:33: <Nuppiz> does this system take into account the cars the driver has driven at all?
  618. 22:59:40: <klon> Nuppiz, nope
  619. 22:59:51: <Aerond> That's part of the fun, I guess
  620. 22:59:59: <TMLW> So even less fair then.
  621. 23:00:12: <TMLW> What exactly was wrong with the old system again?
  622. 23:00:15: <Aerond> It's supposed to bring equality
  623. 23:00:19: <klon> TMLW the old system
  624. 23:00:21: <klon> was the sole cause
  625. 23:00:23: <klon> for
  626. 23:00:26: <klon> DAGNALLWINSLOL
  627. 23:00:33: <Salamander> especially considering davies did a hell of a job to qualify that trueba
  628. 23:00:37: <TMLW> But no Dagnall.
  629. 23:01:00: <Eurobrun> Fun, what a load of bullshit. This is only rigging F1RWRS in favour of those at the front
  630. 23:01:23: <Aerond> So Melrose would start the 2016 season with 14198 as race grip, +5% of the credits invested in him in race pace in the 2013-2015 period
  631. 23:01:47: <Aerond> Eurobrun, non-scoring drivers can still improve from one season to the next
  632. 23:01:53: <klon> That is bascially nothing so the car he is in would be the most important thing
  633. 23:02:00: <wizzie> 14198? It should have easily been 14400 if it didn't decide to screw me over in 2011 and 2012 :P
  634. 23:02:17: <wizzie> I will admit I got off rather lightly for 2015 though
  635. 23:02:49: <Eurobrun> Sorry for the retard question but can you still buy driver upgrades
  636. 23:02:56: <klon> no
  637. 23:02:56: <Nuppiz> no
  638. 23:03:06: <Aerond> Buuuuuuuut
  639. 23:03:16: <Aerond> You can still improve your drivers through testing
  640. 23:03:20: <wizzie> Klon, that's what your guy has to beat if he still wants his drive for this year :P
  641. 23:03:27: <klon> He will
  642. 23:03:46: <wizzie> Aerond, could you do Lon as well just to see if he'll still have a job beyond this afternoon? :L
  643. 23:03:53: <Aerond> :p
  644. 23:04:03: <Aerond> No stats are definitive
  645. 23:04:09: <Aerond> this is just a simulation
  646. 23:04:25: <klon> nah
  647. 23:04:27: <Nuppiz> BTW TMLW, have you done the F3RWRS driver skills yet?
  648. 23:04:29: <Aerond> I'm at the laptop so it's a bit uncomfy for me to do it right now
  649. 23:04:30: <Salamander> hmmm
  650. 23:04:30: <Aerond> sorry
  651. 23:04:31: <klon> then don't do Lon
  652. 23:04:46: <Eurobrun> Glad I got rid of Cannon then. He did ok considering the cars he was driving but will get absolutely murdered
  653. 23:04:50: <klon> I don't want to get hyped on good RNG throws this time only for the real thing to be a farce
  654. 23:05:01: <Aerond> hahah
  655. 23:05:09: <TMLW> Nuppiz, not yet, I'll wait a bit.
  656. 23:05:18: <wizzie> The real thing should be done live. It makes for a great spectator sport :L
  657. 23:05:19: <Nuppiz> ok
  658. 23:05:26: <Aerond> lol
  659. 23:05:27: <Aerond> :p
  660. 23:05:33: <Aerond> It'll take me hours
  661. 23:05:41: <Nuppiz> I don't have high hopes for Larsen, but hopefully Cinotti will be decent
  662. 23:05:52: <TMLW> I really think that the car people drive should be taken into account
  663. 23:06:07: <Eurobrun> Now that I think is it possible to do Cannon as well?
  664. 23:06:13: <TMLW> Davies stats are going to be screwed by driving the crapbox that was the 2014 HRT
  665. 23:06:18: <TMLW> Zimmer by driving the 2015 HRT
  666. 23:06:29: <TMLW> And the 2014 GRM, arguably
  667. 23:06:36: <klon> but again, unless you get some ~700 points (at least) out of the dice rolls, it will have no significance since the random grip range will probably equal the playing field a lot
  668. 23:06:38: <wizzie> Hey, Melrose got fucked over for driving a 2012 MRT. Anything is possible
  669. 23:06:43: <Nuppiz> all Dofasco drivers to date
  670. 23:06:43: <TMLW> Melrose by the ArrowTech shitboxes
  671. 23:06:52: <TMLW> Cannon for the SOTL
  672. 23:06:57: <klon> and Lon got fucked over by the 2010 Kamaha and 2015 Prospec
  673. 23:07:02: <Aerond> right, although the base number for random grip is lowered this year
  674. 23:07:10: <wizzie> And the 2011 Kamahahahaha :P
  675. 23:07:13: <Eurobrun> I don't think Battani will get that fucked over
  676. 23:07:14: <Aerond> Have yet to decide if it's to 2000 or 1800, from 2200
  677. 23:07:24: <klon> Wizzie, the 2011 Kahama was good enough for podiums
  678. 23:07:37: <wizzie> It was a fluke podium. Admit it :P
  679. 23:07:45: <klon> The RNG doesn't care
  680. 23:07:46: <klon> lol
  681. 23:07:55: <Eurobrun> He was good whenever he qualified
  682. 23:07:56: <TMLW> And then drivers like Spencer who will benefit from the 2014 MRT despite being shit.
  683. 23:08:14: <klon> Aerond, don't forget to treat 2012 as a race-winning year for Lon, he was third in the championship :D
  684. 23:08:25: <TMLW> There's another thing!
  685. 23:08:40: <TMLW> No race wins, third in the championship, screwed over!
  686. 23:08:44: <klon> What does halfop do anyway
  687. 23:08:49: <TMLW> Gary Cameron would suffer too
  688. 23:08:53: <Nuppiz> idk
  689. 23:08:58: <Aerond> TMLW
  690. 23:08:59: <klon> lol
  691. 23:09:05: <Aerond> it's race wins or top 5
  692. 23:09:09: <klon> then why are you handing out half ops?
  693. 23:09:12: <Aerond> podium or top 10
  694. 23:09:22: <Nuppiz> we use it to mark whoever is leading the discussion ATM :P
  695. 23:09:32: <TMLW> OK then, so address the rest of my concerns.
  696. 23:09:41: <klon> and [in-character]Lon should actually have been champion[/in-character]
  697. 23:10:08: <Aerond> Also
  698. 23:10:49: <Aerond> to those ranting about Macklin situation
  699. 23:11:00: <Aerond> 2014 F2RWRS drivers
  700. 23:11:16: <Aerond> will have their F2RWRS points added to their grip tally
  701. 23:11:33: <dark77> hope macklin does well
  702. 23:11:52: <TMLW> There's another one screwed over by poor machinery.
  703. 23:12:04: <wizzie> Wait, could you do Macklin's stats now?
  704. 23:12:17: <wizzie> I'm starting to suspect he might end up with better stats that the Mad Uncle
  705. 23:12:27: <klon> he might just
  706. 23:12:37: <wizzie> Or very close to him at the very least
  707. 23:13:06: <Aerond> Yes
  708. 23:13:13: <Aerond> He'd start with 14000
  709. 23:13:25: <Aerond> + 100 for winnning F2RWRS
  710. 23:13:28: <Aerond> 14100
  711. 23:13:42: <Aerond> + 5 wins, 50
  712. 23:13:50: <Aerond> sorry
  713. 23:13:51: <Aerond> 100
  714. 23:13:55: <Aerond> that's 14200
  715. 23:14:18: <Aerond> +4 podiums, 40
  716. 23:14:18: <TMLW> How come it's a constant value for F2 experience, yet the more valuable F1 experience is random?
  717. 23:14:24: <Aerond> 14240
  718. 23:14:27: <Salamander> yeah
  719. 23:14:37: <klon> because then you'd have to throw RNGs for everything
  720. 23:14:45: <klon> and the 2016 season wouldn't start before August
  721. 23:14:45: <Salamander> i think the ranges should be closed up a bit for generating f1 experience
  722. 23:14:59: <Aerond> +2 point scoring, 10
  723. 23:15:05: <Aerond> That's 14250
  724. 23:15:14: <Aerond> Now RNG for 2015 season
  725. 23:15:25: <Aerond> -101
  726. 23:15:32: <Aerond> 14149
  727. 23:15:38: <Aerond> TMLW, not so fast
  728. 23:15:52: <Aerond> Junior driver start from a lower base than 14000
  729. 23:15:57: <wizzie> So, he ended up respectfully close to Melrose in the end
  730. 23:16:01: <Aerond> F2RWRS promoted drivers start at 13800
  731. 23:16:08: <Aerond> not 14000
  732. 23:16:24: <TMLW> So? It's still ridiculous that they have constant numbers
  733. 23:16:31: <wizzie> But I assume Macklin started at 14000 because he drove the shitbox Simpson in 2015, correct?
  734. 23:16:41: <Salamander> hmmm
  735. 23:16:52: <Aerond> They also get a +/-100 before starting
  736. 23:16:56: <TMLW> I might as well leave Carter Simpson in F2 so that he racks up the wins, then when he has 20 of them promote him to F1 where he'll have brilliant stats
  737. 23:16:57: <Aerond> Right, Wizzie
  738. 23:17:03: <Salamander> this may very well work out in rosco vantini's favour
  739. 23:17:26: <Aerond> Anyway, it will be probably restricted to the last 3 seasons of junior career in the future
  740. 23:17:43: <Aerond> But right now that rule would make no sense since we only had two seasons of F2 and F3
  741. 23:18:24: <TMLW> You should either get the RNG out for everything, or for nothing.
  742. 23:18:25: <wizzie> It just might Salamander. He's sitting on 14155 right now before we get to the RNG for 2015
  743. 23:18:31: <wizzie> Which will be 0/+300
  744. 23:18:54: <TMLW> As we just saw, Macklin had most of his F2 wiped out by the RNG, even though he's better than that.
  745. 23:19:20: <Aerond> no, I can't do that since I can't make an effect on other categories performances
  746. 23:19:51: <Aerond> the RNG would have to dictate the performance of the drivers in your category in the future
  747. 23:20:02: <TMLW> They already do, sort of.
  748. 23:20:10: <TMLW> New F3 drivers get RNG stats.
  749. 23:20:36: <TMLW> The range changes based on previous results, weighted based on series.
  750. 23:20:50: <TMLW> All drivers get them.
  751. 23:21:11: <Aerond> yeah, but my RNG don't necessarily match yours
  752. 23:21:16: <Aerond> So it makes no sense
  753. 23:21:28: <TMLW> Then it become simple.
  754. 23:21:37: <TMLW> DON'T USE THE RNG FOR F1RWRS EXPERIENCE!
  755. 23:21:50: <Aerond> Then what??
  756. 23:21:59: <Aerond> The old system wasn't working
  757. 23:22:13: <wizzie> For those of you that are interested, Tomo Kazama is on 14150 for this year
  758. 23:22:16: <TMLW> Do exactly what you for the junior categories!
  759. 23:22:27: <TMLW> X points for wins, Y for podiums, etc.
  760. 23:22:29: <klon> Wizzie
  761. 23:22:30: <klon> what!
  762. 23:22:33: <klon> that cannot be right
  763. 23:22:34: <Aerond> no
  764. 23:22:39: <Aerond> because that way
  765. 23:22:50: <klon> She has more success than Vantini (a lot more) and should therefore have more
  766. 23:22:50: <Aerond> the differences between drivers would become too big
  767. 23:22:53: <wizzie> She started on 13800, but she got so many points in the F2RWRS and F3RWRS it completely negated the disadvantage
  768. 23:22:55: <wizzie> And then some
  769. 23:23:10: <Salamander> yeah
  770. 23:23:13: <klon> oh wait, forget what I said
  771. 23:23:14: <Aerond> Kazama would get a +/-100 on that
  772. 23:23:29: <klon> ?
  773. 23:23:33: <Salamander> using fixed values for wins, podiums, etc, will just ensure DAGNALLWINSLOL for all eternity
  774. 23:23:37: <Aerond> Junior drivers do
  775. 23:23:37: <TMLW> Which means the F2 and F3 champion could have basically nothing. Brilliant.
  776. 23:23:43: <Aerond> Exactly Salamander
  777. 23:23:54: <klon> TMLW, Jan Magnussen called
  778. 23:24:12: <klon> and so will Nico Hülkenberg do soon
  779. 23:25:20: <Aerond> Also
  780. 23:25:29: <Aerond> a driver can do good enough on a bad car
  781. 23:25:35: <Aerond> to be noticed by top team managers
  782. 23:26:17: <TMLW> Not if they have poor stats from being in other bad cars.
  783. 23:26:44: <Aerond> you forget there's more factors into racing
  784. 23:26:57: <wizzie> I like how we're getting so fired up about this when we all know that 2016 will be an MRTWINSLOL anyway :P
  785. 23:27:11: <Aerond> I predict a bad car in the right tyres doing interesting things at some races
  786. 23:27:30: <klon> Wizzie, true
  787. 23:27:31: <Aerond> and the right car with the wrong tyres suffering badly at some
  788. 23:27:36: <wizzie> Aerond, you decided on who gets ROTY for 2015 yet?
  789. 23:27:41: <Aerond> nope
  790. 23:27:50: <Aerond> we have to conduct proper voting
  791. 23:28:04: <Aerond> it's on my to-do list
  792. 23:28:32: <wizzie> But we all know it'll be the Mad Uncle romping away with that award with his spectacular fall from grace :L
  793. 23:28:37: <Salamander> yeah
  794. 23:28:38: <wizzie> With HRT providing some competition
  795. 23:28:43: <TMLW> That would seem to be a priority, since it can determine the budgets for some teams.
  796. 23:28:44: <Salamander> theres really no contest
  797. 23:29:19: <klon> ... isn't ROTY only worth like 50 credits or so?
  798. 23:29:27: <wizzie> 200 credits for the winner
  799. 23:29:37: <klon> Ui, well then yeah, that's significant
  800. 23:29:42: <wizzie> But if Melrose wins, it'll probably be split between Simpson and HRT
  801. 23:29:51: <klon> but ROTY will be like our universes F1 anyway
  802. 23:29:55: <klon> MelroseWinsLol
  803. 23:29:56: <wizzie> It's then 100 credits for second place and 50 for third place
  804. 23:30:54: <wizzie> http://www.f1rejects.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=224568#p224568
  805. 23:30:55: <Salamander> so, if ron mignolet gets an roty award, who gets the credits?
  806. 23:31:03: <Aerond> mmmg
  807. 23:31:07: <Aerond> good question
  808. 23:31:13: <wizzie> Turns out I did neatly summarise all the contenders for this year's ROTY award
  809. 23:31:23: <Aerond> I guess half would be forfeited and half given to Arrowtech
  810. 23:31:37: <Salamander> seems fair to me
  811. 23:32:15: <wizzie> And I managed to bag out Mecha in the process as well :P
  812. 23:33:22: <Aerond> lol
  813. 23:33:29: <Aerond> any extra questions?
  814. 23:33:51: <TMLW> Apart from "Can we just go back to last year's system?", no.
  815. 23:34:12: <klon> no we cannot
  816. 23:34:23: <wizzie> It won't make much of a difference. The only thing it'll change is by how much MRTWILSLOL :P
  817. 23:34:31: <Aerond> lol
  818. 23:34:38: <Aerond> I think it'll make a difference
  819. 23:34:39: <klon> I wil in the lottery, I am a real willer
  820. 23:34:41: <Aerond> Really
  821. 23:34:43: <TMLW> Actually, I do have one.
  822. 23:34:49: <TMLW> Can we change the points system now?
  823. 23:34:50: <RealRacingRoots> could you possibly give more furthur warning about the race weekend weather so support races could use that weather as well?
  824. 23:35:10: <Salamander> yeah
  825. 23:35:12: <Salamander> i second that tmlw
  826. 23:35:18: <klon> yeah, that would be worth considering
  827. 23:35:25: <Aerond> Yes, Realracingroots
  828. 23:35:42: <klon> especially since a less win-orientated system would be helpful in rewarding reliability
  829. 23:35:52: <Salamander> indeed
  830. 23:36:10: <Salamander> i have to admit, im not a fan of the 10-6-4-3-2-1 system
  831. 23:36:12: <Aerond> It'd be ok to me if we keep 6 scorers
  832. 23:36:25: <klon> then we could go with the classic 9-6-4-3-2-1
  833. 23:36:36: <klon> not much of a difference, but something
  834. 23:36:41: <Aerond> how about 10-7-5-3-2-1
  835. 23:36:48: <klon> that sounds neat as well
  836. 23:36:50: <TMLW> I'd prefer a top 8 system. We aren't getting many races with only 7 cars finishing anymore.
  837. 23:37:01: <wizzie> Wasn't that the system Pasta tried to use for his 1980 season?
  838. 23:37:50: <Aerond> no idea
  839. 23:39:59: <Salamander> average number of finishers per race in 2015 is 13.625 by the way
  840. 23:40:18: <Salamander> not counting drivers classified having completed 90% distance
  841. 23:40:20: <Aerond> Similar to early 90`s F1 IIRC
  842. 23:40:26: <TMLW> And less than half got rewarded.
  843. 23:40:33: <Salamander> yeah
  844. 23:40:44: <Salamander> i'd advocate a switch to the 03-09 f1 system
  845. 23:40:48: <Salamander> 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1
  846. 23:41:14: <TMLW> I agree with that one Salamander
  847. 23:41:25: <RealRacingRoots> seems like the most reasonable option out there
  848. 23:41:27: <klon> nah, then let's go with 12-9-7-5-4-3-2-1 ... three points difference between winner and 2nd place is ideal
  849. 23:41:36: <wizzie> About time my idea from 2013 finally got some traction Salamander :P
  850. 23:41:52: <Salamander> hey, i wasnt paying attention then :p
  851. 23:42:27: <klon> but if we change the F1RWRS point system in a significant manner I think the junior categories should follow suit
  852. 23:42:57: <Salamander> i think f1 is the only one using that system
  853. 23:43:05: <TMLW> The F3 is using a top 15 system because of the huge grid.
  854. 23:43:05: <wizzie> Nah, it'll just bring the F1RWRS roughly in line with the F2 and F3RWRS
  855. 23:43:14: <Salamander> yup
  856. 23:43:22: <TMLW> F2 already uses the 03-09 system doesn't it?
  857. 23:43:35: <wizzie> Yeah. With bonus points for poles and fastest laps. Because I can :P
  858. 23:43:35: <TMLW> I stopped paying attention to the championship after a while
  859. 23:44:01: <wizzie> Which led to the ridiculously awesome situation of a five way tie for 3rd heading into the final race
  860. 23:44:16: <wizzie> Which was only broken by a sole point for fastest lap :L
  861. 23:44:42: <Salamander> well, i think we should open this points discussion to all the team bosses before we make a decision either way
  862. 23:44:53: <klon> Nah
  863. 23:45:02: <Salamander> :D
  864. 23:45:06: <klon> discussions upon hours and hours don't lead to anything
  865. 23:45:10: <klon> :D
  866. 23:45:33: <wizzie> Not unless there's a copious amount of alcohol involved :P
  867. 23:45:39: <RealRacingRoots> clearly we can't have a effective democracy
  868. 23:45:41: <Aerond> Real Life F1 in 1991 got 12.9 finishers
  869. 23:45:42: <wizzie> Which the RWRS has plenty of, mind you
  870. 23:45:52: <Aerond> So F1RWRS not doing bad
  871. 23:45:53: <klon> RealRacingRoots - nah, no such thing
  872. 23:46:00: <klon> neither in RL nor on the internet :D
  873. 23:46:47: <klon> Why have I used a smiley there? I was not being ironic or anything.
  874. 23:47:12: <Aerond> Wizzie, the extra credits for FL and Pole are there instead of points
  875. 23:47:30: <Aerond> I'd get rid of those credits if we gave points for that
  876. 23:47:32: <wizzie> Who said I was ever gonna suggest having points for FL and Pole?
  877. 23:47:48: <wizzie> Although that being said, I personally think it should be the same amount of credits for FL and Pole
  878. 23:48:00: <Aerond> mmmh, I don't know
  879. 23:48:01: <wizzie> Whether Poles gets bumped down or FL gets a boost is not my problem :P
  880. 23:48:14: <Salamander> i agree
  881. 23:48:19: <Salamander> fl and poles should get the same amount
  882. 23:48:22: <klon> Poles should be bumped down then
  883. 23:48:46: <klon> because FLAP distribution is rather limited in GP2
  884. 23:49:04: <Salamander> yeah
  885. 23:49:08: <klon> so large sums of dosh for FLAPs would give the fastest teams a significant advantage
  886. 23:49:14: <Salamander> it was usually either dagnall or davies in 2015
  887. 23:49:58: <wizzie> There were only two fastest laps all year that didn't go to either MRT or DGN
  888. 23:50:03: <wizzie> And one of those was with Davies anyway
  889. 23:50:38: <wizzie> That being said, the pole distribution was equally as grim
  890. 23:51:17: <Aerond> Well, we got 8 drivers from 3 different teams
  891. 23:51:22: <Aerond> not that bad
  892. 23:51:36: <Salamander> yeah
  893. 23:51:45: <Salamander> as opposed to 4 drivers from the same 3 teams for fl
  894. 23:51:49: <wizzie> Well, the amount of drivers isn't that much of a concern. It just decides who goes in the record books for what
  895. 23:51:53: <klon> I'll be curious if Kay Lon can score a pole next year
  896. 23:52:10: <wizzie> It's which teams that are getting poles and fls that are the real point of interest
  897. 23:52:53: <wizzie> Although I think the distribution for 2015 was such because the top 4 teams were so much faster than anyone else it wasn't funny
  898. 23:52:56: <Salamander> actually no
  899. 23:53:04: <Aerond> Well, I don't mind much changing the points scoring system as long it's kept on top 6
  900. 23:53:05: <Salamander> 4 teams got pole in 2015
  901. 23:53:19: <Aerond> 25 drivers is still a good ammount of drivers getting points
  902. 23:53:23: <TMLW> Why does it have to be top 6?
  903. 23:53:30: <Salamander> i still think expanding to the top 8 is preferable
  904. 23:53:35: <dark77> ^
  905. 23:53:40: <klon> why not a compromise?
  906. 23:53:41: <klon> Top 7
  907. 23:53:42: <klon> :D
  908. 23:53:52: <wizzie> Because 7 is an awful number to work with
  909. 23:54:02: <klon> but it's a lucky number
  910. 23:54:10: <klon> also "awful"
  911. 23:54:13: <Aerond> And I don't want to give away more credits
  912. 23:54:15: <klon> leads to "rejectful"
  913. 23:54:19: <Aerond> top 8 means more credits
  914. 23:54:24: <klon> leads to "good"
  915. 23:54:24: <Salamander> if it was top 8 in 1991, every team that finished a race in 1991 would scored a point :D
  916. 23:54:32: <Salamander> wait no
  917. 23:54:36: <TMLW> Cheap bastard.
  918. 23:54:37: <Salamander> thats wrong
  919. 23:54:38: <Aerond> and it doesn't mean they will go to lower field teams
  920. 23:54:48: <Salamander> nearly every team
  921. 23:55:00: <dark77> how about the top 8 get points but only the top 6 get credits
  922. 23:55:10: <klon> Salamander, who were the poor sods who failed
  923. 23:55:13: <wizzie> That won't work Dark
  924. 23:55:22: <Aerond> that's unecessarily complicated to calculate
  925. 23:55:22: <wizzie> Because credits are handed out on a per-point basis
  926. 23:55:26: <Aerond> exactly
  927. 23:55:35: <Salamander> klon it was fondmetal and footwork
  928. 23:56:06: <wizzie> If we had the Top 8 points system for 2015, the biggest beneficiary would have been Jones. And the Mad Uncle simply can't have that :P
  929. 23:56:15: <Aerond> lol
  930. 23:56:22: <klon> and Lon still wouldn't have had points :/
  931. 23:56:36: <Aerond> But see, top 8 doesn't mean lower teams will get more benefited
  932. 23:56:44: <klon> makes you wonder why he hasn't had no ROTY nominations
  933. 23:56:58: <Aerond> if top teams get more points because of it
  934. 23:56:58: <TMLW> They'll score more points than they would, and thus earn more credits. That is a pretty clear benefit.
  935. 23:58:16: <Aerond> you're only looking at half of it. What's the point for Team A to get 25 extra credits if more powerful Team B get 75 extra credits????
  936. 23:58:31: <wizzie> As an interesting side note though, HRT would have jumped both Prospec and Kingfisher in the standings with the Top 8 system
  937. 23:58:46: <wizzie> And Prospec would have also fallen behind our friends down at Tropico
  938. 23:58:52: <klon> how?
  939. 23:59:07: <klon> I think we had three top 8 finishes
  940. 23:59:16: <wizzie> Yeah. HRT had four though :P
  941. 23:59:18: <TMLW> Because HRT had a billion 7ths early in the year
  942. 23:59:22: <klon> yes
  943. 23:59:27: <Salamander> alright, im gonna work out exactly who wouldve benefitted from a top 8 scoring system in 2015
  944. 23:59:28: <wizzie> And three of those were 7th places
  945. 23:59:33: <klon> but I was wondering how Tropico could beat Prospec
  946. 23:59:50: <wizzie> Because Prospec only had a sole 5th against a 6th and two 8ths for Tropico
  947. 23:59:52: <Aerond> And what's the point of Top 8?? The epic of scoring will disappear
  948. 23:59:58: <Aerond> As it happened in RL F1
  949. 23:59:58: <klon> that is true
  950. 00:00:02: <wizzie> Which meant they would have been ahead by a single point
  951. 00:00:05: <klon> that is also true
  952. 00:00:20: <wizzie> Alitalia still manage to move absolutely nowhere in the process though :L
  953. 00:00:29: <klon> because Alitalia blows lol
  954. 00:00:31: <Aerond> Remember, it's high reliability which destroyed the epic in real life f1
  955. 00:00:43: <Aerond> And I'll make sure that doesn't happen in F1RWRS
  956. 00:00:44: <Aerond> :p
  957. 00:01:05: <wizzie> The reliability limit's at 2500 right now, correct?
  958. 00:01:10: <Aerond> yup
  959. 00:01:21: <wizzie> Why not raise it to 3000, just for teh lulz?
  960. 00:01:21: <klon> a bit less then five retirements a year
  961. 00:01:33: <Aerond> Well
  962. 00:01:43: <Aerond> I will simply make new engines less reliable
  963. 00:01:43: <Aerond> :p
  964. 00:01:59: <klon> don't forget about the upper limit though :P
  965. 00:02:24: <wizzie> Klon, the upper limit's like 16000 or some ridiculous shit like that :P
  966. 00:02:36: <wizzie> I don't think anyone would be stupid enough to buy an engine that unreliable :P
  967. 00:03:45: <Aerond> Simply with the most reliable engine being at 4000, that'll make pretty hard for almost everyone to get to the limit
  968. 00:03:48: <klon> It's 16384 to be precise
  969. 00:04:00: <Aerond> As you have to add chassis reliability
  970. 00:05:15: <Aerond> Well
  971. 00:05:32: <Aerond> I'll leave you thinking about what we discussed
  972. 00:05:36: <Salamander> alright
  973. 00:05:38: <Aerond> Time for bed
  974. 00:06:02: <Salamander> well, sunshine wouldve benefitted from a top 8 scoring system 7 times
  975. 00:06:08: <Aerond> But don't be as stupid as F1 teams were 10 years ago and keep scoring drivers at 6!!!
  976. 00:06:11: <Salamander> jones 4
  977. 00:06:15: <Salamander> hrt 3
  978. 00:06:18: <Salamander> boxtel 3
  979. 00:06:22: <Salamander> arrowtech 2
  980. 00:06:25: <Salamander> kamaha 2
  981. 00:06:27: <Salamander> gillet 2
  982. 00:06:30: <Salamander> foxdale 2
  983. 00:06:33: <Salamander> alitalia 2
  984. 00:06:36: <Salamander> tropico 2
  985. 00:06:36: <wizzie> You also need to take into account extra points for top 6 finishes as well
  986. 00:06:44: <Salamander> dgn 1
  987. 00:06:46: <Salamander> kingfisher
  988. 00:06:47: <Salamander> 1
  989. 00:06:50: <Salamander> mrt 1
  990. 00:06:54: <klon> well, then a top 8 system is bad
  991. 00:06:55: <Salamander> wizzie screw that
  992. 00:06:59: <klon> Alitalia must never profit
  993. 00:07:06: <Salamander> its way too late to bother :p
  994. 00:07:41: <klon> I for my part think if there is no movement on the 6 points finishers issue we should go for 10-7-5-3-2-1
  995. 00:08:04: <Salamander> nah
  996. 00:08:18: <Salamander> if its gonna be 6 scorers keep it at 10-6-4-3-2-1
  997. 00:08:29: <Salamander> points systems using a 7 are le dumb :p
  998. 00:09:17: <klon> I should mention that seeing "le ironic shitposting" use of the word "le" fulfills me with murderous desire and a lust for warm blood
  999. 00:09:35: <Salamander> sucks to be you then
  1000. 00:09:44: <Salamander> :p
  1001. 00:09:56: <klon> Nah, sucks to be Jordan Davies - because I will use all my power to ruin his career
  1002. 00:10:05: <Aerond> good night guys
  1003. 00:10:05: <Salamander> what power
  1004. 00:10:07: <klon> if you don't cease your villanous behaviour
  1005. 00:10:09: <Salamander> see ya
  1006. 00:10:13: <klon> bye
  1007. 00:10:14: <Aerond> have fun with your 3.30 klon
  1008. 00:10:17: <Salamander> what villainous behaviour
  1009. 00:10:19: <klon> I will lol
  1010. 00:10:23: <Aerond> You should make a blog out of your missery
  1011. 00:10:52: <klon> nah - unlike with this chat I can't force people to listen and if nobody is forced to listen to me nobody listens to me lol
  1012. 00:11:02: <Salamander> :D
  1013. 00:11:04: <RealRacingRoots> did a test race at the norisring
  1014. 00:11:18: <Salamander> how bad?
  1015. 00:11:18: <RealRacingRoots> that was a great battle for the win between the chris short ferraris
  1016. 00:11:44: <klon> how did BITW fare?
  1017. 00:11:51: <RealRacingRoots> i dont remember
  1018. 00:11:59: <RealRacingRoots> I was watching the battle for the win
  1019. 00:12:06: <klon> booo :P
  1020. 00:12:08: <wizzie> Were the JLD as useless as always?
  1021. 00:12:12: <RealRacingRoots> yup
  1022. 00:12:15: <Aerond> Oh, and be prepared for some novelties in the engine market
  1023. 00:12:27: <klon> Trabant?
  1024. 00:12:30: <Aerond> Qualifying and race bhp won't be chained anymore
  1025. 00:12:36: <RealRacingRoots> 3 Laps before the end the Chris Short Ferraris were side-by-side for the duration of the lap
  1026. 00:12:36: <wizzie> Novelties? You mean like free inflatable flailing arms men and shit? :L
  1027. 00:12:56: <Aerond> so it means at least one manufacturer going for a tremendous qualifying engine which could be shit during races
  1028. 00:13:02: <Aerond> or the contrary
  1029. 00:13:14: <Nuppiz> I don't even remember the IFRC points system :D
  1030. 00:13:16: <Salamander> well i know what engine im going for :D
  1031. 00:13:26: <Salamander> that doesnt bode well :p
  1032. 00:13:45: <klon> Ha, there is the advantage of being an utterly independent customer team
  1033. 00:13:46: <Nuppiz> oh, so heat races have 2003-09 F1
  1034. 00:13:58: <klon> I can pick the best one available
  1035. 00:14:05: <Nuppiz> Features have 15-12-9-7-6-5-4-3-2-1
  1036. 00:14:17: <Salamander> :o
  1037. 00:14:24: <Aerond> Ok
  1038. 00:14:24: <Salamander> youre using a 7 :p
  1039. 00:14:26: <Salamander> :o
  1040. 00:14:28: <Aerond> good night guys
  1041. 00:14:36: <RealRacingRoots> i'm doing something similar for GT-R nuppiz
  1042. 00:14:36: <Aerond> my gf is waiting at bed
  1043. 00:14:42: <RealRacingRoots> Oooooo
  1044. 00:14:43: <Nuppiz> ooh
  1045. 00:14:45: <Nuppiz> kinky
  1046. 00:14:49: <Aerond> you'll understand my urge
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement