>>4295694
>Great leap forward was stopped after it proved its uselessness, Cultural revolution and removing corruption/recesionism from power was the main thing here that took country's recourses, it was necessary to not become new ussr and last some more time (or forever, if instead of deng xiaoping there would be someone else)

Ok, but that doesn't erase my point. My point is that Mao Zedong made horrific mistakes. I can't make a moral critique of the Great Leap Forward since it was more about ignorance and economic disasters rather than pure malice. The Cultural Revolution did have malicious aspects. I'll elaborate on that later if you're unaware.

>its obviously influenced by communist saying of women's rights, but it's the bad side of communism.

How is equal working, education, and healthcare rights for women bad bro... I'm not even a feminist I can recognize that some working fields are clearly not designed for women and that men are farly superior and dominate in a lot of jobs more than women. But there is aspects where both men and women could easily cooperate and share that are just locked behind gender even though they both have equal/nearly similar capabilities.

Like you're telling me that a foid shouldn't have the same education as a man. Or shouldn't be able to work jobs that they are clearly capable of working. Or shouldn't recieve equal healthcare, housing, or food rights. Why?

>no, because mao did the majority of the job. going from nothing to superpower can be easy once the fundament is established, this is what modern third/second world countries lack. without mao, china would be like india, its a really good example. bad economic mistakes that mao did were undone and are just here to mobilize the country, also i think you are underestimating the importance

Can you elaborate on how Chairman Mao is directly responsible for China's robust and powerful economy? Sources are preferred.

Because at least with the current knowledge I have, (IDK, don't have full knowledge about Mao Zedong but I know the surface level stuff), Deng Xiaoping was the one responsible for China's economic leap forward. He was the one that implemented the state capitalist and foreign trade advancements in 1978, which is what made China rich.

>mao belived in radical communism, this had bad sides (femenism, 60s) but good sides (fundament for the country).

Fundament for the country is very broad and it depends on what you're talking about. For example, the unification of China, and the defeat of foreign imperialist powers like Japan and the US from pretty much dominating and controlling China, the founding of the PRC, you don't even need to be a communist to make achievements like that. You don't need to believe in a Marxist economic model to do all this stuff. So the radical communist ideology of Mao wasn't the thing that caused this.

And I know anti-imperialism is often associated with communist ideology. (Since anti-imperialism is part of Marxist philosophy)

Every communist is anti-imperialist. Not every anti-imperialist is communist. You can oppose imperialism while believing in a capitalist economy. (Which pretty much describes modern China)

Fundament is also often associated with a constitution and legal system. But that obviously isn't restricted to communism. Fundament can also mean concepts like democracy, freedom, and peace. Mao Zedong Thought, and pretty much Communism/Marxism in general, opposes democracy and supports authoritarianism.

>mao was anti revesionism. deng was slowly destroying fundament from the top, it may be actually over for china because of him. everything maoists told about ussr turned out to be true, and china slowly but surely goes the same direction

Bruh... First of all Deng Xiaoping is dead so I don't know why you think he can continue "ruining the country" Second of all, yes he was a revisionist as the modern CCP usually likes to say they're "communist" even though they're state capitalist but does this small inconvenience really erase his achievements? No, who the fuck cares if he calls himself a communist when he's not. Not a big deal. SNCA. Third of all, how did he destroy the fundament of China? He's literally the one that made China have this powerful, robust, state-centered economy with his state capitalist and pro foreign trade policies in 1978. I am interested to see why you think he ruined China and Mao was responsible for the things that happened after his death and leadership.

>everything maoists told about ussr turned out to be true, and china slowly but surely goes the same direction

Eh, you kind of have a point. The erase of Maoism in China is similar to the destalinization of the Soviet Union. They ditched the communism and replaced it with state capitalism which is obviously not what Mao would've wanted but how is this a bad change? I'm glad China is state capitalist now. If Mao kept being in power China would've never recovered.