Advertisement
JaysonSunshine

Shirakawasuna's fallacies

Jun 14th, 2019
120
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.75 KB | None | 0 0
  1. innit 11:59:17
  2. The UK system was partially attacked and hacked by russia over the Brexit issue.
  3. + Hedrin 11:59:22
  4. Dreams2X -they are dung beetles who want to swallow up the turds the wealthy drop.
  5. + chthonic 11:59:38
  6. that links sucks, please disregard
  7. + innit 11:59:42
  8. Like the US, they're apparently too weak to resolve this after the fact, and so they plow forward with Brexit as if it had a democratic majority, which it didn't.
  9. + Hedrin 11:59:43
  10. It should be like the movie "Overboad" - knock rich people on their heads and steal their women.
  11. er....."Overboard"
  12. + chthonic 11:59:55
  13. GUILLOTINE
  14. + Plan 11:59:59
  15. lol blaming the russians for brexit
  16. @ Shirakawasuna 12:00:02
  17. they're authoritarian conservatives, Dreams2X. It barely matters that it's against their self-interest and it certainly doesn't register.
  18. @ BS_Lewis 12:00:05
  19. partially related mostly off topic: i wonder how many elections the US has interfered in.
  20. + chthonic 12:00:34
  21. the advantage that russia has over the u.s. in espionage and manipulation of foreign powers is that we have a new administration every four years
  22. russia's plans for other countries sprawl out over decades
  23. @ Shirakawasuna 12:00:53
  24. Russia tries and succeeds to tip the scales, just a tad, Plan
  25. + innit 12:01:00
  26. Plan, you have a low-quality mind, and you know what that means.
  27. @ Shirakawasuna 12:01:11
  28. innit, no insults pls
  29. + chthonic 12:01:25
  30. this was more markedly true during the cold war
  31. @ BS_Lewis 12:01:41
  32. warriors fans on twitter are quite salty today
  33. @ Shirakawasuna 12:01:43
  34. the CIA knits teddy bears and bakes cookies
  35. + innit 12:01:49
  36. For everybody else: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/10/russian-influence-brexit-vote-detailed-us-senate-repor...
  37. @ BS_Lewis 12:01:49
  38. wah injuries wah
  39. + pela 12:01:52
  40. [ Russian bid to influence Brexit vote detailed in new US Senate report | World news | The Guardian ]
  41. + chthonic 12:01:59
  42. but even now, it's impossible for the CIA to spin out programs over years and years with different political imperatives in place with each administration
  43. + innit 12:02:29
  44. Shirakawasuna: Is it possible for humans to have low-quality minds?
  45. @ Shirakawasuna 12:02:36
  46. Russia is doing it in new ways with great success, Plan
  47. + innit 12:02:38
  48. https://www.npr.org/2019/01/19/686830510/senate-finds-russian-bots-bucks-helped-push-brexit-vote-thr...
  49. + pela 12:02:39
  50. [ Senate Finds Russian Bots, Bucks Helped Push Brexit Vote Through : NPR ]
  51. + chthonic 12:03:04
  52. there is plenty of responsibility to be heaped on everyone
  53. @ Shirakawasuna 12:03:04
  54. big data-driven propaganda and targeted hacking
  55. the NSA spies
  56. + chthonic 12:03:42
  57. mostly on its own citizens
  58. @ Shirakawasuna 12:03:42
  59. I don't remember the NSA buying out social media ads or pushing fake news
  60. let alone doing that to influence a particular foreign election
  61. + chthonic 12:04:05
  62. the new laws regarding data are saving the NSA heaps of money
  63. + innit 12:04:13
  64. Shirakawasuna: Are you aware that people like Plan who are at best uneducated in this space, and at most likely semi-willing spreaders of disinformation, use their ignorance, feigned or otherwise, as part of asymmetric warfare in our societies.
  65. + chthonic 12:04:14
  66. they can just buy our data with a shell company
  67. @ Shirakawasuna 12:04:14
  68. if you rely too much on whataboutism it starts to stretch belief pretty quickly
  69. + chthonic 12:04:36
  70. if we're going to have a pissing contest, can i sit down
  71. @ BS_Lewis 12:04:52
  72. I got my answer. There's a dedicated Wiki article with an entirely too long of a list about times there was foreign election intervention by the US
  73. @ Shirakawasuna 12:05:03
  74. innit, if you're going to snipe at least do it in a way that's directly relevant to the conversation. Second warning.
  75. * 12:05:13
  76. Ignoring Shirakawasuna
  77. + innit 12:05:23
  78. Shirakawasuna: I ended my conversation with you.
  79. + Dreams2X 12:05:23
  80. someone flush lania, please
  81. + innit 12:05:49
  82. You announced you are unavailable for debate in #debates, and I believe you.
  83. + chthonic 12:06:23
  84. this is all the blink of a gnat's eye in human history
  85. we buy into this idea that "NOW" is the most important thing that ever happened
  86. + Dreams2X 12:07:07
  87. I don't think gnats have eyelids
  88. @ BS_Lewis 12:07:08
  89. it is to my gnats eye
  90. + innit 12:07:21
  91. In case anybody is wondering, yes, responding to legitimate questions about how to modify conversational strategies on the internet, given we know it's a weaponized platform by multiple nation states and corporations, with posts about "sniping" is an example of "sniping" and fallacious thinking.
  92. + chthonic 12:07:27
  93. potayto potahto
  94. + innit 12:07:46
  95. This indicates the speaker is in a world of social hierarchy, as opposed to evidenced-based debate, which renders them an enemy of the ideals of Western civilization.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement