This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier
service at verifier.port25.com.  The service allows email senders to perform
a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms.  It is provided
free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community.  While
it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at
<verifier-feedback@port25.com>.

Thank you for using the verifier,

The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team

==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check:          pass
"iprev" check:      pass
DKIM check:         none
SpamAssassin check: ham

==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================

HELO hostname:  vz12160
Source IP:      91.239.66.236
mail-from:      oxygenthief@programyzadarmo.net.pl

----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         pass
ID(s) verified: smtp.mailfrom=oxygenthief@programyzadarmo.net.pl

DNS record(s):
    programyzadarmo.net.pl. 14400 IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx ip4:91.239.66.236 ~all"
    programyzadarmo.net.pl. 14400 IN A 91.239.66.236


----------------------------------------------------------
"iprev" check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         pass (matches vz12160.dahost.pl)
ID(s) verified: policy.iprev=91.239.66.236

DNS record(s):
    236.66.239.91.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN PTR vz12160.dahost.pl.
    vz12160.dahost.pl. 11400 IN A 91.239.66.236


----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         none (message not signed)
ID(s) verified:

NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs
(RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for
older versions.  If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use
version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.

----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.4.1 (2015-04-28)

Result:         ham (0.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 NO_DNS_FOR_FROM        DNS: Envelope sender has no MX or A DNS records
 0.0 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1    No description available.
 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR        SPF: test of record failed (temperror)
-0.0 BAYES_40               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%
                            [score: 0.2425]
 0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO        No description available.



==============================================================
Explanation of the possible results (based on RFCs 7601, 7208)
==============================================================


DKIM Results
============

none:  The message was not signed.

pass:  The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
    acceptable to the ADMD, and the signature(s) passed verification
    tests.

fail:  The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
    acceptable to the ADMD, but they failed the verification test(s).

policy:  The message was signed, but some aspect of the signature or
    signatures was not acceptable to the ADMD.

neutral:  The message was signed, but the signature or signatures
    contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
    processed.  This result is also used for other failures not
    covered elsewhere in this list.

temperror:  The message could not be verified due to some error that
    is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
    retrieve a public key.  A later attempt may produce a final
    result.

permerror:  The message could not be verified due to some error that
    is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent.  A
    later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.


SPF Results
===========

none:  Either (a) no syntactically valid DNS domain name was extracted from
    the SMTP session that could be used as the one to be authorized, or
    (b) no SPF records were retrieved from the DNS.

neutral:  The ADMD has explicitly stated that it is not asserting whether
    the IP address is authorized.

pass:  An explicit statement that the client is authorized to inject mail
    with the given identity.

fail:  An explicit statement that the client is not authorized to use the
    domain in the given identity.

softfail:  A weak statement by the publishing ADMD that the host is probably
    not authorized.  It has not published a stronger, more definitive policy
    that results in a "fail".

temperror:  The SPF verifier encountered a transient (generally DNS) error
    while performing the check.  A later retry may succeed without further
    DNS operator action.

permerror: The domain's published records could not be correctly interpreted.
    This signals an error condition that definitely requires DNS operator
    intervention to be resolved.


"iprev" Results
===============

pass:  The DNS evaluation succeeded, i.e., the "reverse" and
    "forward" lookup results were returned and were in agreement.

fail:  The DNS evaluation failed.  In particular, the "reverse" and
    "forward" lookups each produced results, but they were not in
    agreement, or the "forward" query completed but produced no
    result, e.g., a DNS RCODE of 3, commonly known as NXDOMAIN, or an
    RCODE of 0 (NOERROR) in a reply containing no answers, was
    returned.

temperror:  The DNS evaluation could not be completed due to some
    error that is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary DNS
    error, e.g., a DNS RCODE of 2, commonly known as SERVFAIL, or
    other error condition resulted.  A later attempt may produce a
    final result.

permerror:  The DNS evaluation could not be completed because no PTR
    data are published for the connecting IP address, e.g., a DNS
    RCODE of 3, commonly known as NXDOMAIN, or an RCODE of 0 (NOERROR)
    in a reply containing no answers, was returned.  This prevented
    completion of the evaluation.  A later attempt is unlikely to
    produce a final result.




==========================================================
Original Email
==========================================================

Return-Path: <oxygenthief@programyzadarmo.net.pl>
Received: from vz12160 (91.239.66.236) by verifier.port25.com id hdnqv02bkd0u for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 11:10:24 -0500 (envelope-from <oxygenthief@programyzadarmo.net.pl>)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; spf=pass  smtp.mailfrom=oxygenthief@programyzadarmo.net.pl;
 iprev=pass (matches vz12160.dahost.pl)  policy.iprev=91.239.66.236;
 dkim=none reason="message not signed"
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=vz12160)
    by vz12160 with esmtpa (Exim 4.87)
    (envelope-from <oxygenthief@programyzadarmo.net.pl>)
    id 1efpXC-0003y2-3F
    for check-auth@verifier.port25.com; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:10:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:10:21 +0100
From: oxygenthief@programyzadarmo.net.pl
To: check-auth@verifier.port25.com
Subject: (brak tematu)
Message-ID: <5a31aa0e51c6aafdb3d68d541a57868c@programyzadarmo.net.pl>
X-Sender: oxygenthief@programyzadarmo.net.pl
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.4