White Nationalist's Guide to Reaching the Eternal Normie

Normie Psychology on Race:

My take on whites begins with what most of us already agree on in that they are deracinated, atomized individualists who embrace universalism and color-blind meritocracies.

While they may be cultural relativists, they are not moral relativists. They accept foreign cultures only to the extent that they don't violate their Christian-derived, liberal European morality. So cultural pluralism [which has been largely imposed upon Western societies by Jewish activists, who feel more secure in diverse societies, and by an oligarchy who want to drive down wages with cheap labor via uncontrolled immigration, manipulate votes (non-whites vote for government-expanding policies to a much larger extent than whites), erode national boundaries for market expansion, use racial divisions as an excuse to legislate "hate speech" laws and rule over a divided, and thus weakened, working class] creates major conflicts of interest where the moralities clash (such as what we're seeing with Islam). Whites view these conflicting foreign moralities as something flawed, waiting to be corrected.

While I suspect that most whites don't really believe in racial egalitarianism, whatever genetic differences they see are limited to IQ gaps. For whites, racial genetic differences in psychology are not really a thing. So whites see the rest of the outside world as people who are pending to be Westerners just like them and would be so under the right circumstances. While whites may not believe that racial achievement gaps will be closed, they ultimately still think Blacks, East Asians, Hispanics and Arabs are capable of embodying the nature and attitude of whites. (Consequently, their governments can take advantage of this universalism and intervene in foreign lands by disguising it as a "humanitarian" necessity of spreading democracy throughout the world.)

Whites view the civilization and land they inherited as a haven for people around the world to escape third world plight. We reprimand them for being "cucks", but white normies are just not accustomed to seeing things the way we do. They don't see their race as a legacy to continue. For them, their only legacy is Western civilization which they believe has nothing to do with their race. And their psychology is so entrenched in individualism and universalism that they think nothing of their race being eliminated (Sad, I know). They see their values as a model for everyone to embrace. Whites are obsessed with equality and fairness for all. They want everyone in the world to have what they have. Whites fail to see that the vast majority of non-whites that have flooded the West only want part in the wealth the West has accumulated and the opportunities it affords and are not particularly interested in our culture or values. Also, whites must ask themselves that if non-whites fleeing their home countries is an indicator that they're either unwilling or incapable of fighting back against corrupt leadership, in what light could they be seen as valuable, or even passable, co-inhabitants in the West? To a normie, such a formulation seems conceited, callous and a deliberate act of disparaging non-whites who are fraught with an unfair plight, but it's really just a sober judgement. If you're an egalitarian then you must conclude that non-whites are just as capable of establishing stable, high trust societies as whites are - in which case it's not imperative to let them in. If you're not an egalitarian then you must conclude that non-whites are not as capable of establishing stable, high trust societies as whites are - in which case they would be a liability in the West. Normies will say it's unfair to point your finger at non-whites and refuse them access to our lands, saying that it's an unfair privilege to have been born in the West. This is wrong. We have what we have because our ancestors fought and died for it. Because we didn't have to lift a finger for it does not mean it doesn't belong to us nor is there an obligation to share it with the world. Saying we have to share our civilization is like saying the children of wealthy parents must share their inheritance. And if we lose what we have we will fight and die for it again, which is what non-whites must learn to do. [Also, the word "inherit" is a key term here. The problems we see when some kid inherits his daddy's business is a microcosm of what happens when a generation of people inherit a civilization. It is no surprise at all that whites who know nothing of the sacrifice our ancestors made to establish Western nations and the adversities they faced, and consequently misunderstand the "racist" efforts they made to secure it for ourselves, are the most eager to "share" everything. Normies who are hell-bent on saving the world are gonna have to find a way to do it without violating our right to homogeneous, white nations.]

Whites regard humanity as individuals first and foremost, not as competing ethnic groups. They are either unaware of ethnic tribalism or think it is some archaic and artificial thing of the past that can and will be discarded with in time. As whites decline in power and influence in their increasingly diversified Western societies and, consequently, non-white groups become more and more emboldened in their hostility towards whites, ethnic tribalism is going to increasingly creep into politics whether whites like it or not.

Whites are unaware of the in-group/out-group social dynamic that naturally develops between majority groups and minority groups in diverse societies. Whites, for the most part, are oblivious to the alienation many non-whites experience living in white societies (regardless of how well they're treated) and the out-group mindset that feeling of alienation often results in. These are perfectly understandable feelings that naturally develop in an individual dwelling in a society that is foreign to them. Jewish-dominated media and academic institutions have been very effective at concealing these types of things from the general public, often opting to distort the situation and blame these frustrations on "white privilege" - as if to imply that a black person wouldn't feel equally alienated living in Israel or some East Asian country.

Whites are very emotionally invested in racial integration. They become very frustrated with the divisiveness of racial identity politics (no doubt the culturally-polarized 2016 election with its covertly racial overtones, as well as America's worsening racial double-standards, have really raddled the minds of many whites and shaken their faith in America). Most whites (normal whites, NOT leftists), despite our branding of them as cucks, are not gonna capitulate to what they perceive as irrational, unproductive race-bating. And their firm stance on individualism has been instrumental in deflecting collective guilt which they find absurd. They are NOT going to pay reparations.

Furthermore, most whites are either unaware or in denial of the inevitable racial profiling and discrimination that happens against the more violent racial groups. Whites are reluctant to concede this point to the race-baters because it gives credit to identity politics, which could result in disillusionment about the prospect of eventual racial cohesion because whites know that white-on-black discrimination is due entirely to disproportionately high black crime and there's nothing whites can do about it. Nevertheless, whites have it in their heads that black crime is a product of their cultural decadence and that this racial scapegoating is largely agitated by the left and would otherwise eventually go away and that blacks, despite potential IQ gap, will overcome their plight and become Westerners like whites (often citing the economic status of blacks prior to civil rights). And here, whites don't fully grasp the implications of this situation. What is the long-term prospect for whites in a multicultural society if the non-white members can be so easily manipulated and pitted against them?

Again, whites are very emotionally invested in racial integration. Whites who have non-white friends/acquaintances view attacks on PoC as if they were attacks on themselves. The trust and affection they win over from non-whites means the world to them. White nationalists disrupt that kinship. That's why they hate us. Whites are individualists who value only individual merit. For them, racial identity politics not only seem irrational, it seems cheap. Whites like fairness. They hate racial politics because it creates unfair impenetrable barriers and entails that one's fate is determined by the genetic lottery of which race you just happen to be born as. Whites are very much loyal and compassionate to their non-white friends and would never dare to let something so distasteful as the issue of race come between them. And for whites to cross the bridge to white nationalism is to burn the bridges between them and their non-white friends/acquaintances. White nationalists often fail to grasp what an emotionally gut-wrenching transition that is for normies. We must be sensitive to this matter, but nevertheless show them the flaws of their thinking. When you mention racial separation, it immediately triggers thoughts about all the blacks they like, causing a knee-jerk reaction. Their altruism always compromises their better judgement. They don't think about the 95% that vote against their interest and god knows how many of them would actually endorse the appropriation and redistribution of white wealth. If the hostility whites are facing in South Africa tell us everything it is that prioritizing a few non-white friends over the big picture of demographics is the mother of all bad ideas.

Lastly, though I suspect that many whites, despite their distorted and unviable view of nationhood, have an aversion to multiculturalism at some unconscious level (tourism in "culturally-enriched" European cities has reached new lows), the emotional pain of going against status quo exceeds the pain of acknowledging the long term consequences of what that status quo entails. People fear social ostracism more than death itself. Very VERY few people have the fortitude for this type of resistance. Many of them would prefer to buy into status quo beliefs for the emotional satisfaction of feeling like they're in the right. It's more satisfying for them to emulate the beliefs of the smart, sophisticated upper class than actually analyze the world and formulate their own views. Even if they became aware of the peril they're putting future generations of whites in, they'd still suppress those views. Humans are not cool-headed, rational beings (and to the extent that they are rational it is for selfish reasons, posterity having little to no priority). They seek comfort at all costs. And the corporate elite have been very good at controlling whites by providing them the material comfort of the industrial age.

This is undoubtedly corny, but it's highly relevant and I have to post it:
"The Matrix is a system, Neo, and that system is our enemy. But when you are inside and you look around, what do you see; businessmen, lawyers, teachers, carpenters. The minds of the very people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of the system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand that most of these people are not ready to be unplugged and many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it."

-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
The Way Forward:

It is imperative for our cause to understand normie psychology in order for them to find us relatable. We could have an advantage over the left by promulgating our ideas to normies on agreeable terms. Unfortunately, many white nationalists are as unable to refrain from indulging in their antipathy toward non-whites as leftists are in indulging in their antipathy toward whites. This Daily Stormer brand of provocative humor I think is such a misstep. This type of rhetoric will only appeal to the disaffected lower-income population of whites, who bare the brunt of diversity and see it for what it actually is, instead of the middle and upper class whites who are largely insulated from diversity. This counter-productive approach will slow down the dissemination of our ideas, delaying our revolution, since we now have to wait for the problems of diversity to reach the doorstep of middle class whites when we could have otherwise communicated with them in an effective manner.

We're very irritated by the naivety and sheep-mindedness of the middle class, but that doesn't mean that their support is not essential. No revolution can happen exclusively with disaffected, lower class proles. We need elites. And I stress that we be diplomatic and sensitive to their concerns. Provide solutions that are agreeable such as Jared Taylor's advocacy for freedom of association. Be fair to the multiculturalists. Concede to the fact that there is a sizable percentage of each racial group who are content with living in a multicultural society and grant them the right to have such societies. Keep in mind that most middle and upper class whites will only be receptive to our ideas insofar as we provide reasonable solutions that ensure the well-being of their non-white friends/acquaintances. We want this to go as smoothly as possible. Nobody wants a war.

Given that so many whites are, for better or for worse, psychologically chained to Enlightenment empiricism/rationalism, it may be required to push this line of thinking to its logical conclusion: the subjectivity of morality. Stress that there is not a shred of evidence of an innate or divine "right" or "wrong", only varying evolutionary strategies for survival, with groups adopting strategies most preferable and/or advantageous to them. Stress that history is merely a power struggle between people with conflicting moralities, each group seeking to subjugate the other groups (either through warfare or cultural subversion) and the conquerors imposing their morality onto the conquered. And that liberalism, the current morality reigning over the West, has no legitimacy, no primacy over other moralities (stressing moral relativism may be the best way for normies to snap out of their zombie liberal trance). Stress that European-descended peoples do not require approval from those who are hostile to them in their pursuit of ethnic self-interests and that whites who desire the existence of white societies/nations ought to pursue them regardless of opposition (it must be noted that whites have an unusual fixation with moral justification and gaining approval from others). Jews do not seek approval from others for the continued existence of their ethnostate just as the Japanese do not seek approval for theirs.

Illustrate the flaws of their individualism and how it gets trounced by collectivist-based strategies. Show how multicultural meritocracies are political non-starters since unbounded individualism inevitably leads to key positions of political and economic power being gradually seized by people with group-based, non-Western agendas (Islam being the one most normies fear).

And don't let up on the common logical inconsistencies of normies such as their acceptance of the existence of non-white nations while remaining hostile to the existence of white ones. Hit hard on this imbecilic notion that diversity is "inevitable" or that it's "necessary for our strength" by noting that America was at its peak in power and stability back when it was 85% white and has been steadily declining in cultural stability as it becomes more diverse and that it's likely to be surpassed by China which has a 90% East Asian population. Last of all, stress that enforcing the entirety of a race to embrace multiculturalism thus eliminating their right to ANY sovereign nation is not only reprehensible, it's dangerous (to this end, one could justify the subjugation of whites by citing the aforementioned moral relativism, but, as I said, it's a dangerous path to go down).

Lastly, avoid mentioning issues with Jews to normies. White nationalism alone is enough of a mindfuck for them.


-------------------------------------------------------
For the non-Normies:

Libertarians shouldn't put up as much of a resistance as normies, because much of our aims came be achieved through the non aggression principle. However, libertarians must understand some things. 1.) When white nationalists form their own communities, they're not gonna remain small since the impulse to self-segregate based on group preference is very pervasive among each race. White communities will grow huge, practically nation in scale. 2.) We have to live under our own rule. The whole reason we can't get libertarian policies in motion in the first place is because we live under the rule of people who are hostile to Western interests - which naturally happens in a diverse country. 3.) A nation is NOT the state. A nation can be aptly defined as "a large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory." White nationalists are in the business of nation-building, not state-building. 4.) We ARE collectivists though. Can't have a prosperous and secure nation without it. As previously noted, unbounded individualism is a recipe for subtle annexation.

Pro-globalist elitists must understand that while globalism is a master morality, it is a morality that ultimately benefits only the 1% of the 1% of the 1%. Unless you have your own yacht, your own private airplane, and some secret underground vault filled with gold, you're probably not going to be shielded from the effects of our civilizational decline. Western elitists will have to pursue a different type of master morality. One that is not ultimately self-defeating. One that is compatible with a stable, lasting Western society. While they may feel superior to everyone, they're still not divorced from them. Their fates are intertwined (and I'd much rather be at the mercy of a mob of Westerners than a mob of non-Westerners). They'll have to refrain from indulging in LARPy, ubermensch fantasies and maintain a healthy, realistic perspective on the world and an awareness of their actual position in it.

.