Mabus and the non-political political

2:10:22 PM@Mabusnbc news is not reliable anymore? brad?
2:11:07 PM@Mabusbrad uh huh
2:11:20 PM@Mabusa single example?
2:11:29 PM* TumblingReverie checks that brad70 is an operator
2:11:39 PMⓘ NaughtyCanid is now known as GlaistigUaine
2:11:39 PM* TumblingReverie checks that Mabus has the power to remove brad70's operatorshihp
2:11:57 PM@Mabustumbling... we dont remove ops because of political views
2:12:27 PM@Mabusbrad LOL THATS your example?
2:12:39 PM@Mabuswow you're right, clearly not a reliable news organization
2:13:27 PM+TumblingReveriehttps://youtu.be/bikgLIK9OlU?t=23
2:13:32 PM* Infradead stabs TonySnark.
2:13:48 PM+TumblingReverieLordGlooom thinks the dotard in this video is a good president.
2:13:57 PM+LordGlooomyeah i do
2:14:08 PM@Mabuse?
2:14:08 PM+TumblingReverieJOHN DICKERSON: George W. Bush said the reason the Oval Office is round is there are no corners you can hide in.
2:14:18 PM+TumblingReveriePRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Well, there's truth to that. There is truth to that. There are certainly no corners. And you look, there's a certain openness. [gestures to window] But there's nobody out there. You know, there is an openness, but I've never seen anybody out there actually, as you could imagine.
2:14:25 PM@Mabusno
2:14:34 PM→ thehorror has joined
2:14:34 PMⓘ ChanServ set mode +b *!*uid193696@*.hathersage.irccloud.com
2:14:34 PM← thehorror was kicked by ChanServ (User has been banned from the channel)
2:14:37 PM@Mabushe was participating in a dox thing
2:14:44 PM@Mabushe's gone for at least a year
2:14:49 PM+TumblingReverieMabus: The fabricated view that NBC is fake news is a valid political view
2:14:53 PM+TumblingReverieAre there any invalid political views, Mabus
2:15:05 PM@Mabustumbling, views are views
2:15:12 PM+TumblingReverieFor example, Say that brad70 stated "I just really think Whites are the supreme race"
2:15:22 PM+TumblingReverieKosher?
2:15:22 PM→ sexb has joined
2:15:23 PMⓘ ChanServ set mode +o sexb
2:15:25 PM@Mabustumbling, then he'd still remain an op
2:15:47 PM@Mabustumbling, ops here is tied to activity and rule abidance... not views
2:15:47 PM+TumblingReverieHow about this, "I think any human, post-puberty, should be able to choose their sexual partners"
2:16:19 PM+LordGlooomTumbling what about 55 year old eunuch, like varys from game of thrones?
2:16:23 PM@Mabustumbling.... i'll save you some time... you can get closer and closer to a rule violation where it becomes dicey....
2:16:31 PM+TumblingReverieWhat?
2:16:35 PM+TumblingReverieViews are views
2:16:36 PM@Mabustony... it depends on the insult wouldn't it
2:16:46 PM+TumblingReverieYou have previously stated that any discussion of pedophilia is taboo here
2:16:49 PM+TumblingReverieIncluding meta-discussions
2:16:53 PM@Mabustumbling.... some expressed views are rule violations. thats the standard
2:16:54 PM+TumblingReverieThose are political views, right?
2:16:58 PM+TumblingReverieOhhh
2:17:10 PM+TumblingReverieSo if an operator expressed some views that are rule violations, they'd lose their operatorship?
2:17:15 PM@Mabushttp://www.dalnetdebates.com
2:17:18 PM@Mabusrules page is there
2:17:25 PM+TumblingReverieNeat
2:17:30 PM+TumblingReverieDo you feel incapable of answering?
2:17:32 PM@Mabustumbling, if they continued to violate the rules yes
2:17:38 PM+TumblingReverieBut views are views?
2:17:47 PM@Mabusand rules are rules
2:17:49 PM+TumblingReverieI thought you don't discriminate according to political views
2:17:54 PM+LordGlooomhindered_debates
2:17:58 PM@Mabussome views are against the rules to express in channel
2:18:03 PM+TumblingReverieI see
2:18:07 PM+TumblingReverieBut you don't discriminate against them
2:18:08 PM@Mabusi dont, i discriminate based on rule violations
2:18:21 PM+TumblingReverieSo it's against the rules to express certain political views
2:18:33 PM@Mabustumbling, none that i know of
2:18:45 PM+TumblingReverie"some views are against the rules to express in channel "
2:18:53 PM@Mabusnot political views
2:19:01 PM+LordGlooomTumbling even in logic there are some truths that there is no way to say
2:19:09 PM+TumblingReverieSo, if I can demonstrate my view is political, then you can't ban for it, yes?
2:19:35 PM+TumblingReverieas "not political views" are inexpressible
2:19:40 PM@Mabuse.. NOT HERE!!! :P
2:19:55 PM@Mabustumbling, i gave you the rules page. it says what is not allowed clearly