Clips

We correspond with the views of liberal luminaries better, and our description of who holds to liberalism is more accurate. Which is why someone like Naked Ape can call us the Summation of Liberalism rather than the Negation Of It. Which is sorely lacked by lazy nonsense like horseshoe theory, which is almost surface level by admission

now I am aware of your answer, while I cant find the clip your response to this is "these were just the contradictions to be worked out"

Well, fine, even if they dont seem to be contradictions with empirical reality, just a part where the romantic language of liberalism (its propaganda as Distributist calls it) clashes with reality. But this makes my overall point: that liberalism can justify anything based on the premises held, it has no inherent arguments against progressivism which is why it was swept aside.

Left Libertarians show us this: they believe white privilege must be abolished because it acts as a set of assumptions and biases in society which prevent PoC from being fully actualized individuals. Like your arguments for redistribution tend to be (when you're poor you dont really live)