Liberalism

Criticizing liberalism and libertarianism as ends and justifications in of themselves is not the same as disdaining the entire concept at all times. Because they promote political inaction, passivity, letting the stronger side shift the conversation, and libertinism in fact. They cant protect themselves from persistent collectivists and subverters, even when much stronger than them. A specific culture gives rise to a liberal character. The French forgot this, the Founders did not. People are dependent and able to be influenced, so make them dependent on society and family instead of ripping away all cultural institutions deemed "insufficiently emancipatory" like cultural marxists and french revolutionaries do. Hence why libertarians siding with hedonists and polyamory are kidding themselves
Make them seek identity and value in their people and culture instead of what they consume or what label they slap on themselves. The postwar consensus was an example of a non-polarized society, but our free and open media spin centers now are polarizing.

You see, the post-war consenses was a bit of an accident. Few channels. It wasnt a huge loss to be unbiased, and was seen as a public service, so the loss there was was eaten. Losing this is a market failure because the market wasnt really providing it.