What I think about the bin on JonSnow

https://pastebin.com/UeS6QVZb

Game #1
- GuyFawkes has never been great at reading for pr. Although he didn't focus on rereading for the obvious doc soft, making strange reads and killing a blue which he claims to be his doc read doesn't mean he cheated. Moreover, cinnanie could also read and as they both didn't read for doc correctly, they're both responsible for the fault.
- Killing a villager was the most optimal thing N4, killing JonSnow would confirm cinnanie as the maf.
- GuyFawkes killed JonSnow instead of leaving him alive and tried getting his cc lynched D5.

Game #3
- LIoyd had been scumtelling and pushing on JonSnow before JonSnow started to fos LIoyd despite his doc claim.

Game #4
- cinnanie was fillering...
- GuyFawkes was genuinely scumhunting, this is what he usually does as town, he focuses on himself towntelling only as maf.

Game #5
- According to the N2 conversation, GuyFawkes reads JonSnow as blue and takes 50-50 between Tartosis and Scumboodler.
- JonSnow reads for mafia correctly, had 50-50 outside guiltied GuyFawkes.
- D3 GuyFawkes was confirmed mafia he tries to trick the cop into voting JonSnow.

Game #6
- JonSnow votes correctly Achieina who's scumtelling.
- GuyFawkes resists the bw against Achieina, that's why he's fos'd the next day once Achieina gets lynched as GF.
- GuyFawkes tries towntelling, although his way of scumhunting looks forced, he tries at least.



1. JonSnow and GuyFawkes not killing each other is not meta abuse, as long as they don't use it for meta-clearing themselves to the town.
2. Leading the kill is legit.
3. GuyFawkes tries to win the game with his towntell, which he focuses on too much as he used to do.
4. There are only two games where JonSnow reads GuyFawkes correctly. In the first one he had no influence on hammering GuyFawkes, in the last one he had reason to fos GuyFawkes.