garr3tt

Saint_ Exupery

Aug 3rd, 2014
457
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.23 KB | None | 0 0
  1. The second candidate for the shooting down
  2. of Saint Exupéry was Horst Rippert of JGr.
  3. 200. In this area, he operated as a fighter
  4. pilot for several years. Due to his ‘non-aryan’
  5. roots, he tended to have problems with his
  6. superiors. He was even to have been sent as
  7. a foot soldier to the Eastern Front. However,
  8. due to connections, he was able to remain in
  9. the south of France as a mechanic.
  10. In the summer of 1943, the unit then known as
  11. JGr. Süd, received a new commanding offi-cer, the legendary Heinz Bär. He vehemently
  12. opposed Rippert’s role and placed him back
  13. among the combat pilots. Over the course of
  14. 1944, Rippert became one of the most su-ccessful pilots to operate in the area. By the
  15. end of July of that year, he had accounted
  16. for six four engined heavy bombers, a photo
  17. reconnaissance twin engined Mosquito, and
  18. a Mustang fighter.
  19. He flew to the end of the war (with JG 27),
  20. and it is known that he accounted for at least
  21. 29 aerial victories. According to the Bunde-sarchiv, eight of these were confirmed. One
  22. was not confirmed, and a determination of
  23. another two were postponed. The remainder
  24. were never determined or their details remain
  25. unknown. After the war, he became a sports
  26. television director with ZDF, and the license
  27. plate of his car must not have been missing
  28. the number ‘109‘. His brother was the Ger-man singer Ivan Rebroff (Hans Rolf Rippert).
  29. I have the honor of owning Horst Ripper-t’s journal with his dedication. From them,
  30. it is evident just how narrow the radio contact
  31. had been with ground control during action
  32. against the enemy. At one point, after shoo-ting down an American fighter into the sea,
  33. he used the term ‘Aufschlagbrand’ (fire after
  34. impact with the ground) and was promptly in-carcerated on his landing, because the auto-matic conclusion was that he had made the kill
  35. up, since he was operating over water. All was
  36. eventually explained, and Rippert continued
  37. to fly. This is only one small example of how
  38. activities of the Luftwaffe could be documen-ted on both sides of the front.
  39. About five years after the end of the war,
  40. Rippert began to consider the notion that he
  41. perhaps did shoot down Saint Exupéry. He fi-nanced his own research into the subject and
  42. concluded that he could not have had any-thing to do with the event, and was still to the
  43. year 2000 convinced of this fact. And the end
  44. of Saint Exupéry was still a mystery.
  45. In 2000, in the ocean not far from Marseille,
  46. Luc Vanrell discovered the wreckage of an
  47. allied aircraft. After the aircraft’s raising
  48. and an analysis of construction numbers, it
  49. was certain the aircraft in question was Saint
  50. Exupéry’s.
  51. Luc Vanrell and Jacques Pradel published
  52. a book in 2008, which is based on new alle-gations of Rippert that he did in fact shoot
  53. Saint Exupery down. What led him to change
  54. his mind, I don’t know. And what’s more, it is
  55. apparent from the book that the authors did
  56. not know about the above described events
  57. documented in various archives, which were
  58. accessible.
  59. I am adding my small contributions and disco-vered documentation to research that is prin-ted on his website www.ghostbombers.com by
  60. Nick Beale.
  61. src- Jan Bobek @ Eduard News 8/2014.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment