API tools faq
paste
Lesta

10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-03 0205 +MomoTheBellyDancer

Lesta
Mar 2nd, 2016
121
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 5.20 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-03 0205 +MomoTheBellyDancer
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJWhWaOI5hQ&google_comment_id=z130wp5g5w3kvft2022vyp35tzyjebacn
  3. https://pastebin.com/qWmknFeE
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +MomoTheBellyDancer __ ::sigh:: "Seismological data" does not tell us whether something did or did not happen. Seismological data does not in-and-of itself prove an earthquake happened.
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11. Pay attention dummy: >>> *We would expect to see seismological data if an earthquake happened AND we would also expect to see it if an earthquake has been faked.* <<<
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15. Or do you expect to see news reports about a fake earthquake showing fake damage but not to also have some fake data to go with it?
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19. *Haha don't be that kind of retard.*
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. The point you don't understand is that seeing numbers alone does not prove something did or did not happen.
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27. *Numbers are descriptive only.* They can be used to describe reality but numbers do not create reality.
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. As I keep trying to point out to you: *your thinking is all backwards.* Low IQ people are forever assuming the conclusion. That is what you are doing.
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35. "But there's seismological data - it MUST have happened!" - *Good grief.* _Incredible wrong._
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39. Pay attention: If I write down that I jogged 6km this morning it does not mean I really did. The fact I really did jog 6km this morning is separate to my recording of it in a journal.
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43. On the days I did not jog 6km if I write that I did *I do not suddenly and magically receive the health benefits of it!*
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47. (Oh - _if only it worked like that_ - am I right? You know I am.)
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51. *The reason you disagree is because you cannot believe "authority" would lie to you.*
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. The reason you disagree is because you cannot believe "multiple authorities" would lie to you.
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59. The reason you disagree is because "scientists record earthquake data" and you believe that "scientists are the best".
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. *But you forget that "scientists are first and foremost people" and "people often lie".*
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. In fact - if you turn on the nightly news (as I'm sure you regularly do) you will find it filled with people who were once considered trustworthy and responsible but have been caught doing bad things.
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71. Just because the "scientific method" is a tool that can lead to truth about reality does not mean that all "scientists" are therefore unable to do bad things.
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75. What you don't seem to realise is that you also believe that "authority" dropped atomic bombs on Japanese children just a few decades ago.
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79. *What you don't seem to realise is that "scientists" invented those atomic bombs which you believe "authority" dropped on Japanese children.*
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83. _Oh my - your brain must be so confused!_
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87. On the one hand you accept that "authority" will kill large numbers of innocent people for the "greater good" but on the other hand you can't wrap your head around the fact that the same "authority" can also LIE to large numbers of innocent people for the "greater good".
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91. Your belief that there was an earthquake in "Nepal" (April, 2015) *is founded and formed on TRUST and accepting PROOF'S APPEARANCES* in place of actual proof.
  92.  
  93.  
  94.  
  95. Your belief that there was an earthquake in "Nepal" (April, 2015) *is because you cannot accept you would be lied to about it.*
  96.  
  97.  
  98.  
  99. Your belief that there was an earthquake in "Nepal" (April, 2015) *is because you have not scrutinised the event properly.*
  100.  
  101.  
  102.  
  103. What is your explanation for the "earthquake ninjas" (which I called "ISIS ninjas/recruits") in this video that I posted here: watch?v=qpcv0FidzO8
  104.  
  105.  
  106.  
  107. No one who asserts the "Nepal earthquake" was a genuine event has been able to give an answer to that. I expect you will continue to ignore it.
  108.  
  109.  
  110.  
  111. __________
  112.  
  113.  
  114.  
  115.  
  116.  
  117. Numbers can be used to describe reality but the numbers themselves cannot prove anything about reality. _No doubt you will continue to disagree._
  118.  
  119.  
  120.  
  121. *No doubt you believe that all the people who are in jail for "cooking the books" are wrongly imprisoned!*
  122.  
  123.  
  124.  
  125. No doubt you are thinking: "But the numbers add up! How can they have done anything wrong if all the numbers add up!"
  126.  
  127.  
  128.  
  129. Oh my - "MomoTheBellyDancer" doesn't understand "fraud".
  130.  
  131.  
  132.  
  133. Numbers can be used to describe an event but the presence of numbers does not necessarily mean an event really happened.
  134.  
  135.  
  136.  
  137. Your head is screwed on backwards!
  138.  
  139.  
  140.  
  141. You have NOT examined the event. You have simply ASSUMED it MUST be real. Because.. *reasons.* Am I right? Of course I am.
  142.  
  143.  
  144.  
  145. __
  146.  
  147.  
  148.  
  149. If you remain stuck on this then you have an IQ under 100 and I must decline any further communication with you.
  150.  
  151.  
  152.  
  153.  
  154.  
  155. __
  156.  
  157.  
  158.  
  159. *Can I get a witness?!*
  160.  
  161. +cabadejo , +Terran Downvale
  162.  
  163.  
  164.  
  165.  
  166. __________________________________________
  167. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  168. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  169.  
  170. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  171. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  172.  
  173. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  174. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  175.  
  176. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  177. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!