33 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-05 1820 +Anthony B.

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-05 1820 +Anthony B.
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/Vi1QgLn9EAo
https://pastebin.com/qWfGbwVH
__

+Anthony B. __ A professional magician makes a simple to perform trick appear elaborate, complex and mysterious. *A professional magician does not attempt a magic trick that cannot be successfully performed*.

I categorically reject the notion that "no system is flawless". The false belief there are *only* flawed systems that *always* generate mistakes which can be found *ensures those who are paying attention waste their time by chasing ghosts and pursuing dead-ends*.

Math - for example - is an invented system and as we calculate it today 1 + 2 will always give 3. It's a "perfect system" in that way. What you perhaps mean is "no system can be perfectly executed" and there you are only partly right. A person who hasn't learned arithmetic can be expected to make calculation errors just as amateur pranksters and small-time criminals can be expected to make errors that reveal the prank or land them in jail.

But when you have mathematicians doing the sums (and especially when several of them can be checking over the math for each simple sum) - _then even without the benefit of a calculator_ - *the sums will never be added up incorrectly*.

It is simply not reasonable to ever expect a mistake to occur. *Just because a mistake is theoretically possible does not mean in reality it occurs*.

There has never been a [fatal] mistake *otherwise the population of the world would already be awake*. And given the hundreds to thousands of lie system events the best a person paying attention can do is say: *_"That doesn't look right"_*.

That something doesn't "look right" or something "looks odd" is not ever proof of anything. The nutty numbers for many *end up becoming a natural way of finding relevance and meaning* (which means fakery in what should be random and unrelated events) *where meaning does not necessarily exist*.

That's the key point being missed: _finding meaning *where relevance and meaning does not necessarily exist*_. We must at all times reject events and claims *for the right reasons* and not ever for the wrong reasons.

To be wrong about a single nutty number (to interpret it as being relevant/meaningful *when it is not*) is indeed to make a mistake. That mistake *when repeated* is what undermines your ability to call events and claims fake (even if they are). It provides a reason for everyone else to reject and dismiss your claims even when you are right.

It is to move away from genuine lie system concepts which means to undo the progress made and go backwards. If Terran insists upon using nutty numbers then he is not observing lie system principles. He's dabbling in Terran's lie system principles. Just as "Brian Hill" - when he insists genuine [fatal] mistakes are being made - is dabbling in "Brian Hill's lie system" (or "Brian Hill's Control System" as he'd probably prefer it).

This has nothing to do with *Lesta's lie system* and when folk like "Russianvids" or John le Bon (JLB) use the term "lie system" *they are not at all talking about any "lie system" that I support and endorse*.

>> If these people and others insist upon attributes that I do not endorse they have *hijacked the term*. And it's very important that I be clear on that. <<

To pursue any other *form* of "lie system" and attribute qualities to it *that I have not described and endorsed* will unavoidably lead to contradictions and problems.

Such people who insist upon using my terms with their audience should by all means learn from me *but they are in no position to take over when they talk about things that cannot be justified*.

They are corrupting and retarding the minds of those who could become *genuine dissidents of the lie system*. At best it is accidental and at worst it is intentional - _shame on them_.

*The nutty numbers serve only to constrain and contain the one who uses them*. To isolate and neutralise that person. To send them wandering about in the darkness of insanity and psychosis - *as each so-called "truther" had been doing until I showed up*.

It's going seven steps forward and then thirty-three backwards. Thus I am speaking up about this as strongly as I can.

And it's no surprise at all that nutty numbers would be encouraged. *By the mentally-ill and agents against truth alike*. Entertaining the nutty numbers has only one possible outcome: *your own ruin*.

My words can be ignored but only to the peril of those who *choose* to ignore them. What I have outlined about the nutty numbers here and elsewhere in recent posts *is true* and disregarding them will result in lessons that need to be learned (and repeated until learned).

*It is better to write forcefully - and painfully - on this now if it can mean avoiding and sparing significantly more pain and hardship down the road*.

Once again I'm doing what no one else is prepared to do and I'll carry on alone if I need to. I have faith that the right people will show up when the time for them is right.

For what it's worth - as my final appeal on this - I was once big on the nutty numbers. Probably more so than most *and so I write from a position of understanding that has arisen out of direct experience*. But that's not why I reject them. I reject them because they are a fool's gold and can only lead to your own ruin. For reasons I have by now made perfectly clear.

Carry on with the nutty numbers for entertainment or because you feel compelled to do so but don't think you're describing the *lie system* - _certainly not Lesta's lie system_.

__
+nationalparksign


______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.