Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- ###MT vs Sylvester
- I don't think MT is OOT. As Elick stated, MT has a deficiency in a couple of stats relative to Lara that make is plausible for the latter to win. As such, I judge the debate as is
- MT wins. Sylvester doesn't really have a well defined win condition throughout the round. I don't think the sheep do anything based on the argumentation. I have no idea what Dr. Beefton/Big Dream does. That leaves me with the sleep/nightmare debate. I think Elick is sufficiently ahead on the whole MT isn't affected by sleep/fears stuff that I find their win con of MT beating up Sylvester relatively more plausible. I think in terms of advice, Jacky would benefit from being less reactive to their opponent's arguments and be more offensive on why and how MT loses specifically to Sylvester.
- ###Conner vs Sips
- Sips wins. I'm convinced that Sips is intelligent enough to use incapping options, and that his attacks can be incapping. I believe that Jacky has proved that the attacks are capable of being incapping from an in-show perspective and from a DnD mechanics perspective. Aside from the judgement, I don't know why Elick linked a feat titled "Knocks out a dude in one punch" and then says "he is not going to realize his sole win con: knocking out Connor"
- ###Max vs Elodie
- Max wins. I think that Max has a sufficient edge in speed ensure that he beats Elodie, even if I accept that her projectiles instantly incap Max. I also think that given that Elick's suppositions about elodie having no defined in character behavior go unrefuted, I'm unsure to what her course of action would be. I think a significant portion of Elodie's win cons rely on her going invisible and accessing her ranged items, but I think in almost any other scenario Max has too much of an advantage with his speed and beating up Elodie either physically or with the shotgun even if the latter is unlikely. I would've liked to see Elick go for a 2nd response since going 1-1 made this decision a lot harder than it should have been
- Hence I vote for Elick on a 2-1 decision
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
