Longitudinal Analysis of Femininity

Longitudinal Analysis of Femininity
-----------------------------------

Femininity[1] includes the symmetrical relations AND and OR as cited in Lithuanian:

***

....│.... 	AND
....│....
....│.... 	(X,Y) AND (X,-Y) olettaa relaation a ∧ b.
..a.│.... 	Propositioiden Y-koordinaatin merkki on eri.
────┼────   a + b on merkityksetön sijainti.
..b.│....   Esim. WANT AND LIKE
....│....   GREED AND WORRY
....│....   MEAN AND NEED
....│....   REFUSE AND PAIN.

....│.... 	OR
....│....
....│.... 	(X,Y) OR (-X,Y) olettaa relaation a ∨ b.
..a.│.b.. 	Propositioiden X-koordinaatin merkki on eri.
────┼────   a + b on merkityksetön sijainti.
....│....   Esim. WANT OR MEAN
....│....   GREED OR REFUSE
....│....   LIKE OR NEED
....│....   WORRY OR PAIN.

....│.... 	CAUS
....│....
...A│D... 	(X,Y) CAUS (-Y,-X) olettaa relaatiot p → P. p + P on erinomainen.
..a.│.b.. 	a + A ja c + C ovat samalla alueella, b + B on c:n alueella ja d + D on a:n alueella.
────┼────   ||a + A|| = 2√2, ||b + B|| = √2, ||c + C|| = 2√2, ||d + D|| = √2
..d.│.c..   a → A: WANT CAUS GREED ("Me haluamme sitä" → "Emme halua tätä")
...B│C...   b → B: MEAN CAUS WORRY ("Sinä voit olla hän" → "Meille tulee huono olo tästä")
....│....   c → C: NEED CAUS PAIN ("Se tyydyttää minut" → "Olen tyytymätön tähän")
....│....   d → D: LIKE CAUS REFUSE ("Meille tulee hyvä olo tästä" → "Et voi olla hän")

***

In a political analysis[2] of femininity, an unexpected way to improve the formalisation of the Aldiode[3] has been found.

Let P and Q be people so that P is in situation p and q is in situation q.

Let p and q be patterns of quality so that p = (x,y) and q = (X,Y).

Let d refer to some arbitrary definition.

Let the word "impose" of natural language be denoted as P ⊨⊨ d which means "P imposes d".

Let Meta(n,N,r) refer to a meta-analysis of n, N and r so that n and N are variables and r is a relation.

Let any declaration of the form Meta(n,N) be imperative so that whoever makes the declarion performs event P ⊨⊨ d to everyone who receives the declaration.

As a sidetrack, we get to quantify the strength of declaration politically so that
P ⊨ d    means suggesting that P ⊨ d
P ⊨⊨ d   means imposing   that P ⊨ d
P ⊨⊨⊨ d  means demanding  that P ⊨ d
P ⊨⊨⊨⊨ d means coercing   that P ⊨ d

and generally so that
P ⊨² d    means trying to establish      that P ⊨ d
P ⊨⊨² d   means working to establish     that P ⊨ d
P ⊨⊨⊨² d  means fighting to establish    that P ⊨ d
P ⊨⊨⊨⊨² d means sacrificing to establish that P ⊨ d

Let "Longitudinal Analysis of Femininity" refer to a political[2] and military[4] viewpoint towards femininity so that:

Meta(x,X,∨) ⊨ y < 0 → (p M(nnnn) q) ∧ (p ∧ q),
Meta(x,X,∨) ⊨ y > 0 → (p P(nnnn) q) ∧ (p ∧ q).

The first line defines normativity and the last line defines empiricality.

[1] https://pastebin.com/RgQXPYjL
[2] https://pastebin.com/Dv06kheM
[3] https://pastebin.com/HiFp3pKk
[4] https://pastebin.com/2Q9rRpf8