daily pastebin goal
56%
SHARE
TWEET

Untitled

a guest Apr 10th, 2012 151 Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
  1. 13:38.33 cartman: sooooo
  2. 13:38.41 mru: hi cartman
  3. 13:38.48 cartman: mru: lo
  4. 13:39.03 cartman: michaelni: thanks for breaking fate & co.
  5. 13:41.33 lu_zero: ?
  6. 13:42.10 cartman: git.ffmpeg.org is not responding
  7. 13:42.15 cartman: didn't you get the memo?
  8. 13:43.20 michaelni: cartman, we have done no change to git.ffmpeg and fate.ffmpeg they point to where they always pointed to
  9. 13:43.36 michaelni: if mru chooses to shut servers down, thats out of our hands
  10. 13:43.50 mru: michaelni: stop telling lies
  11. 13:43.59 mru: you hijacked the dns
  12. 13:44.21 jannau: michaelni: fate.ffmpeg.org doesn't resolve
  13. 13:44.39 jannau: and neither does patches.ffmpeg.org
  14. 13:44.51 michaelni: jannau it resolves for me
  15. 13:45.16 cartman: michaelni: git.ffmpeg.org is not resolving here so I can't submit to FATE
  16. 13:45.27 cartman: boy I am sick of this childish war
  17. 13:45.28 ShadowJK: patches doesn't resolve for me, fate resolves to unicorn.mansr.com
  18. 13:46.00 ShadowJK: and git.ffmpeg.org points to natsuki for me?
  19. 13:46.42 Rathann: git. and fate. resolve here, but patches. does not
  20. 13:47.01 michaelni: I swear we had no plans to do anything with git/fate/patches
  21. 13:47.08 mru: who are "we"?
  22. 13:47.11 michaelni: ill try to figure out whats wrong
  23. 13:47.18 mru: you and yourself and your highness?
  24. 13:49.01 michaelni send SMS to admin
  25. 13:49.46 mru: the worlds best admin can't even get dns right....
  26. 13:49.51 Rathann: looks like current nameservers are replying with NXDOMAIN for patches.ffmpeg.org
  27. 13:50.18 mru: Rathann: yes, a group of rogues have stolen the domain name
  28. 13:50.22 Rathann: mru: you've never made any mistakes, I assume?
  29. 13:50.34 mru: yes, once
  30. 13:50.38 mru: I thought I'd made a mistake
  31. 13:50.39 lu_zero: uhm
  32. 13:50.40 mru: but I hand't
  33. 13:50.42 mru: hadn't
  34. 13:50.50 lu_zero: mru: =P
  35. 13:50.58 Rathann: mru: oh, sorry, I thought that's what you and your group of rogues did with FFmpeg project two months ago
  36. 13:51.21 lu_zero: Rathann: the rogue managing roundup is wondering
  37. 13:51.41 mru: and the one managing fate and git and mailing lists and samples and...
  38. 13:51.46 cartman: This project is worse than Middle East
  39. 13:52.08 mru: michaelni: please stop using my logo now
  40. 13:52.21 mru: or you'll get a letter from my lawyer
  41. 13:53.03 ShadowJK thinks someone or more needs to make a ffmpeg2.org, or ffmpeg2a.org and ffmpeg2b.org
  42. 13:53.04 michaelni: arpi has difficulty reaching .hu network
  43. 13:53.15 lu_zero: michaelni: no wonders
  44. 13:53.22 cartman: lol
  45. 13:53.31 mru: michaelni: reply
  46. 13:53.35 cartman: I knew Arpi was involved in this.
  47. 13:53.45 mru: cartman: arpi is the world's best admin
  48. 13:53.52 cartman: yeah sure
  49. 13:53.53 cartman: :D
  50. 13:53.55 mru: it must be _very_ hard to set up dns
  51. 13:54.11 cartman: Google might be acting :P
  52. 13:54.13 ShadowJK read the "I don't need backups, I have raid1" thing today
  53. 13:54.44 mru: raid1 only does you so much good when both hard drives are dead
  54. 13:55.11 lu_zero: mru: two hard drivers one next to the other NEVER fail
  55. 13:55.18 lu_zero: ok I'm trolling the past
  56. 13:55.34 michaelni: mru dont fear while you have no copyright on ffmpegs logo we will replace it
  57. 13:55.41 mru: you are wrong
  58. 13:55.44 ShadowJK: they will if they have identical firmware bug :) (hello Seagate)
  59. 13:55.46 mru: the copyright is mine
  60. 13:56.26 michaelni: <arpi> patches.* fixed
  61. 13:56.27 Compn: cartman : dns changes will take 24-48 hours to propagate iirc
  62. 13:56.49 michaelni: what was the problem with git/fate ?
  63. 13:57.46 lu_zero: none, now
  64. 13:57.46 cartman: Compn: indeed
  65. 13:57.51 mru: michaelni: I'm waiting for you to stop violating my copyright
  66. 13:58.08 michaelni: mru ill fix it, just sue me in the meantime
  67. 13:58.20 mru: fix it now
  68. 13:58.28 mru: this is no different from ffmpeg license violators
  69. 13:58.47 Compn: michaelni : where is ffmpeg.org repo now btw ?
  70. 13:58.54 Compn: i mean
  71. 13:59.03 Compn: the www xml
  72. 13:59.07 Compn: html whatnot
  73. 13:59.15 michaelni: .hu network problems git/fate should be fine otherwise
  74. 13:59.32 michaelni: maybe one of you is DOS-ing it ;)
  75. 13:59.48 mru: I don't engage in illegal activities
  76. 13:59.50 mru: unlike you
  77. 14:04.24 lu_zero takes his time to do maintainance on lscube.org
  78. 14:05.43 michaelni: mru, you violate the trademark, and even with that logo
  79. 14:05.49 mru: there is no trademark
  80. 14:06.24 michaelni: you have no copyright on the logo you gave it to the ffmpeg project, that was its purpose
  81. 14:06.28 michaelni: besides its my design
  82. 14:06.39 mru: show me where I gave away any rights
  83. 14:06.46 michaelni: but we of course will replace it
  84. 14:06.49 mru: that requires a signature on paper, you know
  85. 14:07.23 mru: you sound just like a typical gpl violator
  86. 14:07.28 mru: we will, we will
  87. 14:07.54 Compn: michaelni : tell me where the xml is and i'll remove the logo now
  88. 14:08.27 Compn remembers old logo revisions > http://www1.mplayerhq.hu/~mru/ffmpeg-logo/
  89. 14:11.45 Compn: well guess i'd need access too
  90. 14:11.48 Compn: haha
  91. 14:13.25 iive: michaelni: is the original design of the logo yours?
  92. 14:14.09 michaelni: yes its my design
  93. 14:15.14 iive: have you made sketch or just described it with words?
  94. 14:15.56 Compn: who cares? if mru wants to take his toy and leave, let him
  95. 14:16.14 Compn: rather fight on more interesting things
  96. 14:16.23 mru: right....
  97. 14:16.26 iive: if he had made it as sketch, then mans logo would be derivative work.
  98. 14:16.33 mru: I remember michael's disaster
  99. 14:16.46 mru has kicked iive (you're not helping)
  100. 14:22.20 mru: found it: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/28816
  101. 14:24.31 Rathann: the zig-zag is there
  102. 14:25.38 mru: yes, but his is totally different
  103. 14:26.07 spaam: michaelni: why did you do takeover the dns?
  104. 14:26.18 mru: spaam: because he's an asshole like that
  105. 14:26.50 lu_zero: mru: that doesn't explain much
  106. 14:27.06 lu_zero: spaam: because he could and he did.
  107. 14:27.10 mru: and a megalomaniac
  108. 14:27.26 mru: he couldn't stand not being in total control
  109. 14:27.26 spaam: lu_zero: ok.
  110. 14:27.28 Compn: because the person who owned the dns agreed with him
  111. 14:27.35 Compn: that person being ... fabrice
  112. 14:27.43 mru: for all we know fabrice is locked up in some cellar in austria
  113. 14:27.54 spaam: so when will this war stop?
  114. 14:28.03 lu_zero: spaam: from my point of view
  115. 14:28.07 mru: when one side is annihilated
  116. 14:28.09 Rathann: mru: you forgot "raped and chained to a wall"
  117. 14:28.09 Compn: why did you lock out michael of the homepage repo? because you couldnt stand not being in total control ?
  118. 14:28.28 mru: because he was making unauthorised changes
  119. 14:28.39 mru: simple as that
  120. 14:28.42 Compn: werent your changes unauthorized first ?
  121. 14:28.42 lu_zero: sigh...
  122. 14:28.43 Compn: heh
  123. 14:28.55 mru has the urge to kickban some people
  124. 14:29.06 Compn: spaam : oh, this just beginning :( watch the fun when people decide they dont like each others' mailing lists or foundation
  125. 14:29.08 lu_zero: Compn: those questions are in bad faith as the last time?
  126. 14:29.30 spaam: Compn: :)
  127. 14:29.32 lu_zero: just to know if I should take time to reply or not
  128. 14:30.07 Compn: lu_zero : i think everyone is set in their ways. so i dont think talking about it will change anyones mind
  129. 14:30.38 Compn: feel free to write up a timeline so you can point at it whenever it comes up :)
  130. 14:30.38 Compn: hehe
  131. 14:31.16 lu_zero: Compn: I take it as a "yes I'm in bad faith"
  132. 14:31.32 ChanServ has changed mode: -o michaelni
  133. 14:31.48 spaam: ok.. who did that?
  134. 14:32.11 lu_zero: not me
  135. 14:32.15 Compn:lu_zero : we have disagreements on which 'side' is right to change the repo, i think
  136. 14:32.16 mru: I did
  137. 14:32.22 mru: I don't think he deserves that anymore
  138. 14:32.37 lu_zero: Compn: I think we are past this
  139. 14:32.44 spaam: mru: that does not help ...
  140. 14:32.50 mru: I'm not trying to help
  141. 14:33.08 spaam: mru: so you like this fight?
  142. 14:33.37 mru: no, I don't like fighting
  143. 14:33.50 ChanServ has changed mode: +o michaelni
  144. 14:33.57 mru: who did that?
  145. 14:34.24 lu_zero: Compn: changes should go to the mailing list
  146. 14:34.45 kierank: [17:27] mru: for all we know fabrice is locked up in some cellar in austria --> saying that doesn't help anyone
  147. 14:34.55 mru: kierank: I'm not trying to help anyone
  148. 14:35.13 mru: I see no reason to be nice
  149. 14:35.33 kierank: bear in mind this was the exact same thing only a few weeks ago you were castigating michaelni over
  150. 14:35.43 mru: huh?
  151. 14:35.48 lu_zero: sigh
  152. 14:35.50 kierank: the death threats
  153. 14:35.52 Compn: kierank : you wont be able to explain irony here
  154. 14:35.57 lu_zero: kierank: where?
  155. 14:36.11 mru: I haven't threatened to kill anyone
  156. 14:36.21 kierank: the discussions where michaelni was saying things about killing the new maintainers
  157. 14:36.28 lu_zero: that line says "I have no clue about where fabrice is"
  158. 14:36.44 kierank: oh come on
  159. 14:36.47 kierank: that's ridiculous
  160. 14:37.33 lu_zero: kierank: anyway I think that's a digression
  161. 14:37.36 iive: kierank: you can't fight bias with reasoning. in only reinforces it.
  162. 14:37.43 spaam: How old are you guys? 5? 6? ;S
  163. 14:37.46 mru has changed mode: +b *!*iive@unaffiliated/iive
  164. 14:37.48 mru has kicked iive (iive)
  165. 14:38.15 lu_zero: spaam: could we go back to more pressing issues?
  166. 14:38.25 kierank: lu_zero: yes it's a digression but as before saying this kind of things doesn't help the situation
  167. 14:38.34 mru: I'm not trying to help the situation
  168. 14:38.39 lu_zero: kierank: that's why I'm trying to be calm
  169. 14:38.52 lu_zero: while mru isn't that much
  170. 14:39.55 lu_zero: now
  171. 14:40.40 mru: I've been calm for 6 months
  172. 14:40.45 mru: it didn't work
  173. 14:42.47 Rathann: mru kickbanning people won't silence them
  174. 14:43.02 mru: no, but it gives me some peace
  175. 14:43.04 mru: and it feels good
  176. 14:43.05 Rathann: if you want to cover your ears, that's fine
  177. 14:43.31 Rathann: but why cover the ears of everyone here?
  178. 14:44.00 Rathann has some other suggestions if you want to feel good
  179. 14:44.09 jannau has changed mode: -o mru
  180. 14:44.10 Rathann: this is just childish
  181. 14:44.19 jannau: mru: please stay calm
  182. 14:44.28 ChanServ has changed mode: +o mru
  183. 14:44.43 kierank: ......
  184. 14:45.41 Rathann wonders why mru hasn't banned michaelni and anyone who supports him yet
  185. 14:45.57 mru has changed mode: +b *!*rathann@fedora/rathann
  186. 14:45.57 mru has kicked Rathann (you're not helping)
  187. 14:46.17 jannau has changed mode: -b *!*rathann@fedora/rathann
  188. 14:46.33 jannau: mru: neither are you
  189. 14:46.39 mru: as I said, I'm not trying to
  190. 14:47.23 ChanServ has changed mode: +o Rathann
  191. 14:47.57 Rathann: :)
  192. 14:48.57 DonDiego: mru: mans, calm down
  193. 14:49.04 mru: fuck you too
  194. 14:50.05 lu_zero: sigh
  195. 14:53.57 lu_zero: michaelni: you have mail
  196. 14:57.09 michaelni: lu_zero, mail me your phone num if you want to talk but i need to deal with the logo first even if i doubt the validity on any copyright claim
  197. 14:57.39 DeathWol1: change logo, profit;)
  198. 14:58.13 DeathWol1 is now known as DeathWolf
  199. 14:58.30 spaam: michaelni: did you talk to the other guys about the change for NS ?
  200. 14:58.35 DeathWolf: a Daizo joins!
  201. 14:59.01 tote: its super effective
  202. 14:59.28 mru: spaam: no he did not
  203. 15:00.25 spaam: mru: it whould have been better if he did that?
  204. 15:01.12 lu_zero: spaam: as I stated, it was and within his possibilities
  205. 15:01.18 DonDiego: michaelni: seems like there was a mail going around that i did not receive....
  206. 15:02.23 spaam: lu_zero: i know..  but maybe mru did like it more if he told everyone first about it.
  207. 15:02.46 mru: it was the _only_ thing he had a hope of doing
  208. 15:02.50 mru: so it was inevitable
  209. 15:02.57 lu_zero: spaam: wouldn't change much
  210. 15:03.04 lu_zero: regarding the logo
  211. 15:03.33 lu_zero: as I stated in the email I have no problem in burying the ffmpeg for now
  212. 15:03.53 lu_zero: michaelni keeps avcodec.org as name and we keep the other
  213. 15:03.56 michaelni: DonDiego, you are on the list of addresses it was sent to
  214. 15:04.13 michaelni: if you talk of the anouncement
  215. 15:04.26 DeathWolf: Domains are so important! They're the essence of a product.
  216. 15:04.35 michaelni: i had some bounces due to SPF but i think you wasnt amongth them
  217. 15:05.11 lu_zero: DeathWolf: wireshark would say not
  218. 15:05.25 DeathWolf: </sarcasm> btw;)
  219. 15:07.44 michaelni: DonDiego, i forwarded the mail to you just in case the original wont reach you for soem reason
  220. 15:08.09 michaelni: We tried to send the mail to everyone who has appeared on svn/cvs
  221. 15:08.14 michaelni: as devel/commiter
  222. 15:09.14 michaelni: there where like 180 email addresses IIRC
  223. 15:10.44 DonDiego: i did not get any email (yet), but my mail is often delayed
  224. 15:12.15 michaelni: if you dont get it tell me and ill ask arpi about it, maybe theres something in the logs that explains it
  225. 15:13.02 DonDiego: i just got the forward, so it's indeed strange
  226. 15:13.07 mru: maybe the world's best admin can't set up a mail relay
  227. 15:17.19 lu_zero: anyway
  228. 15:18.26 lu_zero: michaelni: here's the deal: We try to do our best and by the end of the year we see what's the result. nobody uses the ffmpeg name and we splice the ffmpeg ml
  229. 15:18.46 lu_zero: we are already using git and we already have different repos
  230. 15:20.25 DeathWolf: ffmpeg[0] and ffmpeg[1]
  231. 15:20.31 lu_zero: really, I'd rather quit discussions and just try to go back writing code, you don't like me or my ways, I don't like at all your behaviour.
  232. 15:22.11 Sean_McG is all for the "writing code" bit
  233. 15:22.25 BBB too
  234. 15:22.34 BBB: I see michaelni is on IRC, fun stuff must be happening
  235. 15:22.53 Kovensky: BBB: https://gist.github.com/868293
  236. 15:24.19 BBB: Kovensky: long text... btu I see, the dns button was pushed
  237. 15:24.33 BBB: well, I guess that's the end of that then
  238. 15:24.46 Kovensky: and there have been threats of nuclear weapon usage (aka lawyers)
  239. 15:25.08 ShadowJK: atleast nobody has threatened with journalists yet
  240. 15:25.26 Rathann goes to do some useful work instead of feeding the troll(s)
  241. 15:25.38 kshishkov: ShadowJK: there a bloggers which is worse
  242. 15:25.39 elenril: journalists are busy in japan
  243. 15:25.54 Sean_McG: yes, I am so sick of CNN's coverage of that
  244. 15:25.54 Kovensky: phoronix most certainly has spies
  245. 15:26.59 DeathWolf: vaseline is what's needed here;)
  246. 15:27.46 Kovensky wonders if /g/ is visiting
  247. 15:29.05 DonDiego: bbiab
  248. 15:29.15 lu_zero: uhm my reply to stefano seems missing
  249. 15:33.31 michaelni: mru, we redid the logo, now let me politely ask you to stop immedeatly using our logo, the design and trademark is ours
  250. 15:33.36 michaelni: using that is a scam
  251. 15:34.22 mru: I don't see any change
  252. 15:34.22 michaelni: thanks for understanding, but iam a bit alergic to be called a copyright violator for using our own logo
  253. 15:34.32 michaelni: mru, good
  254. 15:35.09 lu_zero: our...
  255. 15:35.17 mru: I made that design
  256. 15:35.22 mru: I never gave up the rights to it
  257. 15:35.26 mru: you don't have permission to use it
  258. 15:35.27 mru: end of story
  259. 15:35.36 michaelni: mru we meet in court then
  260. 15:35.48 michaelni: lets see if the judge agrees with you
  261. 15:36.06 michaelni: lieing on IRC is easy try it in court
  262. 15:36.17 ruggles: michaelni: what trademark? and in what countries?
  263. 15:36.21 BBB: who made the logo?
  264. 15:36.25 mru: I did
  265. 15:36.32 BBB: the mru owns it, by US copyright
  266. 15:36.38 michaelni: the one on ffmpeg.org has been made by me
  267. 15:36.39 BBB:*then
  268. 15:36.42 mru: by Berne convention
  269. 15:37.31 BBB: michaelni: is it an adaptation of someone else's work?
  270. 15:37.31 lu_zero: michaelni: I guess you aren't aware I did trademark research in the past months...
  271. 15:37.32 lu_zero: and ffmpeg isn't in the trademarks db
  272. 15:37.32 mru: BBB: he changed the font
  273. 15:37.32 BBB: the image is still there
  274. 15:37.32 mru: and that's the part that matters
  275. 15:37.38 mru: I claim no ownership over the word ffmpeg
  276. 15:37.41 BBB: font isn't a creative work
  277. 15:37.47 kshishkov: it is!
  278. 15:37.47 BBB: unless you own the fonttype used
  279. 15:37.50 BBB: which none of us does
  280. 15:37.55 BBB: kshishkov: well, I mean it isn't ours
  281. 15:37.55 mru: designing a font is creative
  282. 15:38.01 BBB: using a font isn't
  283. 15:38.05 mru: can be
  284. 15:38.07 BBB: unless the text itself is creative
  285. 15:38.07 kshishkov: BBB: exactly, but in Germany typeface is protected as trademark
  286. 15:38.11 mru: but that's irrelevant
  287. 15:38.20 mru: the zigzag is what matters
  288. 15:38.41 BBB: michaelni: sorry, you don't own the zigzag logo, mru does. but I can ask aaron to help you with this monday if you so please
  289. 15:38.42 Kovensky: isn't the zigzag more likely to be owned by mpeg? or does that not count since it isn't used as a trademark?
  290. 15:38.57 Kovensky: (by mpeg itself that is)
  291. 15:38.57 lu_zero: and I guess the t-shirts made us owning the implicit trademark
  292. 15:38.58 michaelni: BBB, ok
  293. 15:55.58 DeathWolf: just rotate the zigzag 90°
  294. 15:56.01 DeathWolf: and make it red
  295. 15:56.08 DeathWolf: or pink!
  296. 15:56.13 DeathWolf: Pi/2+pink is always the solution
  297. 16:19.23 DeathWolf: I suggest going for the lawyers and a nice lawsuit though. Giving more money to lawyers is always a great solution.
  298. 16:20.33 Compn: BBB : did you see michael's original ffmpeg logo ? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/28816
  299. 16:20.50 mru: it's pathetic
  300. 16:22.35 Compn refrains from biting troll
  301. 16:44.17 DonDiego: oh, logo fun
  302. 16:44.44 DonDiego: michaelni: there is no trademark apparently and the logo is mans'
  303. 16:44.45 merbanan: Wingmakers .... ok
  304. 16:45.01 DonDiego: also, much of the text on the website is (c) me :)
  305. 16:45.09 DonDiego: and the design is (c) robert ...
  306. 16:46.14 mru points at PLAGIARISM in the dictionary
  307. 16:47.08 Compn: DonDiego : did you see michael's original ffmpeg logo ? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/28816
  308. 16:47.26 lu_zero: Compn: and?
  309. 16:48.05 DonDiego: Compn: yes, nothing to do with the zigzag created by mans
  310. 16:48.26 Compn: DonDiego : are you saying you dont want your copyrighted text on ffmpeg.org now ?
  311. 16:48.37 Compn: or just pointing out copyrights ?
  312. 16:49.47 beastd: mru: What are you claiming copyright for? The concrete digital representation that is used on the homepage, or what?
  313. 16:50.22 DonDiego: Compn: both
  314. 16:50.31 Compn: was used on the homepage... michaelni changed it iirc
  315. 16:50.45 mru: he changed to a slightly different font
  316. 16:50.49 mru: which is irrelevant
  317. 16:51.02 DonDiego: beastd: the green zigzag next to the word FFmpeg on www.ffmpeg.org
  318. 16:51.10 beastd: Are you claiming Rights on zigzag coding and the color green?
  319. 16:51.29 DonDiego: the logo
  320. 16:51.56 Compn: beastd : whole thing together it seems
  321. 16:52.41 merbanan: why even discuss this when we are going to consult SFLC in the matter ?
  322. 16:52.43 Compn: which robert? swain ?
  323. 16:52.44 shahriman: sorry to interrupt, but i really liked the original logo, especially the font
  324. 16:53.14 Compn: michaelni : DonDiego wishes his copyrighted text off ffmpeg.org ...
  325. 16:53.34 Compn: see, this is why its important to get your homepage under a gpl license :\
  326. 16:54.05 DonDiego: hmmm, who was it that insisted on this for years?
  327. 16:54.34 Compn: i dont know, but i think your request is be petty and juvenile :)
  328. 16:55.12 Compn: fully within your rights of course
  329. 16:56.48 DonDiego: i might change my mind, but i don't currently feel like helping the counter-revolution - why should i?
  330. 16:57.49 Compn: because i thought your original announcement was open to helping any ffmpeg developers
  331. 16:58.33 DonDiego: hmmm?
  332. 16:59.25 Compn: the fork mail. maybe i misread your intention to be helpful to the project and not just a group of devels within such project.
  333. 17:02.40 DonDiego: you did not misread - i do not support going back to the reign of the evil overlord though :)
  334. 17:03.02 Compn: he is democratically appointed
  335. 17:03.08 Compn: maybe you should start a vote
  336. 17:03.39 Compn: but i guess i'm tired of arguing
  337. 17:05.24 Compn: its fun to see how petty everyone is tho
  338. 17:05.48 BBB: let's vote whether everyone is petty
  339. 17:06.00 elenril votes maybe
  340. 17:06.11 Compn places bets on when roundup/lists/fate go down
  341. 17:06.24 DonDiego: Compn: he is not
  342. 17:06.39 DonDiego: there was also this "vote with your feet" thing...
  343. 17:06.56 BBB: Compn: why would fate go down. fate rocks
  344. 17:07.27 Compn: yes fate is very valuable to the project
  345. 17:09.21 Compn: there was a counter-vote with your feet too, this time it happened with dns
  346. 17:09.35 Compn: instead of ffmpeg.org homepage repo
  347. 17:09.39 mru: well, have fun with your dns
  348. 17:12.06 BBB: in the end it's all about code
  349. 17:12.15 BBB: unfortunately michaelni doesn't code, still
  350. 17:16.34 thresh: oh, more fun
  351. 17:19.00 DonDiego: Compn: there was no vote about the dns :)
  352. 17:20.47 Compn: there were a few devels who spoke in private about it
  353. 17:20.59 mru: "devels" lol
  354. 17:21.01 Compn: was there a public vote about michaels ffmpeg.org repo access ?
  355. 17:21.24 Compn: heh
  356. 17:21.28 peloverde: the ffmpeg.org repo was a new creation, nothing was taken away
  357. 17:21.30 DonDiego: there was a breach of svn policy :)
  358. 17:21.48 DonDiego: peloverde: Compn is talking about the homepage
  359. 17:21.49 Compn: peloverde : i meant the homepage
  360. 17:22.04 peloverde: ahhh, you are correct then
  361. 17:22.09 Compn: which is getting harder to specify as things go on...
  362. 17:22.19 Compn: DonDiego : which svn policy was broken ?
  363. 17:22.19 Compn: eheh
  364. 17:22.53 Compn: its like you voted to name yourself leader
  365. 17:23.24 Compn: and then kicked out michael for violating policy , since he was no longer leader
  366. 17:23.27 DonDiego: "don't just commit controversial stuff"
  367. 17:23.54 Compn: michael is leader and therefor restoring the original repo...
  368. 17:24.43 Compn: i dont understand why you all ignore this ?
  369. 17:25.02 DonDiego: the leader of what? when 18 people stand up and say they don't want him as leader anymore, is that not clear enough?
  370. 17:25.05 kshishkov: Compn: personally I don't understant why you call him leader
  371. 17:26.52 Compn: DonDiego : so if there are 18 people who stand up and say you arent root anymore , you would accept this ?
  372. 17:27.42 Compn: i think removing the videolan repo was pretty controversial itself
  373. 17:27.50 Compn: if you just listed another repo ... it wouldnt have been so bad
  374. 17:28.07 DonDiego: nobody removed the videolan repo
  375. 17:28.17 Compn: from ffmpeg.org download page ?
  376. 17:28.25 DonDiego: it's there
  377. 17:28.31 Compn: for a week while i asked you and mans to fix it ?
  378. 17:28.52 Compn: and threatened to fix it myself ...
  379. 17:28.58 DonDiego: there's a table now
  380. 17:29.14 Compn: so you agree it was removed for a week then
  381. 17:29.42 Compn: kshishkov : can we agree he was at one point leader ?
  382. 17:29.51 kshishkov: Compn: nope
  383. 17:30.03 Compn: kshishkov : then i cant understand why you dont call him leader
  384. 17:30.19 kshishkov: Compn: because he doesn't lead
  385. 17:30.52 DonDiego: Compn: which week?
  386. 17:31.27 mru: michael never did any leading
  387. 17:32.21 Compn: DonDiego : http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/2011-January/034582.html
  388. 17:34.06 Compn: DonDiego : the week is between that commit and the commit which restored videolan.org repo to the download page
  389. 17:34.23 Compn: michael tried to restore it, and BBB reverted
  390. 17:34.39 Compn: so it must be controversial if we have two reverts
  391. 17:34.42 lu_zero: Compn: by doing math if more people say "go away" than the ones that say "please stay" what does that mean?
  392. 17:35.09 Compn: lu_zero : the announce mail said everyone was welcome, not 'go away'
  393. 17:35.26 lu_zero: which announce email?
  394. 17:35.37 Compn: DonDiego : or dont you think thats controversial and an svn policy broken ?
  395. 17:36.11 Compn: lu_zero : the one which DonDiego posted and 18 developers signed
  396. 17:36.19 Compn: i can get a link if you dont remember signing it...
  397. 17:37.40 Kovensky is pretty sure lu_zero remembers signing it
  398. 17:37.44 Compn: DonDiego : i'm sorry. it just strikes me as hypocritical when you say michael broke a svn rule but when Dark_Shikari and BBB make controversial commits its not breaking an svn rule
  399. 17:38.41 Kovensky: Compn: 1st: it's git now, 2nd: Dark_Shikari made a commit without review (even if uncontroversial) yesterday and he did get yelled at for doing so
  400. 17:39.18 Compn: Kovensky : homepage is hosted on git now ? not svn ?
  401. 17:39.33 Compn: Kovensky : shh if you arent paying attention
  402. 17:39.39 Kovensky: oh, wrong repository =p
  403. 17:42.02 DonDiego: Compn: there was a revolution against mn's fork to videolan.org, it's clear that we would not let that be undone - the other homepage commits were nothing but provocation
  404. 17:42.18 Compn: sounds controversial
  405. 17:42.33 DonDiego: if you want to continue this, feel free to query me, but this is just wasting bandwidth for everybody here
  406. 17:43.15 Compn: well you had asked where it was removed
  407. 17:43.35 Compn: and you asked about the week
  408. 17:43.50 DonDiego: i was not sure what exactly you were referring to, that's all
  409. 17:44.08 Compn: but i'm happy to drop it
  410. 17:59.41 Rathann: AFAIU the git repo at videolan.org was created temporarily because it was taking too long to create it on natsuki @ffmpeg.org
  411. 18:00.20 Compn: iirc michael said he didnt want a repo where mans had root
  412. 18:00.40 Rathann: ah, that might have been an issue as well
  413. 18:00.57 Compn: it took a while for natsuki to get git , but that was ages before the switch
  414. 18:01.02 Compn: that it did get a git repo
  415. 18:01.44 Rathann: I always wondered why mru didn't want to give up being root - it's more of a burden than anything else in my experience
  416. 18:02.24 mru: I refuse to give anything up as punishment for crimes I did not commit
  417. 18:04.05 Rathann: why did it have to be "as punishment"?
  418. 18:04.27 mru: don't ask me
  419. 18:04.40 mru: I wasn't the one demanding it
  420. 18:05.29 spaam: so.. will there be a new channel?
  421. 18:05.40 mru: try #libav-devel
RAW Paste Data
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy. OK, I Understand
 
Top