Recently a girl everyone of ACP knows as Tori was promoted to Division General after being promoted to Master General only a few weeks before. Many people have been working for that rank longer and harder than her, which is why it has come to my attention that this act has been seen as unfair to many and confusing to few.
I am not writing this to cause an argument or form a revolt. I myself have been working for the rank of Division General for a solid 10 months. That alone is the longest I have ever been in an army. I may only have 2 years of experience, but does that make me less eligible for the rank? The idea of that being truth bewilders me. It is correct that I am inactive at times, some more than others, but it seems to the ones that promote the soldiers that it means I am not good enough to be moved up. In August (2012) I was very active until I came down with West Nile, which most of you should know is bad. Going back even farther to July (2012), I had orchestra camp that lasted a week. Even just recently I became extremely inactive for two reasons. One of my own laziness (which I planned to fix the following week) and of my banishment from the computer until I fixed my grades. I cannot reserve all my time to ACP, but neither can anybody else.
I really have nothing against Tori, this isn't supposed to be a rant about how she should be demoted and if you perceive it as that then you are wrong. She is a good friend of mine who I know deserves this ranks, but I really think she should spend more time getting it like the rest of us.