Sargon's appearance on Milleni-yule

Well it's a fun idea to subvert SJWism. But the specifics of what they believe do matter. They think a room full of white people is a microaggression and their belief in restorative justice means they want whitey to still pay with his magic dirt. Not even black separatists are serious about leaving, as Jared Taylor has noted. Maybe a huge injection of insincere but left-presenting white guys would help this and make them decide separation is the right idea. Remains to be seen, we may be terminally unwoke in personality and that will be hard to fix.

And a different approach is good since White Americans actually agree with the altright on certain specific issues (like preserving America's European Heritage) but the elite does not. I'd love to steal the institutional intertia from anyone but they'd just call me a white nationalist eventually, and find my old social media. The presentation here is too close to a political cartoon of SJWs so it's hard to buy. It doesn't sound like a living system with real people involved but a monolithic caricature one can interact with like an instrument.

Ultimately I'd suggest white supremacy means we will always be on the hook for the failures of blacks and browns whereever they may be. And plenty of woke Icelanders are ashamed by their homogeneity and want more diversity anyway so the power play will always come. Eastern Europe and Sweden also had no real connection to non-whites but they still must be diversified. He seems to ignore Woes pointing this out consistently. The original progressives did in fact think the security of nice white nations was unfair to the rest of the world.

And we can expect social justice to become more aggressively anti-white as its non-white ranks swell. Though that could be recast as an argument for injecting ourselves into it, of course.

Moreover I doubt Sargon actually knows what we think, or at least not why we think it. He makes too many blunderous or ideologically beleaguered restatements of our positions. A good example of this would be his comments about the comment regarding 'blacks and browns forming the underclass', he doesnt dispute the veracity of this (he cant) so he recastes it as similar to what SJWs think since it is collectivist (or something). All it means is that even SJWs recognize this reality but hyperindividualists don't. Individual identity isnt automatically more valid than group identity so it doesn't hold some vaunted position of superior predictive validity. I mean, the existence of collectivism shows it actually has pretty poor predictive validity.

And also his interpretation of the JQ is silly. Blacks don't admit whites are smarter than them, while we say Jews are smarter but abuse their elite positions and have a pathological relationship with the white gentile in particular. And they are extra overrepresented even with IQ accounted for. So the meritocracy idea has fallen apart. This is a fairly basic observation anyone studying the altright would have seen by now.

"Nah mang, us thinking jews use their higher iq to abuse elite positions and act as the architects of bad ideas is totally the same as black people thinking white people took away Egypt from them.

It isnt at all comparable to Sargon thinking the rich, Germans, or globalists use their positions to abuse their power and are also architects of bad ideas."

Currently both sides are being used by the other side's media to increase political and racial polarization. Which is honestly happening regardless of what we think or do. Which makes subversion less likely and rather demanding.

Also, sjws think race itself is a social construct so I don't think them ending the "social construction of whiteness" is really as meaningless as you claim. That's the social constructivism as it practically means, your own 'nazis' line belies this paranoia about whites. Maybe he just couldn't explain it well in this format.

Also, after thinking about it, I do think Sargon was being cagey

With his fairly recent Thinkery video where he talks about the state of his community with Dr Layman he says the altright is working hard and basically "we need to work hard to show them up". We being the skeptics and them being the altright.

He also used to say, prominently with Jared Taylor and a livestream with Stardusk, that he accepts race realism and thinks Kraut and Vee are wrong. Now he says he doesnt know who is right (bull).

Does this sound like the Sargon we have heard? And this wasnt a recent change on his part. Woes referenced a stream with Academic Agent

ah, Sargon's plan.

It's okay but honestly they have more deniability here. "It's Okay to be White" made them flip out because it was in areas where prole SJWs could see it and wouldnt control themselves. This would only be understood by the kind of SJW who has self-control