Stone Cold Truth with Roger Stone (03/25/2017) Excerpts

Supplemental document for: "Theory that Roger Stone's go-between for Wikileaks was Randy Credico", link: https://wakelet.com/wake/2d352ae9-febe-44a1-a7bb-51674a2e4bf5

Excerpts from Stone Cold Truth, co-hosted by Roger Stone and Tyler Nixon, broadcast date: March 25, 2017. Excerpt one goes from 15:30-23:00. Excerpt two goes from 28:50-37:07. Excerpt three goes from 42:45-45:52.

File link:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/z2dsbn9n1k9lug6/0325171%20-%20Stone%20Cold%20Truth%20after%20Comey%20hearings%20pt1.mp3

Excerpt four is taken from part two of the podcast, and goes from 49:32-51:02.

File link:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/ac0a4i1iw43z1yn/0325172%20-%20Stone%20Cold%20Truth%20after%20Comey%20hearings%20pt2.mp3

Excerpt one:

ROGER STONE
I have stayed up late last night, to go through the transcripts of this kangaroo court that they called an Intelligence Committee hearing, and it just has echoes of 1954. Mr. Schiff, the junior congressman from California, who always seems rather bug-eyed and upset, asking James Comey, for example, "Are you aware...do you know who Roger Stone is?" Comey says: "Yes, generally." "Are you aware that he was a partner of Paul Manafort?" Not sure what that means, it's sortof like, "Are you now or have you ever been a partner of Paul Manafort?" It's kindof ridiculous, but then it goes down from there. "So, are you aware that Stone has acknowledged directly communicating with someone the intelligence community has assessed as a person of intelligence?" Schiff- FALSE! Never said I directly con-

TYLER NIXON
First lie.

STONE
There is one. Schiff: "I mentioned before that Mr. Stone was in direct communications with a creature of Russian CRU, Crucifer 2.0 [sic] and that is something the intelligence assessment talked about." Schiff - WRONG! Never said I was in direct communications, and you can say it as many times as you like, but far more people believe that Crucifer 2.0 [sic] is not a Russian asset than believe he is. You can go on the internet, this has more opinions than the Kennedy assassination. [speaks as if teeth tightly clenched] So, you can keep saying Crucifer is a Russian, but there is no proof of that, that is a theory, by the Central Intellignece Agency.

I have other favorites here that I just can't leave out, like: "Did you know whether the Russian Intelligence Community has dealt directly with Wikileaks or whether they too are using an intermediary?" "Too", meaning like me. "We assess some kind of cut-out. They didn't deal directly with Wikileaks." In other words, Comey you have nothing! Sorry! Try this hard, let me say it slowly in case the director is listening. Wikileaks is not an asset of the Russians. Never has been. Does not receive their information from the Russians. The hacked material from the DNC did not come from the Russians. It came from Cuccifer 2.0 [sic], who posted it and claimed credit for it on his twitter feed. Another, one of my favorites. Mr. Schiff: "If Mr. Stone acknowledged Mr. Podesta's time in the barrel was coming, on August 2016, would that have been prior to the public release of stolen emails of Mr. Podesta?" "Yes, that's the correct chronology." Accusation, no proof. Speculation. Conjecture. B.S.

NIXON
Well, but-

STONE
No proof.

NIXON
And grandstanding at that, Roger, because Comey said right out of the gate, that he was not going to discuss or answer questions about individuals, particularly you, and that was the line of questioning, and Schiff just went on, and kept asking the same questions, if you run a legitimate inquiry, and you're asking Comey legitimately these questions, he said he's not going to answer specific questions about a specific person. Schiff just went on and on, which is basically just using that platform to defame you, and to grandstand. These guys are-

STONE
[pause] Go ahead.

NIXON
Well, I mean, it's just- The other one is- The Wikileaks aspect, Trey Gowdy, thankfully, at least, was the only person- I don't get- It was a complete Democrat congressman after Democrat congressman at this hearing.

STONE
Well, let's

NIXON
I don't know if they just let them have their do, but Trey Gowdy said it, we're talking in some cases about quadruple hearsay, here. With nothing to back it-

STONE
And that's why we should continue. Again, Mr. Schiff from the hearing. "Roger Stone, longtime Trump political advisor and self-proclaimed dirty trickster-" Well, I'm not sure I proclaim that, I may have accepted it, as you know, one man's dirty trick is another man's political participation, but continuing..."-boasts in his speech, that he communicated with Assange and more documents would be coming, including an October surprise. In the middle of August, he also communicates, again, the Russian cut-out 2.0 and authors a Breitbart piece denying Gruccifer's [sic] links to Russian intelligence." Sorry Congressman, you have the order wrong! I wrote on August 5th for Breitbart News, "How Exactly The DNC Hacks Went Down," ["Dear Hillary: DNC Hack Solved, So Now Stop Blaming Russia" archive link: http://archive.is/MWHW0] I wrote that because I was tired of the Russians-did-it theme being falsely put out by the Clinton people, so it was an antidote to that...and I spoke to Cruccifer two [sic], not spoke to, but communicated by twitter _only_, six weeks later, so the good congressman has the order of events completely wrong. Completely wrong. What do you think, Tyler?

NIXON
[pause, wasn't paying attention] Uh, I don't think facts matter. I think, again, as I said in the opening segment, this is just to put out their murky putrid mist. Not even a fog, really. Like I said, smoke and mirrors wouldn't do justice, is an insult to smoke and mirrors, because smoke has some level of substance at least to it. This is a foggy mist, of nonsense, lies, and fabrications, typical projection from the Democrat party and the Democrat scum, frankly...I don't hesitate to use that word about them, they're scum. They are liars, they're defamers, and I don't say this Roger because I've known you, because I'm friends with you, or because I necessarily support you in any way, this is because, this is rank injustice. This is an abuse of power. They get on their high horse there, and constantly in front of the press, and I mentioned Lawrence O'Donnell the other day, or excuse me, the other segment, and he was on MSNBC, immediately after Chairman Nunes, who, by the way, is a courageous man, to take on this combine of Democrat media defamation. Because, you know, you set yourself in their cross hairs, look out. And Nunes went to the president, and said you were being surveilled, after the election, even. Whether it's incidental or otherwise, And O'Donnell got on his show that night, and talked about how Nunes had blown his credibility, and he had no credibility left because he had gone directly to the president.

STONE
Speaking of no credibility, the guy with no credibility would be O'Donnell, because, in all honesty, when you see him, trust me, most of the time, he's so drunk he can't stand up. We will be right back with the Stone Cold Truth here, on the Genesis Communications Network. We're going to tell you why the whole Russian scam relates directly to the surveillance and Watergate type bugging of the president of the United States. Stay tuned.

Excerpt two:

STONE
Mr. Schiff now speaking to the hearing..."So, I want to look briefly at one of these individuals, and Director Comey, I understand your constraints, let me ask you a couple of questions regardless...Paul Manafort, who is Roger Stone's business partner...I want to ask you a few questions about him." Paul Manafort and I have not been business partners for almost thirty five years. Another lie. Now you have some woman congress [sic] from Connecticut [Jackie Speier, of California], and she says: "Now in terms of understanding all this, I think of a spiderweb with a tarantula in the middle...the tarantula in my view is Putin. Who is entrapping many people to do his bidding, and to engage with him. And I would include those like Roger Stone," and she goes on to say Carter Page, Michael Caputo [former protege of Stone's] - who's probably so happy his name got mentioned, he can't stand it [NIXON laughs] - Wilbur Ross...she's just accused Wilbur Ross and Rex Tillerson of being controlled by Vladimir Putin. [again, the following section is spoken as if STONE has his teeth clenched down, hard] Irresponsible. This congressperson must be required to apologize. Now going into some congressman from Connecticut named Heck [Dennis Heck, Democrat from Washington state]...and he says: "We've heard quite a few individuals in the Trump orbit who feel somewhere on the spectrum from mere naivete, disturbing enough if this naivete is a feature of those who're supposed to be running our country's foreign policy...to being unwitting Russian dupes, to be willing, blindly, to active co-ordination. This rogues includes [sic] those already fired - Roger Stone, and so on." Well, let's see, [teeth clenched] the Congressman who is in his first term wants to talk about experience. [very clenched] I've been around forty years, you are in your first, _and last_ term in Congress. Uh, but in this sentence, you have specifically accused me, of being a willing dupe and an active agent of Vladimir Putin. _That's defamation_. That's reckless disregard [very clenched] for the truth. So, my invitation to all these congresspeople, [very clenched] including that [spits this out] pretty boy Stillwall [Eric Swalwell], from California-

NIXON
Swalwell.

STONE
Right. The one term surfer boy [clenched] who I predict will _not_ have a long and illustrious career in politics, who says "even if Stone testifies [clenched] before the Committee he will lie." Wave your immunity. If you're all so certain you're right, wave your congressional immunity. And we'll let the third branch of government have a say in this matter. These people have acted as demagogues, they have been engaged in mudslinging, red-baiting [clenched] and if you go to Stone Cold Truth today, there's a story on the corruption of...Mr. Schiff! ["Adam Schiff: Grifter, Racketeer, Warmonger", archive link: http://archive.is/6Vkfd] Mr Schiff is so busy pointing fingers at Russians, he forgot to mention his big fundraiser with a Ukrainian arms dealer last week. [a reference to Igor Pasternak, an American who runs an airship company, and is profiled in the New Yorker piece, "A New Generation of Airships is Born", http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/02/29/a-new-generation-of-airships-is-born] And on and on. So please go to Stone Cold Truth, right now, Stone Cold Truth dot com, you can read a terrific new article we've just posted [clenched] on the incredible corruption of Adam Schiff. Tyler, a tea party group in Schiff's district has asked me to come out there and speak...and I may do so.

The idea that these congressmen can draw your reputation through the mud on national television...and then not give you any equal forum to respond...well, that just isn't America. That's not how it works. I mean, you would tell us, one of the most fundamental precepts of American jurisprudence is that people are allowed to see the evidence against them and face their accusers.

NIXON
Absolutely.

STONE
They have no evidence, they have no evidence, and they have beat me up in a public session. Yesterday, my lawyers, as you may have read, told the committee I would be more than happy to testify, voluntarily, and that I really want this session [clenched] to be in public. That's where I was slimed, and that is where I should be allowed to re-but. Why don't we take a question, if we have somebody standing by.

NIXON
We don't, actually, at this point.

STONE
Alright. Don't everrybody rush, don't everybody rush.

NIXON
Not all at once. [laughs, gives out call number] You know, you speak of experience, it's interesting, I had the privilege of working for Newt Gingrich, right, I began work for him as staff assistant in August of 1994. To sortof put that in context, [in background, STONE gives a deep de-compressing sigh] you're talking the eve of the Contract of America when I arrived. You had Barry Jackson, Joe Gaylord, all these guys preparing the contract, and we were going to launch it. They launched it, won the election convincingly. On a very clear agenda. I spent the next six months probably after that, fielding calls from angry people around the country, who were ginned up in their outrage by the absolute outright lies of the Democrats. That they had peddled in the public constantly, with their typical, as I said, their putrid mist, smoke and mirrors type stuff, where it was "You're going to take my social security because so-and-so said so," it amazes me, that almost twenty five years later, that they have this young crop of...B.S. artists who engage in the same type of defamatory lying, just anything...by the time the truth comes out, it's all over with. One example is David Bonior. Just a nasty little man from Michigan, who everybody remembers Dave Bonior, he was the one who filed these hundreds of ethics charges against Newt Gingrich, only one of which in the end stuck. And it was much ado about nothing in the end. And what's funny is being someone who was a firsthand witness to what was going on, on the inside, what the legislation that was being proposed, following what Newt was saying in public, and privately, and otherwise...and then seeing how it was so distorted, and lied about, by that generation of Democratic politicians, and to see it done today, and knowing you as I do, and knowing what a crock it is, I mean, we are in touch regularly, Roger, I think I would know if you were colluding with the Russians. Certainly.

STONE
Here's another one of my favorites. Senator Mark Warner: "Listen, if we're investigating Russian interference, there's someone who's acknowledged that he's been in contact with the Russians," referring to me. Said Mark Warner. I have never acknowledged that, it is a falsehood. Then you have our friend, Congressman Eric Swalwell, the soon-to-be one term Congressman from California. He says: "I'd like Roger Stone, I'd like Carter Page, I'd like the head of Donald Trump's security team in front of the committee. People who are in his orbit, and who have personal and financial ties to Russia." [clenched] That would not be me. You just lied, congressman. You just accused me of something that is not the case.

NIXON
And, by the way, Tucker Carlson nicely dismantled that punk congressman Swalwell, or wherever he's, I believe he's from Virginia. He said that this is an act of war, Salwell. And Tucker said, well, okay, what do we launch, medium range, what missiles should we launch at Russia? You're proposing war with Russia, it's an act of war that was done. These guys have taken exaggeration and hyperbole...it's beyond belief that these people are public officials.

STONE
So, when we come back, Tyler Nixon and I will continue to slice and dice the demagoguery of the House Democrats. But it's time to move not only to your calls but to the big picture, what exactly does this whole phoney Russian meme have to do with the wiretapping Watergate style of the President of the United States. Stick with us at the Stone Cold Truth, and we'll be right back with the answers.

Excerpt three:

NIXON
Let's get to Robin in Texas, who has been very patiently holding to speak to you, Roger. Robin, you're on the Stone Cold Truth.

ROBIN
Well, hello. One question I had, unless I missed something, has there been a show of evidence of any wrong-doing, show up anywhere yet? And then, my other question, you're volunteering to go before the congressional committee, one thing I'm confused about, would you have the opportunity to make a statement? Will you only be able to answer the questions they ask you? And I guess that's my concern, is that even if you go before them, would you have the opportunity to state your case?

STONE
You raise an excellent question. I've instructed my lawyers to insist that I get an opening statement. Why? Because they each got one. You see, they slimed me in their opening statements, which is why I should be allowed to make an opening statement. Which is pretty much the norm for congressional witnesses...I would be less inclined to go there if I'm just going to answer questions framed by them, but frankly, they're so intellectually inferior, and they so misunderstand and misrepresent the subject matter [very clenched] proving their multiple lies would really take about fifteen and twenty minutes [sic]. I mean, someone like Schiff really should not be in public office. [very clenched] The people he represents need to know how fast and loose he is playing with the truth, [very clenched] and again, intrinsically corrupt, in the pocket of an Iranian arms dealer [sic, either a mistaken return to Pasternak or an unknown reference], yet strutting and going back and forth on TV about the Russians. I mean, this guy's a real pain in the neck.

ROBIN
Well, I call him "shifty Schiff". But uh-

STONE
Yes.

NIXON
That's a good one.

ROBIN
He really is. And it's amazing, watching his body language, as you were pointing out, that's what was in my mind, sitting here in Texas, and watching some of the coverage, and one show, I believe it was "Charlie Rose", had Schiff and had Peter King by him, and then I was just like, just watching the editing of it, is so frustrating, because, you know, you want the truth, you want people to have equal time, I guess, and absolutely speak the truth. And-

STONE
And Peter King, who I've known for, I don't know, fifteen years, is a man of judgment, and character, and a man who picks his words very carefully, very widely respected in the Congress by both Republicans and Democrats as a straight shooter. So the juxtaposition of putting him through this slasher, this demagogue slasher, Schiff, is almost laughable. To go back to the first thing that you said, which is the most important. Yes, there is not yet, not a single iota of evidence that shows that there was any collusion by anyone in the Trump orbit with the Russians. But that's how the Big Left works. Say it over and over and over again, try to make it a fact, it is not a fact.

Excerpt four:

NIXON
Julian, welcome to Stone Cold Truth.

JULIAN
Yeah, hi guys, I'm honored to speak with you. So, with Nunes coming out and going tell President Trump [sic] what was really going on, do you think that's going to turn the tide enough, because Democrats are just ridiculously...out of it. With all that they're doing...not that they're ever going to say, okay, we see the truth now, but will this finally stop this?

STONE
Well, the problem- the question of course is this: some people in the Obama administration have real serious jail time type legal vulnerability in terms of what they have done. And I think Chairman Nunes reminds me of, you know, a young Richard Nixon in 1947, going after [Alger] Hiss. He is acting courageously, he is making some tough decisions...I would not have given this to Schiff. Schiff would have had it in the hands of [teeth clench] the media within seconds. This man cannot be trusted. He attacks Nunes for leaking, when he's leaking himself. [there is no basis for this allegation] So, yes, I think this is [teeth clench] the beginning of the end. When this is over, it is conceivable, that Mr. Comey, Mr. Rogers, Loretta Lynch, Ash Carter, James Clapper - these people could all be in prison. Because they have broken serious laws [teeth clench] and now they don't have the means to cover it up. Now Donald Trump has the Attorney General.