Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- The Campaigns. pg 195-196
- Leadership. pgs 195-196
- Immediate consequences. pgs 198
- Divided outcomes. pgs 196-198
- Longer-term consequences. own knowledge
- Create an essay plan for this question:
- Evaluate how far economic concerns explain the result of the referendum to leave the European Union in 2016
- . three factors
- . arguments/counter
- . start with factor in the question, explain its importance and (if you can) counter it
- . what other reasons were there for Brexit?
- QUESTIONS: use pgs 173-174 + own knowledge of recent case studies, to answer questions on Brexit and the Supreme Court
- 1. What are the ECtHR and the ECHR, and which Act brought the ECHR into British law?
- 2. Why do some people want Britain to no longer follow the ECHR?
- 3. Why has leaving the EU not necessarily removed Britain from the ECHR?
- 4. What is the Council of Europe and how does it differ from the EU?
- 5. What is the ECJ and what impact has Brexit had on its role in the UK?
- 6. What impact could leaving the EU & maybe also the ECHR have on the power of the UK Supreme Court?
- 7. What did the Miller cases in 2017 and 2019 say about Supreme Court power?
- IMPORTANT CASE STUDIES:
- 1) The 1997 General Election (electoral system, voting behaviour, power of the PM, efficiency of the Commons at scrutinising the government which makes the Lords more important).
- BREXIT ON...
- The UK constitution and devolution:
- - massive change to the UK Constitution
- - request for a second referendum on Scottish Independence (denied)
- - DUP refused to endorse a Brexit deal that would lead to either a hard border on the island of Ireland or to Northern Island being treated differently from the rest of the UK.
- - 2019 prorogation of Parliament described as a constitutional outrage by John Bercow (previous speaker)
- Parliament:
- - increase in power of Parliament, e.g. May's 33 defeats + Johnson's multiple defeats soon after taking office (weak position of government + no majority)
- - Parliament more able to exercise responsibility of scrutiny
- - parliamentary paralysis over what kind of Brexit should take place
- PM and the executive:
- - tells us what factors affect the strength of a PM, size majority + party unity.
- - ended the premiership of David Cameron and Theresa May (who was forced out of her own party)
- - Johnson's prorogation of Parliament overruled by the Supreme Court, limiting powers used by the PM
- The Supreme Court:
- - willing to limit the power of the executive in order to reinforce parliamentary sovereignty
- - done by insisting that Parliament had to approve the triggering of Article 50
- - also done by declaring Boris Johnson's prorogation of Parliament unlawful
- - led to criticisms that Supreme Court has become politicised or activist
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment