26 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-26 0900 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-26 0900 +Brian Hill
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/EmmXCSRhcgF
https://pastebin.com/pVk5zzJX
__

+Brian Hill __ Once again I am going to give you an answer that may not be the one you are looking for but it is the one that is needed.



__



The population is trained to accept lies when they are presented as truth. Each generation needs to be trained for this so it's an ongoing process.



Without sufficient proof you cannot know if a claim is true. Without a genuine [fatal] mistake to point out you cannot know if something is definitely a lie.



Therefore you cannot say to the lie system: You *ARE* lying to me!



All you can do is say "I think you are lying about X".



Some people would incorrectly reason that this is justified because: _"If you could prove the claim about X you would provide sufficient proof for X and you haven't - therefore X is false"_.



But that is the fallacy of the "conspiracy theorist" and must be avoided by intelligent people.



To assert that an event/claim is false without sufficient proof or a fatal mistake to point out *is to be led toward insanity by way of paranoia*.



__



What I am saying about this situation is as follows: _"In a lie system it is reasonable - *and even necessary* - to rationally doubt each claim that does not come with sufficient proof - even if doubting the claim seems absurd"_.



A key part: _*Even if doubting the claim seems absurd*_.



That doubting some claims seems absurd is a deterrent for many people. (This is surely by design.)



It means doubting the shape of the Earth (to "normal people" that's absurd).



It means doubting an earthquake in Nepal happened (to "normal people" that's absurd).



It means doubting there is a real and manned "ISS" (to "normal people" that's absurd).



It means doubting there was a TransAsia plane crash despite apparent dashcam footage (to "normal people" that's absurd).



*It means doubting everything that lacks sufficient proof because in a lie system that is precisely how the population is trained to accept lies when they are presented as truth*.



Doubting such claims *is the only way to raise genuine awareness to the actual problem with the general population*.



And it is by doubting these events that the concepts and principles of the lie system can be revealed and understood (by good, honest and intelligent people) because the same traits show up in each of the events. (Like a "common denominator".)



We simply cannot (must not) say "X and Y are definitely lies". You might feel that "X or Y" are definitely lies - but you cannot know it *and so you have no right to assert it as a fact about reality*.



You must not assert as a fact about reality that which you are not justified in doing. *Anyone who does this is not seeking true things for true reasons*. Such a person has "strayed" from the right path and upon scrutiny there will always be a "thinking flaw" plaguing them. (It takes a lot of effort and mindfulness to seek true things for true reasons in a consistent way.)



You can say: "In my opinion X is a lie" but you cannot claim it as a fact without sufficient proof of by pointing out a genuine [fatal] mistake.



(To have [strong] opinions about lie system events/claims that cannot be matched up with reality is dangerous and leads you to paranoia/insanity.)



Having written all of this: It is my opinion that the "ISS" is not real and manned *but then again* there are times when it seems extremely convincing. So I don't have a "strong opinion" about it: sometimes I think it must be fake and other times I think it must be genuine. Either way - *I recognise that the "ISS" is without doubt a propaganda platform used to impress beliefs upon children*. (This should not be controversial to anyone who has examined the "ISS" and the way it is presented.)



As a genuine lie system dissident my role is not to have an opinion about events and claims *but rather to rationally doubt each event and claim that is presented to the audience in a form that is doubtable*. (Which can mean appearing to have an opinion - but I am attached to none!)



If you are a genuine person then it is your role to do the same once you have understood these fundamental things.



Otherwise there's no point in being here and you may as well go outside and climb a tree etc.



__

I am looping in the following people because for various reasons these are words that may be of interest to them [at some point]:

+cabadejo , +nationalparksign , +Terran Downvale


______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.