Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2017-01-26 0810 +nationalparksign
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/cgk1HAGqFaL
- https://pastebin.com/pJht6MHH
- __
- +nationalparksign . __ I'm glad you mentioned that. I was going to watch that footage again before writing about it just to be sure *but didn't want to feel sickened*! Had I watched it again I'd have immediately recognised any potential editing points but *I was going by memory*.
- The last time I watched it (now a long time ago - long before figuring out the lie system's perceptual magic trick) *I don't recall any potential editing points being present* - not unless multiple angles had been filmed.
- It could be we saw a version that contained potential editing points but that a clean version also existed which could be shown to those few who voiced concerns about trickery - this is an aspect/nuance of "sufficient proof" I need to write more about. (It could also be shown to different audiences around the world before the Internet etc. to test the differences in memory that gets formed - a kind of practical study in the "Mandela Effect".)
- *If you're right about the pan - and I don't doubt you are - then that changes everything*.
- >>>> *In fact - that would demonstrate very nicely and precisely what I'm trying to point out - that my imagination filled in the blanks and it became a seamless memory because I believed it was real (i.e., I did not for a second genuinely doubt it)*. <<<<
- I think most people - many "hoaxtards" included - accept the "Budd Dwyer" incident as real and focusing on that incident may be what's needed to point out how misdirecting pans - even when fleeting/chaotic - cripple sufficient proof *and how the imagination then activates to fill in the blanks - forming a seamless memory - (when belief about an incident being real is present)*.
- As I find time today I'll revisit that incident and update this post. If it does contain potential editing points (I don't doubt you) I'll also post a video to the channel about it and about the nuance of having two forms of "proof" - *one crippled and one that isn't which qualifies as "sufficient proof"* should it need to be shown to (some) people while everyone else gets shown the crippled version.
- Just as if the "ISS" is real and manned we are only getting to see crippled footage *whereas a few people who need to see it will get to see the footage that would make the "ISS" undoubtable*.
- (For example - a psychologist tasked with writing up a diagnosis for a "conspiracy theory psychosis" might be shown genuine "sufficient proof" to be convinced the "ISS" is real and manned so that he or she can more easily perceive those calling it fake as either liars, crooks, deceived or deceivers etc. I.e., to remove the ability to sympathise with the "ISS doubter" if you've seen genuine sufficient proof.)
- __
- +Terran Downvale - I know I'm behind on a lot of posts and messages I'll eventually catch up with everything.
- ______________________________________________________________
- My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
- Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
- https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
- https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
- https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
- What does not exist - exists to exist.
- What exists - exists to always exist.
- As it is written - so it is done.
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
