8 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-26 0905 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-26 0905 +Brian Hill
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/UF7VXGfdvQt
https://pastebin.com/pD5Sg8gR
__

+Brian Hill __ Here is some kind of response: If someone asserts something about reality *but does not provide you with sufficient proof then you are forced to accept their claim wholly on trust* (and accepting/mistaking proof's appearances for proof).

That's the most important point. As much as possible the lie system (and its many liars) have you accept their claims on *trust* only.

*It is not for us to make ANY EFFORT to distinguish between A and B*. If we are not given what we NEED to know to make an accurate (i.e. correct) distinction then it is NOT FOR US to say!

It is not for us to say "this was a natural earthquake and that was not a natural earthquake".

We are constantly being *encouraged* to distinguish between such things *but that is what places us into a planned dichotomy* (like with "event skeptic" versus "event realist").

We must avoid that *trap*.

__

Of course earthquakes happen and claiming an earthquake happened without providing sufficient proof does not mean an earthquake didn't happen (to assert something *did not* happen because of an absence of sufficient proof is to commit the "fallacy of the conspiracy theorist").

What it means is that you (the receiver of the "news") *have no right to then assert it as a fact about reality to others* (if you repeat the claim then you are potentially "bearing false witness" as some like to say - but whether it happened or not you *are* repeating *ignorance* into the reality of others because you yourself *don't actually know*).

__

It may even be possible for "artificial earthquakes" (such as detonating bombs in a strategic way underground). *Belief in such a possibility then opens you up to other possibilities such as "CERN" being responsible for earthquakes*.

This is dangerous because *for seemingly "natural events"* all we can observe in the audience is *what* and not *how*. There may be artificial ways to induce earthquakes but as far as we are concerned they *appear* as "normal earthquakes".

(We simply cannot distinguish between them with the accuracy required to say X *was* or *was not* "natural". Whatever you had to say would *always* be a reflection of your own pre-existing belief bias.)

__

An aside: If you have been presented with evidence for an earthquake *you should always confirm it wasn't an image from an earlier earthquake* etc. You would need to check it was really from the current event.

*With the alleged "Nepal earthquake" images of earthquake damage were presented to the audience that came from unrelated events* (I seem to have been the only person pointing this out!).

__

There may well be a project called "CERN" and it may or may not be responsible for the things attributed to it. *If you have not seen sufficient proof for "CERN" - yet you believe it exists - then it is only because it has been "repeated into your reality" and that you have convinced yourself about it*.

__

Everywhere we turn there is "CERN" this and "CERN" that. *Imagine the effect this is having on intellectually vulnerable minds who aren't aware of sufficient proof and who aren't aware they are in a lie system*.

Over time such people will *FEEL* as though there *IS* something called "CERN" (and there may well be) but it is not because they saw sufficient proof for it. Rather - *it got repeated into their reality and they convinced themselves it exists*.

Once they have accepted it is possible and can imagine it true they become powerless to resist believing. _Which then sets them up to accept and imagine the *next thing* etc_.

__

Now imagine natural events (earthquakes) occur but "odd" things about them are pointed out and reported. This can only encourage a belief in "artificial earthquakes" etc. (I.e., "something just isn't right about it".)

It seems as though "CERN" is being associated with these "oddities" and "supernatural" things. Almost "mythical abilities" are getting attributed to "CERN" - such as it being responsible for the alleged "Mandela Effect" - and now also earthquakes!

__

A "normal person" who is being exposed to all of this *will likely end up assigning "magical abilities" to the concept of "CERN" in their head*. The abilities attributed will match up with that person's beliefs about what is possible and what is not possible. Always dancing along the limits - lingering on the line between "reality" and "fantasy" (for that person).

__

*The above are just some words* - (and possibly unrelated to what you are talking about!) - *I'm typing quickly and distracted as usual!*

______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.