###Initial flavour event a few years in talking about the Oregon Trail, make separate ones for the USA and Sioux
###Grattan Massacre event in 1854 for Sioux and the USA, Sioux can chose to respond with reparations or war
####Reparations are Casper, Omaha and everything east of Omaha
###USA events letting them know the Sioux wish to give reparations or declare war
###Event for Sioux if they occupy Cheyenne, Alliance and Cody ending the war with their victory, they keep their current borders but are placed back under USA puppet status, although not in sphere
###Event notifying the USA of their loss
###Event for the USA if they occupy the Sioux capital or if Sioux and the USA have a truce with Sioux before 1860, Sioux secedes and loses cores on everything outside Dickson, Dupree and Rapid City and is then annexed
###Event notifying Sioux of their loss
###Event during the civil war for Sioux to rebel again, if they chose not to they secede everything outside north and south Dakota to the USA
###If the Sioux occupy all of Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, Wyoming and Montana they win the war gaining independance and all of north and sout dakota if they've lost anything there and the USA loses cores on these regions, they then gain increased relations and influence with the UK
###If the USA occupies the Sioux capital they annex them, strip all Sioux cores from everywhere but rapid city and dupree and move Dakota pops there
###Event at 1880 if Dakota is still a US puppet, they secede Sioux falls, Bismark and Minot as well as lose cores on those areas
###Event at 1885 if they're still a US puppet, USA annexes Sioux

###Notes, any time the US annexes Sioux land remove the Sioux core and move the Sioux pops to either Dickson, Dupree or Rapid City. If the USA annexes them entirely at any point, make sure to add Dakota as a accepted culture.

(A)American Indian events
	treaty of Fort Laramie might have some potential to it,	assuming the various tribes had all rejected then the
	biggest tribes of the plains could have ended up in open war the USA. Besides which one only needs to look at 		the
	various conflicts, a lot of which are looked at on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Indian_Wars here to
	see that the US and the tribes were near constantly in conflict until their numbers became too small and the settlers became
	too entrenched.

	Not to mention that the Dakota War was pretty gnarly, despite the fact that they didn't have much of a chance.
	Didn't seem to bother them too terribly much, and apparently they did alright for themselves despite not apparently
	being very populous. It apparently was bad enough that the US decided to mobilize 4 regiments and diverted attention
	from the civil war. I think it's also important to note that the US was intentionally taking land from these people,
	who had a concept of nation and were willing to fight it out. The whole reason it happened, after all,
	is that they kept pushing the Sioux around and eventually they have to push back. This is instead of it being
	"American land" with the Dakota as a non-accepted culture, if that makes sense.
	No idea how you'd model that,other than making a Dakota nation with a really grim destiny
	but here's a source that briefly summarizes it.
	http://www.historicfortsnelling.org/history/us-dakota-war

	mini civil war events for the USA during the civil war with events leading up to it and for the aftermath with the
	potential overall to annex all the indians, killing a fuck ton, not accepting them and removing their cores,
	to release small puppet state reservations for them and move all indians of that culture there and to just leave
	them where they are but accept their culture.