More and more conferences have become accustomed to placing signal jammer in the conference hall. At the beginning of the conference, it was discovered that the mobile phone signal was gone, and the connection was completely lost. In the event of an emergency, the responsible comrades of the relevant departments could not be contacted. It took several hours before receiving feedback that the cadres could not close their chat boxes after opening the meeting and talking about being blocked. A township cadre talked about an example that made him quite helpless. One time when he went out to attend a conference, the on-site signal was blocked. It happened that there was a petition by the masses that day, and he had to communicate with him on call. Other cadres explained that they could not be contacted for the time being, and the masses did not believe them, thinking they were perfunctory and deliberately avoiding them. When the masses later went to higher-level departments to petition, another reason was added by the way-the cadres were too aggressive and inaction.

https://www.jammer-mart.com/

Afterwards, he visited the door many times to resolve the knots of the masses. To sort out the dissatisfaction of the cadres, on the one hand, the signal shielding involves too many and too frequent meetings, and there is no clear standard. No matter what the meeting, a shielding instrument is added, and the first level is followed by the first level. The shielding signal gradually becomes the new standard when the meeting is held. On the other hand, there is a lack of timely reminders and notifications in advance. A cadre introduced that the signal was still full when seated and thought it would not be blocked. As a result, when the meeting started, there was no signal for an instant. As a result, the meeting was going on, and the participants went out in twos and threes. , Are looking at their mobile phones outside the venue.

Shielding the signals from the conference site may not lack the original intention for cadres to listen to the conference more carefully and to further ensure the quality and efficiency of the conference. However, simple and rude handling methods may have counterproductive effects. After all, the most fundamental factor that determines whether and what effect a meeting can achieve is the quality of the meeting itself. If the information of the meeting itself is insufficient, and the document is just memorized mechanically, and the direction of the meeting is retreat rather than pragmatic, then, whether to hold a meeting or not, it will inevitably bring about the choice of whether to listen or not. The situation is naturally inevitable.

In a meeting, if the cadres are not willing to listen carefully, they should first reflect on whether there is a problem in the meeting itself; relying on cutting off the signal to force the cadres to listen carefully in disguise is undoubtedly the last thing to do. For truly important, necessary, and informative meetings, attendees are naturally willing to listen carefully, and the actual effect of the cell phone jammer is limited; for those meetings that are mere formality, convoluted, long and protracted meetings, cut off the network signal, and constantly think Distracted, to avoid external contact, nor to doubt about the conference space and too general. Of course, for some meetings that are particularly important or have confidentiality requirements, signal shielding is not impossible when it is indeed necessary to shield signals. However, you should also consider informing the participants in advance, and reserve time for the participants to transfer and transfer important and urgent matters. Conversely, meetings that were originally intended to advance the work may have adverse effects that affect the work. To improve the quality of conferences, we cannot pin our hopes on signal jammers.
https://www.jammer-mart.com/phone-blockers-jammers.html