19:33:32] <Baxtir> I should state for the record, I don't care for the type of discussions that promote drugs especially dangerous ones like meth but talking about their effects is fine, not how to score weed or things like that or how easy it is and I'd clarify more but I've got things I need to do before Dad gets here
[19:34:19] <Corin> It seems like you two are the only ones who enforce anything regarding drugs, honestly.
[19:34:36] <Baxtir> I haven't really done much of that
[19:34:38] <Corin> I don't think someone should be persecuted for a nick, when many won't even know what it means.
[19:34:56] <Baxtir> well, no, as long as they abide by the rules
[19:35:12] <Baxtir> and I'm aware the rules state nothing about drugs
[19:35:29] <Baxtir> ad I don't mind people talking about the effects of drugs or things
[19:35:38] <Baxtir> it really depends on the conversation
[19:36:23] <Corin> I'd agree that encouraging someone to do hard drugs is bad.
[19:36:43] <Baxtir> anyway, now I'm really going but seems maybe a clarification about drugs in the rules might not be a bad idea
[19:36:51] <Baxtir> Yeah, that was the point I was trying to make
[19:37:36] <luckybunny> Corin: please refer to logs of this very channel, dated 2011-10-28
[19:40:50] <Corin> Yes, I recall when you and Bateau were banning Adrian for his nicks.
[19:41:35] <Corin> ...and there were objections, it seems.
[19:45:10] <luckybunny> my point is that the whole point of PG-13 is centred around child-friendly TV
[19:45:52] <Corin> Drugs aren't off limits in PG-13 movies.
[19:45:53] <luckybunny> I don't recall ever switching to a children's TV channel and watching a cartoon show about the joys of smoking crack
[19:47:00] alli pisses on Corin
[19:47:06] <alli> oh, i'm sorry
[19:47:15] <Corin> Might as well kick Nakedman, too. Nudity's not allowed on cable, even!
[19:47:35] <luckybunny> who kicked who?
[19:48:17] <Corin> No one kicked anyone. I meant, in addition to your warnings on drug nicks.
[19:48:19] <luckybunny> my only action was to request a nick change, because it was covered in the 'potentially offensive nicks' rule
[19:48:56] <luckybunny> well we could request he change too
[19:49:46] <luckybunny> but I am pretty sure I've seen the word naked used on children's TV
[19:50:08] <luckybunny> with no footage depicting the nakedness
[19:50:53] <Corin> ...and drugs have been mentioned on family shows.
[19:51:12] <Corin> Like any family oriented sitcom, for instance.
[19:53:00] <luckybunny> also, I'm pretty sure the forum mods wouldn't stand for drug names either
[19:53:16] <luckybunny> not like they're the ultimate example of usefulness or anything
[19:54:31] <luckybunny> my point there, in case you missed it, is that practically anywhere that enforces family friendly rules actively discourages overt references to illicit substances
[19:56:45] <Corin> It's rarely been done in wp.
[19:56:58] <[A]nastazia> pg-13 does not equal "kids shows' luckybunny
[19:57:00] <Corin> At least the channel. The forums are irrelevant.
[19:57:04] <[A]nastazia> We're not talking sesame street here
[19:57:23] <Corin> [A]nastazia: Even PG shows make reference to drugs, at times.
[19:57:29] <luckybunny> cannabis is going on ok, because it really shouldn't be illegal in the first place, alongside the fact that not only is it legal in places, it's also used in a wholly medical sense in many others. It's nigh on impossible to really take any sort of negative stance on cannabis, other than to perhaps keep it to a minimum
[19:58:14] <luckybunny> you'll notice I don't take any active stance against cannabis
[19:58:58] <luckybunny> except for when it's like the only topic of discussion
[19:59:31] <luckybunny> meth on the other hand.....
[19:59:40] <luckybunny> very different matter entirely
[19:59:56] <Corin> Yes, we know about you trolling the channel and pretending you were a kid who was going to ask for meth for Christmas.
[20:00:08] <Corin> It doesn't work, 'cause kids generally aren't that dumb.
[20:01:08] <luckybunny> i was a kid once
[20:01:14] <luckybunny> and yes, I was dumb
[20:01:38] 2 matches: ccallahan, Corin
[20:01:51] <luckybunny> for another case in point.... ccallahan was a kid far more recently
[20:02:00] <luckybunny> and also was a complete dumbass
[20:02:46] <Corin> Kids can be dumb, but your portrayal was not realistic.