API tools faq
paste
Lesta

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-27 0520 +Mitch Conner

Lesta
Mar 26th, 2016
85
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.66 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-27 0520 +Mitch Conner
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8Ultw60zOw&lc=z13kzndpqomhtnyzh04cdz5wjknqu1iwjck
  3. https://pastebin.com/nekKKXP5
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +Mitch Conner __ The woman is - as noted in the video - "foreign affairs chief" [and weekend cougar] "Federica Mogherini". Generally speaking - a person [especially someone trained to be in front of cameras] can typically produce "tears" for two reasons:
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15. 1) They are *upset* about something.
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. 2) They are *pretending to be upset* about something.
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. If you acknowledge there is duping delight then which of the two reasons that are associated with the presence of tears (or in this case - _"moisture"_) do you think is more likely?
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39. Let me frame it this way: Have you ever been to a funeral [i.e., an environment where people can be upset] and seen someone who was crying (or more simply had "moisture" in the corner of their eyes) *and was also leaking duping delight throughout?*
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47. If an event *is real* then would duping delight be out of place? If an event *is not real* then would duping delight be out of place?
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. As for the rest of the clip - I agree that what we see with the hug is suspect (where she walked off stage and hugged "chuckles"). That to me *seemed/felt* practiced/rehearsed/scripted (which would conform - _like the duping delight_ - to the idea that what we saw *wasn't* spontaneous and real but instead *planned and pretended*) but of course I cannot prove that and can only speculate. That being the case *it must not become the focus of our attention.* Our focus must at all times remain on the *duping delight* that has been objectively pointed out.
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. With everything that I have just written imagine we have a piece of paper divided into two columns. One column is reserved for *"reasons to think it was a real event"* and the other column is for *"reasons to think it was not a real event".* Suppose the item is: *Apparent duping delight seen by [weekend cougar] "Federica Mogherini"* then which of the two columns would you be inclined to place a tick?
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. __________________________________________
  68. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  69. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  70.  
  71. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  72. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  73.  
  74. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  75. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  76.  
  77. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  78. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!