Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- [14:03] <TrollTowelhead> Last i saw there was irritation about flooding and i requested that Cripple be re-admitted. I had no idea there were apologies for pedophilia. What's that about, sbalneav?
- [14:04] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> TrollTowelhead, the pedophiles are in our gates.
- [14:04] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> And they want to turn our children into nubile slaves.
- [14:05] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> TrollTowelhead, would you like an accurate and succinct explanation?
- [14:05] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I can give you one, as I am smart and do not experience taboo responses.
- [14:06] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I think I can give an award-winning analysis in ten posts or less.
- [14:07] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Anybody here have a computer science degree?
- [14:07] <Joel> if the 12 year olds are so able to handle sex, they can have it with each other, not with adults
- [14:07] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I'm not totally certain on how randomized quicksort works without doing a full shuffle on the array.
- [14:07] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Adult/child are arbitrary terms, Joel.
- [14:07] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Referencing a particular definition of 'adult' in a conversation about age of consent is a circular argument.
- [14:08] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Here's what I am looking for: randomize quicksort with ninther pivot without shuffling in O(1) space.
- [14:08] <Joel> [154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake: the consensus in the u.s. seems to be 16 years old for age of consent
- [14:08] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Or higher. Agreed.
- [14:08] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Depending on which question you ask me on this topic I'll give different answers.
- [14:08] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I do this because I am nuanced.
- [14:09] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Why am I nuanced? Because the boss of all knowledge is scientific methodology and it teaches us to be nuanced.
- [14:09] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> If you ask me, At what age should a person be allowed to have sex with people of arbitrary age?
- [14:09] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> And I will say 'Depends on a case-by-case basis'
- [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> If you ask me, Should courts use a presumption of harm model in cases involving sexual liasion involving at least one person between 12-18?
- [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I will say, No.
- [14:10] <Joel> there is no basis from any case that would make sleeping with a 12 year old ok
- [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> If you ask me, Can a person of age 12-18 experience harm from sexual liasion, I will say, Yes.
- [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Joel, yes, there is.
- [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> A central tenet of Darwinian evolution is 'variability in species'
- [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> So, not all 12-year olds are the same. There is a distribution
- [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> When you look at historical cases of human beings, e.g. Buddha or Mozart, you realize that humans are capable of some pretty extreme things, at least some of the time
- [14:11] <Joel> pubescantphiles make excuses for their lustful perversion, but the law is clear and it should be, it's a major crime
- [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> So, is there a case for a 6-year old being a world-level composer? Yes, but rarely
- [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> See what you did there. You tabooed.
- [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I won't taboo now, or ever.
- [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Is your 6-year old child a world class composer? Extremely unlikely.
- [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Joel, do you see how we're not discussing sex right now?
- [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I hope you see that.
- [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Right now we're discussing probability distributions and classification problems.
- [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> And the question is this:
- [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I have a set X of elements x. Are there any elements x in X, with the property Y, such that they have the property Z?
- [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> That is what we are discussing.
- [14:13] <Joel> [154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake: no serious person thinks 12 year olds should be having sex with adults, it's a rationalization that pubescantphiles try to use, and it ain't working on the majority of us
- [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> X people, x individual people, property Y is an age cutoff, property Z is ethical ability to consent to some set of sexual experiences.
- [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Joel, that was a fallacy.
- [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> "no serious person"
- [14:13] <Joel> sbalneav: if you think he should be banned go for it
- [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> You are attempting to marginalize my viewpoint without argumentation.
- -
- * Added *!*[email protected] to ignore list
- -
- [14:14] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I added you to ignore, Joel.
- [14:14] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> This is why it is useful to prepend names with IQs.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment