JaysonSunshine

Mean Human Intelligence is Offensively Low

Feb 16th, 2016
96
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 5.10 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [14:03] <TrollTowelhead> Last i saw there was irritation about flooding and i requested that Cripple be re-admitted. I had no idea there were apologies for pedophilia. What's that about, sbalneav?
  2. [14:04] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> TrollTowelhead, the pedophiles are in our gates.
  3. [14:04] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> And they want to turn our children into nubile slaves.
  4. [14:05] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> TrollTowelhead, would you like an accurate and succinct explanation?
  5. [14:05] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I can give you one, as I am smart and do not experience taboo responses.
  6. [14:06] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I think I can give an award-winning analysis in ten posts or less.
  7. [14:07] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Anybody here have a computer science degree?
  8. [14:07] <Joel> if the 12 year olds are so able to handle sex, they can have it with each other, not with adults
  9. [14:07] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I'm not totally certain on how randomized quicksort works without doing a full shuffle on the array.
  10. [14:07] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Adult/child are arbitrary terms, Joel.
  11. [14:07] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Referencing a particular definition of 'adult' in a conversation about age of consent is a circular argument.
  12. [14:08] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Here's what I am looking for: randomize quicksort with ninther pivot without shuffling in O(1) space.
  13. [14:08] <Joel> [154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake: the consensus in the u.s. seems to be 16 years old for age of consent
  14. [14:08] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Or higher. Agreed.
  15. [14:08] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Depending on which question you ask me on this topic I'll give different answers.
  16. [14:08] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I do this because I am nuanced.
  17. [14:09] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Why am I nuanced? Because the boss of all knowledge is scientific methodology and it teaches us to be nuanced.
  18. [14:09] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> If you ask me, At what age should a person be allowed to have sex with people of arbitrary age?
  19. [14:09] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> And I will say 'Depends on a case-by-case basis'
  20. [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> If you ask me, Should courts use a presumption of harm model in cases involving sexual liasion involving at least one person between 12-18?
  21. [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I will say, No.
  22. [14:10] <Joel> there is no basis from any case that would make sleeping with a 12 year old ok
  23. [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> If you ask me, Can a person of age 12-18 experience harm from sexual liasion, I will say, Yes.
  24. [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Joel, yes, there is.
  25. [14:10] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> A central tenet of Darwinian evolution is 'variability in species'
  26. [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> So, not all 12-year olds are the same. There is a distribution
  27. [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> When you look at historical cases of human beings, e.g. Buddha or Mozart, you realize that humans are capable of some pretty extreme things, at least some of the time
  28. [14:11] <Joel> pubescantphiles make excuses for their lustful perversion, but the law is clear and it should be, it's a major crime
  29. [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> So, is there a case for a 6-year old being a world-level composer? Yes, but rarely
  30. [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> See what you did there. You tabooed.
  31. [14:11] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I won't taboo now, or ever.
  32. [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Is your 6-year old child a world class composer? Extremely unlikely.
  33. [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Joel, do you see how we're not discussing sex right now?
  34. [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I hope you see that.
  35. [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Right now we're discussing probability distributions and classification problems.
  36. [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> And the question is this:
  37. [14:12] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I have a set X of elements x. Are there any elements x in X, with the property Y, such that they have the property Z?
  38. [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> That is what we are discussing.
  39. [14:13] <Joel> [154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake: no serious person thinks 12 year olds should be having sex with adults, it's a rationalization that pubescantphiles try to use, and it ain't working on the majority of us
  40. [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> X people, x individual people, property Y is an age cutoff, property Z is ethical ability to consent to some set of sexual experiences.
  41. [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> Joel, that was a fallacy.
  42. [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> "no serious person"
  43. [14:13] <Joel> sbalneav: if you think he should be banned go for it
  44. [14:13] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> You are attempting to marginalize my viewpoint without argumentation.
  45. -
  46. * Added *!*[email protected] to ignore list
  47. -
  48. [14:14] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> I added you to ignore, Joel.
  49. [14:14] <[154IQ]CrippleThreatPowerquake> This is why it is useful to prepend names with IQs.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment