API tools faq
paste
Lesta

15 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-04 1240 +motownflame

Lesta
Mar 3rd, 2016
101
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 8.49 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-04 1240 +motownflame
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nObGH71j3z4&lc=z12hcpiyzwmbjphja04ch3vogvzltfhxui0
  3. https://pastebin.com/nRS5tRkU
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +motownflame __ Howdy. Have you ever seen the alleged Chinese "space station"?! It's called *"Tiangong-1".* It's hilarious. Go watch some videos on it. *When you have seen that you might begin to understand why China isn't calling BS on the "ISS".*
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15. As for the "ISS" that flies over our heads. All you and anyone else have seen is a *DOT OF LIGHT*. That is all. That there is a dot of light that whizzes past according to a time-table found online (e.g., "spotthestation") is not being disputed. *What is disputed is that discernible details can be made out of that dot of light* (thus proving at least the physical form of the "ISS").
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. There are amateur astronomers who complain that FOR YEARS they have been unsuccessful at taking a photo of the "ISS" with details. Yet there are other people (such as "Reds Rhetoric") who magically achieved success on their first go! _Why do you suppose that is?!_
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. On the one hand it is *extremely difficult* to photograph that dot of light with details *yet it is very easy to fake it with CGI.* So do you see what's going on? Something VERY DIFFICULT versus something VERY EASY. Which do you think people will be inclined to do? That is why people like "Reds Rhetoric" will lament in a video _"I know nothing about CGI"_ and then a few weeks later post incredible "ISS with details" footage. Oh - it must be real because he said that he doesn't know anything about CGI! _Uh huh, right._ That shows *intent* and *premeditation* to deceive.
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39. *Here is where you need to pay attention:* The only thing that justifies a belief in a real and manned "ISS" is to see "sufficient proof" (that which necessarily proves a claim or event to be real/true) which in the case of the "ISS" means seeing *genuine sustained duration micro/zero-gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.*
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47. _Despite the "ISS" being manned for over 15 years we have never seen such footage - not even accidentally._ Isn't that fascinating?
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. *Nothing else about the "ISS" is being faked.* There is no green screen. There is no CGI. Everything else about it is genuine. But yet we have dishonest agents of disinformation like "DITRH" ("Deep In The Rabbit Hole"), "Russianvids", "Peekay", "Jeranism" and pals who are all here on YouTube proposing nonsense *so that it causes a "rejection response".* You are supposed to laugh at them.
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. A strategy they employ is to point out a genuine problem (e.g., "masking glitches") but then say it is an indication of "green screen" or "hanging upside down". That is absurd. The point is to have YOU reject that the "masking glitches" as important (or even a "thing") by having you reject the notion of "green screen" and CGI. (A "debunker" like "Jeff C" can then point out how it isn't "green screen" and then remark that "Occam's Razor" tells us it's just video compression" etc.)
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71. On the "video compression" point. Haven't you found it curious that the purported "ISS" live stream remains free from the kind of "video compression" glitches that we routinely see in the "ISS interviews"? Isn't it curious that the HD space walks also don't contain the same kind of glitches but instead they have different types of glitch (where it looks like the camera signal is dropping out every time the camera is moved - _what's up with that?!_).
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79. Again - everything about the zero gravity is genuine. There is only ONE problem: *the inability to have a sustained period of it.* And so the solution (necessarily) is to have briefer zero gravity segments that are cleverly stitched together to form longer footage. These clever joins are disguised as normal "signal/broadcasting glitches" - that is what they are modelled after so no one thinks twice about it. After all - they are broadcasting from space! Surely there will be problems! (People like "Jeff C" will say "if they were faking it then they would remove the glitches" but if the footage was free from glitches don't you think people would find THAT even MORE suspicious?! Given it's supposed to be in space travelling at 17,500 miles/hour!)
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87. The masking glitches I am pointing out do look a bit like "video compression glitches". But there are some notable differences. They must be artificially induced and they don't quite look like genuine video compression glitches. *Simply, you will find that what we see does not also occur in known good footage.* Go ahead and find some if you can. Others have tried. If it were simply "video compression" we would expect to see the glitches in other things but we don't. However - we see the same glitches throughout all of the purported live "ISS interviews"!
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91.  
  92.  
  93.  
  94.  
  95. I should note: *That does not mean every time we see a masking glitch that a join has happened!* That does not follow - but certainly *some of them would be necessary.* Of course - even if the "ISS" is real and manned (which upon scrutiny it DOES NOT seem to be the case) the fact we have all of these problems means that instinctively we are forced to trust.
  96.  
  97.  
  98.  
  99.  
  100.  
  101.  
  102.  
  103. Don't forget: we have plenty of 30 minute "ISS interviews" where the astronaut is asked and answers the same questions over and over but we never see just 3 minutes of consecutive somersaults! Wouldn't you like to see a full minute of somersaults? Wouldn't you like to see a game of space ping-pong between two "astronauts"? I know I would! People like "Jeff C" will tell you that we don't see that because it's "too boring". Well I think the "ISS interviews" are pretty boring but I sit through them. _I think people can handle three minutes of consecutive somersaults!_
  104.  
  105.  
  106.  
  107.  
  108.  
  109.  
  110.  
  111. Ultimately it comes down to trust. You simply TRUST "NASA" would never lie to you and you simply TRUST that "Jeff C" has correctly classified the "masking glitches" as "video compression" (even though he cannot show us the same glitch happening in known good footage).
  112.  
  113.  
  114.  
  115.  
  116.  
  117.  
  118.  
  119. If there is a real and manned "ISS" then why are all these people ("Reds Rhetoric", "Jeff C", etc.) getting upset about it?! Imagine if someone were to post videos to YouTube claiming last year's Wimbledon tennis final was a hologram. _That would be absurd!_ Who would spend any time debunking that person?! But yet people are spending time trying to debunk me. Isn't that curious? While on the surface it may seem as though what I am suggesting is absurd (after all - there IS that dot of light!) - if you examine the issue in a thoughtful, detached and unbiased way *you will soon see that there are many problems with what we have been presented.* _I wish I were wrong because then maybe we don't live in a lie system._
  120.  
  121.  
  122.  
  123.  
  124.  
  125.  
  126.  
  127. And so by all means continue to trust "NASA" and continue to trust individuals like "Reds Rhetoric" and "Jeff C" ("NWA" / "New World Agenda") but before you go running your mouth off at me be sure to *VERIFY* their claims. *Доверяй, но поверяй.* Trust, but verify. _Okay?_
  128.  
  129.  
  130.  
  131.  
  132.  
  133.  
  134.  
  135. I am not doing any of this for the praise or the popularity (do you see either?). In fact - I am getting hated on practically every day. It isn't fun to be constantly abused and made fun of. You have participated in that - shame on you. Yet I am still making an effort to reach you. *I am doing this because we were all born into a lie system and I am trying to communicate this with other people.* We are all being farmed. We are all being bred to become "biological robots" ("biobots"). Biobots are to be good, obedient and versatile workers who will adapt and believe whatever we are told. Not because we are ever shown sufficient proof but always and ONLY because we have been TOLD. We simply trust. Why would anyone lie?!
  136.  
  137.  
  138.  
  139.  
  140.  
  141.  
  142.  
  143. And it doesn't have to be this way but for any of it to change it must first change within YOU.
  144.  
  145.  
  146.  
  147.  
  148. __________________________________________
  149. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  150. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  151.  
  152. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  153. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  154.  
  155. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  156. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  157.  
  158. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  159. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!