Syedur: See, it's either we go to Berserker.
Syedur: Or you do.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: That's fine.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: That still doesn't explain the issue.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Honestly.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I think you're misinterpreting something, or there's something designed poorly.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Unless you have an ability that restricts your ability to communicate.
Syedur: There's no misinterpretation nor is there anything poorly designed.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Latter cannot be judged.
Syedur: From my point of view.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Which is worthless right now. I'm not saying that to you personally.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: That applies to all participants.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You can tell for sure if something is definitely poorly designed, in a few cases.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: But you can't prove the opposte.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: opposite*
Syedur: Regardless, it isn't something entirely difficult to figure out.
Syedur: It's just something hard to come up with without some info.
Syedur: And I say it isn't poorly designed because it isn't new to holy grail wars.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: No, because I'm fixated on the communication aspect.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Which is the issue here.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: And I'm sure it has nothing to do with communication.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Therefore, it isn't something I'll think of.
Syedur: Yeah, well, it isn't really that important for you to figure out anyway.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: It is if it would give us an edge on you.
Syedur: Possibly.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You're extremely protective of it.
Syedur: Of course.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: At this point.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I have more than enough to state in red and blue you until I get the information.
Syedur: I could've lied.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You could have, but I can certainly state that you stated it.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You would need to provide solid reasoning behind your life.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: lie*
Syedur: I might be trolling you in fact. It's not enough of a basis to state a blue or a red.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: It's plenty.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: As I said.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I can definitely state that you stated it.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: That's red regardless.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: It doesn't need to be true. The statement in red is that this is something you said.
Syedur: Of course. Then I could just say "chat black is meaningless" in red and end it there.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You could, but that would prove that the entire thing had no point and that you aren't worth trusting.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You're as bad as Rider, really.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: And you've caused us more harm, too.
Syedur: Think what you will.
Syedur: Unlike Rider, I carry out my promises and go through with my plans. As you can see, I did not bluff when I said I'd kill Berserker and Saber.
Syedur: Saber is next on my list.
Syedur: And I've already killed Lancer.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I would have liked to work with you, but you made it impossible.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Whether that's good or bad for you, time will tell.
Syedur: Interesting. Well, I have no problem there. I don't see what your big complaint really is, to be frank. All I said is that I don't want to reveal the mechanics behind the situation since it harms us if I do. And yet, you threaten me with possible blues and now this. Well, whatever fits your boat, I guess.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I'm saying your situation doesn't even make sense.
Syedur: This is a lose lose situation for me whether I tell you or not.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: The general rules should allow what I'm asking.
Syedur: No, your comprehension of the situation is limited.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You won't make any sort of statement that would invalidate this.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You can say that.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: But from my angle, it's absurd.
Syedur: Anyway, from my perspective
Syedur: Telling you about the mechanics and not telling you would still be a negative factor to me.
Syedur: Considering all these threats and the likes.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: If you're in an impossible scenario.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: And you won't explain it.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Something smells wrong.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: So far, you have killed your targets as desired.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: And attacked us.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You did let us attack you.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: But you were busy attacking Lancer anyway.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: And that was a big priority for you.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: You haven't actually done anything that has assisted us.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Nor do you plan to.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: And you want us to put with with an absurd situation you won't explain.
Syedur: This is stupid, Avvil. I'm the one who led two teams to their deaths and yet you say I didn't assist you?
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I also played a large role in killing Lancer.
Syedur: Not only that, I could've easily attacked you when you attacked me, Avvil.
Syedur: But I did not.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Easy words.
Syedur: Easy words but the truth is still there.
Syedur: Whether you believe it or not, I'll leave it up to you.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: It isn't worth my time to argue.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I'm going to be out for the next two days.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Mounting an offensive against Rider now would be bad for me.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Do you want our help against Berserker, or not?
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I'd take a tentative alliance with you over any relation with Rider or Saber any day.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Whether or not you trust me not to team you when we get down to three teams is up to your belief in my own integrity.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: But regardless of how this conversation has gone.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I still see that as the best path.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Are you willing to assist me in creating it?
Syedur: I had agreed to that a while ago. And I still do.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: Alright.
avvilgarrant@gmail.com: I'm fine with maintaining our alliance, then.