Advertisement
foongus

Untitled

Mar 23rd, 2020
1,013
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 44.05 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [14-Feb-20 02:18 AM] Quote#9846
  2. ok peeps, banning the stupid ghost and firefox today
  3.  
  4. [14-Feb-20 06:31 AM] brewfasa#4532
  5. bop
  6.  
  7. [14-Feb-20 09:07 AM] tazz#5495
  8. k
  9.  
  10. [14-Feb-20 10:36 AM] BurntZebra#8147
  11. Sounds good
  12.  
  13. [14-Feb-20 11:24 AM] tazz#5495
  14. We could look into qbing apix and retesting later
  15.  
  16. [14-Feb-20 11:24 AM] Coconut#8762
  17. is that the easiest fix?
  18.  
  19. [14-Feb-20 11:24 AM] tazz#5495
  20. I think the odds of it being broken are very high
  21.  
  22. [14-Feb-20 11:24 AM] Coconut#8762
  23. because I think doing that as a quick fix for SPL
  24.  
  25. [14-Feb-20 11:25 AM] Coconut#8762
  26. isn't half bad of an idea
  27.  
  28. [14-Feb-20 11:25 AM] tazz#5495
  29. yeah doing retests after things drop isnt uncommon in other tiers
  30.  
  31. [14-Feb-20 11:26 AM] tazz#5495
  32. and its one of those mons where its broken in a way that breaks the tier p much
  33.  
  34. [14-Feb-20 11:26 AM] tazz#5495
  35. bc what makes it broken is getting paired w cheese
  36.  
  37. [14-Feb-20 11:26 AM] tazz#5495
  38. It wouldnt be just another op mon
  39.  
  40. [14-Feb-20 11:27 AM] levi#6206
  41. Don’t really like the idea of quickbanning apix without proof
  42.  
  43. [14-Feb-20 11:27 AM] LilyAC#7887
  44. quickbanning apix is ridiculous
  45.  
  46. [14-Feb-20 11:27 AM] levi#6206
  47. I was hoping it’d already have proven itself by now but we haven’t even gotten rid of pix and floon yet
  48.  
  49. [14-Feb-20 11:28 AM] hongli#4483
  50. idk how i feel about quickbanning apix
  51.  
  52. [14-Feb-20 11:28 AM] tazz#5495
  53. well this is under the assumption w would retest the mon in time
  54.  
  55. [14-Feb-20 11:28 AM] hongli#4483
  56. yeah, even then
  57.  
  58. [14-Feb-20 11:28 AM] hongli#4483
  59. what about
  60.  
  61. [14-Feb-20 11:28 AM] hongli#4483
  62. giving just zig that treatment
  63.  
  64. [14-Feb-20 11:28 AM] levi#6206
  65. It’s still a different bar either way
  66.  
  67. [14-Feb-20 11:28 AM] levi#6206
  68. Since it’s 60% to unban
  69.  
  70. [14-Feb-20 11:28 AM] LilyAC#7887
  71. quickbanning zig is equally ridiculous
  72.  
  73. [14-Feb-20 11:28 AM] tazz#5495
  74. i think the chances of it being insane are there even w/o zig
  75.  
  76. [14-Feb-20 11:29 AM] LilyAC#7887
  77. i think theyre both very possibly bad
  78.  
  79. [14-Feb-20 11:29 AM] LilyAC#7887
  80. or like, not good
  81.  
  82. [14-Feb-20 11:30 AM] levi#6206
  83. I feel like they have to be good at minimum
  84.  
  85. [14-Feb-20 11:30 AM] levi#6206
  86. They’re not like clear cut broken or w.e
  87.  
  88. [14-Feb-20 11:30 AM] tazz#5495
  89. what even stops zig under veils
  90.  
  91. [14-Feb-20 11:30 AM] hongli#4483
  92. zig not needing tect now too is super good for it
  93.  
  94. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] hongli#4483
  95. as well
  96.  
  97. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] tazz#5495
  98. that isnt already overloaded in terms of what it has to deal with
  99.  
  100. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  101. I usually ditched tect in gen 7 too
  102.  
  103. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] hongli#4483
  104. thief isnt necessary either
  105.  
  106. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  107. But yea it’s nice
  108.  
  109. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  110. Well
  111.  
  112. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  113. It’s not like it has a huge movepool anyways
  114.  
  115. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] tazz#5495
  116. Bomb/speed/drum/rock smash?
  117.  
  118. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] levi#6206
  119. It can run seed bomb? And dedge or sth
  120.  
  121. [14-Feb-20 11:31 AM] hongli#4483
  122. you can just run like bd+dedge+espee+bomb
  123.  
  124. [14-Feb-20 11:32 AM] levi#6206
  125. Why rock smash
  126.  
  127. [14-Feb-20 11:32 AM] hongli#4483
  128. pawn+ferro ig but
  129.  
  130. [14-Feb-20 11:32 AM] hongli#4483
  131. its not doing much to ferro
  132.  
  133. [14-Feb-20 11:32 AM] hongli#4483
  134. idt
  135.  
  136. [14-Feb-20 11:32 AM] tazz#5495
  137. Pawn mostly
  138.  
  139. [14-Feb-20 11:32 AM] levi#6206
  140. Wouldn’t thief still be better for either of those
  141.  
  142. [14-Feb-20 11:32 AM] levi#6206
  143. You get a free evio
  144.  
  145. [14-Feb-20 11:32 AM] tazz#5495
  146. Yeah prob
  147.  
  148. [14-Feb-20 11:33 AM] brewfasa#4532
  149. qbanning pix should not be on the table
  150.  
  151. [14-Feb-20 11:33 AM] brewfasa#4532
  152. are we joking
  153.  
  154. [14-Feb-20 11:33 AM] levi#6206
  155. It should be for the start of week 8
  156.  
  157. [14-Feb-20 11:33 AM] levi#6206
  158. Not in two days tho idt
  159.  
  160. [14-Feb-20 11:33 AM] tazz#5495
  161. With the assumption that there would be a retest
  162.  
  163. [14-Feb-20 11:34 AM] tazz#5495
  164. Are the new mons in PS yet
  165.  
  166. [14-Feb-20 11:34 AM] levi#6206
  167. Should be on the table*
  168.  
  169. [14-Feb-20 11:34 AM] levi#6206
  170. Maybe lily is right
  171.  
  172. [14-Feb-20 11:34 AM] Quote#9846
  173. I wasn't looking to QB pix this week guys
  174.  
  175. [14-Feb-20 11:34 AM] Quote#9846
  176. I just want people to talk about it
  177.  
  178. [14-Feb-20 11:34 AM] tazz#5495
  179. lame
  180.  
  181. [14-Feb-20 11:35 AM] Quote#9846
  182. I'm aware of its potency but I don't think we should go for it that quickly
  183.  
  184. [14-Feb-20 11:35 AM] levi#6206
  185. Still think you should’ve gotten rid of pix and floon immediately to at least open the option
  186.  
  187. [14-Feb-20 11:35 AM] levi#6206
  188. But oh well
  189.  
  190. [14-Feb-20 11:35 AM] Quote#9846
  191. do you ever shut up
  192.  
  193. [14-Feb-20 11:35 AM] levi#6206
  194. ?
  195.  
  196. [14-Feb-20 11:35 AM] levi#6206
  197. Are you drunk
  198.  
  199. [14-Feb-20 11:35 AM] brewfasa#4532
  200. I’m more keen on looking at zig over veils
  201.  
  202. [14-Feb-20 11:36 AM] brewfasa#4532
  203. initially
  204.  
  205. [14-Feb-20 11:36 AM] tazz#5495
  206. anyone want to test
  207.  
  208. [14-Feb-20 11:36 AM] tazz#5495
  209. the new mons
  210.  
  211. [14-Feb-20 11:36 AM] tazz#5495
  212. threw together a veils
  213.  
  214. [14-Feb-20 11:36 AM] brewfasa#4532
  215. I got some shit loaded up but won’t be able to play until get off work Unger
  216.  
  217. [14-Feb-20 11:36 AM] brewfasa#4532
  218. unfort
  219.  
  220. [14-Feb-20 11:40 AM] BurntZebra#8147
  221. How many opportunities does zig get to set up not in veils
  222.  
  223. [14-Feb-20 11:41 AM] levi#6206
  224. Uh
  225.  
  226. [14-Feb-20 11:41 AM] levi#6206
  227. It lives neutral ohkos from most non lo I think
  228.  
  229. [14-Feb-20 11:41 AM] BurntZebra#8147
  230. I mean considering how potent zig is, memento dig is enough probably to set up vs most things
  231.  
  232. [14-Feb-20 11:41 AM] BurntZebra#8147
  233. Which is super easy splashable support
  234.  
  235. [14-Feb-20 11:41 AM] levi#6206
  236. Well running dig means pinch is harder to fit in
  237.  
  238. [14-Feb-20 11:42 AM] levi#6206
  239. But yea
  240.  
  241. [14-Feb-20 11:44 AM] Serene Grace#5243
  242. :waving:
  243.  
  244. [14-Feb-20 11:46 AM] Quote#9846
  245. ok done banned them
  246.  
  247. [14-Feb-20 11:47 AM] levi#6206
  248. lol
  249.  
  250. [14-Feb-20 11:47 AM] BurntZebra#8147
  251. Does body press onix do anything to zig
  252.  
  253. [14-Feb-20 11:48 AM] BurntZebra#8147
  254. Sort of needs to be a ohko after rocks for it to be useful probably
  255.  
  256. [14-Feb-20 11:48 AM] levi#6206
  257. If it’s not behind veils then head smash should do a lot, no?
  258.  
  259. [14-Feb-20 11:48 AM] Quote#9846
  260. it's a clean OHKO, isn't it?
  261.  
  262. [14-Feb-20 11:49 AM] Quote#9846
  263. oh behind veils?
  264.  
  265. [14-Feb-20 11:49 AM] Quote#9846
  266. uhh lol
  267.  
  268. [14-Feb-20 11:49 AM] Quote#9846
  269. behind veil body press does half
  270.  
  271. [14-Feb-20 11:49 AM] brewfasa#4532
  272. I think adamant head smash accomplishes the same thing most of the time
  273.  
  274. [14-Feb-20 11:49 AM] brewfasa#4532
  275. but not guaranteed
  276.  
  277. [14-Feb-20 11:51 AM] brewfasa#4532
  278. after rocks ur guaranteed tho
  279.  
  280. [14-Feb-20 11:55 AM] levi#6206
  281. Body press might be worth it anyways
  282.  
  283. [14-Feb-20 11:55 AM] levi#6206
  284. Not missing is probably going to important for sth of ziggys scale
  285.  
  286. [14-Feb-20 11:55 AM] brewfasa#4532
  287. u just blame hax, loss doesn’t count
  288.  
  289. [14-Feb-20 11:56 AM] brewfasa#4532
  290. idt bpress is worth a whole slot for a 10% chance
  291.  
  292. [14-Feb-20 11:56 AM] brewfasa#4532
  293. 20*
  294.  
  295. [14-Feb-20 11:57 AM] starmaster#8286
  296. we def shouldn’t quickban apix or zig lol
  297.  
  298. [14-Feb-20 11:57 AM] starmaster#8286
  299. MAYBE next week if they really seem broken
  300.  
  301. [14-Feb-20 12:19 PM] Serene Grace#5243
  302. we could do it UU style where we ban and then retest
  303.  
  304. [14-Feb-20 12:19 PM] Serene Grace#5243
  305. to not mess up a week of spl
  306.  
  307. [14-Feb-20 12:25 PM] Shrug#7659
  308. imo qb and change the burden of proof vote to half
  309.  
  310. [14-Feb-20 12:26 PM] Shrug#7659
  311. just make "midtier qbs" a different analytical category that requires a different burden than established-tier bans or unbans
  312.  
  313. [14-Feb-20 12:29 PM] levi#6206
  314. It’s still a two day qb for a mon that was balanced in the only other (admittedly different) meta we had it in
  315.  
  316. [14-Feb-20 12:29 PM] levi#6206
  317. There’s no real room for testing it
  318.  
  319. [14-Feb-20 01:23 PM] tazz#5495
  320. shrug and I are doing some testing
  321.  
  322. [14-Feb-20 01:23 PM] tazz#5495
  323. zigveils seems flat broken
  324.  
  325. [14-Feb-20 01:24 PM] tazz#5495
  326. you have to run multiple steels/rocks to have any hope of winning
  327.  
  328. [14-Feb-20 01:25 PM] tazz#5495
  329. and the stuff you have to run to not lose is really restrictive
  330.  
  331. [14-Feb-20 01:25 PM] tazz#5495
  332. I support the midtier qb idea I rly don't think its a good idea to free this for a week
  333.  
  334. [14-Feb-20 01:26 PM] levi#6206
  335. What did it go
  336.  
  337. [14-Feb-20 01:26 PM] Coconut#8762
  338. zigveils is really really really strong
  339.  
  340. [14-Feb-20 01:28 PM] hongli#4483
  341. zig seems like the only like 100% certainly broken aspect of veils to me
  342.  
  343. [14-Feb-20 01:28 PM] hongli#4483
  344. i don't think that veils w.o zig won't be strong but
  345.  
  346. [14-Feb-20 01:29 PM] Coconut#8762
  347. I haven't really played with smashers yet
  348.  
  349. [14-Feb-20 01:29 PM] hongli#4483
  350. i think the play is to midtier zigs out, then later on after we decide what to do with veils we can work w zig
  351.  
  352. [14-Feb-20 01:29 PM] Coconut#8762
  353. but I think zigveils is kinda nutty
  354.  
  355. [14-Feb-20 01:29 PM] hongli#4483
  356. like if we keep them then zig probs stays banned, and if we ban veils then we can retest zig
  357.  
  358. [14-Feb-20 01:30 PM] hongli#4483
  359. idk how broken necessarily smashers+veils would be
  360.  
  361. [14-Feb-20 01:30 PM] hongli#4483
  362. what smashers do we have? squirtle & dwebble?
  363.  
  364. [14-Feb-20 01:31 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  365. shellder
  366.  
  367. [14-Feb-20 01:31 PM] Coconut#8762
  368. shellder
  369.  
  370. [14-Feb-20 01:31 PM] Coconut#8762
  371. is the big one
  372.  
  373. [14-Feb-20 01:31 PM] hongli#4483
  374. right shell as well
  375.  
  376. [14-Feb-20 01:31 PM] Shrug#7659
  377. but also vulla is a smasher
  378.  
  379. [14-Feb-20 01:31 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  380. theres also np vull/np spritz
  381.  
  382. [14-Feb-20 01:33 PM] hongli#4483
  383. np vull/np spritz i reckon have a fair amount of counterplay under veils
  384.  
  385. [14-Feb-20 01:33 PM] hongli#4483
  386. with things getting knock back too
  387.  
  388. [14-Feb-20 01:33 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  389. the only veils abusers we're missing are like clamperl/magby?
  390.  
  391. [14-Feb-20 01:33 PM] hongli#4483
  392. i think shell won't be super broken?
  393.  
  394. [14-Feb-20 01:33 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  395. compared to last gen
  396.  
  397. [14-Feb-20 01:33 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  398. i guess smash tirt was on veils occasionally
  399.  
  400. [14-Feb-20 01:33 PM] hongli#4483
  401. but i'm open to being shown o/w
  402.  
  403. [14-Feb-20 01:34 PM] Coconut#8762
  404. I think we should do something
  405.  
  406. [14-Feb-20 01:34 PM] Coconut#8762
  407. before next week starts
  408.  
  409. [14-Feb-20 01:34 PM] Coconut#8762
  410. this seems like a building nightmare.
  411.  
  412. [14-Feb-20 01:34 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  413. i think zig is the best thing to ban
  414.  
  415. [14-Feb-20 01:34 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  416. its obv the best thing behind veils
  417.  
  418. [14-Feb-20 01:34 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  419. and its really easy to set up with memento outside of veils
  420.  
  421. [14-Feb-20 01:34 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  422. once zig is gone
  423.  
  424. [14-Feb-20 01:34 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  425. veils doesnt seem that much better than it was in gen 7
  426.  
  427. [14-Feb-20 01:35 PM] Coconut#8762
  428. gonna throw together some builds of ziggy without veils
  429.  
  430. [14-Feb-20 01:35 PM] Coconut#8762
  431. before I agree with that
  432.  
  433. [14-Feb-20 01:35 PM] hongli#4483
  434. onix having body press + head smash
  435.  
  436. [14-Feb-20 01:35 PM] brewfasa#4532
  437. again idk why we keep lumping veils and zig together
  438.  
  439. [14-Feb-20 01:35 PM] hongli#4483
  440. makes me think zigs isnt necessarily broken outside of veils
  441.  
  442. [14-Feb-20 01:35 PM] hongli#4483
  443. but idk yeah
  444.  
  445. [14-Feb-20 01:36 PM] hongli#4483
  446. it might still be
  447.  
  448. [14-Feb-20 01:36 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  449. well this is yet another thing
  450.  
  451. [14-Feb-20 01:36 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  452. that trapinch enables to an unhealthy extent
  453.  
  454. [14-Feb-20 01:36 PM] Coconut#8762
  455. don't forget diglett in veils too
  456.  
  457. [14-Feb-20 01:36 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  458. like yeah pawn/onix mess up zig
  459.  
  460. [14-Feb-20 01:37 PM] hongli#4483
  461. would you be running pinch with zig
  462.  
  463. [14-Feb-20 01:37 PM] Coconut#8762
  464. who can reliably revenge a lot of stupid things
  465.  
  466. [14-Feb-20 01:37 PM] hongli#4483
  467. i thought you always run dig for memento
  468.  
  469. [14-Feb-20 01:37 PM] brewfasa#4532
  470. ye I feel like dig is the better support
  471.  
  472. [14-Feb-20 01:37 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  473. could run a different memento user
  474.  
  475. [14-Feb-20 01:37 PM] Coconut#8762
  476. and memento
  477.  
  478. [14-Feb-20 01:37 PM] brewfasa#4532
  479. PaRtInG sHoT
  480.  
  481. [14-Feb-20 01:37 PM] brewfasa#4532
  482. is that just Pancham
  483.  
  484. [14-Feb-20 01:38 PM] Coconut#8762
  485. yes.
  486.  
  487. [14-Feb-20 02:02 PM] Shrug#7659
  488. i think it's the veil mech that does it
  489.  
  490. [14-Feb-20 02:02 PM] Shrug#7659
  491. u gotta be afraid of everything
  492.  
  493. [14-Feb-20 02:45 PM] tazz#5495
  494. zig won vs standard but lost vs ferro/onix/timburr team where it had more trouble
  495.  
  496. [14-Feb-20 02:46 PM] tazz#5495
  497. its definitely not going to bust open every team but I think it warps the meta too much, you have to run so much shit to not lose to it
  498.  
  499. [14-Feb-20 03:12 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  500. yeah you can def adjust your builds to not lose
  501.  
  502. [14-Feb-20 03:12 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  503. but same could be said for other things we've banned
  504.  
  505. [14-Feb-20 03:12 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  506. so eh
  507.  
  508. [14-Feb-20 03:24 PM] levi#6206
  509. The meta just shifted on wed and today, how can there be a standard yet
  510.  
  511. [14-Feb-20 03:27 PM] Coconut#8762
  512. I think "standard" implies non-veils
  513.  
  514. [14-Feb-20 03:41 PM] brewfasa#4532
  515. nah he just meant
  516.  
  517. [14-Feb-20 03:41 PM] brewfasa#4532
  518. non onix / timb / ferro
  519.  
  520. [14-Feb-20 03:41 PM] brewfasa#4532
  521. on the same squad
  522.  
  523. [14-Feb-20 03:41 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  524. i mean maybe zig could be balanced?
  525.  
  526. [14-Feb-20 03:41 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  527. like a generic team of onix vull timburr oddish all pretty much stop zig from setting up
  528.  
  529. [14-Feb-20 03:41 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  530. i guess depends on what those last 2 are
  531.  
  532. [14-Feb-20 03:42 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  533. munch should be fine vs zig in a 1v1
  534.  
  535. [14-Feb-20 03:43 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  536. curse on the drum, then you live espeed and ohko with dedge
  537.  
  538. [14-Feb-20 03:44 PM] brewfasa#4532
  539. don’t u just edge
  540.  
  541. [14-Feb-20 03:44 PM] brewfasa#4532
  542. does zig live
  543.  
  544. [14-Feb-20 03:44 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  545. zig lives
  546.  
  547. [14-Feb-20 03:44 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  548. unless youre adamant max attack in which case its a roll
  549.  
  550. [14-Feb-20 03:44 PM] brewfasa#4532
  551. ah
  552.  
  553. [14-Feb-20 03:45 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  554. and no one really runs max adamant munch atm
  555.  
  556. [14-Feb-20 03:45 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  557. actually return zigzagoon (or dedge?) would beat munch
  558.  
  559. [14-Feb-20 03:46 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  560. nvm i forgot return got nuked
  561.  
  562. [14-Feb-20 03:49 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  563. so zig vs munch is sort of a 50/50
  564.  
  565. [14-Feb-20 03:50 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  566. depends on zig last move though
  567.  
  568. [14-Feb-20 04:00 PM] Coconut#8762
  569. I feel like zig coverage isn't strong enough to win every matchup
  570.  
  571. [14-Feb-20 04:00 PM] Coconut#8762
  572. but guessing zig coverage is bad and shouldn't have to be done in order to win
  573.  
  574. [14-Feb-20 04:29 PM] brewfasa#4532
  575. what coverage are u guessing
  576.  
  577. [14-Feb-20 04:38 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  578. you have to guess if zig has dedge or not
  579.  
  580. [14-Feb-20 04:39 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  581. if you curse vs drum and zig is dedge
  582.  
  583. [14-Feb-20 04:39 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  584. then you die to dedge
  585.  
  586. [14-Feb-20 04:39 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  587. and zig is at 55% hp
  588.  
  589. [14-Feb-20 04:39 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  590. if you curse vs drum and zig isnt dedge, then you live espeed and ohko with dedge (or it thieves your bj)
  591.  
  592. [14-Feb-20 04:40 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  593. if you straight up attack zig
  594.  
  595. [14-Feb-20 04:40 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  596. then zig will kill you with espeed
  597.  
  598. [14-Feb-20 04:51 PM] Coconut#8762
  599. seed bomb/thief/dedge
  600.  
  601. [14-Feb-20 04:52 PM] Coconut#8762
  602. is the coverage guessing game.
  603.  
  604. [14-Feb-20 04:59 PM] brewfasa#4532
  605. ye ig
  606.  
  607. [14-Feb-20 04:59 PM] brewfasa#4532
  608. idk how much guessing ur involving
  609.  
  610. [14-Feb-20 04:59 PM] brewfasa#4532
  611. actually in game
  612.  
  613. [14-Feb-20 05:00 PM] brewfasa#4532
  614. vs a mon like zig
  615.  
  616. [14-Feb-20 08:35 PM] Shrug#7659
  617. Reiterating my desire to get rid of it before next week so we don’t embarrass ourselves
  618.  
  619. [14-Feb-20 08:39 PM] LilyAC#7887
  620. even if veils turns out to be broken how is it embarrassing
  621.  
  622. [14-Feb-20 08:40 PM] Shrug#7659
  623. 8 dudes using the win button strat
  624.  
  625. [14-Feb-20 08:40 PM] levi#6206
  626. it'd be fresh off a meta change
  627.  
  628. [14-Feb-20 08:40 PM] Shrug#7659
  629. And always the ugliest games
  630.  
  631. [14-Feb-20 08:40 PM] levi#6206
  632. so idt we'd be judged
  633.  
  634. [14-Feb-20 08:41 PM] levi#6206
  635. i think it's comfortably broken though
  636.  
  637. [14-Feb-20 08:41 PM] Shrug#7659
  638. Webs games are also ugly
  639.  
  640. [14-Feb-20 09:25 PM] Coconut#8762
  641. I think that
  642.  
  643. [14-Feb-20 09:25 PM] Coconut#8762
  644. you guys are desperate for a win
  645.  
  646. [14-Feb-20 09:25 PM] Coconut#8762
  647. and nearly everyone will try to cheese
  648.  
  649. [14-Feb-20 09:26 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  650. i mean this week is either gonna be cheese or anti cheese
  651.  
  652. [14-Feb-20 09:26 PM] Serene Grace#5243
  653. if we all think its broken why dont we ban and retest
  654.  
  655. [14-Feb-20 09:27 PM] Serene Grace#5243
  656. its a consensus isnt it that its going to be very very broken
  657.  
  658. [14-Feb-20 09:27 PM] Serene Grace#5243
  659. its just that we need time to make a deciision
  660.  
  661. [14-Feb-20 09:27 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  662. star opposed
  663.  
  664. [14-Feb-20 09:28 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  665. fatty also opposed a straight quickban i think
  666.  
  667. [14-Feb-20 09:39 PM] Quote#9846
  668. is it ziggy or veil tho? The impression I'm getting is that it could be either one
  669.  
  670. [14-Feb-20 09:40 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  671. i think theres like a 90% its ziggy
  672.  
  673. [14-Feb-20 09:40 PM] hongli#4483
  674. i think it's safe to say that ziggy is broken w veils support
  675.  
  676. [14-Feb-20 09:41 PM] hongli#4483
  677. unclear as to whether or not it is w.o them, and whether or not veils are overbearing w.o ziggy
  678.  
  679. [14-Feb-20 09:41 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  680. theres like a 65-70% chance that ziggy is broken w/o veils
  681.  
  682. [14-Feb-20 09:41 PM] hongli#4483
  683. so why don't we just treat this like we did cherry+pix
  684.  
  685. [14-Feb-20 09:41 PM] hongli#4483
  686. and we can always revisit it when we've had more time for the meta to develop
  687.  
  688. [14-Feb-20 09:41 PM] levi#6206
  689. as long as we narrow that there -is- a broken thing
  690.  
  691. [14-Feb-20 09:42 PM] levi#6206
  692. i think revisiting is a pretty minimal concern yea
  693.  
  694. [14-Feb-20 09:42 PM] levi#6206
  695. my personal leaning is that ziggy is the issue as well
  696.  
  697. [14-Feb-20 09:42 PM] Quote#9846
  698. yeah there definitely is a broken element here, it's just difficult to determine exactly what it could be
  699.  
  700. [14-Feb-20 09:42 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  701. well
  702.  
  703. [14-Feb-20 09:42 PM] Quote#9846
  704. ziggy's probably still dumb with memento support
  705.  
  706. [14-Feb-20 09:42 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  707. veils havent gotten significantly better than it was last gen
  708.  
  709. [14-Feb-20 09:43 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  710. defog timburr helps
  711.  
  712. [14-Feb-20 09:43 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  713. but also lost stuff like snivy/abra
  714.  
  715. [14-Feb-20 09:43 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  716. and gastly
  717.  
  718. [14-Feb-20 09:43 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  719. w
  720.  
  721. [14-Feb-20 09:43 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  722. which could clean up veils teams
  723.  
  724. [14-Feb-20 09:43 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  725. if they didnt sweep with their first round of veils
  726.  
  727. [14-Feb-20 09:43 PM] Quote#9846
  728. we also have different abusers than before
  729.  
  730. [14-Feb-20 09:43 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  731. the abusers are like 75% the same
  732.  
  733. [14-Feb-20 09:44 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  734. missing magby/clamperl
  735.  
  736. [14-Feb-20 09:44 PM] Quote#9846
  737. we have cutie now tho
  738.  
  739. [14-Feb-20 09:44 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  740. cutie doesnt feel that good in veils
  741.  
  742. [14-Feb-20 09:45 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  743. it doesnt power past ferro/munch even behind veils
  744.  
  745. [14-Feb-20 09:45 PM] hongli#4483
  746. yeah idt cutie is a big boon for veils
  747.  
  748. [14-Feb-20 09:45 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  749. like i think np spritz is better still
  750.  
  751. [14-Feb-20 09:45 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  752. going +2 sp atk in one go
  753.  
  754. [14-Feb-20 09:45 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  755. is a lot better for veils
  756.  
  757. [14-Feb-20 09:46 PM] Quote#9846
  758. yea, I just thought cutie because it sets up so easily, especially with a timburr around
  759.  
  760. [14-Feb-20 09:46 PM] hongli#4483
  761. maybe it wouldn't be bad like
  762.  
  763. [14-Feb-20 09:46 PM] hongli#4483
  764. with a pivot set
  765.  
  766. [14-Feb-20 09:46 PM] hongli#4483
  767. where you have smth else on your team that can abuse ferro/munch
  768.  
  769. [14-Feb-20 09:46 PM] Quote#9846
  770. seems like one of those really nice secondary wincons
  771.  
  772. [14-Feb-20 09:47 PM] hongli#4483
  773. also benefits from less munch
  774.  
  775. [14-Feb-20 09:47 PM] hongli#4483
  776. w knock spam being back again
  777.  
  778. [14-Feb-20 09:48 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  779. i guess theres less reason to run munch now
  780.  
  781. [14-Feb-20 09:48 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  782. now youd probably run ferroseed or ponyta to deal w/ cutie
  783.  
  784. [14-Feb-20 09:48 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  785. although pony does not work vs uturn cutie+dig
  786.  
  787. [14-Feb-20 09:49 PM] Quote#9846
  788. yea it's just another option
  789.  
  790. [14-Feb-20 09:49 PM] Quote#9846
  791. the main sweepers still seems to be ziggy/shellder/vull
  792.  
  793. [14-Feb-20 09:51 PM] Quote#9846
  794. but I think ziggy being broken w/o veil is more likely than veil being broken w/o ziggy
  795.  
  796. [14-Feb-20 09:51 PM] Quote#9846
  797. especially since you can use support other than veil for ziggy
  798.  
  799. [14-Feb-20 09:52 PM] hongli#4483
  800. would zig still be broken though
  801.  
  802. [14-Feb-20 09:52 PM] hongli#4483
  803. without support from trappers
  804.  
  805. [14-Feb-20 09:52 PM] hongli#4483
  806. in a hypothetical where veils are broken even w.o zig
  807.  
  808. [14-Feb-20 09:53 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  809. i mean i think so
  810.  
  811. [14-Feb-20 09:53 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  812. like if youre running pawniard as your zig answer
  813.  
  814. [14-Feb-20 09:53 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  815. as soon as you switch into vull
  816.  
  817. [14-Feb-20 09:53 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  818. you can no longer survive an attack from zigzagoon
  819.  
  820. [14-Feb-20 09:55 PM] hongli#4483
  821. i was mostly thinking in the sense that
  822.  
  823. [14-Feb-20 09:55 PM] hongli#4483
  824. dig makes it incredibly easy to choose when you can set up
  825.  
  826. [14-Feb-20 09:55 PM] hongli#4483
  827. w memento
  828.  
  829. [14-Feb-20 09:55 PM] Quote#9846
  830. memento in general makes ziggy sweeps a joke
  831.  
  832. [14-Feb-20 09:55 PM] hongli#4483
  833. the other memento users aren't that great, and you can also just switch out whatever's in to something that can stop a zig sweep even while memento'd
  834.  
  835. [14-Feb-20 09:56 PM] hongli#4483
  836. so it'd still be strong but like
  837.  
  838. [14-Feb-20 09:56 PM] hongli#4483
  839. much harder to get to the point where you can set up
  840.  
  841. [14-Feb-20 09:57 PM] Quote#9846
  842. if this is the situation though then I'd still prefer a ziggy ban because banning veil because of a single really good abuser seems dumb
  843.  
  844. [14-Feb-20 09:57 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  845. memento isnt even necessary
  846.  
  847. [14-Feb-20 09:57 PM] hongli#4483
  848. yeah i was thinking
  849.  
  850. [14-Feb-20 09:57 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  851. unless every team runs 6 mons that ohko zig
  852.  
  853. [14-Feb-20 09:57 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  854. or have knock off
  855.  
  856. [14-Feb-20 09:57 PM] hongli#4483
  857. if veils turns out to be broken regardless of zig
  858.  
  859. [14-Feb-20 09:57 PM] hongli#4483
  860. things like haze mar/encore spritz aren't terrible too
  861.  
  862. [14-Feb-20 09:58 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  863. like even something like eviolite cutiefly is enough to let zig set up
  864.  
  865. [14-Feb-20 09:58 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  866. or np vullaby
  867.  
  868. [14-Feb-20 09:58 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  869. or non encore spritzee
  870.  
  871. [14-Feb-20 09:58 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  872. idk whos running haze mareanie though
  873.  
  874. [14-Feb-20 09:59 PM] hongli#4483
  875. it was a nice add on teams that couldn't afford to let floon set up on mar
  876.  
  877. [14-Feb-20 09:59 PM] hongli#4483
  878. imo
  879.  
  880. [14-Feb-20 10:00 PM] hongli#4483
  881. but yeah floon's gone now anyways
  882.  
  883. [14-Feb-20 10:00 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  884. i mean pre knock off mareanie
  885.  
  886. [14-Feb-20 10:00 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  887. everyones running iron defense or t spikes
  888.  
  889. [14-Feb-20 10:00 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  890. as last move
  891.  
  892. [14-Feb-20 10:01 PM] hongli#4483
  893. not having sludge bomb
  894.  
  895. [14-Feb-20 10:01 PM] hongli#4483
  896. if u have other things for fairies/oddish
  897.  
  898. [14-Feb-20 10:01 PM] hongli#4483
  899. isnt the worst
  900.  
  901. [14-Feb-20 10:01 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  902. if you have other things for fairies/shellder/oddish/corphish
  903.  
  904. [14-Feb-20 10:01 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  905. wtf are you running mareanie for
  906.  
  907. [14-Feb-20 10:01 PM] hongli#4483
  908. well mar isnt exactly
  909.  
  910. [14-Feb-20 10:01 PM] hongli#4483
  911. the best answer for spritz/qt/oddish to begin with
  912.  
  913. [14-Feb-20 10:01 PM] Coconut#8762
  914. mareanie's just a good pocket monster
  915.  
  916. [14-Feb-20 10:02 PM] hongli#4483
  917. yeah
  918.  
  919. [14-Feb-20 10:02 PM] Quote#9846
  920. mareanie likes to check everything a little bit
  921.  
  922. [14-Feb-20 10:02 PM] Coconut#8762
  923. soft checks a lot of things
  924.  
  925. [14-Feb-20 10:02 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  926. mareanie tanks hits from oddish pretty well
  927.  
  928. [14-Feb-20 10:02 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  929. as long as something else is sleep foddered
  930.  
  931. [14-Feb-20 10:02 PM] Coconut#8762
  932. mareanie isn't a great answer
  933.  
  934. [14-Feb-20 10:02 PM] Coconut#8762
  935. but it's an answer
  936.  
  937. [14-Feb-20 10:02 PM] Coconut#8762
  938. what's this have to do with apix or ziggy though
  939.  
  940. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] starmaster#8286
  941. i think its bad looks to theoryban smth thats never been broken b4 even if its likely it might be
  942.  
  943. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  944. doka suggested haze mareanie
  945.  
  946. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  947. as a counter to drum zigzagoon
  948.  
  949. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] starmaster#8286
  950. especially when it doesnt kill ppl to build around it
  951.  
  952. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] starmaster#8286
  953. for 1 week
  954.  
  955. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  956. i thought that was dumb
  957.  
  958. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] starmaster#8286
  959. while we figure it out
  960.  
  961. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] hongli#4483
  962. not as a hard counter
  963.  
  964. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] hongli#4483
  965. i was just saying that it's much harder for zig to actually set up
  966.  
  967. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] starmaster#8286
  968. it doesnt require insane effort to zig proof a team
  969.  
  970. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] hongli#4483
  971. w.o memento support from dig
  972.  
  973. [14-Feb-20 10:03 PM] hongli#4483
  974. and listed that as an example of smth mar could run to prevent getting set up on
  975.  
  976. [14-Feb-20 10:04 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  977. feels like a big stretch
  978.  
  979. [14-Feb-20 10:04 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  980. when you could be running knock off
  981.  
  982. [14-Feb-20 10:04 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  983. which is literally useful in every matchup
  984.  
  985. [14-Feb-20 10:05 PM] Quote#9846
  986. I went into this thinking that we should just see how the week plays out, but early impressions already suggest that there's a big issue
  987.  
  988. [14-Feb-20 10:05 PM] Quote#9846
  989. and using SPL as a testing ground of all things isn't the most appropriate
  990.  
  991. [14-Feb-20 10:05 PM] starmaster#8286
  992. idk i dont think its that big an issue
  993.  
  994. [14-Feb-20 10:05 PM] starmaster#8286
  995. its not like we're going to be the only tier with a weird week lol
  996.  
  997. [14-Feb-20 10:05 PM] Quote#9846
  998. I don't think so either, but I'm not an SPL player so my opinion isn't as valid
  999.  
  1000. [14-Feb-20 10:05 PM] hongli#4483
  1001. it's just one week tops and it's not like we're getting in next spl anyways right
  1002.  
  1003. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] Coconut#8762
  1004. don't say that yet!
  1005.  
  1006. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] hongli#4483
  1007. i mean ideally i think zig should be banned but i don't think it'd be the worst thing ever
  1008.  
  1009. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] hongli#4483
  1010. if we wait
  1011.  
  1012. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] Coconut#8762
  1013. our tour rep needs to be high anyway.
  1014.  
  1015. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] Quote#9846
  1016. star does make a good point tho
  1017.  
  1018. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] Quote#9846
  1019. all the tiers are gonna be fucked this week
  1020.  
  1021. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] Quote#9846
  1022. so lol
  1023.  
  1024. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] Coconut#8762
  1025. right but let's try
  1026.  
  1027. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] Coconut#8762
  1028. to not be fucked
  1029.  
  1030. [14-Feb-20 10:06 PM] starmaster#8286
  1031. theorybanning smth that hasnt ever been broken in practice will never sit right w/ me
  1032.  
  1033. [14-Feb-20 10:07 PM] Coconut#8762
  1034. see normally I'd agree
  1035.  
  1036. [14-Feb-20 10:07 PM] Coconut#8762
  1037. but last gen we removed more elements than we added
  1038.  
  1039. [14-Feb-20 10:07 PM] starmaster#8286
  1040. ya ofc its a diff meta and im not denying that
  1041.  
  1042. [14-Feb-20 10:07 PM] starmaster#8286
  1043. its more favorable to zig
  1044.  
  1045. [14-Feb-20 10:07 PM] starmaster#8286
  1046. but i dont think zig is so absurd on paper that it justifies a drifloon/sun level ban
  1047.  
  1048. [14-Feb-20 10:08 PM] Coconut#8762
  1049. honestly, and I know this is an unpopular opinion
  1050.  
  1051. [14-Feb-20 10:08 PM] Coconut#8762
  1052. I wouldn't be opposed to banning literally every new form of every new mon
  1053.  
  1054. [14-Feb-20 10:08 PM] Coconut#8762
  1055. that we just got
  1056.  
  1057. [14-Feb-20 10:08 PM] Coconut#8762
  1058. and figuring it out after SPL
  1059.  
  1060. [14-Feb-20 10:09 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1061. even like alola zigzagoon?
  1062.  
  1063. [14-Feb-20 10:09 PM] Quote#9846
  1064. that sounds like an awful take
  1065.  
  1066. [14-Feb-20 10:09 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1067. or w/e random forms
  1068.  
  1069. [14-Feb-20 10:10 PM] Quote#9846
  1070. that's waaaaay too extreme of a move to make
  1071.  
  1072. [14-Feb-20 10:10 PM] Quote#9846
  1073. we got new stuff, we have to accept that it's all here
  1074.  
  1075. [14-Feb-20 10:10 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1076. i guess itd be basically preserving the current meta but in a theoretical world where we banned floon+pix
  1077.  
  1078. [14-Feb-20 10:10 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1079. and some stuff gets knock off
  1080.  
  1081. [14-Feb-20 10:10 PM] Coconut#8762
  1082. any new mon
  1083.  
  1084. [14-Feb-20 10:10 PM] Coconut#8762
  1085. introduced
  1086.  
  1087. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] Quote#9846
  1088. it's also really uneven to ban the mons and not the moves
  1089.  
  1090. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] Quote#9846
  1091. feels like we're picking and choosing because we're not happy or something
  1092.  
  1093. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] hongli#4483
  1094. yeah if there weren't any movepool changes it'd be one thing
  1095.  
  1096. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1097. i dont think the new mons are balancing the added moves
  1098.  
  1099. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] Coconut#8762
  1100. it's not my preferred change to the meta
  1101.  
  1102. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] Coconut#8762
  1103. but I wouldn't be opposed to it
  1104.  
  1105. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] Coconut#8762
  1106. at this point
  1107.  
  1108. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] Quote#9846
  1109. I'm strongly opposed
  1110.  
  1111. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] Quote#9846
  1112. a change like that comes off as arbitrary af
  1113.  
  1114. [14-Feb-20 10:11 PM] Quote#9846
  1115. if they were all broken af that would be one thing
  1116.  
  1117. [14-Feb-20 10:12 PM] Quote#9846
  1118. but that isn't even the case here
  1119.  
  1120. [14-Feb-20 10:12 PM] Coconut#8762
  1121. sure, we be banning things that aren't broken, but it's at the cost of a stable meta that we know works
  1122.  
  1123. [14-Feb-20 10:12 PM] Quote#9846
  1124. sorry, that just gives the impression that we're either afraid of change or we're bending over backwards way too hard for SPL
  1125.  
  1126. [14-Feb-20 10:12 PM] Coconut#8762
  1127. and the remaining changes are small, while the bans we made are easily reversible
  1128.  
  1129. [14-Feb-20 10:12 PM] Coconut#8762
  1130. it's not my preferred way of going about this
  1131.  
  1132. [14-Feb-20 10:12 PM] Coconut#8762
  1133. that'd be banning zig
  1134.  
  1135. [14-Feb-20 10:13 PM] Quote#9846
  1136. keep in mind that all the other metas received way more mons and wouldn't even think of doing this
  1137.  
  1138. [14-Feb-20 10:13 PM] Quote#9846
  1139. it would make us look really bad
  1140.  
  1141. [14-Feb-20 10:13 PM] Coconut#8762
  1142. possibly.
  1143.  
  1144. [14-Feb-20 10:13 PM] Quote#9846
  1145. no I think we would be a laughing stock
  1146.  
  1147. [14-Feb-20 10:41 PM] starmaster#8286
  1148. we'd look like complete clowns
  1149.  
  1150. [14-Feb-20 10:41 PM] starmaster#8286
  1151. for sure
  1152.  
  1153. [14-Feb-20 11:35 PM] levi#6206
  1154. if the council was unanimous then thered be nothing to clown
  1155.  
  1156. [14-Feb-20 11:35 PM] levi#6206
  1157. im 100% sure of this
  1158.  
  1159. [14-Feb-20 11:36 PM] levi#6206
  1160. but fwiw
  1161.  
  1162. [14-Feb-20 11:36 PM] levi#6206
  1163. i dont think ziggy would be broken w.o trappers
  1164.  
  1165. [14-Feb-20 11:36 PM] levi#6206
  1166. im kind of interested in hearing more of what doka has on that actually
  1167.  
  1168. [14-Feb-20 11:36 PM] levi#6206
  1169. wearing down checks w.o trappers never rlly works the same way bc it means you're going fully offensive
  1170.  
  1171. [14-Feb-20 11:38 PM] levi#6206
  1172. and that gives them room to sack more easily
  1173.  
  1174. [14-Feb-20 11:43 PM] Quote#9846
  1175. another reason to ban diglett?
  1176.  
  1177. [14-Feb-20 11:43 PM] Quote#9846
  1178. sounds good to me
  1179.  
  1180. [14-Feb-20 11:44 PM] levi#6206
  1181. i dont think banning dig alone would do the trick
  1182.  
  1183. [14-Feb-20 11:44 PM] levi#6206
  1184. i guess it'd be the first step
  1185.  
  1186. [14-Feb-20 11:45 PM] hongli#4483
  1187. this was just a hypothetical for if we decide veils are broken even w.o zig
  1188.  
  1189. [14-Feb-20 11:46 PM] hongli#4483
  1190. there r probs more important things to be discussing rn
  1191.  
  1192. [14-Feb-20 11:47 PM] levi#6206
  1193. i think this is a real path to consider idk
  1194.  
  1195. [14-Feb-20 11:48 PM] levi#6206
  1196. veils + trappers
  1197.  
  1198. [14-Feb-20 11:48 PM] levi#6206
  1199. bc again, trappers do push a few other things to borderline at least
  1200.  
  1201. [14-Feb-20 11:49 PM] Quote#9846
  1202. they all support each other in a roundabout way
  1203.  
  1204. [14-Feb-20 11:49 PM] hongli#4483
  1205. does diglett push anything in specific to borderline brokenness
  1206.  
  1207. [14-Feb-20 11:50 PM] hongli#4483
  1208. i hate dig a ton and think the meta would be much more enjoyable w.o it but it's hard for me to view it in a similar manner to pinch
  1209.  
  1210. [14-Feb-20 11:54 PM] Quote#9846
  1211. are you guys still against an Arena Trap suspect?
  1212.  
  1213. [14-Feb-20 11:55 PM] Quote#9846
  1214. I recall seeing argument that Diglett and Trapinch do enough of their own support to justify looking at them separately and that suspecting Arena Trap would be considered a cop out.
  1215.  
  1216. [14-Feb-20 11:59 PM] levi#6206
  1217. i think diglett requires more support from pinch to get its traps but ultimately dont see it as being enormously less effective
  1218.  
  1219. [15-Feb-20 12:05 AM] hongli#4483
  1220. i don't think it's necessarily less effective either, it's just an issue of reliability of trapping the things it wants to
  1221.  
  1222. [15-Feb-20 12:07 AM] hongli#4483
  1223. diglett is more high risk high reward and you often times need to do some doubling in order to get it in vs the target you want
  1224.  
  1225. [15-Feb-20 12:08 AM] hongli#4483
  1226. and if you get that wrong then dig is just like flat out dead since it's defenses r paper thin
  1227.  
  1228. [15-Feb-20 12:10 AM] hongli#4483
  1229. pinch doesn't really have that issue w what it wants to trap. even though it's less useful after successfully trapping something since it's at like 1hp, it can still also use first impression to pick off weakened things later on in the match as well
  1230.  
  1231. [15-Feb-20 12:13 AM] hongli#4483
  1232. i'd be interested in hearing why @levi changed his mind though wrt dig since iirc he's always held the opinion that dig promotes good play and is an overall positive presence for the meta
  1233.  
  1234. [15-Feb-20 12:13 AM] levi#6206
  1235. bc it's potentially breaking things
  1236.  
  1237. [15-Feb-20 12:13 AM] levi#6206
  1238. i never considered a dig core to be broken before this
  1239.  
  1240. [15-Feb-20 12:14 AM] levi#6206
  1241. i dont consider promoting good play to be a real consideration for tering fwiw
  1242.  
  1243. [15-Feb-20 12:14 AM] levi#6206
  1244. tiering*
  1245.  
  1246. [15-Feb-20 12:14 AM] levi#6206
  1247. or it being a subjectively positive presence
  1248.  
  1249. [15-Feb-20 12:14 AM] levi#6206
  1250. those were moreso against arguments that it was inherently unhealthy or unfun and so on, which i also dont think should be real considerations for tiering
  1251.  
  1252. [15-Feb-20 12:15 AM] hongli#4483
  1253. ah
  1254.  
  1255. [15-Feb-20 12:15 AM] hongli#4483
  1256. is the core you're referencing zigdig?
  1257.  
  1258. [15-Feb-20 12:15 AM] hongli#4483
  1259. if there's only one broken core then wouldn't it be more beneficial to ban the mon that dig supports
  1260.  
  1261. [15-Feb-20 12:16 AM] levi#6206
  1262. if its the only core then yes
  1263.  
  1264. [15-Feb-20 12:16 AM] hongli#4483
  1265. like zig doesn't really offer much to the meta on its own, and dig gives offensive teams the ability to deal w hard hitting speedy mons like ponyta+lo qt
  1266.  
  1267. [15-Feb-20 12:17 AM] levi#6206
  1268. im like 75% sure that vulldig is going to become an issue in the near future anyways though
  1269.  
  1270. [15-Feb-20 12:26 AM] hongli#4483
  1271. what would we do if we don't ban veils so zig is still banned regardless
  1272.  
  1273. [15-Feb-20 12:26 AM] hongli#4483
  1274. and vulldig is the only core
  1275.  
  1276. [15-Feb-20 12:26 AM] levi#6206
  1277. ban vull
  1278.  
  1279. [15-Feb-20 12:27 AM] levi#6206
  1280. 😡 😡 😡
  1281.  
  1282. [15-Feb-20 12:27 AM] Quote#9846
  1283. no thanks
  1284.  
  1285. [15-Feb-20 12:27 AM] hongli#4483
  1286. let's compromise and ban both
  1287.  
  1288. [15-Feb-20 12:27 AM] hongli#4483
  1289. we all win
  1290.  
  1291. [15-Feb-20 12:28 AM] levi#6206
  1292. no way
  1293.  
  1294. [15-Feb-20 12:28 AM] levi#6206
  1295. i love diglett
  1296.  
  1297. [15-Feb-20 12:28 AM] levi#6206
  1298. but not if it breaks ziggy
  1299.  
  1300. [15-Feb-20 12:28 AM] hongli#4483
  1301. 😡 😡 😡
  1302.  
  1303. [15-Feb-20 12:29 AM] Quote#9846
  1304. if dig does break ziggy I'm fine with booting ziggy
  1305.  
  1306. [15-Feb-20 02:42 AM] Coconut#8762
  1307. I hate doing this again
  1308.  
  1309. [15-Feb-20 02:43 AM] Coconut#8762
  1310. but we need to push diglett down the line
  1311.  
  1312. [15-Feb-20 02:43 AM] Coconut#8762
  1313. for the more immediate threat
  1314.  
  1315. [15-Feb-20 03:03 AM] Quote#9846
  1316. going after the more important threat is how cutie's managed to stay alive for so long
  1317.  
  1318. [15-Feb-20 10:31 AM] Shrug#7659
  1319. is there even a serious cutiefly outcry
  1320.  
  1321. [15-Feb-20 10:34 AM] Quote#9846
  1322. a serious one? Nah. A couple of people want it gone but no one here I think
  1323.  
  1324. [15-Feb-20 10:34 AM] BurntZebra#8147
  1325. I mean I think it’s sort of bad for the meta
  1326.  
  1327. [15-Feb-20 10:43 AM] Coconut#8762
  1328. I don't think cutiefly is any more dangerous than vullaby.
  1329.  
  1330. [15-Feb-20 11:07 AM] Quote#9846
  1331. I wouldn't say that around those pro-ban kids itc 🧐
  1332.  
  1333. [15-Feb-20 11:13 AM] Coconut#8762
  1334. I am the pro-ban kids
  1335.  
  1336. [15-Feb-20 11:18 AM] Quote#9846
  1337. yikes
  1338.  
  1339. [15-Feb-20 12:56 PM] Kingler#6931
  1340. With home, do we have a new VR thread?
  1341.  
  1342. [15-Feb-20 01:00 PM] Quote#9846
  1343. We'll be working on an update for it soon
  1344.  
  1345. [15-Feb-20 01:12 PM] levi#6206
  1346. You’re in the vrc kingler..
  1347.  
  1348. [15-Feb-20 02:54 PM] jake#8907
  1349. what do you guys think of new meta so far
  1350.  
  1351. [15-Feb-20 02:54 PM] jake#8907
  1352. i haven't had time to play until this weekend
  1353.  
  1354. [15-Feb-20 02:55 PM] Quote#9846
  1355. post-home post-floon/pix is pretty neat so far tbh
  1356.  
  1357. [15-Feb-20 02:56 PM] jake#8907
  1358. is pony any good? i was rly thinking it would be great in the pre-home meta if it were there
  1359.  
  1360. [15-Feb-20 03:05 PM] brewfasa#4532
  1361. seems like it has almost exactly the same place it had in sm
  1362.  
  1363. [15-Feb-20 03:06 PM] brewfasa#4532
  1364. basically only strong viable fire, great bulky wow check to phys mons
  1365.  
  1366. [15-Feb-20 03:06 PM] brewfasa#4532
  1367. strong enough to be offensive threat
  1368.  
  1369. [15-Feb-20 03:06 PM] brewfasa#4532
  1370. trappers still limit its ability
  1371.  
  1372. [16-Feb-20 01:16 PM] hongli#4483
  1373. has there been enough discussion
  1374.  
  1375. [16-Feb-20 01:16 PM] hongli#4483
  1376. for us to do a quickban on zig
  1377.  
  1378. [16-Feb-20 01:16 PM] hongli#4483
  1379. or would it still be in the autoban range
  1380.  
  1381. [16-Feb-20 01:20 PM] hongli#4483
  1382. if so im nomming we quickban zig
  1383.  
  1384. [16-Feb-20 01:39 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1385. zigs def not broken
  1386.  
  1387. [16-Feb-20 01:44 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1388. i think zig is prob broken
  1389.  
  1390. [16-Feb-20 01:44 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1391. so autoban means no forum discussion
  1392.  
  1393. [16-Feb-20 01:45 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1394. quickban means we post on forums and we ban it unless theres some compelling argument?
  1395.  
  1396. [16-Feb-20 02:16 PM] Shrug#7659
  1397. seems like we have no fucking idea whats going on
  1398.  
  1399. [16-Feb-20 02:16 PM] Coconut#8762
  1400. that's the vibe I'm getting ya
  1401.  
  1402. [16-Feb-20 02:18 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1403. i agree
  1404.  
  1405. [16-Feb-20 02:19 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1406. quickbanning things is a bad idea when we have no idea whats going on
  1407.  
  1408. [16-Feb-20 02:20 PM] hongli#4483
  1409. how many people actually think zigs is fine though
  1410.  
  1411. [16-Feb-20 02:20 PM] hongli#4483
  1412. i was under the impression that a vast majority of ppl thought it was broken
  1413.  
  1414. [16-Feb-20 02:21 PM] hongli#4483
  1415. lily doesn't think so, starm thinks that it's not a good idea to qb it because of zigs not being broken at all before
  1416.  
  1417. [16-Feb-20 02:21 PM] hongli#4483
  1418. which isn't the same as thinking that it's not necessarily broken right now
  1419.  
  1420. [16-Feb-20 02:28 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1421. im def fine with no autoban
  1422.  
  1423. [16-Feb-20 02:28 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1424. but i think its a ridiculous constraint on teambuilding
  1425.  
  1426. [16-Feb-20 02:29 PM] Coconut#8762
  1427. it's quite difficult to keep track of what everyone thinks
  1428.  
  1429. [16-Feb-20 02:30 PM] Shrug#7659
  1430. we need a distinct, fully inclusive slate of options
  1431.  
  1432. [16-Feb-20 02:30 PM] Shrug#7659
  1433. everyone needs to weigh in
  1434.  
  1435. [16-Feb-20 02:30 PM] Shrug#7659
  1436. we consolidate to the most popular / likely
  1437.  
  1438. [16-Feb-20 02:30 PM] Shrug#7659
  1439. make a decision from there
  1440.  
  1441. [16-Feb-20 02:31 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1442. strawpoll?
  1443.  
  1444. [16-Feb-20 02:37 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1445. what i shouldve said was
  1446.  
  1447. [16-Feb-20 02:38 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1448. zig def isnt quickban worthy (yet)
  1449.  
  1450. [16-Feb-20 02:38 PM] Coconut#8762
  1451. why not
  1452.  
  1453. [16-Feb-20 02:38 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1454. i think it probably isnt broken too but thats aside from the point
  1455.  
  1456. [16-Feb-20 02:38 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1457. we cant quickban something before we understand how good it is
  1458.  
  1459. [16-Feb-20 02:38 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1460. its been less than a week and theres been 0 tour games, theres no way we can know zig is broken
  1461.  
  1462. [16-Feb-20 02:38 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1463. its never been close to broken before
  1464.  
  1465. [16-Feb-20 02:39 PM] Coconut#8762
  1466. the previous metas had more things introduced than the current meta currently does
  1467.  
  1468. [16-Feb-20 02:39 PM] Coconut#8762
  1469. so using prior metas as an argument to justify brokeness is flawed
  1470.  
  1471. [16-Feb-20 02:40 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1472. yes thats a reason zig might be broken rn
  1473.  
  1474. [16-Feb-20 02:40 PM] Coconut#8762
  1475. and while I agree it's definitely been a short amount of time and we don't know for sure what is broken
  1476.  
  1477. [16-Feb-20 02:40 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1478. but how can u know that already
  1479.  
  1480. [16-Feb-20 02:40 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1481. when 0 replays of the current meta exist
  1482.  
  1483. [16-Feb-20 02:40 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1484. and its been less than a week
  1485.  
  1486. [16-Feb-20 02:40 PM] Coconut#8762
  1487. I think if you've played this meta you understand that it's highly unfavorable.
  1488.  
  1489. [16-Feb-20 02:40 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1490. ive played like 4 games
  1491.  
  1492. [16-Feb-20 02:40 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1493. its been fine
  1494.  
  1495. [16-Feb-20 02:41 PM] Coconut#8762
  1496. I've ran the gauntlet of different cheese and I think this is a very unstable metagame at the moment
  1497.  
  1498. [16-Feb-20 02:41 PM] Coconut#8762
  1499. but I am having trouble determining what exactly the best fix is
  1500.  
  1501. [16-Feb-20 02:42 PM] Coconut#8762
  1502. and it appears the rest of the council is undecided as well.
  1503.  
  1504. [16-Feb-20 02:42 PM] Coconut#8762
  1505. because many of us share vastly different opinions on the approach we should take moving forward
  1506.  
  1507. [16-Feb-20 02:42 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1508. ran against what?
  1509.  
  1510. [16-Feb-20 02:43 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1511. i really doubt youve played enough high level games already to be able to confidently conclude anything
  1512.  
  1513. [16-Feb-20 02:43 PM] Coconut#8762
  1514. Well yes, that's what I said
  1515.  
  1516. [16-Feb-20 02:43 PM] Coconut#8762
  1517. I haven't been able to figure out what I don't like about the meta
  1518.  
  1519. [16-Feb-20 02:43 PM] Coconut#8762
  1520. but I have figured out I don't like the meta
  1521.  
  1522. [16-Feb-20 02:44 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1523. you somehow concluded zig is highly unfavourable
  1524.  
  1525. [16-Feb-20 02:44 PM] Coconut#8762
  1526. when???
  1527.  
  1528. [16-Feb-20 02:45 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1529. you said it like just a few lines up as if it was something obvious
  1530.  
  1531. [16-Feb-20 02:45 PM] Coconut#8762
  1532. ???
  1533.  
  1534. [16-Feb-20 02:45 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1535. ឵឵ ឵឵Today at 19:40
  1536. I think if you've played this meta you understand that it's highly unfavorable.
  1537.  
  1538. [16-Feb-20 02:45 PM] Coconut#8762
  1539. I asked you why you think zig isn't banworthy
  1540.  
  1541. [16-Feb-20 02:45 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1542. did u not mean zig?
  1543.  
  1544. [16-Feb-20 02:45 PM] Coconut#8762
  1545. and I claimed that the metagame in general
  1546.  
  1547. [16-Feb-20 02:45 PM] Coconut#8762
  1548. is unstable
  1549.  
  1550. [16-Feb-20 02:46 PM] levi#6206
  1551. i think theres a good chance zig isnt broken
  1552.  
  1553. [16-Feb-20 02:46 PM] levi#6206
  1554. i spammed zig yesterday and kept on losing
  1555.  
  1556. [16-Feb-20 02:46 PM] hongli#4483
  1557. levi's really been on a downward spiral
  1558.  
  1559. [16-Feb-20 02:46 PM] hongli#4483
  1560. ever since spl 8 mids
  1561.  
  1562. [16-Feb-20 02:46 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1563. i assumed you meant zig is highly unfavourable
  1564.  
  1565. [16-Feb-20 02:47 PM] Coconut#8762
  1566. No I tried to clarify that the metagame is kinda shit to play
  1567.  
  1568. [16-Feb-20 02:47 PM] Coconut#8762
  1569. not specifically ziggy
  1570.  
  1571. [16-Feb-20 02:47 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1572. oh okay
  1573.  
  1574. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1575. i guess we agree then
  1576.  
  1577. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] levi#6206
  1578. were you trying to say zig was banworthy then
  1579.  
  1580. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] levi#6206
  1581. i didnt rlly follow
  1582.  
  1583. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1584. on not qbing zig?
  1585.  
  1586. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] Coconut#8762
  1587. I have no idea what is currently broken.
  1588.  
  1589. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] Coconut#8762
  1590. and it's very apparent to me
  1591.  
  1592. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1593. it feels like balance is really crappy right now
  1594.  
  1595. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] Coconut#8762
  1596. that we cannot reach a consensus in the council chat
  1597.  
  1598. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] Coconut#8762
  1599. but I can affirm
  1600.  
  1601. [16-Feb-20 02:48 PM] Coconut#8762
  1602. this current metagame sucks
  1603.  
  1604. [16-Feb-20 02:49 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1605. lets bring back gastly
  1606.  
  1607. [16-Feb-20 02:49 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1608. best zig answer
  1609.  
  1610. [16-Feb-20 02:49 PM] LilyAC#7887
  1611. facts
  1612.  
  1613. [16-Feb-20 02:49 PM] hongli#4483
  1614. gastly, much like recycle floon
  1615.  
  1616. [16-Feb-20 02:49 PM] Coconut#8762
  1617. gonna need sucker punch drfiloon back
  1618.  
  1619. [16-Feb-20 02:49 PM] hongli#4483
  1620. has no hands
  1621.  
  1622. [16-Feb-20 02:49 PM] Coconut#8762
  1623. to balance it.
  1624.  
  1625. [16-Feb-20 02:49 PM] hongli#4483
  1626. the signifier of a broken mon
  1627.  
  1628. [redacted]
  1629.  
  1630. [16-Feb-20 02:52 PM] BurntZebra#8147
  1631. zigzagoon must be a freak in bed
  1632.  
  1633. [redacted]
  1634.  
  1635. [16-Feb-20 02:52 PM] hongli#4483
  1636. i'd buy drifloon's bathwater
  1637.  
  1638. [redacted]
  1639.  
  1640. [16-Feb-20 06:30 PM] starmaster#8286
  1641. anyway tho
  1642.  
  1643. [16-Feb-20 06:30 PM] starmaster#8286
  1644. i still think ziggy should get an spl week for sure
  1645.  
  1646. [16-Feb-20 06:30 PM] starmaster#8286
  1647. we havent seen any tour play whatsoever in this meta
  1648.  
  1649. [16-Feb-20 06:30 PM] starmaster#8286
  1650. so it feels hella premature to quickban anything
  1651.  
  1652. [16-Feb-20 06:32 PM] hongli#4483
  1653. ok yeah im against banning it immediately now too
  1654.  
  1655. [16-Feb-20 06:32 PM] hongli#4483
  1656. i do think teambuildings gonna suck this week but
  1657.  
  1658. [16-Feb-20 06:33 PM] hongli#4483
  1659. i dont think it's like swirlix level, at the very least we can wait a week or two to see how the meta develops around it
  1660.  
  1661. [16-Feb-20 06:33 PM] levi#6206
  1662. zigzagoon isn’t even viable
  1663.  
  1664. [16-Feb-20 06:34 PM] levi#6206
  1665. this mon stinks
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement