Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jan 2nd, 2022
3,119
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 10.31 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. Main CMMG Junior miners plays
  3. CORE
  4. Bayhorse Silver
  5. >Pros: low AISC, comfy CEO, online cult following, no debt, good jurisdiction, production any week now
  6. >Cons: small operation, slow movers, no cash, not alot of proven silver ounces, share count is starting to get too big, "two more weeks" syndrome
  7.  
  8. Blue Lagoon Resources
  9. >Pros: Cash flow from production to fund exploration, CEO has raised 500m$ before in prior company, big exploration potential and clear path forward, Crescat investment, good jurisdiction, cash in the bank / fully funded, low share count
  10. >Cons: Slow progress due to permit delays and assay delays (not really their fault), not a lot of hype / visibility, long-term play as we have to wait for alot of drill holes to trickle in, Onion Property bad deal?
  11.  
  12. Impact Silver
  13. Type: DevOps
  14. >Pros: Established producer in legendary Mexican silver district
  15. >Cons: Management is full of boomers, zero ambition, zero planning. High AISC due to shit management, doesnt care about shareholders. Also Mexico.
  16. Note: Fucking boomers are spoiled by their land!
  17.  
  18. Irving Resources
  19. >Pros - Quinton Hennigh, Eric Sprott, Newmont, no mill needed, well placed smelters, high grade in all holes drilled,
  20. >Cons - Japan shut down because of Covid. Probably will take long to get up and running (2 years)
  21.  
  22. Silver One Resources
  23. >Pros - they are drilling,
  24. >Cons - flaw is the production being 2 years away,
  25.  
  26. Starcore international Mine
  27. Type: ExpOps
  28. >Pros: Stable cash flow from small Mexican gold mine, super cheap compared to P/E. Large exploration project that might go big.
  29. >Cons: Bit high AISC, but tune-able (mine high grade when gold low, low grade when high)
  30.  
  31. Explanations
  32. Re-start developer: Has an existing mine as a start, which massively reduces CAPEX and time to operation. Example: Gayhorse, Blue Lagoon
  33. DevOps/ExpOps: Uses the income of an existing (usually small) operation to fund additional (usually big) projects. Examples: Impact Silver, Cerrado, soon Blue Lagoon, soon Braveheart
  34.  
  35. Guanajuato Silver
  36. >Pros: Low AISC. 2 mines. Actually in production generating cash flow in 1 mine with the 2nd coming soon for 1.8m total AgEq oz per year total production. Acquired a 230m$ asset for only 20m$ from Endeavor. May be able to acquire other local silver miners if they fail, like GPL. Good CEO, Sprott investment
  37. >Cons: Jurisdiction risk (Mexico), AISC might not prove to be as low as they thought due to inflation / energy input costs, share count starting to get too big
  38.  
  39. Nicola mining
  40. >Pros: Only permitted mill in British Columbia to process gold and silver at 200tpd, have already commenced milling operations, invested over $30 million into the milling site since 2011 at a mcap of 24,77M CAD
  41.  
  42. >100% ownership of craigmont copper mine + over 10000 hectares are claimed, during its life span it yielded in excess of 36,750,000 tons of ore at an average grade of 1.30% Cu, containing approximately 900 million pounds of Cu extracted from both open pit and underground mining activities, mining ended due to low copper prices,
  43. >There's an 43-101 on their historic mining waste terraces, appears to be profitable at US$2.8/lb at a cut-off grade of 0.06% copper
  44. >100% ownership of Treasure Mountain silver mine in BC, fully permitted (over 2800 hectares), exploration completed in 2020
  45. >They own a gravel pit giving them some revenue of 50-70k each year…
  46. >Has a deal with Blue Lagoon Resources to mill ore.
  47.  
  48. >Cons: A lot of debt(12 mil as of their last financial report), it will take years to get their mines into operation, currently little cashflow to further develop existing properties, will likely sell their properties especially treasure mountain at higher silver prices, almost 280 million shares
  49.  
  50.  
  51. Dolly Varden Silver
  52. Type: Advanced explorer
  53. >Pros: Huge gold and silver resource (MRE for 40 MOz + drilling since + Fury lands), just got even larger by buying ground from Fury. Big names, Sprott, well-funded. Right next to Hecla.
  54. >Currently holds the past producing Torbit and Dolly Varden silver mines on the "Arm of Ghosts" at Alice Arm on the BC West Coast. They recently combined forces with Fury Metals Homestake Ridge Project, creating a fantastic land package suitable for wider investment potential and allowing for a broader exploration program on the site. I've been to both the Torbit and Dolly Varden sites a number of years ago, fantastic potential for silver / gold mineralization, however much of it is near surface only. Again more drilling is needed before we can really get an idea if the property has serious potential to become a mine again. Hecla Mining has a major stake in the area and in Dolly Varden Silver, as they hope to buy out the property in the future if its worth exploiting.
  55. The property is accessible by road and by boat from the camp at Alice Arm from Kitsault on the opposite side of the arm. Infrastructure is close by in the form of hydro power and camp.
  56. >Cons: Just drilling, no clear strategy: don't want to develop, don't want acquisition (yet)
  57. Note: Possible takeover target by Hecla
  58.  
  59. Galleon Gold
  60. Type: Advanced stage explorer
  61. >Pros: Advanced gold explorer with ~1 MOz resource, established mining camp, survived the last bear market, recent MRE, new PEA incoming, many institutional investors, Sprott
  62. >Cons: Management shilled 3-5 MOz resource but MRE gave 1 MOz (fired a director), PEA is delayed economics might suck, many years away from becoming a mine, no timeline
  63. Note: Possible takeover by big neighbors
  64.  
  65. Interesting
  66. Goliath Resources
  67. Exploration play
  68. >Pros - properties not far from Dolly Varden at Alice Arm and near Terrace BC. Both properties are VMS hosted Silver lead zinc gold. Drilling has shown extremely wide intercepts of mineralization but only basic on site assays have been returned, we wont know what they have until better assays are done.
  69. >Cons - Goliaths primary targeted property is high elevation and has extremely difficult seasonal access by helicopter only.
  70.  
  71. Scottie Resources
  72. Type: Exploration play
  73. >Pros - past producing mines on property, hydro electric and road infrastructure, situated for modern mining. They will likely look for a buyout.
  74. Their scottie gold mine project zones are all within the Golden Triangle, historically known for some of the most impressive gold discoveries in North America
  75. >Cons - As of May 31st, 2021 they have over 3.5million in cash
  76. Compared to August 31st, 2020 they had over 4.7million
  77. So you might say they roughly burn through 1.2 million every 9 months
  78.  
  79. Mountain boy
  80. Type: Early stage explorer
  81. >Pros: Lots of ground in BC, some properties with historic bonanza grade mines, dumped heavily in last year only strong hands hold it
  82. >Cons: Last year management shilled drill core visuals but came back EMPTY, this year's drill results were modest, some of their properties are quite remote
  83. Note: These monkeys can't distinguish ore from rock
  84.  
  85. Kuya Silver
  86. >Pros:Kuya Silver is expanding the Bethania silver mine in Peru for a restart planned as soon as early 2022, less than a year from now.
  87.  
  88. They successfully won approval (environmental impact assessment) last year to construct a 350 tonne-per-day plant at site, which given the historical grades should produce about 2 million ounces per year of pure silver, and 2.5 MMoz equivalent/year including the by-products.
  89.  
  90. Low costs: Before Kuya took over, this mine produced (without a plant at site) at $16.30/oz all in sustaining cost (AISC) incurring extra toll milling and trucking charges to process its ore at other Peruvian mines. With its own plant Kuya should be able to reduce the costs by at least $3-4/oz.
  91. Kuya will be drilling in two phases at Bethania this year, and they are planning get more and more aggressive with resource development as the year goes on. We expect that by next year, Kuya’s exploration program and increase in resources could justify a second expansion of Bethania production by another 50-100%.
  92.  
  93. Beautifull detail: once the production financing is in place, future exploration could be financed with own means. Watch GoGold how explosive exploration could become, both at Bethania Peru and at Silver Kings, Ontario Canada, their new acquired asset.
  94.  
  95. Finally, with Kuya you are getting their newly acquired Silver Kings project in Ontario, Canada for free.Kuya has acquired a commanding land position with drill ready targets in a prolific silver mining camp that has produced ~600 million ounces over the past 120 years. Kuya has >1000 g/t silver intersections that will be followed up by new drilling in the next few months…so it may not be “free” for much longer.
  96. >Cons: Peru
  97.  
  98. Gold Mountain
  99. Type: Re-start developer
  100. >Pros: Restarting an existing mine, very low CAPEX, exploration upside, low share count, production should've already started
  101. >Cons: Production delays, might have to do a PP at shit price, can be fucked if toll mill goes wrong
  102.  
  103. Cerrado
  104. Type: Re-start developer, DevOps
  105. >Pros: Took over problematic mine (original developer fucked up chemistry), production is slowly improving. Also has an advanced development project in Brazil that they intend to fund from production.
  106. >Cons: Brazil and Argentina are a dream-team, production is still low.
  107.  
  108. Braveheart
  109. Type: Re-start developer, soon DevOps
  110. >Pros: Took over bankrupt underground copper mine, with mill and everything. New MRE, high grade drills. Production should start soon, Ocean offtake agreement. Also has a huge abandoned open pit copper project that they intend to fund from cash-flow.
  111. >Cons: Delays with permitting and development, went silent lately
  112.  
  113. > Mammoth resources:
  114. Type: Early explorer
  115. Pros: Got pre-drilled ground from major, near surface bulk tonnage deposit, good grades. Big investors, insiders, Sprott, good management.
  116. Cons: Mexico
  117.  
  118. This is the first time I read these so I don't know their history, but they seem to be bigger than our usual microcaps.
  119.  
  120. > Summa Silver
  121. Type: Developer
  122. Pros: US based, historic bonanza mines, current bonanza drills, etc... Big names, insiders, Sprott, etc...
  123. Cons: Priced in :/
  124.  
  125. Magna Gold
  126. Type: Re-start producer, ExpOps
  127. Pros: Producing gold mine, production improving, drilling, etc, good track. Silver exploration projets with nice results and historic bonanza mines, MRE coming.
  128. Cons: Mexico, high AISC, production problems (seems improving)
  129.  
  130. Silver Hammer
  131. Type: Early explorer
  132. Pros: Three really nice historic property with bonanza grades
  133. Cons: Recently pumped
  134.  
  135.  
  136.  
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment