My PBworks Workspaces l2udsyear2017 Léo ADAMaccountlog outhelp
WikiPages & Files

Search this workspace
VIEWEDIT

Me and my e-identity
Page history last edited by Thomas Weissgerber 6 days ago
- Léo Adam : Juridical access + Productivity killer + Hazardous trends and viral challenges
- Nicolas Argyriou : Privacy and security + What impact do social networking and social networking sites have on society? + What's a social network + The indexing of our lives + e-identity: why is it necessary + Proofreading + Formatting ?
- Thomas Weissgerber : Cyber bullying + Apology of terrorism + Easy access to public expression  + Smartphones + Language evolution + Artistic explosion
- Marie-France Kommer : Meaning of friendship + Social Isolation + A time before Social Network + Conclusion

Intro
What impact do social networking and social networking sites have on society? (Argyriou)
What's a social network ? (Argyriou)
Privacy and security (Argyriou)
Presence in our lives
Meaning of friendship (Kommer)
Social isolation (Kommer)
Cyber bullying (Weissgerber)
Apology of terrorism (Weissgerber)
The indexing of our lives (Argyriou)
Smartphones (Weissgerber)
Productivity killer (Adam)
Hazardous trends and viral challenges (Adam)
Changes in our society
Easy access to public expression (Weissgerber & Argyriou)
Artistic explosion (Weissgerber)
Language evolution (Weissgerber)
e-identity: why is it necessary ? (Argyriou)
A time before Social Network (Kommer)
Finding solutions
Juridical access (Adam)
Conclusion (Kommer)


What impact do social networking and social networking sites have on society? (Argyriou)
Is it still possible not to be on a social network when everyone else is ?
How did social network affect our relationships with others and our definition of friendship ?

Social medias have changed the world for the last 15 years. Regularly, new ones are created and they become more and more controversial.
The biggest ones have gained a power over our lives that we did not expect and wouldn't have willingly granted to anyone, much less a some faceless company.
In this group work, we are going to talk about the impact social networks have had over our lives and society and discuss how they could be regulated.

What's a social network ? (Argyriou)
But before all, we should define what social networks are. In these paragraphs, when referencing social networks, we will be talking about those digital networks such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, Instagram... Networks with a clear and definite real-life dimension, social networks that incite you to share about your life and make social connections with real-life acquaintances.

Privacy and security (Argyriou)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-siciliano/social-media-privacy-and_b_245857.html
http://www.datacenterjournal.com/privacy-concerns-threat-social-media/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/onmarketing/2012/04/24/social-media-privacy-a-contradiction-in-terms/#2a92f9737c45
http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/05/21/teens-social-media-and-privacy/
It is a common idea that people, particularly young people underevaluate the value of privacy. It is partly true.
Social networks make use of people's ignorance of the commercial value their data represents. As long as it remains like this, and as long as advertisers do value that data, the business model of social medias will continue to flourish. In fact, social medias sell their users' personnal informations to advertisment companies, that is how they make money. If users discovered the real value of privacy, the situation could change. Recent events like Facebook's secret psychological studies, Edward Snowden's revelations, it seems that people don't need much reasons to change their behaviour towards social medias.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-uUT1mvmmODg/UhAYoaFufaI/AAAAAAABH74/iVOnIiGSXEQ/s400/NSA+CIA+NSC+FBI+Facebok+Google+iPhone+Apple+Twitter+Skype+Snowden+Prism+spying+DEA+DHA+by+Trianons+flickr+9409194750_40a1136a06.jpg
Edward Snowden and the Prism program (gathering of personnal informations in collaboration with social media groups)

It seems, based on a Pew Research Article, that young people tend to be more concerned by privacy issues than before. Today's teens have a better understanding of the privacy issues of social medias, and they are more likely to be careful about their data and to lock up their accounts to show the minmum of personnal informations to the world. This awareness is pretty recent, and partly due to the different scandals previously mentionned.
There are also a lot of security concerns about social medias, such as facebook that had a potential breach in a part of its code, and they didn't do anything to fix it.
In the end, it is up to the user to be careful, in fact, the best privacy guard is ourselves. If we are careful with what we put on social medias, no one could someday get access to sensitive informations. When you post a picture of you playing with your auntie's dog, you do not feel any potential threat, but if someone could gather all of the data that someone "produced", he could have and incredible tool to usurpate your identity or cause you harm.

Presence in our lives
Meaning of friendship (Kommer)
Social networks have changed our society, our individual lives and even our language. For instance, the meaning of certain words. With Facebook, the word “friend” has become a verb under the form "to friend" and now has a broader meaning. It no longer designates what the word initially meant.We place every type of social connection into our “friends” list.
May it be an acquaintance or our best friends, there are no distinctions in the friends list. Adding someone in requires no effort; It is a passive act that rarely marks a relationship.
In real life, becoming friend with someone requires more; it takes some getting used to, some regular contact. Maintaining a relationship is done by "keeping in touch" and takes some active participation. Breaking a relationship is a major event that has an important cause and occupies the minds of those involved.

On the contrary, on the social networks, to start a relationship, it is enough to send a "friend request" and wait for confirmation or not to this request. There is no need to take the news to maintain the relationship: have can consult the "timeline" of the person if desired or not.We can be more active by sharing content, commenting, liking, reacting, etc.
Finally, breaking a relationship for one reason or another can be as easily unnoticed as starting that relationship.
Obviously, these events can be much more "noisy" due to public or partially public exposure of our lives and social relationships.
At the end of a relationship, we can, as in real life, involve other people, and even we can involve far more people as long as they have knowledge of this event not the bias of people contacts Concerned or contacts of the persons concerned.

Despite the term "friends" used to designate all our acquaintances and even the contacts of our acquaintances, we distinguish the knowledge of our friends. We are aware of the proximity of our relations and we invoke new words to designate our closest friends: "best friends".

Social isolation (Kommer)

With social networks, we are constantly connected to the world or, in any case, we have access to all the information of the largest library that exists (internet) and we are connected with a network of contacts related to us.

Even if we have access to all the documentary resources to learn on various and varied subjects, we prefer to spend our free time on social networks and on some applications. So we do not take advantage of the resources on the internet and not all the information we can find here is necessarily interesting.
In the same way, not all people who have access to our personal information and contacts are necessarily friends.
We drown in an ocean of contacts that do not really know us, who are not real friends, that's why many of us feel lonely, lost in a crown.

In a world where many people publicly expose their personal information and opinions, some people do not want to or do not dare to expose themselves for various reasons: sometimes for fear of being judged, for want of protecting their privacy, and so on.

The human is a social animal and not solitary: it needs the others. We need to be loved and loved in return. If we only have superficial relationships, we may feel a sense of lack.


Cyber bullying (Weissgerber)
Cyber bullying is also a concern about social medias. Bullying has been a problem for a while, but before, it was only in schools. Now with social medias, kids can be harassed even when they are at home. Stalking people on their social medias is easy, and bullies can easily use them to send hateful posts or spread falsehoods. It is a new form of bullying that kids have to face, outside of the teacher's reach; There have been cases of Kids being ostracized; expelled from group chats, banned on forums, etc...  The anonimity on social media/forums also simplifies bullying.
A study says:
"54% of the students were victims of traditional bullying and over a quarter of them had been cyber-bullied. Almost one in three students had bullied others in the traditional form, and almost 15% had bullied others using electronic communication tools. Almost 60% of the cyber victims are females, while over 52% of cyber-bullies are males. Majority of the cyber-bully victims and bystanders did not report the incidents to adults."
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563205000889

There is also some forms of harassment in video games, multiplayer ones, of course. The competitiveness of it enables the most hateful parts of some people.
The consequences are the same than "classic" bullying: isolation, depression, eating disorder, sleep disorder, suicide...
http://bcloud.marinschools.org/SafeSchools/Documents/BP-CyberBandT.pdf

Apology of terrorism (Weissgerber)
The Internet is also a place where influenceable minds can be... infuenced. Internet is the new playground for terrorist organizations. Al-Qaida has for long used this network to communicate, but ISIS has put it to a whole new level. Now, not only do they use this "new" way of communicating internally, they also reach out to new recruits directly from there. Much like big corporations, they created their very own brand image. They have a very good communication department, regularly posting propaganda videos, with groovy musics and Blockbuster-like visuals, enough to seduce numbers of young adults. They use Facebook, Twitter and other popular social medias to spread their propaganda around. The fact that those social medias are really popular among their target audience is a godsend, no pun intended, to recruit new members.
Social medias are also a really cheap way to communicate. ISIS members post also regularly videos of their accomplishments and can be followed by anyone.

https://media.vocativ.com/photos/2015/08/ISISEXECANBAR3101251764.png
An exemple of ISIS' propaganda

They also use popular apps like Telegram, so as to have encrypted communications and organize themselves. It is an excuse for classic medias to regulary attack the more secure means of communication and other privacy-friendly softwares in the name of the anti-terrorism, but sacrificing individual rights and liberties would be giving in to terror, which is what terrorism is hoping to achieve.
Some solutions are being developped, like in Facebook, where they develop AIs specialized in detecting apology of terrorism/hate speech. But it is not dramatic if they get caught, because they can recreate a profil/account right after.

Old school media outlets like to attack the new medias, but they are also guilty, as they relay ISIS's actions and sometimes in a really sensationalist and click-baity manner.

The indexing of our lives (Argyriou)
The invasion of our privacy was something that we were deeply afraid of on the internet, before social networks became a thing. "Once upon a time", you wouldn't reveal your real identity to anyone on the internet. Now not only do we do that, but social networks also gather data about us without passively while we browse the web. For instance, Facebook, Twitter and Google+ are mostly able to track what they call our "web path"; a map of the pages we were on around the internet and at what time we browsed them. They do that through the use of those tiny "like" buttons, often displayed under press articles and on nearly every website. These buttons are entirely hosted on the social network's servers, thus, to display them when you come around a page, the website has to your "browser" to ask google to fetch it for you. Your browser complies, of course, because its job is to draw properly what the website should look like, and the like button is a part of it.
So, the servers can record what button is being displayed where and to whom (Facebook does this, for instance) and get to know you based on what you like to do online. That data is currently used to target ads with more finesse. Advertising companies pay for each click on their ads, it is completely up to Google and Facebook to decide who "sees" those ads. So, it is in their best interest to know a lot about you, to show you the ads you are more likely to click on. For instance, if you browsed a lot of pediatrics-related, non-scientific articles, Google will conclude that you are pregnant and could show you diaper ads, thus boosting their click rates and making more money from the same ads.
These "meta-data" are powerful. For instance, the grocery store chain "Target" once shook up the press by figuring out that a teenager was pregnant before her father based on her purchases history.
Of course all of this seems mostly harmless, but now that these data exist, and without entering the realm of paranoia, no one knows what they could be used for in the future.
Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/541351/facebooks-like-buttons-will-soon-track-your-web-browsing-to-target-ads/

Smartphones (Weissgerber)
Smartphones are incredible devices, bringing a lot of knowledges in the palm of our hands. Almost everyone owns one, whether the last-gen or any old model. Every smartphone has a web browser and an access to the web and phone network, that is what make them "smart". But this can be a concern, because in every smartphone, in addition to those connexions, they have a geolocation system, and a camera (or two), a microphone, and a fingerprint sensor, so on and so on... Any intelligence agency would have dreamt of a world where everyone is carrying a device that collected so much information about its owner. There are some informations that we choose to share, on social networks for instance. By the way, having a smart device connected to social networks encourages us to share useless details about our lives, and that everyone can see. But moreover, there are many informations that we "share" inconsciously, like what phone tower we currently are connected to (which means our position on the phone grid and in the real world up to a precision of 3 kilometers), meta-data in our researches, many data in applications and websites. And those are just the official ones, Edward Snowden (whistleblower, ex-NSA) has been known to claim that even if your phone looks shut down, it can record you.
And with the actual uprising of the Big Data field of research, we have infrastructures able to cross-reference our position with everyone else's, and figure out with whom someone slept at night. Smartphone are useful tools but we have to be educated about them and to know the extent of their power, to know how to protect our privacy, when to use encryption, and to pay attention to our (privacy) settings.

Productivity killer (Adam)
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wired-success/200911/social-media-does-it-help-or-hinder-productivity
http://www.inc.com/john-boitnott/social-media-addiction-the-productivity-killer.html
http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/social-media-affecting-workplace-productivity-says-study-1475746
http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/does-social-media-enhance-employee-productivity/

Social medias can also impact productivity, especially at work. It is a real question for companies : Should they limit, or even forbid, the access to social medias during worktime ?

Of course, every studies confirms that social medias take a more and more important place in people's life : Nearly 20% of users can't go beyond "a few hours" without checking Facebook and 61% of users check their newsfeed "at least once a day".
But does it really mean a waste of time ? According to TeamLease World of Work Report, an average of 2 hours and a half is spent accessing social media at work every day and 13% of the total productivity is lost owing to the social media indulgence alone.
However, a study published by Australian scientists found that taking time to visit websites of personal interest, including news sites and YouTube, provided workers a mental break that ultimately increased their ability to concentrate and was related with a 9% increase in total productivity.

In the end, some studies show that social medias at work, or at school, imply a loss in productivity, such as other studies show the opposite. An argument for the presence of social medias in learningplaces is that nowaday's, and tomorrow's generations have a gift for multitasking because they have integrated technlogy into their lives. Even if today a lot of companies, and schools, decide to forbid the utilisation of social medias for personal use, it's a safe bet that social medias will be even more present in people's life in the years to come.


Source: http://www.smartinsights.com/


Hazardous trends and viral challenges (Adam)
http://growingsocialmedia.com/best-worst-social-media-challenges/
http://www.thedrum.com/news/2016/07/27/als-ice-bucket-challenge-showcases-power-social-media-it-funds-landmark-scientific
https://socialmediaweek.org/blog/2015/10/viral-social-challenges-ice-bucket/
https://www.connexionfrance.com/Practical/Health/Deadly-Blue-Whale-Challenge-spreads-to-France

Social medias are a perfect place for viral challenges to develop, since they can reach millions of persons all around the world. But these trends can sometimes be quite hazardous. Indeed, while some of these challenges can be funny and harmless, like the Ice Bucket Challenge was in which people dumped buckets of ice-cold water on their heads and donated money to the ALS Foundation to raise awareness for that specific disease. The ALS syndrome is a neurodegenerative disorder, it is the one that Stephen Hawking is suffering from, for instance. It slowly takes over its host and paralyzes its body and ultimately kills the host when it reaches vital parts of it. It is deadly and hard to cure, but most importantly, the reasearch behind it lacked funding.
Another example, "The Kylie Jenner Lip Challenge", in 2015. It consistsed in using a shot glass or anything similar to suction your lips (by heating it and applying it to any body part), in order to look like Kylie Jenner. Except that Kylie Jenner transformed her lips via surgery, and many people who did this challenge ended up hurting themselves.


Source: http://www.alsa.org

But recently another exemple, far more dangerous, named the "Blue Whale Challenge" appeared on social medias. It consists in a person, the "whale", urging a teenager to commit suicide by encouraging him to accomplish a list of tasks which get seedier and seedier day after day, until the final task...
This challenge, which came from Russia and appeared in France recently, is a real danger for the most fragile teenagers who could be brought to do this challenge and risk their life.

If some of these trends don't imply any danger and become viral thanks to their originality or thanks to celebrities involved, such as Bill Gates, Jimmy Fallon or Justin Timberlake who all gladly recorded themselves getting soaked by a bucket of ice-cold water. Others can represent a real danger.

Changes in our society

Easy access to public expression (Weissgerber & Argyriou)
Social networks have changed our society by providing an easy access to public expression to people who wouldn't have gotten any before. We also now share things that would have been kept hidden by how the media worked decades ago. Outrageous content, unusual humor... Social outcasts have become small-scale national celebrities, people such as Sylvain Durif who claim to be Merlin the wizard, the cosmic christ, the great monarch and so on, burlesque parodies of news segments reached dozens of millions of views, there now is a "flat earth society", a community of people who believe the earth is flat that gained a certain popularity, and, most importantly, openly extreme communities: racists, negationnists, anti-semitic...

The internet allowed for places to open on which people could anonymously discuss anything. People figured out that their more extreme opinions were actually widespread, and grouped people who couldn't have known that they were philosophically alike. Donald Trump was particularily popular among the youngs, and giant communities developped around him.

The internet has also made it easier for people to form a communities over relatively uncommon hobbies, opinions or tastes: groups of people who would have thought that they were the only ones into something before, people of a feather who were geographically too scattered around to find each other and form a group. Before then, when you had a hobby, it required knowledge and dedication to create the infrastructure needed to find people of similar interests and interract with them. It even sometimes took courage to reveal that you were into that thing, depending on what it was; a problem that disappeared with the internet's anonimity. You needed some way to advertize maybe your club or your magazine and manage it all.
Now, with the internet, we've seen the creation of small niches that wouldn't have been able to exist more locally or wouldn't have gotten the funding to go national. We've seen giant communities form over singular bad movies, japanese spinning dolls, the belief that the earth is flat, animal costumes or vampires, and of course the various obscure sexual proclivities that probably made some psychologists scratch their head.

Artistic explosion (Weissgerber)
Social medias are an incredible opportunity for freelance artists. Anyone can create his own page, to display art pieces. Artists now have access to a kind of visibility that had never existed before. In all kinds of art whether it is music, painting, photography, films you can find tons of home artists, some of them quite renowned. There are even some sites/social medias specialized in art, or that have been taken over by artists (think about soundcloud, tumblr, deviantArt, youtube, Instagram in some ways...).
But social medias that were in the first place really good for artists are now less and less welcoming for some kind of art. There are a lot of reported cases of artists being censored because some of their pieces contained nudity. Even the Philadelphia Art Museum had trouble with a 1960's pop painting judged too suggestive.

Language evolution (Weissgerber)
Social networks has also changed our way of communicating with each other, not because we are 24/7 connected, but in our way of writing. Some people might speak of the changes in our language as if we were murdering it, using abreviations and misspelling.
One really interesting behavior is the usage of emotes. Those little faces we use in our messages seems natural now, but it is pretty recent in the mainstream sphere. Those emotes allows us to express emotions on a sterile support like text messages or blogs, which is something that used to require a skill. It is an interesting behavior that we, as humans, felt the need to invent a direct, unequivocal way of expressing emotions through text. Were figures of speech deemed insufficient ?
There is also a vernacular language that appeared on the internet, memes, and a common culture between internet users.

e-identity: why is it necessary ? (Argyriou)
We talked about our e-identity. Our googleablity, our online profile; basically whatever comes up when looking for you on the internet, may it be through google or any other service.
Having our name searched for online is now something that we expect to happen at some point. What people see there will often be their first inquiry into our lives, and pretty often, their first impression. Indeed, you rarely need to Google someone you already know. Ideally, our e-identity should be suitable for anything we would like to do so as not to limit us, and shouldn't be off-putting to anyone we'd like to meet.
Someone's e-identity is broader than social networks. It is composed of everything one can find about you on the network. Hence, we still have an online identity without a social network, albeit a little more uncontrollable. It could be our A-Level's results in our academy, a paper on our highschool's website, or worse, someone else's unsecured Facebook's post. When looking for someone's name through a search engine, Google for instance, the engine knows that social networks are most likely the most relevant result it can find when looking for a name. Therefore, social networks have become an excellent way to deflect your results towards something you can actually control: your personnal space on the social network of your choice. By carefully putting the important information about you on there, maybe you'll humor that stranger enough so that (s)he doesn't have to look elsewhere.
Since almost everyone at least uses the internet sometimes, Google has become a very convenient tool to use for background checks. Having your name and face on the internet is such a common, widespread thing now, because of social networks and the popularity of the internet, that it can be frustrating for an employer to not find anything. Especially if you are young.
"Why isn't this guy anywhere? Why doesn't he have Facebook?"; questions that will inevitably lead to "Does he have something to hide ?" "Doesn't he have any friends ?" "Doesn't he care about his friends ?"


A time before Social Network (Kommer)
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/2p2m1q/redditors_who_were_teens_before_social_networks/
A recent study revealed that people now spend longer looking at their mobile phones than they do the television on average day

Social networks are a fabulous way to kill time and kept up to date about the news.
Before social networks were omnipresent in our daily lives and occupied a significant part of our free time, people had different ways of distraction and information.
It's not only the practices that have changed, but the time we dedicate.

The time spent in front of the phone screen increases over the years. Being simply on your phone can be an activity in itself or an activity in addition to other activities (watching your phone while watching TV or talking with someone, etc.). More than 80% of consumers use mobile as second screen while watching TV.

Before, we went outside more than today and we had fewer contacts but we knew our friends better.

The sharing of information has changed with social networks and new technologies: we post on our profiles photos, comments, reactions, news, music, ... We send less postcards or letters, we exchange less CDs or usb keys, we invite less friends to watch a slideshow of holiday photos with us, we send less mail with large archives containing our family photos, etc.

Finding solutions

Juridical access (Adam)
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/facebook-is-expanding-the-way-it-tracks-you-and-your-data/372641/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/08/19/98-personal-data-points-that-facebook-uses-to-target-ads-to-you/
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-germany-idUSKCN0US27W20160114
http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/27/13071330/facebook-whatsapp-user-data-germany-privacy
https://www.forbes.com/sites/abigailtracy/2016/02/09/french-data-protection-authority-facebook-privacy-cnil/#4b8f1fa21480

Social medias are collecting more and more datas from the users in order to be more and more efficient in knowing each user's wishes. To collect these datas, social medias use algorithms which, for example, notice every post you've clicked on, every post you've commented, etc...
This data gathering can be seen as a violation of privacy, that's why it is offently criticized.

However, a social media user is supposed to be aware of this gathering. Indeed, he signed for it when he first created his account.
Social medias collect user's datas for several reasons. First of all, they use them to improve their site. Indeed, datas are used to adapt the content better to each user. Then they are used to target ads to each user. That's why medias such as Facebook are collecting more and more data, at the risk of breaking the law of several countries by, for exemple, collecting datas in user's smartphones, outside the application.

To begin with, Germany has declared unlawful a Facebook feature named "Friend finder", which consists in offering user's contacts who don't already use the application to join Facebook. The highest court ruled that it constituted advertising harassment. The Federation of German Consumer Organisations welcomed the ruling and said it will have implications for other services in Germany which use similar forms of advertising.
Then, always in Germany, but also in France, Facebook has been noticed it isn't  complying with law and has to adapt its data collection practices. Indeed, the data protection authority in France identified Facebook collects the information of Internet users who do not have accounts on the social media platform but who visit public Facebook pages and then uses cookies to track the browsing activities of these individuals. The press also released the fact that Facebook doesn't properly inform users of the ways on which it uses cookies for advertising purposes, which violates their right to respect for private life.

Conclusion (Kommer)

Social networks are part of our daily lives. We devote more and more time to them.
They can be powerful tools as long as we use them well and we control them. Otherwise, they control us. Socially and professionally, the "good" users of social networks can benefit from their positive visibility and Contacts. But the risks associated with social networks are non-negligible: having negative visibility (e-identity), social isolation, dependence on social networks, cyber-bullying, etc.
To prevent these risks, actions such as awareness campaigns, intervention in schools, etc. are put in place.

Social networks are transforming our society and our habits, we must be responsible to protect ourselves and enjoy the benefits of being connected with the whole world.
What impact do social networking and social networking sites have on society?
Comments (5)

Nathan Roth said
at 2:38 pm on Apr 6, 2017
Reply

Interesting subject, it is well explained and very complete !

Eloise Stein said
at 2:46 pm on Apr 6, 2017
Reply

It's a good article and it's very interesting. There are a lot of content, the risks associated with social networks are very good represented. I think too that the social isolation, dependance on social networks and cyber-bullying are a really problem in the society.

Ludovic MULLER said
at 2:47 pm on Apr 6, 2017
Reply

The topic of this article is very interesting. It's very well detailled and the differents risks are nicely exposed.

Quentin Gliech said
at 3:02 pm on Apr 6, 2017
Reply

“usurpate your identity” -> “fake your identity”

“We need to be loved and loved in return.” –> something like “We need to love and be loved in return”

“we may feel a sense of lack.” –> wat. Seriously, stop using Google Translate.

MorganeRIT said
at 3:17 pm on Apr 6, 2017
Reply

It's a very interesting subject and very complete.
Add a comment

Add comment 0/2000
Printable version
PBworks / Help
Terms of use / Privacy policy

About this workspace
Contact the owner / RSS feed / This workspace is private

Create a page
Upload files

Share this page
Put this page in a folder
Add Tags
Copy this page
Navigator
Starred Pages and Files
L2udsyear2017Activity TrackingAddictionsalternative medicineArtificial intelligenceArtificial IntelligenceAssignmentsBiomimetismBlank PageCan you remember ! Memory : from disease to enhancementCourseExtreme Sportsforget meaning, forget science, for the profit of beliefFrom Practical to digital !Genesis of behaviorHow far can medecine goHuman impact on environmentIs neuromarketing ethicalLie to meLife After Earth : No Come BackLove binds around the worldMe and my e-identityMeeting AgendaNew TechnologiesNew technologies, the green step for everyoneNothing proves that reality is realOur future with robotsracismracismeRelation between food and feeling goodSex changeShould we legalize cannabisSideBarStatus of transhumanismSyllabusTechnologies in the futureThe Death PenaltyThe ethical issues of Virtual RealityThe power of advertisingThe subjectivity of RealityThe true story of the three little pigsTime travelling through psychiatryWhere may artificial intelligence lead us in a not so distant futureWhy eat differently
optionsPagesFiles

SideBar
This is your Sidebar, which you can edit like any other page in your workspace.

This Sidebar appears everywhere on your workspace. Add to it whatever you like -- a navigation section, a link to your favorite web sites, or anything else.
Edit the sidebar
Recent Activity
The subjectivity of Reality
edited by Lucas
forget meaning, forget science, for the profit of belief
edited by monique schlick
Biomimetism
edited by
Biomimetism
edited by
Biomimetism
edited by
Biomimetism
edited by
Biomimetism
edited by
More activity...

Sélect. fichiers