1. Do you visit /lit/ regularly (more than once a week)?
Yes.
2. Why do you visit /lit/?
I enjoy it.
3. Do you prefer it over similar sites, if so, why?
No such thing. If I was looking for an identity, a reputation, etc. I wouldn't be here.
4. Is there something like a board identity in your opinion?
(my understanding of identity below)
Ok so here's your understanding of it:
>identity defining norms and practices
Even basic shit like the often repeated "start with the Greeks", the usefulness of which I regard as self-evident for a literature message board that is part of a Website website, is repeatedly contested and argued over, so no. This is not a complaint, I'm reporting the fact that you will not get people to obey you no matter how reasonable or shared you might think the rule is. There is no designated caste of hierarch ideologues to give orders, no truncheon-swinger caste to enforce them either. No behavior is learned here.
>social purposes
It's already a miracle if a reading group isn't autistically shitposted to its death within two chapters, let alone it making it to the back cover. "Anon", "social" and "purpose" in the same sentence? Are you sure?
>relationships to other identities
"Go back to Reddit" is not a relationship with Reddit, it's an insult towards the person it is said to, and so is true for most of what you will be reading in here, pronounced by a person that wants no relationship with Reddit, no love, no hatred, you just happened to be on the wrong website, go back there and do not ever show up again. I can tell because you have an ideology you acquired from a particular website and I have none.
>shared worldviews or understandings of political/material conditions and interests
When people such as you come to make datamining threads, for example the Political Compass or other tests, the results are all over the place. "I am suprised by the variety", commented Anon, who may or may not have been me. That said, do you perhaps think "Fuck you", "No" and "I am superior to you" are a complete philosophy, able to answer any and all questions?
>Contestation is the degree of agreement
You don't know that.
>5. What does this identity consist of?
You're looking for something that isn't there, whoever sent you here to do this degrading job, beyond accomplishing the objective of humiliating you, will require further decades to realize this.
>6. Would you consider yourself as a member of that identity?
Rather, the absence of identity known as anonimity. Anonimity also allows me not to be myself, to argue for things I don't support, views I don't share, books I don't like. Not only there isn't an identity collective, there isn't an identity personal either.
>selfdefinition/perception is the most important part of identities
How many posts do you think I replied to your questions in? How many skin colors do I have? Which countries am I posting from? Which one is me? Who am I?
>7. Anything else you want to say?
I am OP who is samefagging, my job is the Queen of England.