Questions for Fundamental Physics

Questions for Fundamental Physics
**********************************


What in physics is not geometrizable? (If there is something currently not, do you believe it is absolutely unable to be, or just currently no human has figured out how yet?)(A small section at the bottom of this post titled 'closing thoughts' contains my thoughts on this questions matter)


How many possible angles can an EM wave travel in;
Up down up down
And left right left right
Establish the poles:
Humans say there are 90 degrees of freedom orientation in between that polar perpendicularity;
Does Nature use the 90 degrees, between straight up and straight right, system also?



If there really is a non surface wave, that is, there Is a wave in the middle of a 4d medium/field; when the wave first trajectories upwards in it's crest, what forces it downwards and not just continuing upward

A wave; up down up down up down
Or side to side to side to side

Whatever this 4d materia is, when it is forced it's first Up, what forces it down, and not just Up Up Up




Imagine a wave going from left to right plotted on x y axis:

0 1 2 1 0 -1 -2 -1 0 1 2 1 0 -1 -2 -1 0 1 2 1 0

Is that wave parting an equal amount of energy at every point?

And considering a wave as continous;

0..0.0001...0.0002....0.0003..........
1.....1.0001.....1.0002.........
1.100000......1.1001.......
1.20001.... 1.22222.....
1.22223....
etc.

Can part/s of the wave be absorbed, reflected? And parts continue on waving?


If this wave hits into an object, or just, what is the meaning of an atom, or an antenae absorbing the entire wave, literally where does the waves body go, when an electron absorbs a light wave it absorbs some fraction of the wave depicted in the replied to post 0 1 2 1 0 -1 -2 -1 0...

The atom/electron can absorb a quanta of 1 from that wave, or a quanta of .0013 or a quanta of .1534? Those are arbitrary numbers I'm aware the answer will either be yes an electron/atom can absorb any finite near infinitesimal quantity of light wave, or no, the electron can only absorb specific numbers (recall it being the latter)

So the electron is bumped up an energy level, that body of light wave is now existing in between the electron and nucleus? But it can't hold on it quickly waves out just as it waved in and goes on its way? ( Like an ocean wave rising and falling a buoy?)



Are virtual photons what photons are before charged particles motion them to radiation?


Just before accelerated particle radiates EM field/photons; what state are the EM field/photons in?

Is every point of the EM field moving lightspeed at all times?

Does magnetism work via light speed moving photons?

Are virtual photons moving light speed?

What differentiates them from non virtual photons?

Can atoms absorb virtual photons?
Can virtual photons be emitted as visible light?

If you removed everything besides EM field/photons/virtual photons from the universe; what percent of the universes volumetric area would be full of EM field/photons/virtual photons?

And what would be the percental breakdown?


(The total universe is a total volume. Roughly galaxies exist in 3d/4d space, by universe I mean the extent of the totality of galaxies; of course this is unfathomably difficult to approach considering as we can't see the edges of the universe, but I'm asking for some general feel for some general comprehension;

We see stars, planets, and a lot of space (volume), the space is much larger than the stars and planets.

The space also apparently contains things in and of it that we cannot see (it looks like empty black, it's look is decieving)

Roughly, of the total volume of the universe; stars, planets, EM field, Gravity field, (absolutely purely really truly nothingness?);

What percent of the total volume of the universe, does EM field compose?
(Also nessecary to say first; what exactly composes the EM field?)

Out of the total available space of the universes volume (that is 100%), how much of that percent is occupied by EM field?)


What IS the field then?

There are particles that mediate the field energy and momentum;

When the field is not being mediated, what is there, what particles is the field made of then?

What is the quantity and quality of that standard field? What is trying to be depicted, there are various types of "substances"/fundamental things; quarks, electrons, photons, (gravity field) for instance.

When there is needed terms and concepts to point to other fundamental things, virtual photons, qed lattice etc. What is it that is being pointed to?

Quarks, electrons, photons, are not enough to explain magnets and magnetism, yes?

So virtual photons are said to be something else that explains the possible phenomenal relations between these few fundamental bits;

In what way are virtual photons related to photons, describe their differences (size?mass? Means, speed of propagation? Physical ability? Spin?)

What is the EM field besides photons and virtual photons?

What percentage of total universe volume space does the EM field occupy?


A field is actually something that exists in reality or it is not. I only care about that which actually exists/occurs in reality.

Either the field is something, or it is not.

Either there are particles And a field that is not just the particles. And a quantitys and qualitys difference between them.

Or there are just particles. And nothing other than particles, no existing 'field thingness thing besides the particles themselves' (And all particles are called 'the field" and there is nothing besides just the particles, there is no existing thingness that is The Field; there are Trees, and there is the Forrest, there is no Forrest, there is only trees, there is no trees there is only Forrest, there is such a thing as tree, and such s thing as Forrest and they are real exisiting different actual things).

Or only fields, In which case what is the substantial (substance, existent, quantity and quality) existence of these?


List all the differences, and all the similarities between virtual photons and non virtual photons (photons)?

How many virtual photons would you estimate exist in the universe right now?

How many non?

Where there is no matter and energy besides photons and virtual photons, (there are volumetric areas of the universe with very few quarks and electrons and neutrinos and what have you);
How densely packed are photons and virtual photons in those such areas? Are all photons tightly densely packed together, if not is there pockets of pure nothing space between them? How does the gravity field weave it's way inbetween and surrounding these?


Do virtual photons also always travel at c?

Are virtual photons oscillating magnetic and electric fields?


Could positrons be protons or neutrons that lost a quark?

And/or could positrons be protons or neutrons ejected from the nucleus and by virtue of this occurance possess a different quantum spin?


The crazy thing about reality is that it is not only that it is 4d geomtries, and actually this isn't really crazy at all maybe it's quite obvious and natural, but maybe just frustrating that it is so perfectly complicated and confounding; but that the geometries have (meta?) qualities as well.

Or even the fact that there are multiple styles of fundamental stable thing, though maybe it is only a size thing; maybe the electron, neutron, and proton is made of the same fundamental stuff, it's just different sizes,

As electron, proton, and neutron are the things that make up rocks and water and ice cream. Just different numbers of them and order.



Closing thoughts:


Reality is the substance of video image, reality is always real time 4d geometries.

There is that which exists and that which does not.

That which exists always exists exactly as itself as it exists.

That which exists always exactly exists some way.

A video image composed of self equaling substance.

We can draw and diagram apples and trees.

It's harder to draw and diagram quarks and the EM field and gravity field.

But as an drawing of apple and tree is a fake representation of a real reality,

Reality is the real representation being aproximated best as possible towards perfectly and purely.

We maybe right now cannot diagram quarks and the Gravity field; but nature has been drawing the real version for billions of years.