Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Greg Malivuk
- http://www.pastebin.com/u/gmalivuk - notes from all classes
- ---
- Homework: p. 166 practice 1 (use “must (not)”, “may (not)”, “could (not)”, etc.)
- 1 must be / has to be
- 2 could/may/might be
- 3 must not live
- 4 could/may/might have
- 5 must recognize / have to recognize
- 6 can’t be / couldn’t be (impossible because spiders have 8 legs) / must not be (if there’s some possibility it’s a spider with missing legs)
- 7 may/might not see (it’s unpredictable, so I don’t know)
- 8 must be coming
- ---
- p. 96 - Have you seen images like the picture? What are the Nazca lines?
- part 2 - listen and answer these questions
- 1 enormous drawings on the ground
- 2 in the Nazca desert in southern Peru
- 3 650 feet across (200m)
- 4 geometric shapes and figures of animals and humans
- 5 hundreds, covering 200 square miles (500 km^2)
- 6 2000 years old
- 7 by removing stones from on top of the ground
- ---
- Is there anything else you’d like to know about the lines?
- Who made them?
- Why did they make them?
- How did they plan them?
- ---
- Read the article. Does it answer your questions?
- ---
- part 4 - Answer these questions from the article.
- 1 in the late 1920s
- 2 astronomical calendar, Inca roads or irrigation, landing strips for aliens
- 3 It is a very dry place.
- 4 The lines may have been part of a long tradition of ceremonial activities connected to water and religious beliefs.
- ---
- Find the sentences in the article about different theories for the Nazca lines:
- The lines must have been part of an astronomical calendar.
- They might have been ancient Inca roads or irrigation systems.
- They could have been landing strips for alien spacecraft.
- The Nazca lines may have been part of a long tradition of ceremonial activities connected to water and religious beliefs.
- Find a negative sentence with similar grammar:
- The Nazca people couldn’t have seen them from above.
- The same group of people can’t have created them.
- ---
- Modals for speculation about the past (meaning):
- The lines must be part of a calendar. = I think the lines are part of a calendar.
- The lines must have been part of a calendar. = I think the lines were part of a calendar.
- (Maria Reiche was convinced of this, so she was almost certain and we can use “must”.)
- ---
- The meaning of each modal is the same as it was yesterday, but now about things in the past.
- They must have been man-made. = This is the only believable explanation.
- This could/may/might have been a work of art. = This is one of many believable explanations.
- This may/might not have been an egg. = It’s possible that it was not an egg.
- They must not have been common. = This is not a believable explanation.
- They can’t/couldn’t have been natural. = This is not a possible explanation. = I think it’s impossible.
- ---
- Form:
- +
- subject + modal + have + past participle
- They must have thought water was very important.
- -
- subject + modal + not + have + past participle
- They could not have seen them from above.
- ?
- y/n Could they have seen the lines from a balloon? (We use “could” and “might” in y/n questions.)
- Yes, they could have. / No, they couldn’t have.
- info Where could they have seen the lines from?
- What must they have thought when they saw the water suddenly resurfacing?
- ---
- p. 97 part 8 - Rewrite these sentences using one of the modals in parentheses, so they have the same meaning.
- 1 (We know that) water can’t have been easy to find.
- 2 The rivers might have dried up. (“might” = “it’s possible”, so we don’t need to write both)
- 3 The lines must have been very important.
- 4 The lines may have had a religious significance.
- 5 The animal drawings couldn’t have been roads.
- 6 The animals must have lived in the region.
- 7 The Nazca people could have used simple tools.
- 8 People must have maintained the lines carefully.
- ---
- BREAK
- ---
- In groups, speculate about what the items shown on the handout might have been.
- 1 It could have been a pillow or something for decoration.
- (It couldn’t have been a pillow! It’s too hard.)
- It might have been a footrest.
- It may have been a statue of a god or something.
- - It was a type of pillow.
- 2 This might have been used as a brooch.
- It could have been used like a belt to hold long clothes.
- - It was a large pin used to hold clothing together.
- 3 It could have been a mirror and a hair cutter.
- It might have been a mirror and a razor.
- - It was a mirror and razor.
- 4 People might have used this as a whistle for communication.
- It could have been a waterproof container for tinder to start fires.
- - They were like sunglasses to prevent snow blindness (from the very bright reflection of the sun on white snow).
- 5 It could have been a compass.
- It could have been a world map.
- - It was a map used to navigate in the ocean.
- ---
- Your project on Friday will be to design a monument or structure that will confuse archaeologists in 2000 years.
- ---
- noun -> adjective (wordbuilding)
- In general, the way to change part of speech (adjective, noun, verb, adverb, etc.) is to change the end of a word.
- -ous: mystery -> mysterious, religion -> religious, monster -> monstrous, fury -> furious
- (Sometimes English doesn’t have the original noun: delicious, curious, gorgeous, etc.)
- -(ic)al: ceremony -> ceremonial, astronomy -> astronomical, biology -> biological, profession -> professional, education -> educational, nation -> national
- -ic: geometry -> geometric, problem -> problematic
- -y: sun -> sunny, cloud -> cloudy, sugar -> sugary
- -ful: wonder -> wonderful, beauty -> beautiful, care -> careful
- -less: sugar -> sugarless, care -> careless, home -> homeless
- -ly: friend (-> friend-like) -> friendly, love -> lovely, mother (-> mother-like) -> motherly
- ---
- These are mostly useful for identifying the meaning of new words.
- “garlicky” = with a lot of garlic
- “flavorful” = with a lot of flavor
- (You have no way to predict that it isn’t “garlicful” or “flavory”.)
- ---
- p. 98 - Have you heard of Amelia Earhart? What happened to her?
- Read “Three Theories”. What are the theories?
- 1 She ran out of fuel and crashed in the Pacific Ocean.
- 2 She crashed on Nikumaroro (a different island) and died later.
- 3 She was captured while on a secret mission and later returned to the US with a new identity.
- ---
- Homework: read the other article on p. 99 and do p. 98 parts 2, 3, 4
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment