fant0men

RMS email

Oct 12th, 2021 (edited)
141
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.82 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
  2. [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
  3. [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
  4.  
  5. > I want to ask you what you think about the leak of Windows XP source code
  6. > that happened last September? The leak happened on 2020-09-24, and it was
  7. > the XP source along with some previous leaks of other Windows versions
  8. > (uploaded as a torrent file). That is obviously illegal considering
  9. > copyright law, but I want to know what you think may be the broader
  10. > implications of the leak, if any.
  11.  
  12. I don't know whether it will have any practical effect. Have you seen any?
  13.  
  14. > Do you think that projects such as Wine or ReactOS may indirectly find use
  15. > for the code through clean-room reverse engineering? I know they say
  16. > officially that they won't touch the code or even look at it, but I still
  17. > wonder.
  18.  
  19. Someone who has the source code doesn't need to do "reverse
  20. engineering". What someone might do is study the leaked source to
  21. figure out an API description and publish that anonymously. Maybe
  22. that would enable ReactOS to use the API. But IANAL.
  23.  
  24. Depending on details, the leak might cause the secrets in that code
  25. to cease, leally, to be trade secrets. But that depends on details
  26. of the events, and IANAL.
  27.  
  28. > Are leakers of copyrighted source code morally in the right or wrong? Does
  29. > it depend on the context?
  30.  
  31. Developing nonfree software for others to run is an injustice.
  32. Typically it is designed to be malware, which is a second injustice.
  33. See https://gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html
  34. and https://gnu.org/malware/.
  35.  
  36. In my view its developers are not morally entitled to criticize the
  37. leaking of their source code, just as someone who planned to commit
  38. armed robbery cannot morally complain that someone else thwarted the
  39. plan by swiping the gun.
  40.  
  41. But it would be hard to find or arrange circumstances where the leak
  42. would actually benefit society or even give the perpetrator an
  43. effective punishment.
  44.  
  45. > I just want to start out by saying how grateful I am to you, for your
  46. > lifelong work of increasing and defending freedom in the IT space. I went
  47. > to one of your speeches in Gothenburg, Sweden in 2007 and hearing your
  48. > arguments made me a lifelong proponent of Free Software. Congrats on being
  49. > back at the FSF.
  50.  
  51. The FSF is in somewhat of a crisis because of attacks by people who
  52. hate me. stallmansupport.org explains.
  53.  
  54. Would you like to show support for the FSF and for me? We need this
  55. form of help.
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62. --
  63. Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
  64. Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
  65. Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
  66. Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment