Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- curl -s http://english.blogoverflow.com/2015/11/why-did-i-delete-your-answer/ |
- pup '.post-text' |
- pandoc -f html -t markdown_strict
- <a href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Why+did+I+delete+your+answer%3F+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F1PG9vyr+%23english" class="tt" title="Post to Twitter"><img src="//english.blogoverflow.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-micro4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" class="nothumb" /></a>
- Imagine someone has a question about physics, say “How can I figure out
- the acceleration due to gravity?”
- A physicist answers with “You can throw a bowling ball from various
- floors of a multistorey building.” The physicist knows in their head the
- experiment they would perform. It’s so obvious to them that they skim
- over the details and say what they see to be the key points, and assume
- that the person asking will figure the rest out.
- The problem with this is that a non-physicist has asked the question,
- and they don’t know the details that the physicist skimmed over. If they
- did, they maybe wouldn’t have to ask the question. Thus, the person
- asking the question is little better off than they were before asking.
- Now imagine this is a single word request:
- > Word for staring wide-eyed at a TV
- > ==================================
- >
- > I saw my son staring wide-eyed at the television. His face looked so
- > comical to me. Is there a word to describe such wide-eyed staring?
- >
- > I’d like to use it like “My son was staring at the TV last night, it
- > was so funny to see.”, but I don’t like *staring* because it doesn’t
- > emphasise his wide-eyed-ness.
- >
- > Is there a word that would better describe what I mean?
- And then there is the answer:
- > I think you’re looking for *goggling* .
- Now you and I know that is a good word for the situation, but is it a
- **helpful answer** ?
- If you’re wondering, then let me tell you: it’s not. The Stack Exchange
- system itself will parse it and flag it as “low quality” and it will
- garner a comment from a moderator or other concerned member and then, if
- no improvements are made after a week or so, it will be deleted.
- Yes, the asker now has a word to fill their gap, but the answer does not
- explain why *goggling* is fit for the purpose. The asker has no context
- to decide if this answer is the best fit, and no way to generalize the
- word to fit other situations.
- Why is that important? The thing to remember is that the person who came
- here looking for an answer is unlikely to already know the answer. You
- don’t get many people who go around wondering “how many people know the
- word *goggling* ?” (And I suspect most of those who do are crossword
- designers.)
- If someone doesn’t already know the answer, then the details are
- important. When you suggest a word for a given context, you need to
- explain why it fits the context so that when they try and use it in the
- future they have a grasp on how the word works and what its connotations
- are.
- I know many of you might complain that they should look it up in a
- dictionary. We’re a site for serious English language enthusiasts, after
- all.
- That is irrelevant. An answer needs to be complete.
- However, to entertain that idea for a moment. Most of our users are not
- serious enthusiasts. Most people come here looking for an answer and
- leave with one, without ever posting anything. That is the beauty of
- Stack Exchange.
- That is why it is so important to leave a complete answer. With only
- half an answer, people will only half understand how to use a word.
- So what does a better answer look like?
- > I think you’re looking for *goggling* . It’s from the verb *to
- > goggle*, which means to stare at something with your eyes wide open
- > and an amazed look on your face.
- Instantly this answer is a lot more helpful. By adding a definition the
- answer now gives a clear explanation why the word is suitable. Also note
- that the definition isn’t from a reference. When giving the explanation
- a reference can be useful, but if you have your own way to articulate
- the meaning, then that is fine, too.
- If you do use a reference it is essential to cite your source. If you
- copy and paste without citing your source the answer will be deleted as
- plagiarism. With a reference the answer would be:
- > I think you’re looking for *goggling* . From
- > [ODO](http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/goggle) ,
- > *to goggle* means:
- >
- > > Look with wide open eyes, typically in amazement
- The important points to remember:
- - You are writing an answer for someone who doesn’t know anything
- about the word you’re suggesting.
- - An answer needs to explain the word in order for it to be useful.
- - If you are copy/pasting a definition you **must** cite where you got
- it from.
- <span class="filedto"> Filed under [English Stack
- Exchange](//english.blogoverflow.com/category/english-se/)
- [Learning](//english.blogoverflow.com/category/learning-2/) </span>
- <span class="post-tag"> Tagged:
- [answers](//english.blogoverflow.com/tag/answers/) ,
- [main-site](//english.blogoverflow.com/tag/main-site/) , [single word
- requests](//english.blogoverflow.com/tag/single-word-requests/) </span>
- $ curl -s http://english.blogoverflow.com/{,page/{2,3}/} | pup '.blog-title a attr{href}'
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2015/11/why-did-i-delete-your-answer/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2015/09/how-we-talk-about-future-situations/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2015/02/where-did-blizzard-come-from-the-too-long-did-not-read-version/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2015/01/good-things-from-2014/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2013/07/chat-vs-comment/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2013/06/one-language-many-voices/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/12/the-give-that-keeps-on-gifting-the-protean-nature-of-english-words-and-why-thats-a-good-thing/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/12/you-could-look-it-up/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/12/good-english-effective-english/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/11/much-ado-about-possessive-apostrophes/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/11/looking-up-a-gun-common-english-words-with-nordic-origins/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/10/prescriptivism-and-descriptivism/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/10/tw-a-pragmatic-approach/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/09/typography-striking-language-part1/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/09/writing-good-meaning-questions/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2012/01/book-review-the-adventure-of-english/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2011/12/getting-into-the-spirit/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2011/12/adspeak/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2011/11/the-basics-of-limerick-composition/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2011/11/themed-posts-wars/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2011/11/articles-a-vs-an/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2011/10/grammar-girl-interview/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2011/10/on-vs-about/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2011/10/on-proofreading-questions/
- //english.blogoverflow.com/2011/09/how-to-ask-out-an-apple/
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement