Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Thursday, May 17, 2018
- pf: the people in this game are truly awful
- נויז: RANDOS
- pf: meepo doesn't know how to play meepo
- pf: cw keeps initiating on disruptor
- pf: bloodseeker keeps murdering 2 people who try to go on him
- pf: lmao peruvianos
- pf: did u see imperator rome
- נויז: YE
- pf: also why are you awake
- pf: what a stupid name
- נויז: dota finals
- נויז: stop being so judgemental
- נויז: it ruins ur skin
- pf: its just a bad name m8
- נויז: https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/172290600/this-guy-killed-himself-and-the-left-is-doing
- pf: just imperator would be better
- נויז: also pf why did you kys
- נויז: we gunna imperator -> ck2 -> eu4 -> ciky ->HoI
- pf: video games haven't really been fun with acd lately
- נויז: dota brings out the best in people
- pf: got mad at a thing and stayed away for a month and it's been ok
- נויז: yeah idk people make fun of me going off to play single player games for a week
- נויז: but tbh it's usually fine
- pf: i'm still mad about thing and video games aren't fun enough anymore to make me stop being mad about thing to get on
- נויז: then again: i enjoy games that aren't multiplayer
- נויז: ur p autistic
- pf: yes
- נויז: i can't really imagine caring about admin
- pf: that doesn't make me not mad about thing
- נויז: just exist
- pf: it's more mad at the reasoning behind it
- pf: that ab needs to have the ability to moderate me
- נויז: no
- נויז: that isnt it
- נויז: the logic was originally that you admin abuse semifreuqently
- נויז: frequently
- pf: when was the last time i had admon
- נויז: and now you've made it a sticking point
- נויז: in the mumble?
- pf: in mumble was 4 years ago
- נויז: i can recall 5 seperate ocasions of you getting your admin taken away
- נויז: or privs
- pf: and i got admin taken away for banning you and forgetting about it overnight
- נויז: one of the two
- pf: that was the last time i had full admin on mumble
- pf: anethema gave me admin in discord to set a thing up and then took it away
- נויז: or movewars
- נויז: b/c the point is having as few admins as possible
- pf: i was the one being moved to fags constantly when the thing i got mad about happened
- pf: like i was actually getting admin abused
- pf: and then got my privs taken away
- נויז: that happens to e v e r y o n e
- נויז: that isn't what happened
- pf: here is what happened
- pf: 100% my honest recollection
- נויז: if we're recalling the same incident
- pf: i got on on a saturday afternoon
- pf: nimoy and stia were playing poe
- נויז: i have never doubted the honesty of your recollections
- pf: danger and ab and maybe jshaw were in the chan and hadn't miced up in about a half hour
- pf: so i moved the people playing the game half of acd plays into another chan and the people who were by all appearances afk into fags
- pf: the people playing poe came back or were moved back
- pf: so i moved them into another chan 1 more time
- pf: that was all the moving i did
- pf: none of those things were particularly out of line i think
- pf: then somebody keeps moving me to fags every time i mic up
- נויז: are we recalling mumble or discord
- pf: discord
- נויז: oh
- נויז: you havent done anything in discord
- pf: i probably started raging out and moving people
- נויז: that's not why we're reticent to grant admin
- pf: so danger takes away my move privs
- pf: so i start typing out screeds in the chat
- נויז: all of the relevant incidents i can recall are from mumble
- pf: ab starts deleting my lines faster i can type
- pf: so i start spamming like an autistic retard
- נויז: i can picture it in my head
- נויז: like a micheal bay movie
- pf: privs to message the chan get taken away
- pf: i get mad
- pf: am still mad
- pf: i'm upset that any time there is a conflict between me and ab it ends up with me losing privs
- pf: and has been this way for years
- pf: i don't really appreciate being treated like a child and the fact that the apparent majority of the group thinks it's necessary makes me not want to come back
- נויז: so wecan actually clarify this a bit
- pf: every argument for ab having admin and me not is based on hypotheticals that haven't happened in acd for years
- נויז: it's not so much that we think you're a child, but we are legit trying to restrict admin privs on a legit need-to-have
- pf: i feel like i'm not taken seriously ever
- pf: it's very difficult to get people into games
- נויז: well, you're often not taken seriously in X game b/c you happen not to be good at it
- pf: people dont' listen to me at all when they do play with me
- נויז: that's the cold, god's hoenst truth
- נויז: you have to be hotwire to get taken seriously in cs: go
- pf: which is such a nonsense reason
- נויז: you have to be danger or ab or me to get taken seriously in dota
- pf: lack of mechanical skill doesn't mean i can't think critically about the game
- נויז: that may be true
- pf: and i am as good as you or danger or ab in dota
- pf: synch is significantly better than all of us and he takes me seriously when we play together
- נויז: you are not as good as danger at carry
- pf: and i do well and we do well and fun is had by all
- pf: that's wrong
- pf: i firmly believe i'm a better carry than danger
- נויז: you're playing at a 2.5k level when you 2q with him
- נויז: you are delusional
- נויז: i'm sorry
- נויז: ab is a better offlane than me
- נויז: danger is a better carry than me
- נויז: he is better than you too
- נויז: there's no shame in having a realsitic skill assessment
- pf: this is kind of part of my point here
- נויז: i do the same with stia
- pf: you are like 1/3 of the problem i have btw
- נויז: when we 2q
- נויז: understandable
- pf: every time we disagree "no you're wrong"
- pf: and that's the end of the discussion
- נויז: im not very empathetic
- נויז: well, i try to reduce our disagreements down to their most basic levels
- נויז: but when im not trying very hard to be understandable, i cand efinitely seem dismissive
- נויז: i'd apologize for that, but it's likely to continue
- נויז: if you remind me of that, i will try to explain further
- pf: and i'm kind of fine with it on an interpersonal level
- pf: i can deal with it enough
- pf: but when it's combined with a *formalized* method of treating me like i'm a lesser member of the group
- pf: it's really irritating
- נויז: so: i think i tried earlier but got sidetracked
- נויז: lemme write a blog real quick
- נויז: just to get it out there
- נויז: re: Discord privs; We're legit trying to restrict them as much as possible, because in the grand "everyone has them" vs. "no one has them" poles, everyone having them has proven time and time again to generate a mess. So, we're trying to keep them restricted. Ideally, only anethema would be admin. The problem is that he's not around enough for this to be viable, so ab, who is around frequently, gets them. I cannot speak to your personal experience or beliefs, but ab has a less marked history of "admin abuse" b/c he doesnt get in move fights with tubes or autistically rage out and do anything. This group recollection is shared by the majority of ACD, so he gets to hold the bag. Danger, to date, got them b/c he was adding emojis and then anethema forgot to take them away -- because Danger never used them at all. 1/2
- נויז: So, we arrive at a point wherein this conflict emerges.
- pf: "ab has a less marked history"
- pf: except with me
- נויז: That might be true.
- pf: which is my specific problem
- pf: i don't have a marked history with admin abuse
- pf: because i haven't had admin for literally years
- נויז: You had admin in mumble.
- pf: the reason people think i admin abuse is because of shit that happened in 2014
- נויז: Don't you rememeber the whole admin de-admin shit
- pf: i don't even want admin
- pf: i want the ability for ab or danger to take away my privs to be gone
- נויז: Well, this gets to the Big Point
- pf: privs meaning moving people and typing in the fucking channel
- נויז: Now, you've turned this whole argument into an ultimatum.
- pf: i haven't at all
- נויז: Well, yes.
- pf: you're misstating my points
- נויז: No, you said "I'm not using this while X is true."
- pf: and i'm specifying what my problems are
- נויז: That is, by nature, an ultimatum.
- pf: if you want to frame it that way that's unfortunate
- pf: there's more nuance to what i'm saying and you're being reductionist
- נויז: So, the point that's at the head of the argument now is whether we cave to the demand because you're you, or because it's justified.
- pf: i don't really want to come back to discord the way things currently stand
- נויז: And what way is that?
- pf: if they changed i would probably get back in discord
- נויז: If you start literally spamming the chanel, someone can make you stop?
- pf: but i'm tired of being treated the way i am and i won't really be around a lot in any case unless that would change
- נויז: And you can retaliate by doing something to them?
- pf: which it obviously can't
- pf: the admin/privs thing is one thing that i can specifically avoid by not interacting with acd in places where it can be an issue
- pf: so i'm doing that
- pf: when the fuck did "don't spam irc" become an acd rule, by the way
- נויז: it isn't
- נויז: not generally
- pf: like that's nonsense
- נויז: but i presume that people don't like it when the discord chat, which is formated less accomadating to spam, is spammed
- pf: if i wanted to be told not to spam text chat or my privs would be taken away i'd still be in MIA and acd would never have happened
- נויז: i don't imagine it's a rule
- pf: i literally left and made my own team because people were telling me what to do
- pf: the people must be free etc.
- pf: the people being me in this case
- נויז: i imagine it was more of a context kind of thing
- pf: and free being able to move people and spam chat
- pf: and the context would not have happened if danger and ab didn't have the ability to take away my privs
- נויז: idk im pretty sure you can move people whenever you want
- pf: except always
- נויז: no, i mean, discord currently allows everyone to move everyone
- נויז: so
- נויז: yeah
- נויז: i can't speak to the nature of spam
- נויז: b/c i didnt like it even when it was on irc
- נויז: but if you're doing it to piss someone off
- נויז: i'd advise you not do it because you ought not to do something to annoy everyone b/c you have been annoyed
- נויז: b/c that strikes me as an unkind thing to do
- pf: it was a peaceful protest
- pf: sometimes protests annoy bystanders
- נויז: but that's my p e r s o n a l o p i n i o n
- נויז: i'm happy you've authorized yourself to annoy me
- נויז: :^)
- נויז: but
- נויז: Well, pf, here's the head of the problem and also the reason why I contribute to it. It seems to me that you can't accept some very basically simple facts: People don't listen to your calls when you make a call and it strikes them as basically wrong.
- pf: but whether my actions were out of line or not isn't really relevant to my point here
- נויז: This isn't an indicator of disrepect as much as it an indicator of a lack of respect; I have no particular reason to trust a call from you when it seems wrong -- I don't regard you as an expert because you've never displayed the marks of expertise.
- נויז: In counterstrike, you were not known to frequently watch streams or converse about legit pro strarts in the way hotwire or peak-ab did.
- pf: and at a point i recognized that and just stopped trying
- pf: i would maintain that pro play isn't really directly applicable to our pubbing in either cs or dota though
- pf: but that's so far away from anything that matters to argue about that i don't really care to debate that point
- נויז: Not directly -- calling out a literal pro strart would be useless to us -- but it's more of a balancing test.
- נויז: Being aware of pro strarts is just a mark int he "game knowledge mastery" subsection.
- pf: i obviously now don't and for years haven't played cs on the level that ab and hotwire play it
- pf: but in the first year or so when acd started playing it together it was valid for me to say 'let's try thing'
- pf: when nobody but hotwire and maybe jshaw were really significatly ahead of the rest of everybody
- pf: i dont remember the exact timing of jshaw joining but w/e
- נויז: There's also a marked difference between, "lets try mid" -- a call that no one will listen to because "try mid" isn't a thing, you need to say, "I will smoke window in mid and we can take it" and then actually perform the action.
- pf: which was actually what i was calling
- נויז: Which, I gather, is a large reason ab disregards your calls
- pf: i learned smokes
- pf: to be able to try more strategic plays at specific points of the map
- נויז: and whenever you smoked mid, you and the awper would go mid
- נויז: and that's what a mid strat is
- pf: you can pretend that people listened to what i said in cs and changed their behavior based on it
- pf: i guess
- pf: there's a reason i gave up trying though
- נויז: well, I can't say i every enjoyed playing cs with acd
- נויז: So my recollections aren't exactly top tier
- pf: again though cs is literally half a decade ago
- pf: not really a concern
- נויז: So, we can talk about dota now
- נויז: When you say things like, "of course the inititor dies" when discussing your abysmal k/d as legion offlane (when legion offlane was bad)
- נויז: That's the kind of credibility destroying thing
- נויז: that means that when you assert something, people don't take it as face value true
- pf: legion offlane was never completely unviable like you guys made it out to be
- pf: and my k/d overall on legion is ass because it's like 1/3 jungle lc
- נויז: That you contineu to refuse to accept this is also credibility damaging
- נויז: Becase there absolutely was a time period in which lc offlane was terrible
- נויז: This is, of course, within the context of dota
- נויז: where everything is sort of viable if you're good at it
- pf: she's never been significantly changed though
- נויז: but other heroes have
- נויז: that's the rub
- pf: what specifically changed to make lc viable
- pf: "because you stopped playing it"
- pf: is the answer i'd expect
- נויז: nerfs to other dominant offlaners such as slardar and centaur
- נויז: the pace of the game created by creep gold and bounty rune adjustm,ents
- נויז: how strong carries are in the metagame, versus how strong supports are
- pf: different question then
- pf: around which patch did lc offlane become viable
- נויז: i think it happened around the introduction of talents
- נויז: b/c that totally rebalanced most of the offlane
- נויז: So, there you have it.
- pf: thank you for treating me like i have a valid question and actually answering
- pf: it's appreciated
- נויז: Now, we can do this right now b/c we have plenty of time and i have nothing im focusing on
- pf: and notable
- pf: we have had the beginning of this convo before though
- pf: and it stopped at 'lc isn't/wasn't viable and you're bad'
- pf: with no actual reasoning
- נויז: however, when these arguments emerge while we're in a game of dota, i'm not intelligent enough to balance both an extended disagreement and playing mid
- pf: not during a game of dota
- pf: we're not discussing heroes' viability in the middle of a game
- pf: unless somebody picked techies and i'm going 'well great we lose in 50 minutes'
- נויז: well, part of this is the expectation that you are aware of how relatively well or poorly various heroes do in the meta
- pf: what meta
- נויז: seeing as synch, danger, ab, and to a elsser extent stia all pay attention to it
- pf: every game we play is drastically different at our level
- pf: and have very little relation to pro games
- נויז: that doesn't mean that heroes are magically all equal
- pf: that much is obvious just by looking at winrates vs. mmr on dotabuff
- pf: obviously certain heroes are better or worse
- pf: but there is a much wider group of heroes that don't make you lose at our level than at a pro level
- pf: and those heroes aren't the same
- נויז: but it
- pf: and how effective individual players are at using particular heroes or play styles is a much bigger factor than the meta
- נויז: but it's the choice to pick a suboptimal hero, and then insist that the hero isn't suboptimal that's the grating part
- נויז: when it's clear to all of us that slardar, etc, is just better
- נויז: like: right now, if you picked lc you'd eb an idiot
- pf: people literally press a button to give them a random hero
- נויז: b/c doom is just better
- נויז: in every way
- pf: is doom good again?
- נויז: yeah, i don't pretend i;m on board for that
- pf: haven't played dota in like 3 patches
- נויז: he's insane
- נויז: fucking invicible faggot demon
- pf: i just want to play video games with my friends and not be treated like a lesser person
- נויז: walk around and smack people with your fat burning demon dick for a ministun +%hp burn
- pf: but it's to the point where i'm not going to be in a place where there's a technical method by which that's enforced
- pf: so i guess that is an ultimatum
- נויז: well, i don't know how to make it seem to you that you are not a "lesser person" when it comes to how people regard your mastery of video games
- נויז: well, not necessarily seem, but rather have it be the actual treatment of you in regards to video games
- נויז: because it has always seeemed to me that you regard people not agreeing with you as them treating you with condescention
- pf: i dont have a problem with people disagreeing with me
- pf: i love arguing
- pf: it's when people are dismissive of things i say
- נויז: well, part of it is when you're the only one insisting on some point
- נויז: like, there is a certain point at which my obligation to convince you of some fact that is obvious to everyone else is going to start to get treated like a burden
- נויז: and it's pretty damn quick when im annoyed at losing a game
- נויז: and I'm not saying, "bow to the consensus"
- pf: you literally are
- נויז: but I am saying, when everyone sees blue and black and you're insisting on white and gold
- pf: i feel like that's not the best metaphor
- נויז: then the burden doesn't really seem to be on me to explain to you why you're wrong
- נויז: rather, it would be on you to argue affirmatively your point
- נויז: blah
- pf: it's impossible to argue when there is no response
- נויז: man i'm flagging
- pf: "no you're wrong"
- pf: "ok but x"
- pf: responses are "no you're wrong
- pf: or "..."
- נויז: well, we can do this with the aged "initiators are mor likely to die" argument
- נויז: when peopel say, "no that's wrong"
- נויז: it's, at the basic level, a statement that whatever you just asserted is false
- נויז: (which is why, if at the time you made that argument, you had known that most intiators rushed to buy items like force staff and uels to boost their survibility you might have realized why that assertion was false)
- נויז: Because at a very basic level that claim isn't true
- נויז: or, rather ought not to be true
- נויז: aggh
- נויז: im not explaining this well
- נויז: i can barely keep my eyes open
- נויז: im going to go to bed
- נויז: also: we need to find games that are more cooperative
- נויז: like eu4
- pf: or ratas
- נויז: or ratas
- pf: which people flat refused to play unless i wasn't there
- נויז: ?
- pf: that was nice
- נויז: tubes was always trying to rustle people up for that game
- pf: (when i wasn't there)
- נויז: did you happen to come on during the time wherein everyone was 5quing a dota game
- pf: i'm just memeing at this point
- pf: go to bed
- pf is now Online.
- pf: anyway if the thought is that you guys are playing dota at a level i can't even comprehend, why would you want me to play or why would i want to play with you
- pf: like what's the point if that's how you guys feel
- pf: and aren't going to make any kind of effort to engage me
- pf: same thing with discord - if i'm a notorious admin abuser who needs a strong admin to keep me in line
- pf: why would i come around and subject you guys and myself to that
- pf: seems like both everybody else and me are less happy when i'm around
- pf: so
- נויז: that's not the thought, pf
- נויז: in fact, i'm often baffled by the fact that you voluntarily refuse to assent to basic dota knowledge relayed by myself, ab, danger, and stia
- נויז: seeing as we're certainly not on "different" levels of dota play
- נויז: such as certain heroes being good, etc
- נויז: moreover, you're not a "notrious admin abuser" that no one trusts
- נויז: when it came down to giving a person admin, we went with one of the people who is traditionally always around
- נויז: ab's record was slightly cleaner than yours so anethema picked him
- pf is now Away.
- נויז: as a matter of fact, a point which was discussed by anethema, had you not come in and started throwing around ultimatums, you probably would have gotten admin
- נויז: because we don't really care, but at this point are pretty well comitted to not giving you want you want because you're being a bit silly about all of this
- נויז: i'd say childish, but i'd rather not come off as condescending
- נויז: but you are the only person that consistently has trouble with this
- נויז: and you can feel free to blame us, blame ab's cyberbullying, and feel that we are being the unreasonable party
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement