Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
May 20th, 2018
130
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 21.24 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Thursday, May 17, 2018
  2. pf: the people in this game are truly awful
  3. נויז: RANDOS
  4. pf: meepo doesn't know how to play meepo
  5. pf: cw keeps initiating on disruptor
  6. pf: bloodseeker keeps murdering 2 people who try to go on him
  7. pf: lmao peruvianos
  8. pf: did u see imperator rome
  9. נויז: YE
  10. pf: also why are you awake
  11. pf: what a stupid name
  12. נויז: dota finals
  13. נויז: stop being so judgemental
  14. נויז: it ruins ur skin
  15. pf: its just a bad name m8
  16. נויז: https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/172290600/this-guy-killed-himself-and-the-left-is-doing
  17. pf: just imperator would be better
  18. נויז: also pf why did you kys
  19. נויז: we gunna imperator -> ck2 -> eu4 -> ciky ->HoI
  20. pf: video games haven't really been fun with acd lately
  21. נויז: dota brings out the best in people
  22. pf: got mad at a thing and stayed away for a month and it's been ok
  23. נויז: yeah idk people make fun of me going off to play single player games for a week
  24. נויז: but tbh it's usually fine
  25. pf: i'm still mad about thing and video games aren't fun enough anymore to make me stop being mad about thing to get on
  26. נויז: then again: i enjoy games that aren't multiplayer
  27. נויז: ur p autistic
  28. pf: yes
  29. נויז: i can't really imagine caring about admin
  30. pf: that doesn't make me not mad about thing
  31. נויז: just exist
  32. pf: it's more mad at the reasoning behind it
  33. pf: that ab needs to have the ability to moderate me
  34. נויז: no
  35. נויז: that isnt it
  36. נויז: the logic was originally that you admin abuse semifreuqently
  37. נויז: frequently
  38. pf: when was the last time i had admon
  39. נויז: and now you've made it a sticking point
  40. נויז: in the mumble?
  41. pf: in mumble was 4 years ago
  42. נויז: i can recall 5 seperate ocasions of you getting your admin taken away
  43. נויז: or privs
  44. pf: and i got admin taken away for banning you and forgetting about it overnight
  45. נויז: one of the two
  46. pf: that was the last time i had full admin on mumble
  47. pf: anethema gave me admin in discord to set a thing up and then took it away
  48. נויז: or movewars
  49. נויז: b/c the point is having as few admins as possible
  50. pf: i was the one being moved to fags constantly when the thing i got mad about happened
  51. pf: like i was actually getting admin abused
  52. pf: and then got my privs taken away
  53. נויז: that happens to e v e r y o n e
  54. נויז: that isn't what happened
  55. pf: here is what happened
  56. pf: 100% my honest recollection
  57. נויז: if we're recalling the same incident
  58. pf: i got on on a saturday afternoon
  59. pf: nimoy and stia were playing poe
  60. נויז: i have never doubted the honesty of your recollections
  61. pf: danger and ab and maybe jshaw were in the chan and hadn't miced up in about a half hour
  62. pf: so i moved the people playing the game half of acd plays into another chan and the people who were by all appearances afk into fags
  63. pf: the people playing poe came back or were moved back
  64. pf: so i moved them into another chan 1 more time
  65. pf: that was all the moving i did
  66. pf: none of those things were particularly out of line i think
  67. pf: then somebody keeps moving me to fags every time i mic up
  68. נויז: are we recalling mumble or discord
  69. pf: discord
  70. נויז: oh
  71. נויז: you havent done anything in discord
  72. pf: i probably started raging out and moving people
  73. נויז: that's not why we're reticent to grant admin
  74. pf: so danger takes away my move privs
  75. pf: so i start typing out screeds in the chat
  76. נויז: all of the relevant incidents i can recall are from mumble
  77. pf: ab starts deleting my lines faster i can type
  78. pf: so i start spamming like an autistic retard
  79. נויז: i can picture it in my head
  80. נויז: like a micheal bay movie
  81. pf: privs to message the chan get taken away
  82. pf: i get mad
  83. pf: am still mad
  84. pf: i'm upset that any time there is a conflict between me and ab it ends up with me losing privs
  85. pf: and has been this way for years
  86. pf: i don't really appreciate being treated like a child and the fact that the apparent majority of the group thinks it's necessary makes me not want to come back
  87. נויז: so wecan actually clarify this a bit
  88. pf: every argument for ab having admin and me not is based on hypotheticals that haven't happened in acd for years
  89. נויז: it's not so much that we think you're a child, but we are legit trying to restrict admin privs on a legit need-to-have
  90. pf: i feel like i'm not taken seriously ever
  91. pf: it's very difficult to get people into games
  92. נויז: well, you're often not taken seriously in X game b/c you happen not to be good at it
  93. pf: people dont' listen to me at all when they do play with me
  94. נויז: that's the cold, god's hoenst truth
  95. נויז: you have to be hotwire to get taken seriously in cs: go
  96. pf: which is such a nonsense reason
  97. נויז: you have to be danger or ab or me to get taken seriously in dota
  98. pf: lack of mechanical skill doesn't mean i can't think critically about the game
  99. נויז: that may be true
  100. pf: and i am as good as you or danger or ab in dota
  101. pf: synch is significantly better than all of us and he takes me seriously when we play together
  102. נויז: you are not as good as danger at carry
  103. pf: and i do well and we do well and fun is had by all
  104. pf: that's wrong
  105. pf: i firmly believe i'm a better carry than danger
  106. נויז: you're playing at a 2.5k level when you 2q with him
  107. נויז: you are delusional
  108. נויז: i'm sorry
  109. נויז: ab is a better offlane than me
  110. נויז: danger is a better carry than me
  111. נויז: he is better than you too
  112. נויז: there's no shame in having a realsitic skill assessment
  113. pf: this is kind of part of my point here
  114. נויז: i do the same with stia
  115. pf: you are like 1/3 of the problem i have btw
  116. נויז: when we 2q
  117. נויז: understandable
  118. pf: every time we disagree "no you're wrong"
  119. pf: and that's the end of the discussion
  120. נויז: im not very empathetic
  121. נויז: well, i try to reduce our disagreements down to their most basic levels
  122. נויז: but when im not trying very hard to be understandable, i cand efinitely seem dismissive
  123. נויז: i'd apologize for that, but it's likely to continue
  124. נויז: if you remind me of that, i will try to explain further
  125. pf: and i'm kind of fine with it on an interpersonal level
  126. pf: i can deal with it enough
  127. pf: but when it's combined with a *formalized* method of treating me like i'm a lesser member of the group
  128. pf: it's really irritating
  129. נויז: so: i think i tried earlier but got sidetracked
  130. נויז: lemme write a blog real quick
  131. נויז: just to get it out there
  132. נויז: re: Discord privs; We're legit trying to restrict them as much as possible, because in the grand "everyone has them" vs. "no one has them" poles, everyone having them has proven time and time again to generate a mess. So, we're trying to keep them restricted. Ideally, only anethema would be admin. The problem is that he's not around enough for this to be viable, so ab, who is around frequently, gets them. I cannot speak to your personal experience or beliefs, but ab has a less marked history of "admin abuse" b/c he doesnt get in move fights with tubes or autistically rage out and do anything. This group recollection is shared by the majority of ACD, so he gets to hold the bag. Danger, to date, got them b/c he was adding emojis and then anethema forgot to take them away -- because Danger never used them at all. 1/2
  133. נויז: So, we arrive at a point wherein this conflict emerges.
  134. pf: "ab has a less marked history"
  135. pf: except with me
  136. נויז: That might be true.
  137. pf: which is my specific problem
  138. pf: i don't have a marked history with admin abuse
  139. pf: because i haven't had admin for literally years
  140. נויז: You had admin in mumble.
  141. pf: the reason people think i admin abuse is because of shit that happened in 2014
  142. נויז: Don't you rememeber the whole admin de-admin shit
  143. pf: i don't even want admin
  144. pf: i want the ability for ab or danger to take away my privs to be gone
  145. נויז: Well, this gets to the Big Point
  146. pf: privs meaning moving people and typing in the fucking channel
  147. נויז: Now, you've turned this whole argument into an ultimatum.
  148. pf: i haven't at all
  149. נויז: Well, yes.
  150. pf: you're misstating my points
  151. נויז: No, you said "I'm not using this while X is true."
  152. pf: and i'm specifying what my problems are
  153. נויז: That is, by nature, an ultimatum.
  154. pf: if you want to frame it that way that's unfortunate
  155. pf: there's more nuance to what i'm saying and you're being reductionist
  156. נויז: So, the point that's at the head of the argument now is whether we cave to the demand because you're you, or because it's justified.
  157. pf: i don't really want to come back to discord the way things currently stand
  158. נויז: And what way is that?
  159. pf: if they changed i would probably get back in discord
  160. נויז: If you start literally spamming the chanel, someone can make you stop?
  161. pf: but i'm tired of being treated the way i am and i won't really be around a lot in any case unless that would change
  162. נויז: And you can retaliate by doing something to them?
  163. pf: which it obviously can't
  164. pf: the admin/privs thing is one thing that i can specifically avoid by not interacting with acd in places where it can be an issue
  165. pf: so i'm doing that
  166. pf: when the fuck did "don't spam irc" become an acd rule, by the way
  167. נויז: it isn't
  168. נויז: not generally
  169. pf: like that's nonsense
  170. נויז: but i presume that people don't like it when the discord chat, which is formated less accomadating to spam, is spammed
  171. pf: if i wanted to be told not to spam text chat or my privs would be taken away i'd still be in MIA and acd would never have happened
  172. נויז: i don't imagine it's a rule
  173. pf: i literally left and made my own team because people were telling me what to do
  174. pf: the people must be free etc.
  175. pf: the people being me in this case
  176. נויז: i imagine it was more of a context kind of thing
  177. pf: and free being able to move people and spam chat
  178. pf: and the context would not have happened if danger and ab didn't have the ability to take away my privs
  179. נויז: idk im pretty sure you can move people whenever you want
  180. pf: except always
  181. נויז: no, i mean, discord currently allows everyone to move everyone
  182. נויז: so
  183. נויז: yeah
  184. נויז: i can't speak to the nature of spam
  185. נויז: b/c i didnt like it even when it was on irc
  186. נויז: but if you're doing it to piss someone off
  187. נויז: i'd advise you not do it because you ought not to do something to annoy everyone b/c you have been annoyed
  188. נויז: b/c that strikes me as an unkind thing to do
  189. pf: it was a peaceful protest
  190. pf: sometimes protests annoy bystanders
  191. נויז: but that's my p e r s o n a l o p i n i o n
  192. נויז: i'm happy you've authorized yourself to annoy me
  193. נויז: :^)
  194. נויז: but
  195. נויז: Well, pf, here's the head of the problem and also the reason why I contribute to it. It seems to me that you can't accept some very basically simple facts: People don't listen to your calls when you make a call and it strikes them as basically wrong.
  196. pf: but whether my actions were out of line or not isn't really relevant to my point here
  197. נויז: This isn't an indicator of disrepect as much as it an indicator of a lack of respect; I have no particular reason to trust a call from you when it seems wrong -- I don't regard you as an expert because you've never displayed the marks of expertise.
  198. נויז: In counterstrike, you were not known to frequently watch streams or converse about legit pro strarts in the way hotwire or peak-ab did.
  199. pf: and at a point i recognized that and just stopped trying
  200. pf: i would maintain that pro play isn't really directly applicable to our pubbing in either cs or dota though
  201. pf: but that's so far away from anything that matters to argue about that i don't really care to debate that point
  202. נויז: Not directly -- calling out a literal pro strart would be useless to us -- but it's more of a balancing test.
  203. נויז: Being aware of pro strarts is just a mark int he "game knowledge mastery" subsection.
  204. pf: i obviously now don't and for years haven't played cs on the level that ab and hotwire play it
  205. pf: but in the first year or so when acd started playing it together it was valid for me to say 'let's try thing'
  206. pf: when nobody but hotwire and maybe jshaw were really significatly ahead of the rest of everybody
  207. pf: i dont remember the exact timing of jshaw joining but w/e
  208. נויז: There's also a marked difference between, "lets try mid" -- a call that no one will listen to because "try mid" isn't a thing, you need to say, "I will smoke window in mid and we can take it" and then actually perform the action.
  209. pf: which was actually what i was calling
  210. נויז: Which, I gather, is a large reason ab disregards your calls
  211. pf: i learned smokes
  212. pf: to be able to try more strategic plays at specific points of the map
  213. נויז: and whenever you smoked mid, you and the awper would go mid
  214. נויז: and that's what a mid strat is
  215. pf: you can pretend that people listened to what i said in cs and changed their behavior based on it
  216. pf: i guess
  217. pf: there's a reason i gave up trying though
  218. נויז: well, I can't say i every enjoyed playing cs with acd
  219. נויז: So my recollections aren't exactly top tier
  220. pf: again though cs is literally half a decade ago
  221. pf: not really a concern
  222. נויז: So, we can talk about dota now
  223. נויז: When you say things like, "of course the inititor dies" when discussing your abysmal k/d as legion offlane (when legion offlane was bad)
  224. נויז: That's the kind of credibility destroying thing
  225. נויז: that means that when you assert something, people don't take it as face value true
  226. pf: legion offlane was never completely unviable like you guys made it out to be
  227. pf: and my k/d overall on legion is ass because it's like 1/3 jungle lc
  228. נויז: That you contineu to refuse to accept this is also credibility damaging
  229. נויז: Becase there absolutely was a time period in which lc offlane was terrible
  230. נויז: This is, of course, within the context of dota
  231. נויז: where everything is sort of viable if you're good at it
  232. pf: she's never been significantly changed though
  233. נויז: but other heroes have
  234. נויז: that's the rub
  235. pf: what specifically changed to make lc viable
  236. pf: "because you stopped playing it"
  237. pf: is the answer i'd expect
  238. נויז: nerfs to other dominant offlaners such as slardar and centaur
  239. נויז: the pace of the game created by creep gold and bounty rune adjustm,ents
  240. נויז: how strong carries are in the metagame, versus how strong supports are
  241. pf: different question then
  242. pf: around which patch did lc offlane become viable
  243. נויז: i think it happened around the introduction of talents
  244. נויז: b/c that totally rebalanced most of the offlane
  245. נויז: So, there you have it.
  246. pf: thank you for treating me like i have a valid question and actually answering
  247. pf: it's appreciated
  248. נויז: Now, we can do this right now b/c we have plenty of time and i have nothing im focusing on
  249. pf: and notable
  250. pf: we have had the beginning of this convo before though
  251. pf: and it stopped at 'lc isn't/wasn't viable and you're bad'
  252. pf: with no actual reasoning
  253. נויז: however, when these arguments emerge while we're in a game of dota, i'm not intelligent enough to balance both an extended disagreement and playing mid
  254. pf: not during a game of dota
  255. pf: we're not discussing heroes' viability in the middle of a game
  256. pf: unless somebody picked techies and i'm going 'well great we lose in 50 minutes'
  257. נויז: well, part of this is the expectation that you are aware of how relatively well or poorly various heroes do in the meta
  258. pf: what meta
  259. נויז: seeing as synch, danger, ab, and to a elsser extent stia all pay attention to it
  260. pf: every game we play is drastically different at our level
  261. pf: and have very little relation to pro games
  262. נויז: that doesn't mean that heroes are magically all equal
  263. pf: that much is obvious just by looking at winrates vs. mmr on dotabuff
  264. pf: obviously certain heroes are better or worse
  265. pf: but there is a much wider group of heroes that don't make you lose at our level than at a pro level
  266. pf: and those heroes aren't the same
  267. נויז: but it
  268. pf: and how effective individual players are at using particular heroes or play styles is a much bigger factor than the meta
  269. נויז: but it's the choice to pick a suboptimal hero, and then insist that the hero isn't suboptimal that's the grating part
  270. נויז: when it's clear to all of us that slardar, etc, is just better
  271. נויז: like: right now, if you picked lc you'd eb an idiot
  272. pf: people literally press a button to give them a random hero
  273. נויז: b/c doom is just better
  274. נויז: in every way
  275. pf: is doom good again?
  276. נויז: yeah, i don't pretend i;m on board for that
  277. pf: haven't played dota in like 3 patches
  278. נויז: he's insane
  279. נויז: fucking invicible faggot demon
  280. pf: i just want to play video games with my friends and not be treated like a lesser person
  281. נויז: walk around and smack people with your fat burning demon dick for a ministun +%hp burn
  282. pf: but it's to the point where i'm not going to be in a place where there's a technical method by which that's enforced
  283. pf: so i guess that is an ultimatum
  284. נויז: well, i don't know how to make it seem to you that you are not a "lesser person" when it comes to how people regard your mastery of video games
  285. נויז: well, not necessarily seem, but rather have it be the actual treatment of you in regards to video games
  286. נויז: because it has always seeemed to me that you regard people not agreeing with you as them treating you with condescention
  287. pf: i dont have a problem with people disagreeing with me
  288. pf: i love arguing
  289. pf: it's when people are dismissive of things i say
  290. נויז: well, part of it is when you're the only one insisting on some point
  291. נויז: like, there is a certain point at which my obligation to convince you of some fact that is obvious to everyone else is going to start to get treated like a burden
  292. נויז: and it's pretty damn quick when im annoyed at losing a game
  293. נויז: and I'm not saying, "bow to the consensus"
  294. pf: you literally are
  295. נויז: but I am saying, when everyone sees blue and black and you're insisting on white and gold
  296. pf: i feel like that's not the best metaphor
  297. נויז: then the burden doesn't really seem to be on me to explain to you why you're wrong
  298. נויז: rather, it would be on you to argue affirmatively your point
  299. נויז: blah
  300. pf: it's impossible to argue when there is no response
  301. נויז: man i'm flagging
  302. pf: "no you're wrong"
  303. pf: "ok but x"
  304. pf: responses are "no you're wrong
  305. pf: or "..."
  306. נויז: well, we can do this with the aged "initiators are mor likely to die" argument
  307. נויז: when peopel say, "no that's wrong"
  308. נויז: it's, at the basic level, a statement that whatever you just asserted is false
  309. נויז: (which is why, if at the time you made that argument, you had known that most intiators rushed to buy items like force staff and uels to boost their survibility you might have realized why that assertion was false)
  310. נויז: Because at a very basic level that claim isn't true
  311. נויז: or, rather ought not to be true
  312. נויז: aggh
  313. נויז: im not explaining this well
  314. נויז: i can barely keep my eyes open
  315. נויז: im going to go to bed
  316. נויז: also: we need to find games that are more cooperative
  317. נויז: like eu4
  318. pf: or ratas
  319. נויז: or ratas
  320. pf: which people flat refused to play unless i wasn't there
  321. נויז: ?
  322. pf: that was nice
  323. נויז: tubes was always trying to rustle people up for that game
  324. pf: (when i wasn't there)
  325. נויז: did you happen to come on during the time wherein everyone was 5quing a dota game
  326. pf: i'm just memeing at this point
  327. pf: go to bed
  328. pf is now Online.
  329. pf: anyway if the thought is that you guys are playing dota at a level i can't even comprehend, why would you want me to play or why would i want to play with you
  330. pf: like what's the point if that's how you guys feel
  331. pf: and aren't going to make any kind of effort to engage me
  332. pf: same thing with discord - if i'm a notorious admin abuser who needs a strong admin to keep me in line
  333. pf: why would i come around and subject you guys and myself to that
  334. pf: seems like both everybody else and me are less happy when i'm around
  335. pf: so
  336. נויז: that's not the thought, pf
  337. נויז: in fact, i'm often baffled by the fact that you voluntarily refuse to assent to basic dota knowledge relayed by myself, ab, danger, and stia
  338. נויז: seeing as we're certainly not on "different" levels of dota play
  339. נויז: such as certain heroes being good, etc
  340. נויז: moreover, you're not a "notrious admin abuser" that no one trusts
  341. נויז: when it came down to giving a person admin, we went with one of the people who is traditionally always around
  342. נויז: ab's record was slightly cleaner than yours so anethema picked him
  343. pf is now Away.
  344. נויז: as a matter of fact, a point which was discussed by anethema, had you not come in and started throwing around ultimatums, you probably would have gotten admin
  345. נויז: because we don't really care, but at this point are pretty well comitted to not giving you want you want because you're being a bit silly about all of this
  346. נויז: i'd say childish, but i'd rather not come off as condescending
  347. נויז: but you are the only person that consistently has trouble with this
  348. נויז: and you can feel free to blame us, blame ab's cyberbullying, and feel that we are being the unreasonable party
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement