Advertisement
franky1

BFL research

Sep 1st, 2012
575
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.64 KB | None | 0 0
  1. butterfly labs inc. has no public records or anything to prove its a real world business
  2.  
  3. step one - anonymity when registering web address
  4. http://who.godaddy.com/whois.aspx?domain=butterflylabs.com&prog_id=GoDaddy
  5.  
  6. step two - their PO POX address for a state that has no record of them
  7.  
  8. step three - their trademarks are not listed on government search (TESS search)
  9. http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp
  10. closest thing that is BFL Inc is a emergency shelter company.
  11.  
  12. step four - they publicise they are in Kansas MO.. but the state records cant find them
  13. https://www.sos.mo.gov/BusinessEntity/soskb/csearch.asp
  14.  
  15. step five - the telephone number 816 226 6966
  16. is not a business line, its a residential line registered to the address:
  17. Chambers Lofts
  18. 25 E 12 St #804
  19. Kansas City, MO 64106
  20.  
  21. step six - address found via telephone
  22. indeed is a kansas address which coincides with their PO-BOX but the address is a residential building of one bedroom one bathroom apartments above some shops
  23. http://www.americanlisted.com/missouri_25/apartments_27/594_1br_chambers_lofts_downtown_kc_13650906.html
  24.  
  25. step seven - the biggest slip up by BFL rep on bitcointalk
  26. random people investigating found a close 'corporation listing' to BFL which is based in Wyoming called BF labs Inc.
  27.  
  28. BFL quoted on bitcointalk soon after
  29. <quote>
  30. Post by: BFL on November 15, 2011, 03:19:40 PM
  31. Hi guys.
  32. Corporate registry - The company is a 'C' corp registered in the state of Wyoming as BF Labs Inc. Why Wyoming when you're not based there? Mostly due to it's favorable tax and legal climate.
  33. </qoute>
  34.  
  35. trying to convince users that the closest INC listing to BFL which a user found is theirs without actually realising the initial user who found the wyoming listing made a mistake and did not look into the Wyoming company before publishing the record.
  36.  
  37. the mistake is this.. they didnt check to see what the wyoming company actually does. they just seen a close enough name to it and posted it, then BFL said its them without also checking into how plausible they could get away with saying its the same company.
  38.  
  39. well here is the listing:
  40. https://wyobiz.wy.gov/Business/FilingDetails.aspx?eFNum=149144214231010201167112190255028042109060235081
  41. file number 2011-000606261
  42.  
  43. step eight - BF labs inc is a registered and trademarked company but they are BIOTECH Frontiers Lab
  44. http://www.lookupbook.com/profile/healthcare-biotech/wy/casper/bf-labs-inc
  45.  
  46. they make and maintain medical equipment such as freezers, sterilisers centrifuges etc.
  47.  
  48. When BFL spokesperson on bitcointalk suggested that they are the wyoming listing due to the lack of digging one of the bitcoin community done to realise it was a different company. made me laugh, then for BFL to not look at the listing enough to realise that its nothing like their business, and just say yes thats us, in a rash judgement to gain credibility without genuine first person identification made me laugh more.
  49.  
  50. step nine - the common vouching that its real
  51. bitcointalk user: inuba who owns a pool and who just so happened to work in same street as the BFL residential apartment and the only person claiming to be using ASICS is now working for them.
  52.  
  53. its far easier to beleive he and his cohorts used the $600 deposits to pay for many standard GPU rigs.. link them all to one worker and claim that its ASIC's.
  54.  
  55. step ten- read the whole thread here:
  56. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=printpage;topic=48863.0
  57. including BFLs omission that they are a steriliser production company for the medical industry.
  58.  
  59. as u can see by the dates in thread, it was proven in november 2011 they are fake. yet people still wait for their products.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement