Zama's Incident

RaZgRiZ | 2011-06-17 12:29
You've rated lowly, didn't you like the texture pack?

Zama | 2011-06-17 17:04
I rated average because there plain textures, unchanged by you! Suicizer is right I'd like to see them with bump and heightmap then I will change My rating!

RaZgRiZ | 2011-06-17 17:54
Well, perhaps you're looking at the wrong texture pack, cause i WILL NOT be including normal, height or specular maps for this texture set. It's all you get, and if you want the extra candy, you'll have to make it yourself.
-
And yea, they're plain textures, what did you expect from me, draw smiling faces on them? Perhaps i should have made my own textures, would that have made you think otherwise of them? You can't expect your oven to make the beds for you, and you can't expect from me to go through all this just to please a handful of people who would like the candy but don't really have a need for it.

Zama | 2011-06-17 20:21
Well, after thinking about your reply it's clear your opinion of Simon's work is that you don't care for improving it! Also if you can't take constructive criticism then your on the wrong forum! We look for the best out of people for a reason! It's so when some one else post a nod of similar content one content won't be better then the other! Otherwise admins will need to come back someday to an older less better content of the same thing to clear it off the sever! So asking you to improve the work is not out of the question and do to your ugly response I will deduct one point!

RaZgRiZ | 2011-06-17 22:39
However much you'd like to be the one being right here, you're utterly wrong and it's sad how you try to intimidate me.
What i think of Simon's work is that it is an awesome texture pack, and i'm really happy that i'm sharing it with everyone else here on Quadropolis. I do not plan to "improve", nor want to, and if you want to improve it, you're free to do so.
-
There is no constructive criticism for this content. The textures are top quality and blend in together seamlessly. I don't see how your nagging is supposed to be interpreted on a public or personal level as constructive criticism. I dare say it's obvious you have no idea when criticism is really constructive or when it's just a bunch of words that aim nothing but to demean.
-
The fact that you deduct points that are supposed to rate the quality, presentation and ease of usage of the content out of personal spite shows how much you really know and how mature you really are. I doubt you took the chance to read back to yourself what you wrote to see how wrong it really is and how much of an "ass" it makes you look.
-
For your information, i am an admin here, and i have high standards myself. If some content is not worth someone's effort, you'll pretty much see me and generally everyone else disapproving. If that is the case, the content is removed for lack of quality. We cannot define quality. Actual players with actual expectations are those who cast the final vote.
-
It seems to me that you are trying to play the all-knowing and always-right person, only though you're neither making any progress, nor fooling anyone.
I don't have anything against you, and i don't plan to continue this conversation any further. If you don't like the content, remove your vote and go elsewhere to flame and hate. This is no place to do so.

Zama | 2011-06-17 23:16
It's amazing you assume you deviated a critique from the truth!

RaZgRiZ | 2011-06-18 00:15
It's amazing how much of a fool you can be and not realise what is really happening.
-
This conversation ends here. If you decide to continue it, i will take action.

Zama | 2011-06-18 01:35
"It's amazing how much of a fool you can be and not realise what is really happening."
Flaming Me will get you results! You need to apologize for that heavy insult!

RaZgRiZ | 2011-06-18 13:25
You have been warned. Do NOT continue this or i will do much worse than just put the little skull on your profile. The conversation ended. Stop trying to light a fire and move on. If you do not, i'll make sure you receive the momentum required.